Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 21 Mar, 2016
Print   |    |  Comment

Mobile Accessories turns expensive

Mobile Accessories turns expensive

 

An article by:-
CA Pradeep Jain
CA Neetu Sukhwani &
Monika Tak

 
Introduction:-
With the hype created regarding implementation of revolutionary taxation reform, i.e., GST in the financial year 2016-17, the government attempted to mentally prepare the assessees as regards substantial reduction in the exemptions available. This is reflected by the levy of excise duty on jewellery except pure silver jewellery. Furthermore, government has also withdrawn exemptions on charger/adapter, battery, wired headsets/speakers etc. usually accompanied by the mobile handsets. This article is an attempt to present the excise duty rates applicable to parts and accessories of mobile handsets.
Glance at the erstwhile provision:-
 

S.No. Chapter Heading Description of goods Rate Condition
272 85 or any other chapter (a)Parts, components and accessories of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b)Parts, components of battery chargers and hands-free head-phones and PC connectivity cable of mobile handsets including cellular phones;
(c)  Sub-parts of (a) and (b)
Nil 2

 
Condition no. 2:- Where such use is elsewhere than in the factory of production, the exemption shall be allowed if the procedure laid down in the Central Excise (Removal of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2001, is followed.
 
Glance at the amended provisions:-
 

S.No. Chapter Heading Description of goods Rate Condition
272 85 or any other chapter (a)Parts, components and accessories excluding Charger or Adapter, Battery, Wired Headsets and Speakers  of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b)Parts, components of battery chargers and hands-free head-phones and PC connectivity cable of mobile handsets including cellular phones;
(c)  Sub-parts of (a) and (b)
Nil 2

 
Apart from above, new serial entries have been inserted with respect to charger, adapter, battery, wired headsets and speakers which is reproduced for the sake of quick reference as follows:-

S. no. Chapter or heading or sub heading or tariff items of first schedule Description of excisable goods Rate Conditions
“263B 8504 Charger or adapter for manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones. 2% 2 and 16
263C 85 or any other Chapter (a) Inputs or parts for manufacture of charger or adapter of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b) Inputs or sub-parts for manufacture of parts mentioned at (a) above
Nil 2
263D 8506, 8507 Battery for manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones 2% 2 and 16
263E 85 or any other Chapter (a) Inputs or parts for manufacture of battery of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b) Inputs or sub-parts for manufacture of parts mentioned at (a) above
 
Nil 2
263F 8518 30 00 Wired headsets for manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones. 2% 2 and 16
263G 85 or any other Chapter (a) Inputs or parts for manufacture of wired headsets of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b) Inputs or sub-parts for manufacture of parts mentioned at (a) above
Nil 2
263H 8518 Speakers for manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones 2% 2 and 16
263I 85 or any other Chapter (a) Inputs or parts for manufacture of speakers of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b) Inputs or sub-parts for manufacture of parts mentioned at (a) above
Nil 2

 
For the exemption following conditions should be fulfilled:-
Condition no. 2:- Where such use is elsewhere than in the factory of production, the exemption shall be allowed if the procedure laid down in the Central Excise (Removal of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2001, is followed.
Condition no. 16:- If no credit under rule 3 or rule 13 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has been taken in respect of the inputs or capital goods used in the manufacture of these goods.
 
Analysis of the amendment:-
In Budget 2016-17, excise duty exemption has been withdrawn on accessories i.e. charger/adapter, battery and wired headsets/speakers for use in manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones. However, concessional rate of 2% only if used by mobile handset manufacturers but this concessional rate is not applicable in case where charger/adapter, wired headsets/speakers etc. are sold in open market. Moreover, the exemption is continued on Inputs or parts for manufacture of charger or adapter, battery and wired headsets/speakers of mobile handsets including cellular phones.
 
Furthermore, the reduced rate of 2% is applicable on accessories subject to the condition that Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods has not been availed.
It is worth noting that similar changes have also been made in Customs. Basic Customs Duty, CVD and SAD exemptions are being withdrawn on charger/Adapter, Battery and Wired Headsets/Speakers for use in manufacture of mobile handsets. Furthermore, Basic Customs Duty and CVD are being exempted on inputs and parts for manufacture of charger/adapter, battery and wired headsets/speakers of mobile handsets including cellular phone and inputs and sub-parts for use in manufacture of parts of charger/adapter, battery and wired headsets/speaker. Consequently, these goods will also be exempt from SAD.
 
 
Good bye words:- The manufacturers of mobile handsets including cellular phones have the option to clear mobile handsets at the concessional excise duty of 1% provided no cenvat credit on inputs/capital goods is being availed. Now, concessional rate of 2% without cenvat is being specified for adaptors, chargers, wired headsets/speakers etc. Hence, the mobile manufacturers may either opt for cenvat credit facility by paying excise duty at full rate or adopt the practise of expensing the concessional excise duty without availing any cenvat credit.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com