Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Publish Date: 04 Nov, 2009
Print   |    |  Comment

Service Tax on Transport of Goods by Rail- Shortest Journey

 

Service Tax on Transport of Goods by Rail- Shortest Journey

 

 

Introduction: -

 

The Finance Minister in his Speech on Budget proposed imposition of service tax on transport of goods by rail. This was done to provide a level playing filed in the goods transport sector. Before Budget 2009, in the goods transport sector, service tax was levied on transport of goods by road, by air, through pipeline and by rail in containers. In the Budget 2009, service tax was proposed to be levied on Rail transport alongwith water transport. Thus, the entire goods transport sector would have come under the service tax net. However, the next steps taken by the Government taken for rail transport brought this proposal to an abrupt end even before anything started.

 

Service Tax on Rail Transport: -

 

Section 65 (105) (zzzp) of the Finance Act, 1994 was proposed to amended to include goods transported by railways, including Government railways, whether in containers or otherwise. Thus, this proposed amendment had two implications. Firstly, the Railway will also have to charge service tax on transportation by containers. This was leviable on person other than Railways. Secondly, the service tax will also be proposed to levy on transportation by non container cargo also.

 

Thereafter the budget was passed in Lok Shaba, Rajya Sabha and it was enacted with the approval of president. It was announced that the new levy will come into effect from September 01, 2009. Thus, Indian Railways will have to pay the service tax from September 1, 2009. The exemptions and abatement to be given were to be announced later on.

 

Exemptions: -

The levy was to come into effect from September 1, 2009 and as such various other exemption notification came along with this levy.

 

Exemption was granted to transport of several items by Railways vide Notification No. 28/2009-Service Tax dated 31.08.09. The said Items were as under: -

 

v    Defence/ military equipments

 

v    Railway equipments/ materials

 

v    Postal mail bags

 

v    Relief materials meant for victims of natural or manmade disasters, calamities, accidents and mishap

 

v    Luggage of train passengers, whether carried as personal luggage in the train compartments or booked separately in the luggage van/Household effects

 

v    Parcels [including newspaper/magazines registered with Registrar of Newspapers] booked in the luggage vans, where the goods/commodity heads fall below train load class 130 as per the Indian Railway Conference Association(IRCA) Goods Tariff

 

v    The following goods which are classified in the IRCA Goods Tariff, as below train load class 130 and wagon load class 130 ( Formula: Train Load Class 120+10) including ‘Low Rate’ goods viz., LR1, LR2, LR3, LR4:

 

Food grains, flours and pulses(9), Chemical Manure(6), Gunnies(21), Oil cakes and seeds(16), Soap(19), Starch(21), Salt for industrial use(18), Sugar(20), Salt (18),De-oiled cakes(16), Machinery and machine tools(14), Hides and Skins(12), Leather(12), Rubber and plastic(12), Electrical appliances and fittings(22), Empty drums(22), jerry cans and barrels(22), Jaggry(22), Jute(22), Milk and Milk products(22), Organic Manure(22), Paints and polishes(22), Timber(22), Vegetable oil pitches(22), Water(22), Fireworks(23), Boiler components(24), Charcoal(24), Paper(24) Bamboos(25), Brooms(25), Coffee and Tea(25), Cotton and other textiles(25), Fodder and Husk(25), Fruits and vegetables(25) and other perishables like fishery and marine produce, Groceries(25), Live stock(25), Motor vehicles(25), Sugar cane and Bagasse(25),Fire clay(7),Edible oils booked in covered wagons and charged as LR4, booked in 4 wheeled Tank wagon and charged as Train Load class-100

 

v    Kerosene oil meant for supply through public distribution system; Petroleum products including LPG Cylinders (filled and empty) booked by public sector Oil Marketing Companies transported by Indian Railways

 

 

Abatement: -

 

The benefit of abatement was extended to Rails Transport vide Notification No. 29/2009-ST, dated 31.08.09. 70% abatement from service tax on rail transport was granted. This meant that service tax was payable only on 30% of the value of taxable services.

 

The Notification No. 01/2006-ST dated 01.03.06 was amended accordingly.

 

 

Grant of Exemption from Service Tax to Rail Transport: -

 

It was clear that Indian Railways will have to start paying service tax on transport of goods subject to exemptions and abatement granted. However, this was not going to happen. The powerful Railway minister has upper hand over the Finance ministry.

 

The Government granted full exemption from service tax on transport of goods by rail. The position of pre-budget position was restored. The abatement Notification No. 01/2006-ST was again amended to restore it to the pre-September 2009 positions. This was done vide Notification No. 34/2009-ST dated 01.09.09. The exemption was again provided to Indian Railways from service tax in respect of container cargo and non-container cargo by Notification no. 33/2009-ST dated 01.09.09. Further, the impugned notification also provided exemption to transportation of non-container cargo by others. Thus, the levy was left only to transport of goods in containers by rail where the service tax liability is on a person other than Railway. Thus, it was restored to pre-budget period.

 

Resultantly, service tax was payable by any person other than Government Railways in relation to transport of goods in containers by rail.

 

All this was done on the exact day the service tax was to be leviable on rail transport. Not a single day was wasted.

 

Rescinding of Notification No. 28/2009-ST, dated 31.08.09: -

 

Since full exemption was granted to transport of goods by rail for now, the Notification No. 28/2009-ST which granted exemption to transport of several items by rail from service tax became irrelevant.

 

The Government rescinded the Notification No. 28/2009-St vide Notification No. 36/2009-ST, dated 09.10.09.

 

In the end: -

 

The whole affair of levying of service tax on rail transport started and came to an end within few days. The Indian Railways was saved from service tax net, of course by the blessings of Mr. Railway Minister. Else the situation would have been still worse for railways – it took lot many years to bring Indian Railways in profit, if the service tax would have to be paid by it; perhaps the situation would have reverted back due to increase in Service tax related direct and indirect expenditure. However, there was wastage of Finance Ministry’s time and money in amending and re-amending the Finance Act and the relevant notifications which would have added much to the country’s deficit. “Truth is stranger than fiction” – Right Mr. Finance Minister!!!

 

 

 

                      

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com