Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 14 Jul, 2014
Print   |    |  Comment

Permission to dispose of Plant and Machinery Supplied to UN Projects

Permission to dispose of Plant and Machinery Supplied to UN Projects

 

An Article by:-
CA PRADEEP JAIN &
RANU DHOOT

Burdened with extraordinary expectations after a campaign that promised "good days are coming," Prime Minister Narendra Modi's center-right government presented the most hyped budget on Thursday aimed at increasing investment, improving infrastructure and reviving manufacturing, though it fell short of the drastic overhauls necessary to rein in spending. The much anticipated Budget 2014 delivered amid an environment of price rise and huge expectations from the government brought about several changes in the gamut of indirect taxes. One of which stands the insertion of a proviso in Notification 108/95 CE dated 28.08.1995.
 
BACKGROUND
NOTIFICATION 108/95 CE Dated 28.08.1995, provides for exemption from payment of duty of excise, for all goods when supplied to United Nations or an International organization for their official use or supplied to the projects financed by the said United Nations or an International organization and approved by the Government of India. Due to the boom in infrastructural sector, several infrastructural development works, such as road projects, etc. are being carried out by the Central Government / various State Governments, with financial assistance from various International organizations.  The exemption is subject to a condition that if the goods are thus supplied to a project, a Certificate from an officer not below the rank of Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance should be furnished certifying that the said goods are required for the execution of the said project and that the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India. 
Claiming the said exemption for consumable goods such as cement, steel, etc., which would be used in the project does not have any problem.  But, when some capital items, such as cranes, crushers, machineries, etc. are required for execution of the said project, there is a possibility that the contractor may claim exemption for such goods and after using it in the said project for namesake, divert the same to his any other contracts, which are not entitled for the benefit of exemption.  By this ingenious method, a contractor may procure all his capital equipments required for all his contracts, claming exemption under this notification on the basis of the Certificate as envisaged and immediately withdraw the capital equipments from the said project and divert the same to his other projects.
In order to avoid such dubious practices, an Explanation had been inserted in Notification 108/95, vide Notification 1/2008 CE Dated 01.03.2008, which disentitled the exemption in respect of the items which are temporarily used in the said projects.  In case of items of capital nature, like cranes, crushers, machines, etc. the exemption could not be denied, if these items were used in the project, till the completion of the project and not withdrawn in between and the exemption cannot be denied, if such capital items were transferred to any other projects, after completion of the specified projects.  In other words, the vice of this explanation would get attracted only in case of premature withdrawals.
However this notification could not provide benefit of exemption on plant & machine supplied prior to 2008.  Such plant & machine (obtained prior to 2008) could not be transferred or sold out from the project site. The contractors, in such case were left with no other option but to build a museum in the respective sites, after completing the project and keep all items procured without payment of duty of excise, for execution of the project!
 
GOOD NEWS: BUDGET 2014’s IN
With the budget hailed a good news for the contractors. Vide Notification No. 11/2014-Central Excise dated 11.07.2014 the Central Government seeks to amend Notification No. 108/95-Central Excise dated 28.08.1995. In the said notification, after the proviso, the following shall be inserted, namely:-
 
“2. Where the said goods are cleared prior to the 1st March, 2008, the manufacturer may -
 

  1. transfer the said goods to a new project subject to the condition that the manufacturer produces before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, as the case may be, that the said goods are no longer required for the said project and a declaration from the United Nations, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other international organization listed in the Annexure to the said notification that the said goods are required for the new project and the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India; or

 

  1. pay duty of excise which would have been payable but for the exemption contained herein on the depreciated value of the said goods subject to the condition that the importer produces before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, as the case may be, that the said goods are no longer required for the existing project. The depreciated value of the said goods shall be equal to the original value of the goods at the time of clearance reduced by the percentage points calculated by straight line method as specified below for each quarter of a year or part thereof from the date of clearance of the said goods, namely:-

 

  1. for each quarter in the first year at the rate of 4 per cent;

 

  1. for each quarter in the second year at the rate of 3 per cent;

 

  1. for each quarter in the third year at the rate of 2.5 per cent; and

 

  1. for each quarter in the fourth year and subsequent years at the rate of 2%,

 
subject to the maximum of 70%.”.
With the upcoming of such proviso the supplier of Plant & machinery can now transfer the said goods to a new project subject to the following conditions:

  1. the manufacturer needs to produce before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, that the Plant & Machinery are no longer required for the said project, and;
  2.  a declaration from the United Nations, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other international organization listed in the Annexure to the said notification that the said goods are required for the new project and the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India.
  3. For clearance of the such Plant & machinery the importer shall have to pay excise duty on the depreciated value of the same after charging depreciation on the original value of it as calculated in the manner and at the rates as prescribed in the amendment notification for transfer of the said goods to a new project subject to the condition that the manufacturer produces before the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, a certificate from the officer concerned of the Central Government, State Government or Union territory Administration, as the case may be, that the said goods are no longer required for the said project and a declaration from the United Nations, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank or any other international organization listed in the Annexure to the said notification that the said goods are required for the new project and the said project has duly been approved by the Government of India.

 
 
TO SUM UP…
For the machine supplied by the supplier before 2008, if the exemption of duty had to be availed the supplier could not transfer or sell out such machines in any circumstance. However, with the introduction of amendment through the budget of 2014, liberty has been provided to transfer or sell the said plant and machinery from the project site subject to the conditions discussed above.


 

 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com