Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 14 Jul, 2014
Print   |    |  Comment

Permission to dispose of Plant and Machinery Supplied to UN Projects

Permission to dispose of Plant and Machinery Supplied to UN Projects

 

An Article by:-
CA PRADEEP JAIN &
RANU DHOOT

Burdened with extraordinary expectations after a campaign that promised "good days are coming," Prime Minister Narendra Modi's center-right government presented the most hyped budget on Thursday aimed at increasing investment, improving infrastructure and reviving manufacturing, though it fell short of the drastic overhauls necessary to rein in spending. The much anticipated Budget 2014 delivered amid an environment of price rise and huge expectations from the government brought about several changes in the gamut of indirect taxes. One of which stands the insertion of a proviso in Notification 108/95 CE dated 28.08.1995.
 
BACKGROUND
NOTIFICATION 108/95 CE Dated 28.08.1995, provides for exemption from payment of duty of excise, for all goods when supplied to United Nations or an International organization for their official use or supplied to the projects financed by the said United Nations or an International organization and approved by the Government of India. Due to the boom in infrastructural sector, several infrastructural development works, such as road projects, etc. are being carried out by the Central Government / various State Governments, with financial assistance from various International organizations.  The exemption is subject to a condition that if the goods are thus supplied to a project, a Certificate from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance should be furnished certifying that the said goods are required for the execution of the said project and that the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India. 
Claiming the said exemption for consumable goods such as cement, steel, etc., which would be used in the project does not have any problem.  But, when some capital items, such as cranes, crushers, machineries, etc. are required for execution of the said project, there is a possibility that the contractor may claim exemption for such goods and after using it in the said project for namesake, divert the same to his any other contracts, which are not entitled for the benefit of exemption.  By this ingenious method, a contractor may procure all his capital equipments required for all his contracts, claming exemption under this notification on the basis of the Certificate as envisaged and immediately withdraw the capital equipments from the said project and divert the same to his other projects.
In order to avoid such dubious practices, an Explanation had been inserted in Notification 108/95, vide Notification 1/2008 CE Dated 01.03.2008, which disentitled the exemption in respect of the items which are temporarily used in the said projects.  In case of items of capital nature, like cranes, crushers, machines, etc. the exemption could not be denied, if these items were used in the project, till the completion of the project and not withdrawn in between and the exemption cannot be denied, if such capital items were transferred to any other projects, after completion of the specified projects.  In other words, the vice of this explanation would get attracted only in case of premature withdrawals.
However this notification could not provide benefit of exemption on plant & machine supplied prior to 2008.  Such plant & machine (obtained prior to 2008) could not be transferred or sold out from the project site. The contractors, in such case were left with no other option but to build a museum in the respective sites, after completing the project and keep all items procured without payment of duty of excise, for execution of the project!
 
GOOD NEWS: BUDGET 2014’s IN
With the budget hailed a good news for the contractors. Vide Notification No. 11/2014-Central Excise dated 11.07.2014 the Central Government seeks to amend Notification No. 108/95-Central Excise dated 28.08.1995. In the said notification, after the proviso, the following shall be inserted, namely:-
 
“2. Where the said goods are cleared prior to the 1st March, 2008, the manufacturer may -
 

  1. transfer the said goods to a new project subject to the condition that the manufacturer produces before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, as the case may be, that the said goods are no longer required for the said project and a declaration from the United Nations, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other international organization listed in the Annexure to the said notification that the said goods are required for the new project and the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India; or

 

  1. pay duty of excise which would have been payable but for the exemption contained herein on the depreciated value of the said goods subject to the condition that the importer produces before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, as the case may be, that the said goods are no longer required for the existing project. The depreciated value of the said goods shall be equal to the original value of the goods at the time of clearance reduced by the percentage points calculated by straight line method as specified below for each quarter of a year or part thereof from the date of clearance of the said goods, namely:-

 

  1. for each quarter in the first year at the rate of 4 per cent;

 

  1. for each quarter in the second year at the rate of 3 per cent;

 

  1. for each quarter in the third year at the rate of 2.5 per cent; and

 

  1. for each quarter in the fourth year and subsequent years at the rate of 2%,

 
subject to the maximum of 70%.”.
With the upcoming of such proviso the supplier of Plant & machinery can now transfer the said goods to a new project subject to the following conditions:

  1. the manufacturer needs to produce before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, that the Plant & Machinery are no longer required for the said project, and;
  2.  a declaration from the United Nations, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other international organization listed in the Annexure to the said notification that the said goods are required for the new project and the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India.
  3. For clearance of the such Plant & machinery the importer shall have to pay excise duty on the depreciated value of the same after charging depreciation on the original value of it as calculated in the manner and at the rates as prescribed in the amendment notification for transfer of the said goods to a new project subject to the condition that the manufacturer produces before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, as the case may be, that the said goods are no longer required for the said project and a declaration from the United Nations, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other international organization listed in the Annexure to the said notification that the said goods are required for the new project and the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India.

 
 
TO SUM UP…
For the machine supplied by the supplier before 2008, if the exemption of duty had to be availed the supplier could not transfer or sell out such machines in any circumstance. However, with the introduction of amendment through the budget of 2014, liberty has been provided to transfer or sell the said plant and machinery from the project site subject to the conditions discussed above.


 

 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com