Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 11 Oct, 2007
Print   |    |  Comment

REFUND OF SERVICE TAX ON THREE MORE SERVICES ALLOWED TO EXPORTERS

 
 
ANALYSIS OF Notification No. 41/2007-SERVICE TAX, DATED 6-10-2007
 
As we all are aware that the Finance Ministry has come out with the notification of exemption of service tax to exporters after almost 9 months of announcement of such exemption by the commerce minister in Foreign Trade Policy. But the exemption was granted only for 4 services and too by way of refund.
 
Now, the CBEC has come up with a new notification no. 41/2007-ST DT. 6.10.07 in supersession of earlier notification. The three new services have been added in the list of eligible services. But number of conditions has been incorporated in the same. The salient features of the new scheme are as under:-
 
Conditions:-
 
  1. The exporter who has received and used the services for the export can only apply for the refund.
  2. The exemption will be granted by way of refund as was done in the earlier notification.
  3. The refund will be granted only when the exporter has actually paid the amount to the service provider. Thus, receipt and bank reconciliation statement has become important for claiming of the refund.
  4. No Cenvat credit should have been taken by the exporter of such services for which the refund has been applied by him.
  5. No drawback has been taken of such specified services. The drawback rates are declared by the Government only and they do not give any detail that these services are included for fixation of drawback rates. As such, it is very difficult for the exporter claiming drawback to ascertain that these services have been included in fixation of the rates of drawback. Eventually, he has to forgo the refund,
  6. No other exemption or refund of these specified services has been claimed by the exporter.
 
Procedure:-
 
i.                   The very first condition in this category that the person liable to pay service tax should pay the service tax. Thus, the exporter has to ensure that the service provider has paid the service tax. Further, it is provided that the refund will be granted to exporter and it will not be given to the service provider. But there is one exception in this regard that the person liable for payment of service tax and exporter are one and same person then the refund will be granted to him. This happens in many services as listed in Rule 2(1) (d) where service recipient and service provider are one and same person. One common example is of Goods Transported by Road.
ii.                The exporter should file the refund claim with the department. The registered manufacturer exporter will easily file the claim. If the claim is filed by merchant exporter then he has to file a declaration with the department. The Assistant Commissioner will give a Service tax code to him and thereafter he can file the refund claim.
iii.              The refund claim is to be filed on quarterly basis. It will be filed for the goods which custom officer give let export order. Normally, the department provide the six months period for filing of proof of export and one year period for rebate claim. But this claim gives only two months period. It might happen that the proofs of export are not received during this period.
iv.              The refund claim should accompany with the documents of export of goods, payment of service tax on specified services and agreement of exporter with the buyer. The documents of export of goods are already filed by the exporter along with the Annexure 19 on monthly basis. Secondly, it is very difficult to give the details of payment of service tax. As the service tax is paid by the service provider and not by the exporter. Lastly, the agreement between the buyer and exporter has no relevance for the refund claim. The exporter might not like to give the same due to fear of leakage of his trade secret. But the department will insist for the same. Thus, there is every possibility of conflict in this claim.
v.                 The Assistant Commissioner will verify the refund claim and if he is satisfied with the same then he will sanction the same to the exporter. But no time limit has been provided for the sanction of the same. Even there is no provision for the interest payment. As such, it is sweet will of the department to sanction the refund claim in this regard.
vi.              Lastly, if the payment is not received for the goods exported then the department will recover the amount from the exporter. Such type of condition does not exist in the Central Excise Act earlier. They were only concerned with the export of goods. But recovery of refund when the payment is not received has been introduced for this refund. As such the exporter has to give Bank Realization Certificate also to substantiate his claim. But the problem is that Foreign Exchange manual provides 180 days for payment but the refund provides maximum period of five months.
 
Services eligible for refund:-
 
The following services have been listed for the refund to the exporter:-
  1. General insurance services;
  2. Port services;
  3. Technical testing and analysis services;
  4. Technical inspection and certification services;
  5. Other port services;
  6. Goods transported by Road;
  7. Goods transported by Rail.
 
Out of above, four services were already eligible for refund in the earlier notification. Now, three more services have been included which are general insurance services, Technical testing and analysis services and lastly Technical inspection and certification services. The last two services will be given refund only in case where there is provision in the agreement with the buyer for the same.
 
Conclusion: -
 
 The Board has included some more services for the refund but numbers of conditions have been added to the scheme. These conditions will create undue hardship for the exporters. Even it may result in rejection of most of refunds of the exporters like condition of drawback. These problems should be resolved at the earliest. Further, the other services like commission to agents, banking and financial charges, courier charges, custom house agent charges should be included in the list of services. This inclusion will be real benefit to the exporters in such a tough time.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com