Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 14 Jul, 2014
Print   |    |  Comment

Permission to dispose of Plant and Machinery Supplied to UN Projects

Permission to dispose of Plant and Machinery Supplied to UN Projects

 

An Article by:-
CA PRADEEP JAIN &
RANU DHOOT

Burdened with extraordinary expectations after a campaign that promised "good days are coming," Prime Minister Narendra Modi's center-right government presented the most hyped budget on Thursday aimed at increasing investment, improving infrastructure and reviving manufacturing, though it fell short of the drastic overhauls necessary to rein in spending. The much anticipated Budget 2014 delivered amid an environment of price rise and huge expectations from the government brought about several changes in the gamut of indirect taxes. One of which stands the insertion of a proviso in Notification 108/95 CE dated 28.08.1995.
 
BACKGROUND
NOTIFICATION 108/95 CE Dated 28.08.1995, provides for exemption from payment of duty of excise, for all goods when supplied to United Nations or an International organization for their official use or supplied to the projects financed by the said United Nations or an International organization and approved by the Government of India. Due to the boom in infrastructural sector, several infrastructural development works, such as road projects, etc. are being carried out by the Central Government / various State Governments, with financial assistance from various International organizations.  The exemption is subject to a condition that if the goods are thus supplied to a project, a Certificate from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance should be furnished certifying that the said goods are required for the execution of the said project and that the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India. 
Claiming the said exemption for consumable goods such as cement, steel, etc., which would be used in the project does not have any problem.  But, when some capital items, such as cranes, crushers, machineries, etc. are required for execution of the said project, there is a possibility that the contractor may claim exemption for such goods and after using it in the said project for namesake, divert the same to his any other contracts, which are not entitled for the benefit of exemption.  By this ingenious method, a contractor may procure all his capital equipments required for all his contracts, claming exemption under this notification on the basis of the Certificate as envisaged and immediately withdraw the capital equipments from the said project and divert the same to his other projects.
In order to avoid such dubious practices, an Explanation had been inserted in Notification 108/95, vide Notification 1/2008 CE Dated 01.03.2008, which disentitled the exemption in respect of the items which are temporarily used in the said projects.  In case of items of capital nature, like cranes, crushers, machines, etc. the exemption could not be denied, if these items were used in the project, till the completion of the project and not withdrawn in between and the exemption cannot be denied, if such capital items were transferred to any other projects, after completion of the specified projects.  In other words, the vice of this explanation would get attracted only in case of premature withdrawals.
However this notification could not provide benefit of exemption on plant & machine supplied prior to 2008.  Such plant & machine (obtained prior to 2008) could not be transferred or sold out from the project site. The contractors, in such case were left with no other option but to build a museum in the respective sites, after completing the project and keep all items procured without payment of duty of excise, for execution of the project!
 
GOOD NEWS: BUDGET 2014’s IN
With the budget hailed a good news for the contractors. Vide Notification No. 11/2014-Central Excise dated 11.07.2014 the Central Government seeks to amend Notification No. 108/95-Central Excise dated 28.08.1995. In the said notification, after the proviso, the following shall be inserted, namely:-
 
“2. Where the said goods are cleared prior to the 1st March, 2008, the manufacturer may -
 

  1. transfer the said goods to a new project subject to the condition that the manufacturer produces before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, as the case may be, that the said goods are no longer required for the said project and a declaration from the United Nations, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other international organization listed in the Annexure to the said notification that the said goods are required for the new project and the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India; or

 

  1. pay duty of excise which would have been payable but for the exemption contained herein on the depreciated value of the said goods subject to the condition that the importer produces before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, as the case may be, that the said goods are no longer required for the existing project. The depreciated value of the said goods shall be equal to the original value of the goods at the time of clearance reduced by the percentage points calculated by straight line method as specified below for each quarter of a year or part thereof from the date of clearance of the said goods, namely:-

 

  1. for each quarter in the first year at the rate of 4 per cent;

 

  1. for each quarter in the second year at the rate of 3 per cent;

 

  1. for each quarter in the third year at the rate of 2.5 per cent; and

 

  1. for each quarter in the fourth year and subsequent years at the rate of 2%,

 
subject to the maximum of 70%.”.
With the upcoming of such proviso the supplier of Plant & machinery can now transfer the said goods to a new project subject to the following conditions:

  1. the manufacturer needs to produce before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, that the Plant & Machinery are no longer required for the said project, and;
  2.  a declaration from the United Nations, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other international organization listed in the Annexure to the said notification that the said goods are required for the new project and the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India.
  3. For clearance of the such Plant & machinery the importer shall have to pay excise duty on the depreciated value of the same after charging depreciation on the original value of it as calculated in the manner and at the rates as prescribed in the amendment notification for transfer of the said goods to a new project subject to the condition that the manufacturer produces before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, as the case may be, that the said goods are no longer required for the said project and a declaration from the United Nations, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other international organization listed in the Annexure to the said notification that the said goods are required for the new project and the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India.

 
 
TO SUM UP…
For the machine supplied by the supplier before 2008, if the exemption of duty had to be availed the supplier could not transfer or sell out such machines in any circumstance. However, with the introduction of amendment through the budget of 2014, liberty has been provided to transfer or sell the said plant and machinery from the project site subject to the conditions discussed above.


 

 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com