Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 17 Mar, 2012
Print   |    |  Comment

Section 80A - Another way to trap Renting service providers

Section 80A – Another way to trap Renting service providers..

Prepared By:
CA Preeti Parihar
Manish Vyas

Introduction-
 
Service tax on “Renting of immovable property” service was introduced w.e.f. 1.6.2007. That time the language of charging Section 65(105)(zzzz) to the Finance Act, 1994 suggested that taxable service in this case would be service provided “in relation torenting of immovable property. Thus, at that time the services provided in relation renting of immovable property were chargeable to service tax. Renting in itself was not chargeable to service tax.
 
Litigation rounds:-
 
Later on, after huge claws of litigation, Government amended this Section retrospectively in the Finance Act, 2010. Now, service tax was specifically levied on the “renting of immovable property service”. As such, this amendment brought the renting per se under the net of service tax; that too, retrospectively since levy, irrespective of anything contained in any judgment, decree or order of any court, tribunal or other authority.
 
Even after the retrospective amendment, litigation continued and Delhi high Court has granted stay from recovery of Service Tax in respect of renting of immovable property service in the case of Home Solutions Retails Ltd Vs UoI [2010-TIOL-341-HC-DEL-ST]. It was held that renting of immovable property by itself cannot be regarded as a service. The recovery of service tax thereupon was stayed by the hon’ble High Court.
 
Trent Limited & Future Value Retail Ltd. challenged the validity of the retrospective amendment brought by the Finance Act, 2010. The Andhra Pradesh High Court has stayed the recovery of service tax for the period June 1, 2007 to March 31, 2010 as decided in TrentLtd. v. Union of India and Others [2010-TIOL-402-HC-AP-ST]. But the verdicts of hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court that service tax is not leviable for the period from 1.6.2007 to 1.4.2010. 
 
Further, Delhi High court in the case of Home solutions Retail vs UOI has observed that the government should examine about the waiver of penalty due to non-payment of service tax in this matter. Subsequently, in the case of Retailers Association of India vs UOI, hon’ble Supreme Court has directed the litigants to pay 50% of the arrears within six months in three equal installments. For balance 50%, it was directed to furnish solvent surety at the satisfaction of the jurisdictional commissioner.
 
Section 80A introduced by Budget, 2012-
 
In the above background, the recent Budget has introduced a Section 80A for waiver of penalty subject to following conditions –
 
-                     Service tax due on renting of immovable property service is paid within a period of six month along with interest.
-                     The amount of service tax due will be as on 6.3.2012.
 
Thus, if the service tax due as on 6.3.2012 is paid within six months, the penalty will be waived. However, those who don’t avail this benefit, this Section will be treated as non-existent for them.
 
While parting-
 
Right now, the constitutional validity of Renting of immovable property service is pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Retailers Association of India v/s UOI in Civil Appeal No. 8390 of 2011 and in the case of Home Solutions Retail (India) Ltd v/s UoI in Special Leave Civil Appeal No. 27636/2011. But before the Apex Court decided this issue, government is once again ready to convince the providers of renting service to pay the service tax and availment the benefit of penalty waiver. Payment of the service tax on renting of immovable property service means they have accepted the levy. It seems government want to trap the renting service providers in the other way – this is Section 80A …
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com