Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 18 Sep, 2007
Print   |    |  Comment

SERVICE TAX REFUND FOR EXPORTERS

REFUND OF SERVICE TAX PAID BY EXPORTERS
 
 
1.)        INTRODUCTION
 
The Commerce Minister of India, Mr. KAMAL NATH had announced in his Foreign Trade Policy that exporters will not be charged service tax in order to mitigate there cost and enhance there international competitiveness. But the Finance ministry was not agreeing to the same. Both ministries have long discussing to finalize the same. Today, the Notification No. 40/2007-ST, dated: 17-09-2007 has been issued which provides for the refund of the service tax paid by the exporter. The notification allows the exporters to claim refund of the service tax paid by them provided they fulfill the conditions mentioned there under the notification. This article attempts to give a quick analysis of the key factors of this notification.
 
2.)        CONDITIONS TO BE FULFILED
 
The notification specifies that to avail the refund the exporter has to satisfy certain conditions. The conditions mentioned therein are as follows: -
 
Ø             The exemption (i.e. refund) should be claimed by the exporter of the goods for the specified services received and used by the exporter for export of the said goods only;
 
Ø             The exemption claimed by the exporter shall be provided by way of refund of service tax paid on the specified services used for export of the said goods;
 
Ø             The exporter claiming the exemption has actually paid the service tax on the specified services;
 
Ø             The exemption or refund shall not be claimed except under the said notification.
 
 
3.)        SPECIFIED SERVICES
 

 

S.NO.
TYPE OF SERVICE
1
Port Services provided for export. (Section 65[105][zn] )
2
Other port Services provide for export. (Section 65[105][zzl])
3
Services of transport of goods by road from ICD to port of export provided by Goods Transport Agency. (Section 65[105][zzp])
4
Services of transport of export goods in containers by rail from ICD to port of export. (Section 65[105][zzzp]).
 
 
Thus, the refund is to provide in respect of the four services only. The logic of Finance ministry is that exporter can claim Cenvat credit on the rest of services. They will be allowed the refund under Rule 5 of Cenvat credit Rules for the rest of services. But the credit is not available for above listed services. Secondly, they will be able to connect directly these services with the export goods. Hence the refund for only these four services has been allowed.
 
 
4.)        PROCEDURE FOR CLAIMING REFUND         
 
            The Notification provides for the manner in which the exemption should be claimed. The various quotes of the notification are as under: -
 
o         The exemption can be claimed by that person only if he is exporter of the said goods and he himself is liable to pay service tax for the said services i.e. he is both exporter of goods and person liable to pay service tax.
 
o         The claim of refund by the exporter should be by way of filing a “claim for refund of service tax” paid on specified services. The exporter will have to enclose respective documents evidencing that the goods have been exported and service tax thereon have been paid.
 
o         The claim for refund should be filed on a quarterly basis, within sixty days from the end of the relevant quarter during which the said goods have been exported.
 
o         There after the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise as the case may be will allow the refund after satisfying themselves that all the provisions have been complied with.
 
o         Where any refund of service tax has been paid to an exporter but the sale proceeds in respect of the said goods have not been realised by the exporter within the period allowed under the FEMA, 1999 then, such service tax refunded shall be recoverable as if it is a recovery of service tax erroneously refunded.
 
 
5.)        CONCLUSION
 
The Finance ministry has not provided what has been demanded by the exporters. Firstly, it is not exemption but the refund. The exporter has to waste his time and money in the department for getting the refund. As we all know that it is very difficult to get the refund from the department. In place, a simple procedure which is available for the goods under Rule 19 should have been prescribed. Secondly, all the input services have not been included in the same as desired by the commerce minister and exporter. Thus, all the exporters will not be benefited from the same. Like Handicraft exporters cannot claim the Cenvat credit as there final product is exempt from the duty. Thus, it is half hearted approach on the part of the Finance minister. Moreover, it took around six months to finalize the scheme. Why there is lack of the communication and co-ordination between these two main arms of the Government. There are still many other promises made by Commerce minister in Foreign Trade Policy but the Finance Ministry is not coming with the amendments in Custom notifications. This create undue harassment for the exporters.

 

*-*-*-*-*

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com