Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 16 Nov, 2015
Print   |    |  Comment

PROPOSED REFUND PROCESS UNDER GST – HAPPINESS ON THE WAY TO EXPORTERS

PROPOSED REFUND PROCESS UNDER GST – HAPPINESS ON THE WAY TO EXPORTERS
 

An article by:-
CA. Pradeep Jain
CA. Preeti Parihar
 

Introduction
Goods and Services Tax (GST) is said to be the most awaited indirect tax reform of India since independence. Due to much hyped advantages, the industry is eager to welcome GST and so is the Government. On the way forward to GST, government has issued the ‘Report of The Joint Committee on Business Processes for GST’ for the persual of industry at large. Suggestions have also been invited for the improvement of business processes discussed in this report. The report is divided into three parts namely GST Registration, GST payment process and GST refund process. In this piece of diction, we have tried to give an insight of the third part of this report namely “GST Refund process”.
 
Refund mechanism under GST: simplified and tech-based:-
The report says that GST law shall provide for the cases in which refund claim can be filed. It states some of such cases as excess payment of tax by mistake, export of goods and services under rebate claim, refund of accumulated credit in case of exports, finalization of provisional assessment, refund of pre-deposit where the demand is dropped wholly or partly, refund of tax payment made by embassies or UN bodies, credit accumulation due to output tax being nil or concessional, etc. The refund mechanism as proposed in the GST model for all the cases except exports (where some major changes have been proposed) are more or less the same. However, one major change is that the refund procedure is going to be simplified and online filing of refund application will be there except a few cases which shall be exceptionally provided.
 
Further, where the tax amount has been mentioned wrongly, either it can be refunded or would automatically be carried forward at the option of tax payer. Automatic carry forward would be allowed only if the excess payment was on account of a return not on account of any other liability. Further, the excess payment should not be due to difference in opinion, i.e. difference should not be on account of interpretation of a notification. In this situation, it has been proposed that the return may also be treated as refund application if the GST law so provides. At present, under service tax law, excess payment of service tax, if any, has to be intimated to superintendent as well as reflected in the ST-3 return; if the same is intended to be carried forward. There have been cases where show cause notices have been issued for disallowing the carry forward of excess paid service tax as no intimation was filed within prescribed time and/or it was not reflected in the ST-3 return. The proposed provision under GST law will eliminate the unnecessary litigation on account of technical lapses like this.
 
Refund claim related to export goods: simple & integrated:-
The most commonly known refund claim is that filed by the exporters, whether it is rebate claim or refund of accumulated credit. Present refund mechanism involves filing of bulk sets of export documents; thereby involving a sheer wastage of time, money and energy. The division offices are burdened with tons of papers which are to be preserved for no use in future. Also, it is said that it is feasible for exporters to keep a dedicated person for doing photocopies of export documents. So, now this saying will say good bye in the GST era as under GST, there will be least filing of documents for the purpose of export as most of the filing will be online. Following are the key features of newly proposed refund mechanism applicable to exporters under GST era:-
·        In IGST Model, there is proposal of online filing details of invoice wise sale/purchase alongwith the monthly returns to GST network (GSTN). These details will be linked to customs network (ICEGATE). Thus, the details of basic export documents like invoice no., packing list, etc. as submitted to GSTN can be verified with those available at ICEGATE. Thus, there would be no need of submitting the same manually.
·        The refund application will be submitted online within the time prescribed under GST law which is proposed as one year from relevant date. Definition of relevant date is to be prescribed by GST law.
·        Mate’s receipt and bill of lading are the crucial documents evidencing the factum of export. Thus, the scanned copies of mate’s receipt and bill of lading will be submitted alongwith the refund application.
·        Bank realization certificate (BRC) may not be available at the time of filing the refund application; thus, the same shall be submitted subsequently to GSTN.
·        There will be inbuilt feature in the GSTN to track those export invoices in respect of which BRC has not been submitted within due time. This feature will send alert to respective officer for taking the appropriate action.
·        The time limit for granting refund has been fixed as three months from the date of filing of application.
·        There shall be inbuilt feature in GSTN to link the refund sanctioned with blocking of carry forward of input tax credit in the return/cash ledger. Thus, double benefit could not be taken by the exporters.
·        In case of export of service, only two documents are available - invoice and BRC. Further, no data is available on the ICEGATE also. Therefore, the refund in case of export of service shall be filed manually after the realization of export proceeds.
In GST regime exports are proposed to be zero rated, i.e. the export goods will not suffer any actual tax liability although the inputs for them would be tax paid which would subsequently be neutralized. Exports will be treated as inter-state supply of goods, thus, IGST will be paid by the tax payer in case the tax is paid at the time of export. This IGST can be claimed as refund by following the procedure detailed as above.
It is worth mentioning here that the refund procedure prescribed above allows the time limit to grant refund as three months from the date of filing the application. This time limit exists now also. However, it is also the fact on record that departmental officers are habitual of granting the refund after expiry of this time period. No doubt refund is allowed alongwith interest, but it is a cost to government. It is also a point to be noted that the report states that it was advised that 90% of the refund should be granted as soon as the export was done and remaining 10% should be granted after scrutinizing all the documents related to it. However, this suggestion has not been accepted and the time limit of three months has been fixed. Under GST era, the refund mechanism could have been drafted like it is allowed in case of drawback. Once the export is done, the drawback is allowed in the bank account of the exporter, there is no need of filing the application separately. This procedure should have been imported by GST also as it is easy and hassle free. Also, since everything is going to be online; there are least chances of any error or fraud.
 
Procurement @ NIL rate: proposed to be done away:-
It is the policy of government to promote the export of goods. Due to this, export goods are not burdened with any of the taxes and duties. For fulfilling this purpose, government has announced a no. of policies and has left exporters with a no. of options to make their goods tax/duty-free. At present, the exporters can avail any one of the following options:-
1.     Procure duty free inputs for the purpose of manufacture of export goods which are cleared without payment of duty.
2.     Duty-paid inputs are procured for manufacture of export goods which are cleared without payment of duty. The refund of duty paid on inputs is claimed after export of goods without payment of duty.
3.     Duty-paid inputs are procured and Cenvat credit is availed. Export Goods are manufactured and cleared on payment of duty by utilizing the credit so availed. Rebate claim of duty paid on export goods is filed.
Out of the above three, option to procure duty free inputs has been proposed to be done away with in GST regime. It is worth mentioning here that under this option, a no. of procedural formalities are to be followed like filing of requisite bond with excise officer, issue of procurement certificate, maintaining records of debit and credit in the bond, giving proof that the material so procured at NIL rate of duty has been utilized for the intended purpose, etc. Thus, this is the option which involves a no. of procedural formalities both at exporter’s end as well as at the end of department.
The report states that this option will not be available under GST regime. Thus, the supplier of goods will be required to pay the GST on the inputs so procured and in no case duty free inputs shall be allowed. Thus, the no. of formalities which are required to be fulfilled under present situation will not be there in the GST era and the exporters will be left with only two options as discussed above.
 
Refund against Deemed exports: specifically provided under GST era:-
Deemed export refers to the situations provided in chapter 8 of the Foreign Trade Policy. These situations include supply of goods to 100% EOU, SEZ, Projects under international competitive bidding, etc. The supplier can claim the refund of terminal excise duty or drawback of duty paid on inputs used in manufacture of such goods as per provisions of Foreign Trade Policy. However, it is worth mentioning here that this has been an issue on fire since inception as there was no corresponding provision in the Central excise Act or rules framed thereunder. A no. of show cause notices have been issued round the corners of country denying the refund claims so filed for deemed exports which were rigorously denied by the lower authorities on the grounds that the deemed exports are not real exports, thus, provisions of rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 are not applicable on them. However, Tribunals have allowed the refund claims so filed in respect of deemed exports on the grounds that deemed exports are to be treated at par with the real exports for the purpose of rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004. Some of such decisions allowing the refund claim in respect of deemed exports are cited as follows:-
·        COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., SURAT VERSUS SHILPA COPPER WIRE INDUSTRIES [2008 (226) E.L.T. 228 (Tri. - Ahmd.)]; as affirmed by Gujarat High Court in the citation as 2011 (269) E.L.T. 17 (Guj.)
·        NBM INDUSTRIES VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAJKOT [2009 (246) E.L.T. 252 (Tri. - Ahmd.)] asaffirmed by Gujarat High Court having citation as [2012 (276) E.L.T. 9 (Guj.)]
·        COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., AHMEDABAD VERSUS RANGDHARA POLYMERS [2011 (264) E.L.T. 275 (Tri. - Ahmd.)] as affirmed by High court under citation Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Ahmedabad-II Vs Rangdhara Polymers [2012-TIOL-1076-HC-AHM-CX]
Thus, it is clear that the department is reluctant to allow the refund claim in case of deemed exports since there is no specific provision in the Central excise law. However, Tribunal judgments have been passed in favour of assessees, thereby allowing the refund claim in case of deemed exports.
Due to the above stated litigation, the report of the Joint Committee has proposed that under GST regime, deemed export shall be kept at par with normal exports. Therefore, all the procedures applicable in case of normal exports shall be applicable in case of deemed exports also; subject to following exceptions:-
·        The supplier of goods in course of deemed export will be required to pay IGST and will be able to claim refund only if he has not collected the same. Also, it would have to be checked that receiver of goods has not claimed the input tax credit.
·        For claiming the refund on deemed exports, a simple application will be required to file alongwith certificate from chartered accountant certifying that the burden of GST has not been passed. GST law may also provide a threshold below which no such certificate shall be required and self certification would be sufficient for claiming the refund.
Thus, providing the specific provision in case of deemed exports will put a full stop on the litigation ongoing in current scenario.
 
Tax refund for international tourists: new scheme proposed in GST regime:-
Tax refund for international tourists scheme provide an opportunity to foreign tourists to buy goods manufactured during their stay in any country and claim the refund of tax suffered by such goods at the time of their exit from that country. About 52 countries are following this practice to encourage the sale of their goods to foreign tourists who visit their country and buy goods manufactured there. In India, this scheme will be implemented through retailers who shall be specifically registered for the purpose of this scheme. The refund would be available at designated ports and airports. Part of refund claim will be deducted as handling fees for such services rendered. This scheme will obviously boost the Indian products in international market. Since incidence of duty will not be there, they will also be cost effective to the tourists. Thus, make in India slogan of present Government will come true by this scheme.
 
Good bye words:-
Exporters earn valuable foreign exchange for our country. Therefore, it is necessary to take care of exporters. This time government has tried to simplify the refund related procedures by encouraging the online filing of refund claim under GST regime. Also, doing away cumbersome procedures related to export and brining new schemes for export promotion is a step forward to take the country from the group of developing nations to a developed one. The joint committee’s report on the refund process is the one drafted with due care and diligence; truly meeting the needs of exporters and other tax payers too.
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com