Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 16 Nov, 2015
Print   |    |  Comment

PROPOSED REFUND PROCESS UNDER GST – HAPPINESS ON THE WAY TO EXPORTERS

PROPOSED REFUND PROCESS UNDER GST – HAPPINESS ON THE WAY TO EXPORTERS
 

An article by:-
CA. Pradeep Jain
CA. Preeti Parihar
 

Introduction
Goods and Services Tax (GST) is said to be the most awaited indirect tax reform of India since independence. Due to much hyped advantages, the industry is eager to welcome GST and so is the Government. On the way forward to GST, government has issued the ‘Report of The Joint Committee on Business Processes for GST’ for the persual of industry at large. Suggestions have also been invited for the improvement of business processes discussed in this report. The report is divided into three parts namely GST Registration, GST payment process and GST refund process. In this piece of diction, we have tried to give an insight of the third part of this report namely “GST Refund process”.
 
Refund mechanism under GST: simplified and tech-based:-
The report says that GST law shall provide for the cases in which refund claim can be filed. It states some of such cases as excess payment of tax by mistake, export of goods and services under rebate claim, refund of accumulated credit in case of exports, finalization of provisional assessment, refund of pre-deposit where the demand is dropped wholly or partly, refund of tax payment made by embassies or UN bodies, credit accumulation due to output tax being nil or concessional, etc. The refund mechanism as proposed in the GST model for all the cases except exports (where some major changes have been proposed) are more or less the same. However, one major change is that the refund procedure is going to be simplified and online filing of refund application will be there except a few cases which shall be exceptionally provided.
 
Further, where the tax amount has been mentioned wrongly, either it can be refunded or would automatically be carried forward at the option of tax payer. Automatic carry forward would be allowed only if the excess payment was on account of a return not on account of any other liability. Further, the excess payment should not be due to difference in opinion, i.e. difference should not be on account of interpretation of a notification. In this situation, it has been proposed that the return may also be treated as refund application if the GST law so provides. At present, under service tax law, excess payment of service tax, if any, has to be intimated to superintendent as well as reflected in the ST-3 return; if the same is intended to be carried forward. There have been cases where show cause notices have been issued for disallowing the carry forward of excess paid service tax as no intimation was filed within prescribed time and/or it was not reflected in the ST-3 return. The proposed provision under GST law will eliminate the unnecessary litigation on account of technical lapses like this.
 
Refund claim related to export goods: simple & integrated:-
The most commonly known refund claim is that filed by the exporters, whether it is rebate claim or refund of accumulated credit. Present refund mechanism involves filing of bulk sets of export documents; thereby involving a sheer wastage of time, money and energy. The division offices are burdened with tons of papers which are to be preserved for no use in future. Also, it is said that it is feasible for exporters to keep a dedicated person for doing photocopies of export documents. So, now this saying will say good bye in the GST era as under GST, there will be least filing of documents for the purpose of export as most of the filing will be online. Following are the key features of newly proposed refund mechanism applicable to exporters under GST era:-
·        In IGST Model, there is proposal of online filing details of invoice wise sale/purchase alongwith the monthly returns to GST network (GSTN). These details will be linked to customs network (ICEGATE). Thus, the details of basic export documents like invoice no., packing list, etc. as submitted to GSTN can be verified with those available at ICEGATE. Thus, there would be no need of submitting the same manually.
·        The refund application will be submitted online within the time prescribed under GST law which is proposed as one year from relevant date. Definition of relevant date is to be prescribed by GST law.
·        Mate’s receipt and bill of lading are the crucial documents evidencing the factum of export. Thus, the scanned copies of mate’s receipt and bill of lading will be submitted alongwith the refund application.
·        Bank realization certificate (BRC) may not be available at the time of filing the refund application; thus, the same shall be submitted subsequently to GSTN.
·        There will be inbuilt feature in the GSTN to track those export invoices in respect of which BRC has not been submitted within due time. This feature will send alert to respective officer for taking the appropriate action.
·        The time limit for granting refund has been fixed as three months from the date of filing of application.
·        There shall be inbuilt feature in GSTN to link the refund sanctioned with blocking of carry forward of input tax credit in the return/cash ledger. Thus, double benefit could not be taken by the exporters.
·        In case of export of service, only two documents are available - invoice and BRC. Further, no data is available on the ICEGATE also. Therefore, the refund in case of export of service shall be filed manually after the realization of export proceeds.
In GST regime exports are proposed to be zero rated, i.e. the export goods will not suffer any actual tax liability although the inputs for them would be tax paid which would subsequently be neutralized. Exports will be treated as inter-state supply of goods, thus, IGST will be paid by the tax payer in case the tax is paid at the time of export. This IGST can be claimed as refund by following the procedure detailed as above.
It is worth mentioning here that the refund procedure prescribed above allows the time limit to grant refund as three months from the date of filing the application. This time limit exists now also. However, it is also the fact on record that departmental officers are habitual of granting the refund after expiry of this time period. No doubt refund is allowed alongwith interest, but it is a cost to government. It is also a point to be noted that the report states that it was advised that 90% of the refund should be granted as soon as the export was done and remaining 10% should be granted after scrutinizing all the documents related to it. However, this suggestion has not been accepted and the time limit of three months has been fixed. Under GST era, the refund mechanism could have been drafted like it is allowed in case of drawback. Once the export is done, the drawback is allowed in the bank account of the exporter, there is no need of filing the application separately. This procedure should have been imported by GST also as it is easy and hassle free. Also, since everything is going to be online; there are least chances of any error or fraud.
 
Procurement @ NIL rate: proposed to be done away:-
It is the policy of government to promote the export of goods. Due to this, export goods are not burdened with any of the taxes and duties. For fulfilling this purpose, government has announced a no. of policies and has left exporters with a no. of options to make their goods tax/duty-free. At present, the exporters can avail any one of the following options:-
1.     Procure duty free inputs for the purpose of manufacture of export goods which are cleared without payment of duty.
2.     Duty-paid inputs are procured for manufacture of export goods which are cleared without payment of duty. The refund of duty paid on inputs is claimed after export of goods without payment of duty.
3.     Duty-paid inputs are procured and Cenvat credit is availed. Export Goods are manufactured and cleared on payment of duty by utilizing the credit so availed. Rebate claim of duty paid on export goods is filed.
Out of the above three, option to procure duty free inputs has been proposed to be done away with in GST regime. It is worth mentioning here that under this option, a no. of procedural formalities are to be followed like filing of requisite bond with excise officer, issue of procurement certificate, maintaining records of debit and credit in the bond, giving proof that the material so procured at NIL rate of duty has been utilized for the intended purpose, etc. Thus, this is the option which involves a no. of procedural formalities both at exporter’s end as well as at the end of department.
The report states that this option will not be available under GST regime. Thus, the supplier of goods will be required to pay the GST on the inputs so procured and in no case duty free inputs shall be allowed. Thus, the no. of formalities which are required to be fulfilled under present situation will not be there in the GST era and the exporters will be left with only two options as discussed above.
 
Refund against Deemed exports: specifically provided under GST era:-
Deemed export refers to the situations provided in chapter 8 of the Foreign Trade Policy. These situations include supply of goods to 100% EOU, SEZ, Projects under international competitive bidding, etc. The supplier can claim the refund of terminal excise duty or drawback of duty paid on inputs used in manufacture of such goods as per provisions of Foreign Trade Policy. However, it is worth mentioning here that this has been an issue on fire since inception as there was no corresponding provision in the Central excise Act or rules framed thereunder. A no. of show cause notices have been issued round the corners of country denying the refund claims so filed for deemed exports which were rigorously denied by the lower authorities on the grounds that the deemed exports are not real exports, thus, provisions of rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 are not applicable on them. However, Tribunals have allowed the refund claims so filed in respect of deemed exports on the grounds that deemed exports are to be treated at par with the real exports for the purpose of rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit
Rules, 2004. Some of such decisions allowing the refund claim in respect of deemed exports are cited as follows:-
·        COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., SURAT VERSUS SHILPA COPPER WIRE INDUSTRIES [2008 (226) E.L.T. 228 (Tri. - Ahmd.)]; as affirmed by Gujarat High Court in the citation as 2011 (269) E.L.T. 17 (Guj.)
·        NBM INDUSTRIES VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAJKOT [2009 (246) E.L.T. 252 (Tri. - Ahmd.)] asaffirmed by Gujarat High Court having citation as [2012 (276) E.L.T. 9 (Guj.)]
·        COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., AHMEDABAD VERSUS RANGDHARA POLYMERS [2011 (264) E.L.T. 275 (Tri. - Ahmd.)] as affirmed by High court under citation Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Ahmedabad-II Vs Rangdhara Polymers [2012-TIOL-1076-HC-AHM-CX]
Thus, it is clear that the department is reluctant to allow the refund claim in case of deemed exports since there is no specific provision in the Central excise law. However, Tribunal judgments have been passed in favour of assessees, thereby allowing the refund claim in case of deemed exports.
Due to the above stated litigation, the report of the Joint Committee has proposed that under GST regime, deemed export shall be kept at par with normal exports. Therefore, all the procedures applicable in case of normal exports shall be applicable in case of deemed exports also; subject to following exceptions:-
·        The supplier of goods in course of deemed export will be required to pay IGST and will be able to claim refund only if he has not collected the same. Also, it would have to be checked that receiver of goods has not claimed the input tax credit.
·        For claiming the refund on deemed exports, a simple application will be required to file alongwith certificate from chartered accountant certifying that the burden of GST has not been passed. GST law may also provide a threshold below which no such certificate shall be required and self certification would be sufficient for claiming the refund.
Thus, providing the specific provision in case of deemed exports will put a full stop on the litigation ongoing in current scenario.
 
Tax refund for international tourists: new scheme proposed in GST regime:-
Tax refund for international tourists scheme provide an opportunity to foreign tourists to buy goods manufactured during their stay in any country and claim the refund of tax suffered by such goods at the time of their exit from that country. About 52 countries are following this practice to encourage the sale of their goods to foreign tourists who visit their country and buy goods manufactured there. In India, this scheme will be implemented through retailers who shall be specifically registered for the purpose of this scheme. The refund would be available at designated ports and airports. Part of refund claim will be deducted as handling fees for such services rendered. This scheme will obviously boost the Indian products in international market. Since incidence of duty will not be there, they will also be cost effective to the tourists. Thus, make in India slogan of present Government will come true by this scheme.
 
Good bye words:-
Exporters earn valuable foreign exchange for our country. Therefore, it is necessary to take care of exporters. This time government has tried to simplify the refund related procedures by encouraging the online filing of refund claim under GST regime. Also, doing away cumbersome procedures related to export and brining new schemes for export promotion is a step forward to take the country from the group of developing nations to a developed one. The joint committee’s report on the refund process is the one drafted with due care and diligence; truly meeting the needs of exporters and other tax payers too.
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com