Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 04 Nov, 2009
Print   |    |  Comment

Service Tax on Transport of Goods by Rail- Shortest Journey

 

Service Tax on Transport of Goods by Rail- Shortest Journey

 

 

Introduction: -

 

The Finance Minister in his Speech on Budget proposed imposition of service tax on transport of goods by rail. This was done to provide a level playing filed in the goods transport sector. Before Budget 2009, in the goods transport sector, service tax was levied on transport of goods by road, by air, through pipeline and by rail in containers. In the Budget 2009, service tax was proposed to be levied on Rail transport alongwith water transport. Thus, the entire goods transport sector would have come under the service tax net. However, the next steps taken by the Government taken for rail transport brought this proposal to an abrupt end even before anything started.

 

Service Tax on Rail Transport: -

 

Section 65 (105) (zzzp) of the Finance Act, 1994 was proposed to amended to include goods transported by railways, including Government railways, whether in containers or otherwise. Thus, this proposed amendment had two implications. Firstly, the Railway will also have to charge service tax on transportation by containers. This was leviable on person other than Railways. Secondly, the service tax will also be proposed to levy on transportation by non container cargo also.

 

Thereafter the budget was passed in Lok Shaba, Rajya Sabha and it was enacted with the approval of president. It was announced that the new levy will come into effect from September 01, 2009. Thus, Indian Railways will have to pay the service tax from September 1, 2009. The exemptions and abatement to be given were to be announced later on.

 

Exemptions: -

The levy was to come into effect from September 1, 2009 and as such various other exemption notification came along with this levy.

 

Exemption was granted to transport of several items by Railways vide Notification No. 28/2009-Service Tax dated 31.08.09. The said Items were as under: -

 

v    Defence/ military equipments

 

v    Railway equipments/ materials

 

v    Postal mail bags

 

v    Relief materials meant for victims of natural or manmade disasters, calamities, accidents and mishap

 

v    Luggage of train passengers, whether carried as personal luggage in the train compartments or booked separately in the luggage van/Household effects

 

v    Parcels [including newspaper/magazines registered with Registrar of Newspapers] booked in the luggage vans, where the goods/commodity heads fall below train load class 130 as per the Indian Railway Conference Association(IRCA) Goods Tariff

 

v    The following goods which are classified in the IRCA Goods Tariff, as below train load class 130 and wagon load class 130 ( Formula: Train Load Class 120+10) including ‘Low Rate’ goods viz., LR1, LR2, LR3, LR4:

 

Food grains, flours and pulses(9), Chemical Manure(6), Gunnies(21), Oil cakes and seeds(16), Soap(19), Starch(21), Salt for industrial use(18), Sugar(20), Salt (18),De-oiled cakes(16), Machinery and machine tools(14), Hides and Skins(12), Leather(12), Rubber and plastic(12), Electrical appliances and fittings(22), Empty drums(22), jerry cans and barrels(22), Jaggry(22), Jute(22), Milk and Milk products(22), Organic Manure(22), Paints and polishes(22), Timber(22), Vegetable oil pitches(22), Water(22), Fireworks(23), Boiler components(24), Charcoal(24), Paper(24) Bamboos(25), Brooms(25), Coffee and Tea(25), Cotton and other textiles(25), Fodder and Husk(25), Fruits and vegetables(25) and other perishables like fishery and marine produce, Groceries(25), Live stock(25), Motor vehicles(25), Sugar cane and Bagasse(25),Fire clay(7),Edible oils booked in covered wagons and charged as LR4, booked in 4 wheeled Tank wagon and charged as Train Load class-100

 

v    Kerosene oil meant for supply through public distribution system; Petroleum products including LPG Cylinders (filled and empty) booked by public sector Oil Marketing Companies transported by Indian Railways

 

 

Abatement: -

 

The benefit of abatement was extended to Rails Transport vide Notification No. 29/2009-ST, dated 31.08.09. 70% abatement from service tax on rail transport was granted. This meant that service tax was payable only on 30% of the value of taxable services.

 

The Notification No. 01/2006-ST dated 01.03.06 was amended accordingly.

 

 

Grant of Exemption from Service Tax to Rail Transport: -

 

It was clear that Indian Railways will have to start paying service tax on transport of goods subject to exemptions and abatement granted. However, this was not going to happen. The powerful Railway minister has upper hand over the Finance ministry.

 

The Government granted full exemption from service tax on transport of goods by rail. The position of pre-budget position was restored. The abatement Notification No. 01/2006-ST was again amended to restore it to the pre-September 2009 positions. This was done vide Notification No. 34/2009-ST dated 01.09.09. The exemption was again provided to Indian Railways from service tax in respect of container cargo and non-container cargo by Notification no. 33/2009-ST dated 01.09.09. Further, the impugned notification also provided exemption to transportation of non-container cargo by others. Thus, the levy was left only to transport of goods in containers by rail where the service tax liability is on a person other than Railway. Thus, it was restored to pre-budget period.

 

Resultantly, service tax was payable by any person other than Government Railways in relation to transport of goods in containers by rail.

 

All this was done on the exact day the service tax was to be leviable on rail transport. Not a single day was wasted.

 

Rescinding of Notification No. 28/2009-ST, dated 31.08.09: -

 

Since full exemption was granted to transport of goods by rail for now, the Notification No. 28/2009-ST which granted exemption to transport of several items by rail from service tax became irrelevant.

 

The Government rescinded the Notification No. 28/2009-St vide Notification No. 36/2009-ST, dated 09.10.09.

 

In the end: -

 

The whole affair of levying of service tax on rail transport started and came to an end within few days. The Indian Railways was saved from service tax net, of course by the blessings of Mr. Railway Minister. Else the situation would have been still worse for railways – it took lot many years to bring Indian Railways in profit, if the service tax would have to be paid by it; perhaps the situation would have reverted back due to increase in Service tax related direct and indirect expenditure. However, there was wastage of Finance Ministry’s time and money in amending and re-amending the Finance Act and the relevant notifications which would have added much to the country’s deficit. “Truth is stranger than fiction” – Right Mr. Finance Minister!!!

 

 

 

                      

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com