Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 23 Jul, 2014
Print   |    |  Comment

Rule 7 of Point of Taxation Rules: Reducing the time limit from 6 months to 3 months does not pain m

Rule 7 of Point of Taxation Rules: Reducing the time limit from 6 months to 3 months does not pain much

An article by:-
CA. Pradeep Jain
CA. Preeti Parihar
Manish Bhati

Introduction:-

Point of Taxation means the point in time when a service shall be deemed to have been provided and service tax is required to be paid on that point of time. The provisions related to determination of point of taxation under different situations have been prescribed under a separate set of rules namely the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011. This article revolves round the changes made by budget, 2014 in the Point of Taxation rules pertaining to the most typical concept of service tax law, i.e. the Reverse Charge Mechanism.

 
Situation prior to Budget, 2014:-
As per Rule 7 of Point of taxation rules 2011 as it existed prior to announcement of budget, where any person receiving the service is liable to pay tax instead of service provider then point of taxation shall,:-

“Where the payment is made within a period of 6 months of the date of invoice then the Point of taxation, be the date on which Payment is made."
Provided that where the payment is not made within a period of 6 months of the date of the invoice then the point of taxation shall be determined as if this rule does not exist and point of taxation shall be determined according to rule 3 of Point of taxation Rules 2011.

According to Rule 3 of point of taxation rules 2011, point of taxation shall be:-

(a)   Where Invoice is issued with in specified time period specified in rule 4A of the service tax rules 1994 (Rule 4A of Service tax rules 1994 as produced below) then the Point of taxation shall be the time when the invoice for the service provided or to be provided is issued.

(b)  Where invoice is not issued with in specified time period specified in rule 4A of Service Tax Rule 1994, then the point of taxation shall be the date of completion of provision of the service. Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994 states that the provider of taxable service is required to issue the invoice within 30 days (14 days upto 31.03.2012) from the date of completion of service. 
Thus, according to rule 7 of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 as it stood prior to announcement of budget, the date of payment shall be the Point of taxation provided the payment is made to the service provider within six months from the date of invoice. If there is any failure to make the payment within the 6 months of date of invoice, then the point of taxation shall fall on a back date as per rule 3 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011; i.e. the date of invoice or date of completion of service, as the case may be. Thus, failure to make the payment to service provider will take the Point of Taxation to back date and in that case service receiver has to pay service tax along with interest from the date of invoice or date of completion of service upto the date of actual payment.

 
 
Situation after Budget, 2014:-
With the announcement of Budget, 2014; Notification No. 13/2014-ST dated 11th July, 2014 has issued to amend the aforesaid rule 7 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011. As per amended Rule 7, where any person receiving the service is liable to pay tax instead of service provider then point of taxation shall,:-

“Where the payment is made within a period of 3 months of the date of invoice, be the date on which Payment is made.
Provided that where the payment is not made within a period of 3 months of the date of the invoice then the point of taxation shall be the date immediately following the said period of 3 months.”

Thus, according to new provision, in case of Reverse charge, the point of taxation shall be the date of payment only if the payment is made within three months of the date of invoice. If the payment is not made within three months from the date of invoice, the point of taxation shall be the date just after the expiry of this period of three months. For eg. the date of issue of invoice is 1.8.2014. If the payment is made on or before 31.10.2014, the point of taxation shall be that date. However, if no payment is made upto this date, the point of taxation shall be 1.11.2014. The service tax for this point of taxation has to be paid upto 5.12.2014. If the payment is made after this date, say on 9.1.2015; the interest will be required to be paid for the period from 5.12.2014 to 9.1.2015.

 
Transitional Provision:-
The switching over to new rule has been facilitated by inserting a new rule 10 to Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 as a transitional provision. This rule has been inserted vide the notification no. 13/2014-ST and it reads as follows:-

“10. Notwithstanding anything contained in the first proviso to rule 7, if the invoice in respect of a service, for which point of taxation is determinable under rule 7 has been issued before the 1st day of October, 2014 but payment has not been made as on the said day, the point of taxation shall,–
(a) if payment is made within a period of six months of the date of invoice, be the date on which payment is made;
(b) if payment is not made within a period of six months of the date of invoice, be determined as if rule 7 and this rule do not exist.”

 The analysis of this rule makes it ample clear that if an invoice for the service covered under Reverse charge has been issued before 1.10.2014; the point of taxation shall be determined according to rule 7 as it existed before the issuance of notification no. 13/2014-ST. Thus, the old provisions will continue to be applicable and the new provision will be applicable for the invoices issued after this notification comes into force, i.e. from 1.10.2014.

 
Winding up:-

Amendment in the rule 7 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 gives somewhat relief, in respect of payment of interest, to defaulter service receivers; who do not make payment of invoice within prescribed period. The old provision shifted the point of taxation to the earlier date in case of failure to pay the invoice within a period of six months. This attracted huge amount of interest which will substantially reduce with the amended provision. Though the time limit for making the payment to service provider has been halved, yet the relief from payment of interest from back date is a welcome step looking to the fact that this budget has drastically increased the interest rates in case of delay in payment of service tax.
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com