Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 18 Sep, 2007
Print   |    |  Comment

SERVICE TAX REFUND FOR EXPORTERS

REFUND OF SERVICE TAX PAID BY EXPORTERS
 
 
1.)        INTRODUCTION
 
The Commerce Minister of India, Mr. KAMAL NATH had announced in his Foreign Trade Policy that exporters will not be charged service tax in order to mitigate there cost and enhance there international competitiveness. But the Finance ministry was not agreeing to the same. Both ministries have long discussing to finalize the same. Today, the Notification No. 40/2007-ST, dated: 17-09-2007 has been issued which provides for the refund of the service tax paid by the exporter. The notification allows the exporters to claim refund of the service tax paid by them provided they fulfill the conditions mentioned there under the notification. This article attempts to give a quick analysis of the key factors of this notification.
 
2.)        CONDITIONS TO BE FULFILED
 
The notification specifies that to avail the refund the exporter has to satisfy certain conditions. The conditions mentioned therein are as follows: -
 
Ø             The exemption (i.e. refund) should be claimed by the exporter of the goods for the specified services received and used by the exporter for export of the said goods only;
 
Ø             The exemption claimed by the exporter shall be provided by way of refund of service tax paid on the specified services used for export of the said goods;
 
Ø             The exporter claiming the exemption has actually paid the service tax on the specified services;
 
Ø             The exemption or refund shall not be claimed except under the said notification.
 
 
3.)        SPECIFIED SERVICES
 

 

S.NO.
TYPE OF SERVICE
1
Port Services provided for export. (Section 65[105][zn] )
2
Other port Services provide for export. (Section 65[105][zzl])
3
Services of transport of goods by road from ICD to port of export provided by Goods Transport Agency. (Section 65[105][zzp])
4
Services of transport of export goods in containers by rail from ICD to port of export. (Section 65[105][zzzp]).
 
 
Thus, the refund is to provide in respect of the four services only. The logic of Finance ministry is that exporter can claim Cenvat credit on the rest of services. They will be allowed the refund under Rule 5 of Cenvat credit Rules for the rest of services. But the credit is not available for above listed services. Secondly, they will be able to connect directly these services with the export goods. Hence the refund for only these four services has been allowed.
 
 
4.)        PROCEDURE FOR CLAIMING REFUND         
 
            The Notification provides for the manner in which the exemption should be claimed. The various quotes of the notification are as under: -
 
o         The exemption can be claimed by that person only if he is exporter of the said goods and he himself is liable to pay service tax for the said services i.e. he is both exporter of goods and person liable to pay service tax.
 
o         The claim of refund by the exporter should be by way of filing a “claim for refund of service tax” paid on specified services. The exporter will have to enclose respective documents evidencing that the goods have been exported and service tax thereon have been paid.
 
o         The claim for refund should be filed on a quarterly basis, within sixty days from the end of the relevant quarter during which the said goods have been exported.
 
o         There after the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise as the case may be will allow the refund after satisfying themselves that all the provisions have been complied with.
 
o         Where any refund of service tax has been paid to an exporter but the sale proceeds in respect of the said goods have not been realised by the exporter within the period allowed under the FEMA, 1999 then, such service tax refunded shall be recoverable as if it is a recovery of service tax erroneously refunded.
 
 
5.)        CONCLUSION
 
The Finance ministry has not provided what has been demanded by the exporters. Firstly, it is not exemption but the refund. The exporter has to waste his time and money in the department for getting the refund. As we all know that it is very difficult to get the refund from the department. In place, a simple procedure which is available for the goods under Rule 19 should have been prescribed. Secondly, all the input services have not been included in the same as desired by the commerce minister and exporter. Thus, all the exporters will not be benefited from the same. Like Handicraft exporters cannot claim the Cenvat credit as there final product is exempt from the duty. Thus, it is half hearted approach on the part of the Finance minister. Moreover, it took around six months to finalize the scheme. Why there is lack of the communication and co-ordination between these two main arms of the Government. There are still many other promises made by Commerce minister in Foreign Trade Policy but the Finance Ministry is not coming with the amendments in Custom notifications. This create undue harassment for the exporters.

 

*-*-*-*-*

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com