Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 06 Nov, 2015
Print   |    |  Comment

PROPOSED PAYMENT PROCESS UNDER GST – NEW & IMPROVED

PROPOSED PAYMENT PROCESS UNDER GST – NEW & IMPROVED

 

An article by:-
CA. Pradeep Jain
CA. Preeti Parihar

 
Introduction-
‘Report of The Joint Committee on Business Processes for GST’ has already been circulated and views have been sought from people at large for suggesting improvements thereupon. This report is divided into three parts namely GST Registration, GST payment process and GST refund process. In this article, some benefits of the proposed payment process under GST regime have been discussed alongwith some minor drawbacks of the proposal.
 
Proposed payment process: Merits over existing system:-
The report of the Joint Committee on the payment process has discussed in detail about the mechanism to be followed in respect of affecting the flow of funds in GST era. Some of the merits of proposed system of payment are discussed as below:-
1)    Under present system, manual filing of challan is also accepted, thus, the chances of errors are more. In the proposed system, only electronic challan generated by GST network (GSTN) will be accepted, thus, the details therein will be more reliable.
2)    The GSTN will provide a unique Id (CPIN) which will be used until payment has actually been received by the bank and CIN (CPIN plus bank code has been generated. Thereafter, the CIN will be used for all the later purposes like accounting, reconciliation, etc.
3)    Three payment modes have been prescribed namely online payment through authorized banks, debit cards, credit cards, etc.; over the counter payment and RTGS/NEFT payment through all the banks including non-authorized banks. All the three modes will be using the electronic challan in which the data filed by the tax payer could not be redigitalized by any of the parties using the said challan data.
4)    RBI will play the role of aggregator for fund flow and information flow, thereby making the flow as well as information more reliable.
5)    Due to automation and transparency in flow of information and very few parties involved in the transaction, there would be nominal errors, therefore, reconciliation process will be easy.
6)    E-scroll facility will be provided by RBI which will make the accounting, reconciliation and other ancillary activities easy and effective.  
7)    The two coloured challan is the special feature of GST payment process. Since only one challan shall be required to pay the taxes namely CGST, IGST, SGST, etc.; two colours have been assigned to the challan for easy demarcation.
 
Proposed payment process: Discussions and Downsides thereof:-
The proposed payment system in the report indicates some minor demerits which are discussed as follows:-
1)    The Report indicates that that the GST regime will accept only payment of tax only via electronically generated challan whatever be the mode of payment. There will be no use of manually prepared challan. The report prescribes the following three modes of payment:-
·        Payment by tax payers through internet banking through authorized banks and through debit and credit cards.
·        Over the counter payment (OTC) through authorized banks.
·        Payment through NEFT/RTGS from any bank (including other than authorized banks).
Out of the above three, second mode of payment namely “over the counter” payment will be available for payments upto Rs. 10000/- per challan only. However, the report does not describe whether Rs. 10000/- per challan will be per challan per day or per challan per month or something else. No clarification has been given on the same. It further states that the outstation cheques will not be accepted. Only those cheques which are payable at par at all the branches of bank having presence at that location will be accepted. Thus, there is a constraint besides the ceiling limit of Rs. 10000/-. It is worthwhile to mention here that over the counter payment is the most popular mode of payment at small places where internet access and/or banking facilities are least. Also, as the GST will bring a no. of new tax payers in its net; this mode which is considered as the safest by the small town people; should be accompanied by facilities instead of restrictions at the beginning of GST era. However, gradually, this mode can be made stringent so as to shift towards automation.
 
2)    The payment through NEFT/RTGS from any bank (including other than authorized banks) is the new mode of remittance to be implemented as from start of GST era. At present no payment can be accepted from any bank other than nationalized bank which has been duly authorized to collect the taxes. However, with implementation of GST, payment through NEFT/RTGS will be accepted from any bank, even other than authorized bank. In this system, the RBI will accept the money on behalf of Government and will generate a challan. The Common Portal Identification Number (CPIN) will be generated alongwith the challan which shall be valid for a period of seven days. If any tax payer uses this challan beyond the validity period of 7 days more than twice, he will be debarred from using this option by the GST network. Thus, to opt for this mode of payment, the tax payer has to be prompt, otherwise habitual late filer/ user shall be  debarred from using this facility. According to RBI, this method was tested in Karnataka and this experience will be further used for developing this mode. It is to be noted that this is the totally new method. Though it has been accepted for the sake of benefit of tax payers, yet, since it is still under testing stage; it will take time to gain popularity. Also, the payment mechanism prescribed for availing this mode of payment is somewhat cumbersome when compared to other two modes of payment. Therefore, this mode will be accepted only by those people who are left with no option.
 
3)    Under the new system of GST Era, RBI shall play the role of aggregator through its e-Kuber system. It will facilitate larger no. of banks in GST receipts enhancing convenience of tax payers. It will simplify the accounting and reconciliation tasks. In case any discrepancy is found, tax authorities will directly interact with RBI. Further, in case of RTGS/ NEFT payments through non-authorized bank also, RBI’s role will be crucial as it will be the only mediator between the tax payers and Government. Therefore, the role of RBI will increase drastically in the GST era and responsibilities of RBI people will enhance tremendously. In fact, the entire tax collection and remittance procedure will solely depend on the efficiency of RBI personnel.
 
4)    At present, the Central excise as well as the service tax challans namely GAR-7 has the details of jurisdictional locations. However, the report states that under GST era, the Jurisdictional location (eg. Commissionerate, division and range) shall not be mentioned on the challan. However, the tax authorities will send the taxpayers updated master data to GST Network and accounting authorities. The accounting authorities shall be using the taxpayer mater data for mapping the challans with the jurisdictional location code. This will make the process of accounting bit lengthy and cumbersome. If the location details are there in the challan itself, there is no need of referring the taxpayer’s master data every now and then for accounting purpose.
 
5)    The challan correction mechanism has been kept as nominal in the GST regime. Though not completely ruled out, the GST network will allow the tax payers to make corrections in the challan already filed only in very few exceptional cases. Thus, due care shall have to be exercised while filing the challan as once filed, the chances of making corrections will be very nominal.
 
6)    One major drawback of the proposed payment process is that the other means of payment by book adjustments or payment by debit to export scrips while paying taxes would not be allowed. At present, payment of custom duty, CVD, etc. at the time of import is also allowed to be debited in duty credit scrip. The report proposes that this method of payment of tax will be scrapped in the GST regime. So, how the export promotion schemes will work in the time to come; has not been discussed in the report. Also, the payment of tax by way of book adjustment is also allowed in specified cases under Central Excise law which is also proposed to be done away with the GST era. The reasons in particular have not been given for scrapping these modes of payment, yet it is a fact on record, that it is going to decrease the liquidity of the tax payers.
 
While winding:-
The report of Joint Committee on the payment process is very detailed and responsive. The authors of this article appreciate the steps taken by the Committee to create awareness on the drafts of payment process under GST. However, the report is silent on some issues which constitute the demerits of the proposed payment process. After some improvements, the payment process will become flawless and more reliable, thereby making the path of GST as more smooth.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com