Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 05 Jun, 2007
Print   |    |  Comment

ONE TIME CREDIT ON GOODS LYING IN STOCK

ONE TIME CREDIT ON GOODS LYING IN STOCK
 
 
            The CENVAT credit facility for Textile industry on actual basis has been introduced from April 1, 2003. As a measure, the Board has introduced transitional provisions for one time credit on stock as on 31.03.2003 under Rule 9A of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The provisions relating to same has been introduced by Notification no. 25/2003-CE (N.T.) dt. March 25, 2003. These are certain clarifications needed urgently for smooth implementation of the same: -
 
1.         VALUE OF INPUTS AS SUCH AND UNDER PROCESS: -
            As per Rule 9A (1) manufacturer can take credit on stock lying with him on the basis of actual duty paying documents. Otherwise, he can take credit on the basis of actual duty paying documents. Otherwise, he can take credit on the basis of declaration made by him under Rule 9A (2). It clearly says that credit will be available for inputs lying in stock or in process or contained in finished goods.
 
            Further, Rule 9A (2) (ii) provides that, a manufacturer whose finished goods and inputs covered by earlier deemed credit Notification No. 6/2002-CE (N.T.) dt. March 1, 2002, this transitional credit will be equal to product of: -
 
i)                    the applicable percentage credit in the said Notifications (66.67 % or 33.33%) ;
ii)                  the value of such finished product declared by the assessee ; and
iii)                the duty rate applicable to such final product in terms of Notification No. 7/2003-CE dt. 28.02.2003 (10% = 8% CENVAT, 2% AED).
 
Thereafter, this transitional credit on stock will be available on value of finished goods. There was under process as well as inputs as such lying in stock as on March 31, 2003. Therefore, credit will be available on likely value of finished product made from these products. This argument also gets strength from the fact that earlier deemed credit was available on value of finished goods at the time of removal of goods. This need clarification from the Board.
  
 
2.                  UNUTILIZED DEEMED CREDIT: -
The exporter has deemed credit unutilized lying with them as they can take the same on clearance of consignment for export under bond. This is clear from provisions of deemed credit. Notification No. 6/2002-CE (NT) dt. March 1, 2002. This reads as follows: -
 
“2(iii) The credit of declared duty allowed in respect of the declared inputs shall be utilized towards payment of duty of Excise or the additional duty of excise leviable under the said Central Excise Act and the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, on the said final product:
Provided that the credit of the declared duty in respect of the declared inputs used in the final products cleared for export under bond shall be allowed to be utilized towards payment of duty of excise on any final products cleared for home consumption or for export on payment of duty and, where for any reason, such adjustment is not possible, by refund to the manufacturer subject to such safeguard, conditions and limitations as may be specified by the Central Government in the Official Gazette.”
 
            This Notification is issued under Rule 11 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. This is available on deemed basis. The department is contending that this balance credit can not be utilized for payment of duty as there is no provision for converting this credit in normal Cenvat Credit. But this is wrong conclusion drawn by them.
 
            The deemed credit is also a Cenvat Credit although under Notification issued from power under Rule 11 of Cenvat Credit Rules and there is no provision for lapsing of the same. Moreover this unutilized credit can be claimed refund from the department as per provisions of Notification no. 6/2002 CE (NT) dated 28.02.2002. The situation should be made clear to avoid unnecessary litigation.
 
3.         TRANSITIONAL CREDIT ON INTERMEDIATE PROCESS:-
            Earlier to this budget, the process of stentering and calendaring was exempt for cotton fabrics. By virtue of exemption Notification No. 6/2002 CE dated 01.03.2002 (S. No. 114). This was available to factory who does not facility of printing, dying or bleaching with the aid of power or steam. As such these processes were separately installed in a factory. They were receiving cotton fabrics and clearing the same at Nil rate of duty.
 
            They were also receiving the man made fabrics and taking the credit of duty paid on earlier process and clearing after payment of duty. They were not covered under Notification No. 6/2002 CE (NT) dated 01.03.2002 as they were receiving processed fabrics. The Explanation 3 of impugned Notification debars them which reads as follows:
 
            “For the removal of doubt, it is clarified that the provision of this Notification shall not apply where processed fabric itself is used as an Input for other processing”.
 
            Now, the duty is imposed on processing of cotton fabrics with these machines. This earlier exemption is withdrawn from 01.03.2003. They have to pay duty on stock lying with them if the same is cleared after 01.03.2002. However the transitional credit on stock will not be available to them as they were not covered under Notification No. 6/2003 CE (NT). These processes are intermediate processes and processed fabric is received by them. Now, they will have to pay the duty at the rate of 10% on total value which is very heavy. This is not intention of the Government. Therefore it needs clarification from the Government.
 
4.         TRANSITIONAL CREDIT ON HAND PROCESSING UNITS:-
            The transitional credit on deemed basis is available to fabrics processors only if these Inputs and finished goods are covered under Notification No. 6/2003 CE (NT). The stock of hand processing units is not covered under aforesaid Notification as their final product is exempt from levy of duty. However these units send their product on padding, stentering, calendaring, etc., which is done with the aid of power. Earlier these were exempt from levy of duty but Exemption is withdrawn from 01.03.2003. Thus, duty is to be paid on them and transitional credit is not available to these units. They cannot compete with power operated units. This situation also demands immediate intervention.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com