Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 08 Jul, 2009
Print   |    |  Comment

New Refund Scheme For Exporters

 

NEW REFUND SCHEME FOR EXPORTERS
 Prepared By:- Pradeep Jain, CA   &               
Neetu Sukhwani                     
INTRODUCTION:-
 
The government has revamped the Refund scheme for exporters for ensuring speedier grant of refunds to them. The salient features of the new scheme have been notified under the two notifications, No. 17/2009-ST and No. 18/2009-ST, both being dated 07.07.2009. The scheme, though aspires to grant speedier refunds to the exporters but actually it incorporates increased formalities and compliance procedure that further increases the complexity in the process. This new scheme is very much similar to the marketing technique of introducing the same old product in new package to lure customers even when nothing seems to be new. A critical analysis of the key points mentioned in the said notifications is presented as follows:
Notification No. 17/2009-Service Tax:
1.     This notification provides exemption to taxable services specified in column (3) of the table provided that the exporter claiming such exemption has actually paid the service tax on the specified service to its provider. This condition as such restricts the benefit of exemption being provided.
2.     Further, according to clause (b), this exemption is provided to the manufacturer-exporter who is registered as an assessee under the Central Excise Act, 1994 or the rules made there under. By imposition of this condition, the manufacturer-exporter registered under the Service Tax Rules cannot avail this exemption as contrary to the earlier scheme of refund.
3.     Moreover, to claim this exemption, the exporter who is not registered under the provisions referred to in clause (b), shall before filling a claim for refund of service tax, file a declaration in Form A-2 with the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having the jurisdiction over the registered office or the head office, as the case may be, of such exporter. This clause does not clarify whether the assessee has any option to file the declaration to the commissioner having jurisdiction over the registered office or head office or file it as per the specified order.
4.     The clause (d) states that the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, shall, after due verification, allot a service tax code (STC) number to the exporter, referred to in clause ( c), within seven days from the date of receipt of the said form A-2. It is to be noted here that to claim this exemption under this notification, the assessee is required to hold registration in Central Excise Act and so a STC no. will be allotted to him but what if the assessee is already registered under the Service Tax Rules and already has a STC no. Moreover, allotment of STC no. was being proposed in earlier scheme also but no allotment regarding the same has been made till date. The inclusion of the same clause is not feasible if no action could be taken on it in an earlier scheme.
5.     Further, according to clause (e), the exporter, referred to in clause (b) or (c), shall file the claim for refund of service tax to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacture, registered office or the head office, as the case may be, of such exporter in Form A-1; There remains ambiguity as to filing of such refund claim to whom. If the merchant exporter has to file the refund claim with the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of manufacturer then it will be very difficult situation as the STC code has been given by his jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner.
6.     The clause (f) further prescribes that the refund claim shall be filed within one year from the date of export of the said goods. Earlier it was to be filed for a quarter and that too within 180 days. But now it can be filed within a year and no period is prescribed. The exporter can file as many refund claim as they wish. The big exporters will like to file monthly claims so that their money is not blocked.
7.     The clause (h) prohibits refund claim for an amount less than Rs.500.
8.     Moreover, clause (i) reads as follows:
(A) the total amount of refund sought under a claim is upto 0.25% of the total declared free on board value of export;
(B) the exporter is registered with Export Promotion Council sponsored by the Ministry of Commerce or the Ministry of Textiles; Every exporter has to register himself with the export promotion council. Normally exporters availing the benefits from DGFT register themselves with EPC and those availing drawback does not go for the same. But now they have to register for claiming the refund claim.
(C) Subject to the provisions of (A) and (B) above, each document specified in clause (b) and in column (4) of the said Table shall be enclosed with the claim;
(D) Invoice, bill or challan, or any other document issued in the name of the exporter, showing payment for such service availed and the service tax payable shall be submitted in original after being certified in the manner specified in sub clauses (E) and (F); If the original are submitted, the exporter will not have the same. It is needed in various other laws. As such this condition is not practical.
(E) the exporter is a proprietorship concern or partnership firm, the documents enclosed with the claim shall be certified by the exporter himself and where the exporter is a limited company, the documents enclosed with the claim shall be certified by the person authorised by the Board of Directors;
(F)  the documents enclosed with the claim shall contain a certificate from the exporter or the authorised person to the effect that specified service, to which the document pertains, has been received, the service tax payable thereon has been paid and the specified service has been used for export of goods under the shipping bill number;
By examining the points specified above, it can be very well concluded that the procedure to claim refund has been made even more complicated than before as the exporter is not only required to get STC under the Central Excise Act but also get registered with Export Promotion Council and comply with its formalities. Further, the documents to be submitted are to be original. In such a case, there will not be any proof of submission of such documents with the exporter and also, it has not been specified whether these documents will be returned back to the exporter or not.
9.     Further, the clause (j) states that where the amount of refund sought under a refund claim is more than 0.25% of the declared free on board value for export, such certification, shall be done by the Chartered Accountant who audits the annual accounts of the exporter for the purposes of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) or the Income Tax Act, 1961(143 of 1961), as the case may be;
10. Further, it has been mentioned that the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, shall, after satisfying himself,-
(i)                That the claim filed is complete in every respect
(ii)             That all the documents requiring certification have been filed after due certification; and
(iii)            About the arithmetical accuracy of the claim,
shall refund the service tax paid on the specified service within a period of one month from the receipt of said claim. This truly reflects the stringent requirements and the increased procedural compliance. Further. the Assistant Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, may deny such refund claim on any reason or take action if there is any deficiency in complying with the provisions in this regard. This discretionary power being given also presents the strict procedure for granting refund. If after getting all the certificates, each claim has to be verified by the department then it will lead to old position wherein all the claims will be rejected on small or procedural requirements.
11.  Further, there has been included the provision for recovery of the service tax refunded where any refund of service tax paid on specified service utilized for export of said goods has been paid to exporter but the sale proceeds in respect of the said goods have not been realized within the period allowed under FEMA or if the refund has been sanctioned erroneously.
12.  Further, the waiver of formalities like submission of written agreement with the buyer in case of service provided by a technical testing and analysis agency, in relation to technical testing and analysis of said goods and service provided by technical inspection and certification agency in relation to inspection and certification of export goods is being welcomed.
13.  Similarly, the waiver of the formalities like submission of written agreement and the certificates in case of specialized cleaning services namely disinfecting, exterminating, sterilizing or fumigating of containers used for export of said goods provided to an exporter is also welcomed.
14. The grievance of many formalities being incorporated in case of courier services is communicated as these services involve meager amount and hence these compliances should be removed at the earliest.
15.  Further, the refund can also be claimed in respect of service tax paid on services commonly known as terminal handling charges by this notification which is also being appreciated.
16. Further, in the table given in Form-A1, it is specified to give the details as regards total amount of service tax claimed as refund in column 6. In that also, the bifurcation as to service tax in figures and the service tax as a percentage of f.o.b. value in shipping bill is to be provided. In this respect, it has not been specified as to whether service wise percentage of f.o.b. is to be shown or as a percentage of total service provided.
Notification No. 18/2009-Service Tax:
1.     Exemption to Goods Transport Agency: This notification exempts the service provided to an exporter for transport of the said goods by road from any container freight station or inland container depot to the port or airport, as the case may be, from where the goods are exported. This covers the road transportation service availed by an exporter from the place of removal to an inland container depot, a container freight station, a port or airport, as the case may be, from where the goods are exported. The conditions prescribed to avail such exemption by the exporter in this regard are that the exporter is required to produce the consignment note issued in his name. Hence, the consignment note holds importance to claim exemption in this regard.
2.     Exemption to Commission Agent: Further, exemption has also been granted in case of service provided by a commission agent located outside India and engaged under a contract or agreement or any other document by the exporter in India, to act on behalf of the exporter, to cause sale of goods exported by him. This exemption is too dependent on the fulfillment of a number of conditions being laid in this regard. The first one being the declaration of the amount of commission paid or payable to the commission agent in the shipping bill or bill of export as the case may be. Further, the exemption shall be limited to one per cent of the free on board value of export goods for which the said service has been used. Moreover, this exemption shall not be available on the export of canalized item, project export, or export financed under lines of credit extended by Government of India or EXIM Bank, or export made by Indian partner in a company with equity participation in an overseas joint venture or wholly owned subsidiary. Further, the stringent requirements of submission of the half yearly return after certification of the same, submission of the original documents showing actual payment of commission to the commission agent, submission of a copy of the agreement or contract entered into between the commission agent located outside India and the exporter in relation to export of goods continues to exist to make the procedure typical.
3.     Filing of Declaration: Moreover, there has also been included the requirement of informing the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction over the factory or the regional office or the head office, as the case may be, in Form EXP1, before availing the said exemption
4.     Filling of Return: The exporter shall also file return in Form EXP2 every six months of the financial year, within fifteen days of the completion of the said six months. Further, the exporter is also required to submit the documents specified in original after certification of the same. The exporter hence exists in a great pressure as to see to it that his excise returns and the above mentioned formalities are complied timely so as to avail the benefit of exemption under this notification. Moreover, the same documents like the Shipping Bill, Bill of Lading etc. would be submitted thrice i.e. once while submitting proof of export, for filling refund claim and for claiming benefit under notification 18/2009 as it specifies to submit these documents while filling return in Form EXP2 which would lead to unnecessary compliance formalities.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com