Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 04 Nov, 2009
Print   |    |  Comment

Service Tax on Transport of Goods by Rail- Shortest Journey

 

Service Tax on Transport of Goods by Rail- Shortest Journey

 

 

Introduction: -

 

The Finance Minister in his Speech on Budget proposed imposition of service tax on transport of goods by rail. This was done to provide a level playing filed in the goods transport sector. Before Budget 2009, in the goods transport sector, service tax was levied on transport of goods by road, by air, through pipeline and by rail in containers. In the Budget 2009, service tax was proposed to be levied on Rail transport alongwith water transport. Thus, the entire goods transport sector would have come under the service tax net. However, the next steps taken by the Government taken for rail transport brought this proposal to an abrupt end even before anything started.

 

Service Tax on Rail Transport: -

 

Section 65 (105) (zzzp) of the Finance Act, 1994 was proposed to amended to include goods transported by railways, including Government railways, whether in containers or otherwise. Thus, this proposed amendment had two implications. Firstly, the Railway will also have to charge service tax on transportation by containers. This was leviable on person other than Railways. Secondly, the service tax will also be proposed to levy on transportation by non container cargo also.

 

Thereafter the budget was passed in Lok Shaba, Rajya Sabha and it was enacted with the approval of president. It was announced that the new levy will come into effect from September 01, 2009. Thus, Indian Railways will have to pay the service tax from September 1, 2009. The exemptions and abatement to be given were to be announced later on.

 

Exemptions: -

The levy was to come into effect from September 1, 2009 and as such various other exemption notification came along with this levy.

 

Exemption was granted to transport of several items by Railways vide Notification No. 28/2009-Service Tax dated 31.08.09. The said Items were as under: -

 

v    Defence/ military equipments

 

v    Railway equipments/ materials

 

v    Postal mail bags

 

v    Relief materials meant for victims of natural or manmade disasters, calamities, accidents and mishap

 

v    Luggage of train passengers, whether carried as personal luggage in the train compartments or booked separately in the luggage van/Household effects

 

v    Parcels [including newspaper/magazines registered with Registrar of Newspapers] booked in the luggage vans, where the goods/commodity heads fall below train load class 130 as per the Indian Railway Conference Association(IRCA) Goods Tariff

 

v    The following goods which are classified in the IRCA Goods Tariff, as below train load class 130 and wagon load class 130 ( Formula: Train Load Class 120+10) including ‘Low Rate’ goods viz., LR1, LR2, LR3, LR4:

 

Food grains, flours and pulses(9), Chemical Manure(6), Gunnies(21), Oil cakes and seeds(16), Soap(19), Starch(21), Salt for industrial use(18), Sugar(20), Salt (18),De-oiled cakes(16), Machinery and machine tools(14), Hides and Skins(12), Leather(12), Rubber and plastic(12), Electrical appliances and fittings(22), Empty drums(22), jerry cans and barrels(22), Jaggry(22), Jute(22), Milk and Milk products(22), Organic Manure(22), Paints and polishes(22), Timber(22), Vegetable oil pitches(22), Water(22), Fireworks(23), Boiler components(24), Charcoal(24), Paper(24) Bamboos(25), Brooms(25), Coffee and Tea(25), Cotton and other textiles(25), Fodder and Husk(25), Fruits and vegetables(25) and other perishables like fishery and marine produce, Groceries(25), Live stock(25), Motor vehicles(25), Sugar cane and Bagasse(25),Fire clay(7),Edible oils booked in covered wagons and charged as LR4, booked in 4 wheeled Tank wagon and charged as Train Load class-100

 

v    Kerosene oil meant for supply through public distribution system; Petroleum products including LPG Cylinders (filled and empty) booked by public sector Oil Marketing Companies transported by Indian Railways

 

 

Abatement: -

 

The benefit of abatement was extended to Rails Transport vide Notification No. 29/2009-ST, dated 31.08.09. 70% abatement from service tax on rail transport was granted. This meant that service tax was payable only on 30% of the value of taxable services.

 

The Notification No. 01/2006-ST dated 01.03.06 was amended accordingly.

 

 

Grant of Exemption from Service Tax to Rail Transport: -

 

It was clear that Indian Railways will have to start paying service tax on transport of goods subject to exemptions and abatement granted. However, this was not going to happen. The powerful Railway minister has upper hand over the Finance ministry.

 

The Government granted full exemption from service tax on transport of goods by rail. The position of pre-budget position was restored. The abatement Notification No. 01/2006-ST was again amended to restore it to the pre-September 2009 positions. This was done vide Notification No. 34/2009-ST dated 01.09.09. The exemption was again provided to Indian Railways from service tax in respect of container cargo and non-container cargo by Notification no. 33/2009-ST dated 01.09.09. Further, the impugned notification also provided exemption to transportation of non-container cargo by others. Thus, the levy was left only to transport of goods in containers by rail where the service tax liability is on a person other than Railway. Thus, it was restored to pre-budget period.

 

Resultantly, service tax was payable by any person other than Government Railways in relation to transport of goods in containers by rail.

 

All this was done on the exact day the service tax was to be leviable on rail transport. Not a single day was wasted.

 

Rescinding of Notification No. 28/2009-ST, dated 31.08.09: -

 

Since full exemption was granted to transport of goods by rail for now, the Notification No. 28/2009-ST which granted exemption to transport of several items by rail from service tax became irrelevant.

 

The Government rescinded the Notification No. 28/2009-St vide Notification No. 36/2009-ST, dated 09.10.09.

 

In the end: -

 

The whole affair of levying of service tax on rail transport started and came to an end within few days. The Indian Railways was saved from service tax net, of course by the blessings of Mr. Railway Minister. Else the situation would have been still worse for railways – it took lot many years to bring Indian Railways in profit, if the service tax would have to be paid by it; perhaps the situation would have reverted back due to increase in Service tax related direct and indirect expenditure. However, there was wastage of Finance Ministry’s time and money in amending and re-amending the Finance Act and the relevant notifications which would have added much to the country’s deficit. “Truth is stranger than fiction” – Right Mr. Finance Minister!!!

 

 

 

                      

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com