Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 11 Oct, 2007
Print   |    |  Comment

REFUND OF SERVICE TAX ON THREE MORE SERVICES ALLOWED TO EXPORTERS

 
 
ANALYSIS OF Notification No. 41/2007-SERVICE TAX, DATED 6-10-2007
 
As we all are aware that the Finance Ministry has come out with the notification of exemption of service tax to exporters after almost 9 months of announcement of such exemption by the commerce minister in Foreign Trade Policy. But the exemption was granted only for 4 services and too by way of refund.
 
Now, the CBEC has come up with a new notification no. 41/2007-ST DT. 6.10.07 in supersession of earlier notification. The three new services have been added in the list of eligible services. But number of conditions has been incorporated in the same. The salient features of the new scheme are as under:-
 
Conditions:-
 
  1. The exporter who has received and used the services for the export can only apply for the refund.
  2. The exemption will be granted by way of refund as was done in the earlier notification.
  3. The refund will be granted only when the exporter has actually paid the amount to the service provider. Thus, receipt and bank reconciliation statement has become important for claiming of the refund.
  4. No Cenvat credit should have been taken by the exporter of such services for which the refund has been applied by him.
  5. No drawback has been taken of such specified services. The drawback rates are declared by the Government only and they do not give any detail that these services are included for fixation of drawback rates. As such, it is very difficult for the exporter claiming drawback to ascertain that these services have been included in fixation of the rates of drawback. Eventually, he has to forgo the refund,
  6. No other exemption or refund of these specified services has been claimed by the exporter.
 
Procedure:-
 
i.                   The very first condition in this category that the person liable to pay service tax should pay the service tax. Thus, the exporter has to ensure that the service provider has paid the service tax. Further, it is provided that the refund will be granted to exporter and it will not be given to the service provider. But there is one exception in this regard that the person liable for payment of service tax and exporter are one and same person then the refund will be granted to him. This happens in many services as listed in Rule 2(1) (d) where service recipient and service provider are one and same person. One common example is of Goods Transported by Road.
ii.                The exporter should file the refund claim with the department. The registered manufacturer exporter will easily file the claim. If the claim is filed by merchant exporter then he has to file a declaration with the department. The Assistant Commissioner will give a Service tax code to him and thereafter he can file the refund claim.
iii.              The refund claim is to be filed on quarterly basis. It will be filed for the goods which custom officer give let export order. Normally, the department provide the six months period for filing of proof of export and one year period for rebate claim. But this claim gives only two months period. It might happen that the proofs of export are not received during this period.
iv.              The refund claim should accompany with the documents of export of goods, payment of service tax on specified services and agreement of exporter with the buyer. The documents of export of goods are already filed by the exporter along with the Annexure 19 on monthly basis. Secondly, it is very difficult to give the details of payment of service tax. As the service tax is paid by the service provider and not by the exporter. Lastly, the agreement between the buyer and exporter has no relevance for the refund claim. The exporter might not like to give the same due to fear of leakage of his trade secret. But the department will insist for the same. Thus, there is every possibility of conflict in this claim.
v.                 The Assistant Commissioner will verify the refund claim and if he is satisfied with the same then he will sanction the same to the exporter. But no time limit has been provided for the sanction of the same. Even there is no provision for the interest payment. As such, it is sweet will of the department to sanction the refund claim in this regard.
vi.              Lastly, if the payment is not received for the goods exported then the department will recover the amount from the exporter. Such type of condition does not exist in the Central Excise Act earlier. They were only concerned with the export of goods. But recovery of refund when the payment is not received has been introduced for this refund. As such the exporter has to give Bank Realization Certificate also to substantiate his claim. But the problem is that Foreign Exchange manual provides 180 days for payment but the refund provides maximum period of five months.
 
Services eligible for refund:-
 
The following services have been listed for the refund to the exporter:-
  1. General insurance services;
  2. Port services;
  3. Technical testing and analysis services;
  4. Technical inspection and certification services;
  5. Other port services;
  6. Goods transported by Road;
  7. Goods transported by Rail.
 
Out of above, four services were already eligible for refund in the earlier notification. Now, three more services have been included which are general insurance services, Technical testing and analysis services and lastly Technical inspection and certification services. The last two services will be given refund only in case where there is provision in the agreement with the buyer for the same.
 
Conclusion: -
 
 The Board has included some more services for the refund but numbers of conditions have been added to the scheme. These conditions will create undue hardship for the exporters. Even it may result in rejection of most of refunds of the exporters like condition of drawback. These problems should be resolved at the earliest. Further, the other services like commission to agents, banking and financial charges, courier charges, custom house agent charges should be included in the list of services. This inclusion will be real benefit to the exporters in such a tough time.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com