Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 13 Mar, 2013
Print   |    |  Comment

REVERSE CHARGE MECHANISM: CLARIFICATIONS STILL NEEDED

REVERSE CHARGE MECHANISM: CLARIFICATIONS STILL NEEDED

 

An article by:-
CA. Pradeep Jain
CA. Preeti Parihar
Manish Vyas

 

Introduction:-
Around a year back, the budget of previous year proposed the “service tax by way of negative list” which was implemented w.e.f. 1.7.2012. This is the milestone date which transformed the service tax law by implementing a numerous key changes. One such key change was the “partial reverse charge” which was totally new concept in India. As a tradition, every new law has several consequences which show their colour in later period. This piece of diction is about one such area namely “partial reverse charge on security services and director’s servcies” and its implication on the services given by certain professional bodies.
 
What is partial reverse charge?
The concept of reverse charge was also prevailing in the positive list era where certain cases/services were specified where the service recipient was made liable to pay the service tax instead of service provider. However concept of partial reverse charge was introduced w.e.f. 1.7.2012 wherein certain cases were prescribed where both service recipient and service provider were made liable to pay the service tax on the basis of specified percentage. This was done by issuance of Notification No. 30/2012-ST dated 20.6.2012 which covered the 10 services on which reverse charge was applicable. Out of 10 services, 3 services namely supply of man power, renting of motor vehicle and works contract, were specified on which partial reverse charge was applicable. This notification was implemented alongwith implementation of “service tax by way of negative list”.
 
Additions in the list of partial reverse charge:-
Certain additions were made to reverse charge notification no. 30/2012-ST vide notification 45/2012-ST dated 07/08/2012. These two notifications added two more services “Security Service”   and “Service provided by Directors of company to said company” in reverse charge mechanism. Partial reverse charge as already applicable to the man power supply is specifically extended to security services with same provisions. Thus, now where the security services are provided by any individual, Hindu Undivided Family or partnership firm, whether registered or not, including association of persons to a business entity registered as body corporate; the 75% service tax is payable by the service recipient and 25% service tax is payable by service provider. On the other hand, full reverse charge is extended to services provided by the director of the company where the 100% service tax on the services of the director will be paid by the company.
 
Definition of “Security Service”:-
Notifications 45/2012-ST has added the security services and services provided by directors to the list of reverse charge mechanism. In this context, the Service Tax Rules, 1994 have also been amended vide notification no. 46/2012-ST dated 7.8.2012 for adding the definition of security services. This notification has inserted a new clause (fa) in the rule 2(1) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 which defines the term “security services” as follows:-
“(fa) “security services” means services relating to the security of any property, whether movable or immovable, or of any person, in any manner and includes the services of investigation, detection or verification, of any fact or activity”
The above definition is very wide and it covers:-
·        The services related to security of any property;
·        The property may be movable or immovable;
·        The security services may be provided in any manner;
·        It will include the services of INVESTIGATION, DETECTION or VERIFICATION of any FACT or ACTIVITY.
If any service satisfies the above referred criteria, it will fall under the definition of “security services” and reverse charge mechanism will be applicable if these services are provided by an individual, HUF, partnership firm or AOP to any business entity registered as body corporate.
 
Investigation, Detection and Verifications – three key words of new definition:-
The definition of “Security services” includes “services of investigation, detection or verification, of any fact or activity” and this inclusive part of the definition has enormously widened the scope of security service. The Dictionary meaning of words ‘Investigation’, ‘Detection’ and ‘verification’ are as follows:-
·        Investigation: Process of inquiring into or tracking down through inquiry. (Black’s Law Dictionary)
·        Detection: Discovery or laying open of that which was hidden, i.e. even out the secret (Black’s Law Dictionary)
·        Verification: Confirmation of correctness, truth or authenticity, by affidavit, oath or deposition (Black’s Law Dictionary)
The collective reading of the above definition with the inclusive portion of the definition of security services makes it clear that any services provided in relation to confirmation of correctness/truth/authenticity of any fact or activity will come under purview of security services. This part of the above definition has vital implications on the services provided by the practicing Chartered Accountants.
 
New definition v/s Services provided by Chartered Accountants:-
Amongst a variety of services as provided by the Practicing Chartered Accountants, the following services are very commonly carried out:-
·        Investigation Services:-
Chartered Accountants are often called upon to carry out investigation to ascertain the financial position of business in connection with matters such as a new issue of share capital, the purchase or sale or financing of a business, reconstruction and amalgamations. These services are coverable under the definition of ‘Security Service’ as Chartered Accountant provides service of “investigating the facts of financial position or investigating the activity of operating performance”.
·        Stock Audit and Assets Verification:-
Practicing Chartered Accountants also conduct verification of asset and stock audit of borrower firm for banks or loan lender. This activity involved verification of asset or stock either physically or otherwise and also involved inspection work. Therefore it is covered under above discussed definition of security service. 
·        Statutory Audits and Other Internal Audits:-
The statutory audit carried out by the auditors also involves the verification, inspection and detection of fact represented by financial statements. Further the object of audit is also to secure the interest of stakeholders. Thus, these services will also be covered under the definition of the security services.
The above referred are few very common services out of a range of services provided by the professional Chartered Accountants. In fact a no. of other services are provided in sequence for carrying out their statutory duties.
 
Services provided by Chartered Accountants: a case of bundled services:-
As per SA- 200 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) :-
“Auditing is the independent examination of financial information of any entity, whether profit oriented or not, and irrespective of its size or legal form, when such an examination is conducted with a view to expressing an opinion thereon."
As per above definition, audit is examination of financial information of any entity and such examination is conducted for expressing an opinion thereon. Thus, a chain of activities are involved like examination of books of accounts, financial statements, stock verification, etc. It is only after every such activity is carried out, then the opinion is given in form of the audit report. Thus, it is a case of bundled services. As per section 66F (3):-
“(a) If various elements of a bundled service are naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business, it shall be treated as provision of a single service which gives such bundle its essential character”
The above provision says that in case of series of services provided, the service dominating the contract will be considered. In case of audit, though the services are being taken for expressing an opinion on the financial statements; yet the dominant service amongst all the services is the “verification” only. Where or not anyone else agree to this, the department will surely do; and partial reverse charge will be made applicable if the other conditions specified in notification no. 30/2012-ST as amended are satisfied.
 
Reverse charge on the directors:-
Vide Notification 45/2012-ST, full reverse charge has been extended to the ‘services provided or agreed to be provided  bya director of a company to the said company’. Thus, in such a case, 100% liability service tax is to be paid by the company for the services provided to it by the director.
However, clause 44 of section 65B defines the term ‘service’ and as per exclusion clause (b) of this definition, the following is not a service:-
“(b) a provision of service by an employee to the employer in the course of or in relation to his employment”
Thus, the activities carried out by a director who is the employee of the company are not covered under the definition of service. Accordingly, no reverse charge is applicable. However, the services provided by the directors who are not the employees of the company, will come in the ambit of reverse charge w.e.f. 7.8.2012. It means service tax would be applicable on Services provided by Independent/Non-Executive Directors of the Company because Managing Director/Executive Director/Whole time Director is the employee of company. But if any amount paid to Managing Director/Executive Director/Whole time Director which is not “a provision of service by an employee to the employer in the course of or in relation to his employment”, will be taxable e.g. renting of building by director to company.
 
Implications on services provided by a Director who is a Chartered Accountant:-
Many Practicing Chartered Accountants are also directors of companies and work in their professional capacity or as an independent director. In such case reverse charge will apply and 100% liability to pay service tax will be on company for their services provided to the company. Also, as per Section 226(3)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956; any officer or employee of the company cannot be a statutory auditor; therefore both the above clauses (being provision of auditing services includible in the definition of security services and services provided by a director) will not conflict in any case.  Thus, both of these two clauses will have different play.
 
Good bye words:-
The partial reverse charge is under transitional phase. At the time of implementation of partial reverse charge, TRU has issued the education guide dated 20.6.2012 which clarified the concept to much extent. However, the partial reverse charge on security services was included thereafter w.e.f. 7.8.2012 and also no further clarification was issued in this context to clarify the scope of these services. However, the clarification was issued in context of director’s services after their implementation, thus, this issue is much clear than that of security services. The analysis of the legal provisions pertaining to the security services w.e.f. 7.8.2012 indicates that this provision has far away impacts, most of which have not yet come into play. Hopes were there from Budget, 2013; but it has also gone without touching this sphere. It seems that the issue will burst out suddenly giving rise to the litigations. Let’s see, whether the clarification is issued first or the litigation arises first… Issue left open!!!
 

Comments

  • AMIT on 04 May, 2014 wrote:

    sir manpower recruitment service cover under RCM OR SERVICE PROVIDER PAY FULL TAX PLS CLARIFY. AND DIFFRENCE AFTER 1/7/12 BETWEEN MANPOWER SUPPLY & MANPOWER RECRUITMENT
  • SATHYARANJAN UDUPA H. on 11 November, 2013 wrote:

    According to Notification 30/2012(Para I(A)(v), Reverse charge would apply on services provided or agreed to be provided by way of renting of a motor vehicle or supply of manpower or service portion in execution of works contract by any individual, Hindu Undivided Family or partnership firm, whether registered or not, including association of persons, located in the taxable territory to a business entity registered as body corporate, located in the taxable territory. Could the words "by an individual, HUF ......." be applied to all the three limbs of this Notification- i.e. renting of motor car, manpower services and works-contract or could the Dept say that the words "by an individual, HUF ....." apply only to Works contract ? Pl give your valued understanding of this as there are conflicting opinions emerging among tax payers and professionals.

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com