Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 04 Nov, 2009
Print   |    |  Comment

Service Tax on Transport of Goods by Rail- Shortest Journey

 

Service Tax on Transport of Goods by Rail- Shortest Journey

 

 

Introduction: -

 

The Finance Minister in his Speech on Budget proposed imposition of service tax on transport of goods by rail. This was done to provide a level playing filed in the goods transport sector. Before Budget 2009, in the goods transport sector, service tax was levied on transport of goods by road, by air, through pipeline and by rail in containers. In the Budget 2009, service tax was proposed to be levied on Rail transport alongwith water transport. Thus, the entire goods transport sector would have come under the service tax net. However, the next steps taken by the Government taken for rail transport brought this proposal to an abrupt end even before anything started.

 

Service Tax on Rail Transport: -

 

Section 65 (105) (zzzp) of the Finance Act, 1994 was proposed to amended to include goods transported by railways, including Government railways, whether in containers or otherwise. Thus, this proposed amendment had two implications. Firstly, the Railway will also have to charge service tax on transportation by containers. This was leviable on person other than Railways. Secondly, the service tax will also be proposed to levy on transportation by non container cargo also.

 

Thereafter the budget was passed in Lok Shaba, Rajya Sabha and it was enacted with the approval of president. It was announced that the new levy will come into effect from September 01, 2009. Thus, Indian Railways will have to pay the service tax from September 1, 2009. The exemptions and abatement to be given were to be announced later on.

 

Exemptions: -

The levy was to come into effect from September 1, 2009 and as such various other exemption notification came along with this levy.

 

Exemption was granted to transport of several items by Railways vide Notification No. 28/2009-Service Tax dated 31.08.09. The said Items were as under: -

 

v    Defence/ military equipments

 

v    Railway equipments/ materials

 

v    Postal mail bags

 

v    Relief materials meant for victims of natural or manmade disasters, calamities, accidents and mishap

 

v    Luggage of train passengers, whether carried as personal luggage in the train compartments or booked separately in the luggage van/Household effects

 

v    Parcels [including newspaper/magazines registered with Registrar of Newspapers] booked in the luggage vans, where the goods/commodity heads fall below train load class 130 as per the Indian Railway Conference Association(IRCA) Goods Tariff

 

v    The following goods which are classified in the IRCA Goods Tariff, as below train load class 130 and wagon load class 130 ( Formula: Train Load Class 120+10) including ‘Low Rate’ goods viz., LR1, LR2, LR3, LR4:

 

Food grains, flours and pulses(9), Chemical Manure(6), Gunnies(21), Oil cakes and seeds(16), Soap(19), Starch(21), Salt for industrial use(18), Sugar(20), Salt (18),De-oiled cakes(16), Machinery and machine tools(14), Hides and Skins(12), Leather(12), Rubber and plastic(12), Electrical appliances and fittings(22), Empty drums(22), jerry cans and barrels(22), Jaggry(22), Jute(22), Milk and Milk products(22), Organic Manure(22), Paints and polishes(22), Timber(22), Vegetable oil pitches(22), Water(22), Fireworks(23), Boiler components(24), Charcoal(24), Paper(24) Bamboos(25), Brooms(25), Coffee and Tea(25), Cotton and other textiles(25), Fodder and Husk(25), Fruits and vegetables(25) and other perishables like fishery and marine produce, Groceries(25), Live stock(25), Motor vehicles(25), Sugar cane and Bagasse(25),Fire clay(7),Edible oils booked in covered wagons and charged as LR4, booked in 4 wheeled Tank wagon and charged as Train Load class-100

 

v    Kerosene oil meant for supply through public distribution system; Petroleum products including LPG Cylinders (filled and empty) booked by public sector Oil Marketing Companies transported by Indian Railways

 

 

Abatement: -

 

The benefit of abatement was extended to Rails Transport vide Notification No. 29/2009-ST, dated 31.08.09. 70% abatement from service tax on rail transport was granted. This meant that service tax was payable only on 30% of the value of taxable services.

 

The Notification No. 01/2006-ST dated 01.03.06 was amended accordingly.

 

 

Grant of Exemption from Service Tax to Rail Transport: -

 

It was clear that Indian Railways will have to start paying service tax on transport of goods subject to exemptions and abatement granted. However, this was not going to happen. The powerful Railway minister has upper hand over the Finance ministry.

 

The Government granted full exemption from service tax on transport of goods by rail. The position of pre-budget position was restored. The abatement Notification No. 01/2006-ST was again amended to restore it to the pre-September 2009 positions. This was done vide Notification No. 34/2009-ST dated 01.09.09. The exemption was again provided to Indian Railways from service tax in respect of container cargo and non-container cargo by Notification no. 33/2009-ST dated 01.09.09. Further, the impugned notification also provided exemption to transportation of non-container cargo by others. Thus, the levy was left only to transport of goods in containers by rail where the service tax liability is on a person other than Railway. Thus, it was restored to pre-budget period.

 

Resultantly, service tax was payable by any person other than Government Railways in relation to transport of goods in containers by rail.

 

All this was done on the exact day the service tax was to be leviable on rail transport. Not a single day was wasted.

 

Rescinding of Notification No. 28/2009-ST, dated 31.08.09: -

 

Since full exemption was granted to transport of goods by rail for now, the Notification No. 28/2009-ST which granted exemption to transport of several items by rail from service tax became irrelevant.

 

The Government rescinded the Notification No. 28/2009-St vide Notification No. 36/2009-ST, dated 09.10.09.

 

In the end: -

 

The whole affair of levying of service tax on rail transport started and came to an end within few days. The Indian Railways was saved from service tax net, of course by the blessings of Mr. Railway Minister. Else the situation would have been still worse for railways – it took lot many years to bring Indian Railways in profit, if the service tax would have to be paid by it; perhaps the situation would have reverted back due to increase in Service tax related direct and indirect expenditure. However, there was wastage of Finance Ministry’s time and money in amending and re-amending the Finance Act and the relevant notifications which would have added much to the country’s deficit. “Truth is stranger than fiction” – Right Mr. Finance Minister!!!

 

 

 

                      

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com