Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 17 Jun, 2010
Print   |    |  Comment

Sequence to Uniqueness for Associated Enterprises

 

Sequence to Uniqueness for Associated Enterprises

 

Prepared By:

CA Pradeep Jain,

CA Ridhi Anchalia and

Sukhvinder Kaur, LLB [FYIC]

Introduction: -

 

Every Finance Act brings with it some new services under the purview of the Service Tax. The Associated Enterprises were also a part of those services that were brought under Service Tax Act in the year 2008 vide the Finance Act. From the beginning the service of the Associated Enterprise is walking with some uniqueness. We had earlier also written an article titled “Associated Enterprise under Service Tax’ throwing light on the unique issues related to levy of service tax on mere book entries by Associated Enterprises. Still the department has not stopped and is working on to add more new features in the uniqueness of the leviability under this service. This Article of ours discusses the latest circular of CBEC that shows that how special the service relating to Associated Enterprises is for the department.

 

Service Tax provisions: -

 

As per Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994, the book adjustments i.e. debit or credit entries are to be included in the “gross amount charged” on which service tax is payable.   

 

And the TRU Letter D.O. F. No. 334/1/2008-TRU dated 29.02.2008, clarified that the service tax was also payable on crediting/debiting of the amount in the books of accounts in case of transactions between associated enterprises.

 

Also, the Rule 6 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 was amended to provide that any amount credited or debited to any account in the books of account will be included in the value of taxable service in case of associated enterprises.

 

Issue involved: -

 

As usual the department in the matter of the Associated Enterprises worked carefully and had clearly mentioned that when the book entry was passed the levy of service tax arises. The mere fact made this service an exception in the whole Service Tax Act. In all other services, the service tax is to be paid when the payment for the same is received.  But the fact of this uniqueness has nothing to do with the department. Their purpose of levy of service tax is solved with this exceptional situation to the whole service tax act also. But what about the Cenvat credit Rules, 2004? They are not having any exceptions for the service of Associated Enterprise. The rules were the same for the associated enterprise and other services. The Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provided that credit of input service is allowed when payment is made of the value of input service and the service tax paid or payable as is indicated in invoice, bill or challan.

 

The transactions of Associated Enterprises were liable to service tax on mere book entries, but could not take the credit until and unless payments were made with regard to such book entries. So again a new fact that the service tax paid is available for credit as an when the service tax is paid to the government, but the credit of the same couldn’t be taken by the service recipient immediately. But, he had to wait till the payment was made for providing the service to the service recipient. Thus, an anomaly was created. The department added every provision in the service tax Act to retain the uniqueness that was created in this service but it was just and just for the sake of that portion which deals in the collection of revenue. The department had nothing to do with the credit because it was just the assessee that was affected through the credit and not the department. So why should the department react?

 

Recent Clarification: -

 

In our earlier article also we had commented that the anomaly could only be solved by amending the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to allow availment of credit in respect of service tax paid by the associated enterprises on book adjustments. The assessees keen eyes were just looking forward to a clarification from the Board in this regard.

 

How can the Trade and Industry be quiet in this regard? They had to represent the Board in this regard, after all the loss was of them and no one else. Never has the Board came up with the helping hand to the assessees without their being vigilant, so how can it come forward now without any representations of the assessee. Finally the Board has came up with a clarification in this regard vide Circular No. 122/03/2010-ST dated 30.04.2010 and has issued following clarification: -

 

“(a) When the substantive law i.e. section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 treats such book adjustments etc., as deemed payment, there is no reason for denying such extended meaning to the word ‘payment’ for availment of credit. As far as the provisions of Rule 4 (7) are concerned, it only provides that the CENVAT credit shall be allowed, on or after the date on which payment is made of the value of the input service and of service tax. The form of payment is not indicated in the same and the rule does not place restriction on payment through debit in the books of accounts. Therefore, if the service charges as well as the service tax have been paid in any prescribed manner which is entitled to be called ‘gross amount charged’ then credit should be allowed under said rule 4 (7). Thus, in the case of “Associate Enterprises”, credit of service tax can be availed of when the payment has been made to the service provider in terms of section 67 (4) (c) of Finance Act, 1994 and the service tax has been paid to the Government Account.”.

 

The Board has listened to the so called poor assessee and clarified that the Section 67 considers the book adjustments as deemed payments and the extended meaning of the word ‘payment’ would apply. It has been clarified that the form of payment has not been indicated in Rule 4 (7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. And no restriction is placed by the said Rule on payment through debit in books of accounts. And, any payment entitled to be called ‘gross amount charged’ would be eligible to be availed as cenvat credit under Rule 4 (7).

 

 Thus, it was clarified that when book entries are made in transactions between the Associated enterprises and service tax is paid on the same, the cenvat credit of the same will be available to the service recipient.

 

The Circular No. 922/03/2010-ST has corrected the anomaly created by the unique provisions of Service Tax governing the transactions between Associated Enterprises. The Circular is a very favorable clarification for the Associated Enterprises. But it has again carry forwarded the uniqueness available to Associated enterprises. As said earlier, there was uniqueness for such enterprises to pay service tax on book entry and not on receipt basis. The credit under Cenvat Credit Rules is allowed when the payment is made for such services. But the uniqueness to Associated Enterprises was continued here and credit is allowed on book entry only. It was not linked with payment.

 

Before Departing:-

 

Surprising!! The Board has done some favour on the assessee without leaving anything for the department to walk in a new dispute. There is no amendment in Cenvat credit rules for the same. Only this circular has been issued. Thus, this circular is not supported by the legal provisions. The Cenvat credit Rules provides the credit only when the payment is made for the services. We all are aware of the Apex Court decision in case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur v/s Ratan Melting and Wire Industries [2008 (231) ELT 0022 (SC)] and Commissioner of Customs, Calcutta v/s Indian Oil Corporation [2004 (165) ELT 0257 (SC)] that the circulars which are inconsistent with legal provisions are not binding on departmental authorities. Thus, the department can take stand against this circular and demands will be issued. Thus, if the Board really intends to give benefit of such nature then they have to amend the Cenvat credit Rules and make a provision for associated enterprises. Thus, the uniqueness of Associated Enterprises will be carry forward in Cenvat credit Rules also if the amendment is made in this respect.  

 

***********

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com