Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 11 Oct, 2007
Print   |    |  Comment

REFUND OF SERVICE TAX ON THREE MORE SERVICES ALLOWED TO EXPORTERS

 
 
ANALYSIS OF Notification No. 41/2007-SERVICE TAX, DATED 6-10-2007
 
As we all are aware that the Finance Ministry has come out with the notification of exemption of service tax to exporters after almost 9 months of announcement of such exemption by the commerce minister in Foreign Trade Policy. But the exemption was granted only for 4 services and too by way of refund.
 
Now, the CBEC has come up with a new notification no. 41/2007-ST DT. 6.10.07 in supersession of earlier notification. The three new services have been added in the list of eligible services. But number of conditions has been incorporated in the same. The salient features of the new scheme are as under:-
 
Conditions:-
 
  1. The exporter who has received and used the services for the export can only apply for the refund.
  2. The exemption will be granted by way of refund as was done in the earlier notification.
  3. The refund will be granted only when the exporter has actually paid the amount to the service provider. Thus, receipt and bank reconciliation statement has become important for claiming of the refund.
  4. No Cenvat credit should have been taken by the exporter of such services for which the refund has been applied by him.
  5. No drawback has been taken of such specified services. The drawback rates are declared by the Government only and they do not give any detail that these services are included for fixation of drawback rates. As such, it is very difficult for the exporter claiming drawback to ascertain that these services have been included in fixation of the rates of drawback. Eventually, he has to forgo the refund,
  6. No other exemption or refund of these specified services has been claimed by the exporter.
 
Procedure:-
 
i.                   The very first condition in this category that the person liable to pay service tax should pay the service tax. Thus, the exporter has to ensure that the service provider has paid the service tax. Further, it is provided that the refund will be granted to exporter and it will not be given to the service provider. But there is one exception in this regard that the person liable for payment of service tax and exporter are one and same person then the refund will be granted to him. This happens in many services as listed in Rule 2(1) (d) where service recipient and service provider are one and same person. One common example is of Goods Transported by Road.
ii.                The exporter should file the refund claim with the department. The registered manufacturer exporter will easily file the claim. If the claim is filed by merchant exporter then he has to file a declaration with the department. The Assistant Commissioner will give a Service tax code to him and thereafter he can file the refund claim.
iii.              The refund claim is to be filed on quarterly basis. It will be filed for the goods which custom officer give let export order. Normally, the department provide the six months period for filing of proof of export and one year period for rebate claim. But this claim gives only two months period. It might happen that the proofs of export are not received during this period.
iv.              The refund claim should accompany with the documents of export of goods, payment of service tax on specified services and agreement of exporter with the buyer. The documents of export of goods are already filed by the exporter along with the Annexure 19 on monthly basis. Secondly, it is very difficult to give the details of payment of service tax. As the service tax is paid by the service provider and not by the exporter. Lastly, the agreement between the buyer and exporter has no relevance for the refund claim. The exporter might not like to give the same due to fear of leakage of his trade secret. But the department will insist for the same. Thus, there is every possibility of conflict in this claim.
v.                 The Assistant Commissioner will verify the refund claim and if he is satisfied with the same then he will sanction the same to the exporter. But no time limit has been provided for the sanction of the same. Even there is no provision for the interest payment. As such, it is sweet will of the department to sanction the refund claim in this regard.
vi.              Lastly, if the payment is not received for the goods exported then the department will recover the amount from the exporter. Such type of condition does not exist in the Central Excise Act earlier. They were only concerned with the export of goods. But recovery of refund when the payment is not received has been introduced for this refund. As such the exporter has to give Bank Realization Certificate also to substantiate his claim. But the problem is that Foreign Exchange manual provides 180 days for payment but the refund provides maximum period of five months.
 
Services eligible for refund:-
 
The following services have been listed for the refund to the exporter:-
  1. General insurance services;
  2. Port services;
  3. Technical testing and analysis services;
  4. Technical inspection and certification services;
  5. Other port services;
  6. Goods transported by Road;
  7. Goods transported by Rail.
 
Out of above, four services were already eligible for refund in the earlier notification. Now, three more services have been included which are general insurance services, Technical testing and analysis services and lastly Technical inspection and certification services. The last two services will be given refund only in case where there is provision in the agreement with the buyer for the same.
 
Conclusion: -
 
 The Board has included some more services for the refund but numbers of conditions have been added to the scheme. These conditions will create undue hardship for the exporters. Even it may result in rejection of most of refunds of the exporters like condition of drawback. These problems should be resolved at the earliest. Further, the other services like commission to agents, banking and financial charges, courier charges, custom house agent charges should be included in the list of services. This inclusion will be real benefit to the exporters in such a tough time.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com