Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 05 Jun, 2007
Print   |    |  Comment

ONE TIME CREDIT ON GOODS LYING IN STOCK

ONE TIME CREDIT ON GOODS LYING IN STOCK
 
 
            The CENVAT credit facility for Textile industry on actual basis has been introduced from April 1, 2003. As a measure, the Board has introduced transitional provisions for one time credit on stock as on 31.03.2003 under Rule 9A of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The provisions relating to same has been introduced by Notification no. 25/2003-CE (N.T.) dt. March 25, 2003. These are certain clarifications needed urgently for smooth implementation of the same: -
 
1.         VALUE OF INPUTS AS SUCH AND UNDER PROCESS: -
            As per Rule 9A (1) manufacturer can take credit on stock lying with him on the basis of actual duty paying documents. Otherwise, he can take credit on the basis of actual duty paying documents. Otherwise, he can take credit on the basis of declaration made by him under Rule 9A (2). It clearly says that credit will be available for inputs lying in stock or in process or contained in finished goods.
 
            Further, Rule 9A (2) (ii) provides that, a manufacturer whose finished goods and inputs covered by earlier deemed credit Notification No. 6/2002-CE (N.T.) dt. March 1, 2002, this transitional credit will be equal to product of: -
 
i)                    the applicable percentage credit in the said Notifications (66.67 % or 33.33%) ;
ii)                  the value of such finished product declared by the assessee ; and
iii)                the duty rate applicable to such final product in terms of Notification No. 7/2003-CE dt. 28.02.2003 (10% = 8% CENVAT, 2% AED).
 
Thereafter, this transitional credit on stock will be available on value of finished goods. There was under process as well as inputs as such lying in stock as on March 31, 2003. Therefore, credit will be available on likely value of finished product made from these products. This argument also gets strength from the fact that earlier deemed credit was available on value of finished goods at the time of removal of goods. This need clarification from the Board.
  
 
2.                  UNUTILIZED DEEMED CREDIT: -
The exporter has deemed credit unutilized lying with them as they can take the same on clearance of consignment for export under bond. This is clear from provisions of deemed credit. Notification No. 6/2002-CE (NT) dt. March 1, 2002. This reads as follows: -
 
“2(iii) The credit of declared duty allowed in respect of the declared inputs shall be utilized towards payment of duty of Excise or the additional duty of excise leviable under the said Central Excise Act and the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, on the said final product:
Provided that the credit of the declared duty in respect of the declared inputs used in the final products cleared for export under bond shall be allowed to be utilized towards payment of duty of excise on any final products cleared for home consumption or for export on payment of duty and, where for any reason, such adjustment is not possible, by refund to the manufacturer subject to such safeguard, conditions and limitations as may be specified by the Central Government in the Official Gazette.”
 
            This Notification is issued under Rule 11 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. This is available on deemed basis. The department is contending that this balance credit can not be utilized for payment of duty as there is no provision for converting this credit in normal Cenvat Credit. But this is wrong conclusion drawn by them.
 
            The deemed credit is also a Cenvat Credit although under Notification issued from power under Rule 11 of Cenvat Credit Rules and there is no provision for lapsing of the same. Moreover this unutilized credit can be claimed refund from the department as per provisions of Notification no. 6/2002 CE (NT) dated 28.02.2002. The situation should be made clear to avoid unnecessary litigation.
 
3.         TRANSITIONAL CREDIT ON INTERMEDIATE PROCESS:-
            Earlier to this budget, the process of stentering and calendaring was exempt for cotton fabrics. By virtue of exemption Notification No. 6/2002 CE dated 01.03.2002 (S. No. 114). This was available to factory who does not facility of printing, dying or bleaching with the aid of power or steam. As such these processes were separately installed in a factory. They were receiving cotton fabrics and clearing the same at Nil rate of duty.
 
            They were also receiving the man made fabrics and taking the credit of duty paid on earlier process and clearing after payment of duty. They were not covered under Notification No. 6/2002 CE (NT) dated 01.03.2002 as they were receiving processed fabrics. The Explanation 3 of impugned Notification debars them which reads as follows:
 
            “For the removal of doubt, it is clarified that the provision of this Notification shall not apply where processed fabric itself is used as an Input for other processing”.
 
            Now, the duty is imposed on processing of cotton fabrics with these machines. This earlier exemption is withdrawn from 01.03.2003. They have to pay duty on stock lying with them if the same is cleared after 01.03.2002. However the transitional credit on stock will not be available to them as they were not covered under Notification No. 6/2003 CE (NT). These processes are intermediate processes and processed fabric is received by them. Now, they will have to pay the duty at the rate of 10% on total value which is very heavy. This is not intention of the Government. Therefore it needs clarification from the Government.
 
4.         TRANSITIONAL CREDIT ON HAND PROCESSING UNITS:-
            The transitional credit on deemed basis is available to fabrics processors only if these Inputs and finished goods are covered under Notification No. 6/2003 CE (NT). The stock of hand processing units is not covered under aforesaid Notification as their final product is exempt from levy of duty. However these units send their product on padding, stentering, calendaring, etc., which is done with the aid of power. Earlier these were exempt from levy of duty but Exemption is withdrawn from 01.03.2003. Thus, duty is to be paid on them and transitional credit is not available to these units. They cannot compete with power operated units. This situation also demands immediate intervention.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com