Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Publish Date: 21 Mar, 2016
Print   |    |  Comment

Mobile Accessories turns expensive

Mobile Accessories turns expensive

 

An article by:-
CA Pradeep Jain
CA Neetu Sukhwani &
Monika Tak

 
Introduction:-
With the hype created regarding implementation of revolutionary taxation reform, i.e., GST in the financial year 2016-17, the government attempted to mentally prepare the assessees as regards substantial reduction in the exemptions available. This is reflected by the levy of excise duty on jewellery except pure silver jewellery. Furthermore, government has also withdrawn exemptions on charger/adapter, battery, wired headsets/speakers etc. usually accompanied by the mobile handsets. This article is an attempt to present the excise duty rates applicable to parts and accessories of mobile handsets.
Glance at the erstwhile provision:-
 

S.No. Chapter Heading Description of goods Rate Condition
272 85 or any other chapter (a)Parts, components and accessories of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b)Parts, components of battery chargers and hands-free head-phones and PC connectivity cable of mobile handsets including cellular phones;
(c)  Sub-parts of (a) and (b)
Nil 2

 
Condition no. 2:- Where such use is elsewhere than in the factory of production, the exemption shall be allowed if the procedure laid down in the Central Excise (Removal of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2001, is followed.
 
Glance at the amended provisions:-
 

S.No. Chapter Heading Description of goods Rate Condition
272 85 or any other chapter (a)Parts, components and accessories excluding Charger or Adapter, Battery, Wired Headsets and Speakers  of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b)Parts, components of battery chargers and hands-free head-phones and PC connectivity cable of mobile handsets including cellular phones;
(c)  Sub-parts of (a) and (b)
Nil 2

 
Apart from above, new serial entries have been inserted with respect to charger, adapter, battery, wired headsets and speakers which is reproduced for the sake of quick reference as follows:-

S. no. Chapter or heading or sub heading or tariff items of first schedule Description of excisable goods Rate Conditions
“263B 8504 Charger or adapter for manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones. 2% 2 and 16
263C 85 or any other Chapter (a) Inputs or parts for manufacture of charger or adapter of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b) Inputs or sub-parts for manufacture of parts mentioned at (a) above
Nil 2
263D 8506, 8507 Battery for manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones 2% 2 and 16
263E 85 or any other Chapter (a) Inputs or parts for manufacture of battery of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b) Inputs or sub-parts for manufacture of parts mentioned at (a) above
 
Nil 2
263F 8518 30 00 Wired headsets for manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones. 2% 2 and 16
263G 85 or any other Chapter (a) Inputs or parts for manufacture of wired headsets of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b) Inputs or sub-parts for manufacture of parts mentioned at (a) above
Nil 2
263H 8518 Speakers for manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones 2% 2 and 16
263I 85 or any other Chapter (a) Inputs or parts for manufacture of speakers of mobile handsets including cellular phones
(b) Inputs or sub-parts for manufacture of parts mentioned at (a) above
Nil 2

 
For the exemption following conditions should be fulfilled:-
Condition no. 2:- Where such use is elsewhere than in the factory of production, the exemption shall be allowed if the procedure laid down in the Central Excise (Removal of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2001, is followed.
Condition no. 16:- If no credit under rule 3 or rule 13 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has been taken in respect of the inputs or capital goods used in the manufacture of these goods.
 
Analysis of the amendment:-
In Budget 2016-17, excise duty exemption has been withdrawn on accessories i.e. charger/adapter, battery and wired headsets/speakers for use in manufacture of mobile handsets including cellular phones. However, concessional rate of 2% only if used by mobile handset manufacturers but this concessional rate is not applicable in case where charger/adapter, wired headsets/speakers etc. are sold in open market. Moreover, the exemption is continued on Inputs or parts for manufacture of charger or adapter, battery and wired headsets/speakers of mobile handsets including cellular phones.
 
Furthermore, the reduced rate of 2% is applicable on accessories subject to the condition that Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods has not been availed.
It is worth noting that similar changes have also been made in Customs. Basic Customs Duty, CVD and SAD exemptions are being withdrawn on charger/Adapter, Battery and Wired Headsets/Speakers for use in manufacture of mobile handsets. Furthermore, Basic Customs Duty and CVD are being exempted on inputs and parts for manufacture of charger/adapter, battery and wired headsets/speakers of mobile handsets including cellular phone and inputs and sub-parts for use in manufacture of parts of charger/adapter, battery and wired headsets/speaker. Consequently, these goods will also be exempt from SAD.
 
 
Good bye words:- The manufacturers of mobile handsets including cellular phones have the option to clear mobile handsets at the concessional excise duty of 1% provided no cenvat credit on inputs/capital goods is being availed. Now, concessional rate of 2% without cenvat is being specified for adaptors, chargers, wired headsets/speakers etc. Hence, the mobile manufacturers may either opt for cenvat credit facility by paying excise duty at full rate or adopt the practise of expensing the concessional excise duty without availing any cenvat credit.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com