Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 08 Feb, 2010
Print   |    |  Comment

Looking Beyond the Things: Outward Freight

 

Looking Beyond the Things: Outward Freight

Article Prepared By:

CA Pradeep Jain and

Siddharth Rutiya

 

Transport of Goods by Road services came into effect from 01.01.2005 and lead to great controversies among the industries as a whole. This service was introduced to include the Transportation services under the scope of Service tax levy. After the inclusion of such service under tax net and simultaneously, looking to the provisions of CENVAT credit Rules, 2004 litigations arose on many subjects including on the subject as to whether CENVAT of Outward freight will be allowed to the manufacture or not ?  There are lot of judgements available on this issue. The larger bench has decided the issue in case of ABB Limited V. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Bangalore [2009] 21 STT 77 (Bang. CESTAT) (LB)].  But the stay against the same has been awarded by Karnataka High Court. But Punjab and Haryana High Court has allowed the credit in case of Ambuja Cement Ltd. V. Union of India & Ors. [2009 (236) ELT 0431 (P&H)] following the Board circular no 97/6/2007-ST Dtd. 23.08.2007.

 

A lot has been written on this issue. The dispute is still not over. We are not writing on this issue in this article. We are seeing this whole issue from another angle. One of our clients approached us and told that he would not like to go into litigation and on the other side he does not want to lose this benefit. We should plan the things in such a way we should be benefited from the whole situation. This has inspired us to write this article.

 

Legal Provisions

 

Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 provides for the definition of “Input Service” as any service used by manufacturer and includes outward transportation upto the place of removal. The relevant portion of Section 2(l) is produced as under: -

 

(l) "input service" means any service,-

(i)         used by a provider of taxable service for providing an output service; or

(ii)        used by the manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products, upto the place of removal and includes ........... outward transportation upto the place of removal;

 

Section 4(3)(c) of Central Excise Act, 1944 provides for the definition of “Place of Removal” to mean either of the following: -

 

1.      A factory or any other place or premises of production or manufacture of excisable goods; or

 

2.      A warehouse or any other place or premises wherein the excisable goods have been permitted to be deposited without payment of duty; from where such goods are removed; or

 

3.      A depot, premises of a consignment agent or any other place or premises from where the excisable goods are to be sold after their clearance from the factory,

 

Hence a combined reading of the above two definitions makes the scope of CENVAT Credit narrower as regards to the CENVAT on Outward transportation services for a manufacturer, where he pays the service tax on outward transportation beyond the place of removal. This escorts to the path towards the tax planning in such a way that the cost to either parties i.e. manufacturer as well as the buyer of the final product, is minimized.

 

Various prospects and their plannings: -

 

We in this article have bifurcated the overall situation into two broad categories: -

 

I.)                 When CENVAT Credit is availed by the buyer of the Goods; and

 

II.)              When CENVAT Credit is not availed by the buyer of the Goods.

 

 

I.)        When CENVAT Credit is availed by the buyer of the Goods: -

 

In this situation we have categorized those buyers who after purchasing the goods from the principal manufacturer shall avail the CENVAT Credit. The various possible circumstances and possibilities of tax planning under them are as under: -

 

(A) When the Outward Freight is to be paid by the Buyer of the Goods: -

 

In this circumstance the liability to pay the Outward Freight is on the buyer of the goods as per the sale agreement or otherwise. As Rule 2(1)(d)(v) of Service Tax Rules, 1944 provides that the person liable for paying service tax is the person who pays or is liable to pay freight, then in such a circumstance the buyer of the goods will be pay the freight to the transporter as well as service tax. He will be allowed to avail the CENVAT of service tax paid on such Transportation services as these will account for inward transportation services for him. Relevant portion of Rule 2(1)(d)(v) of Service Tax Rules, 1944 is produced as under: -

 

“(v) in relation to taxable service provided by a goods transport agency, where the consignor or consignee of goods is,-

 

(a) any factory registered under or governed by the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948);


(b) any company formed or registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956);


(c) any corporation established by or under any law;


(d) any society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any law corresponding to that Act in force in any part of India;


(e) any co-operative society established by or under any law;


(f) any dealer of excisable goods, who is registered under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) or the rules made thereunder; or


(g) any body corporate established, or a partnership firm registered, by or under any law,

 

any person who pays or is liable to pay freight either himself or through his agent for the transportation of such goods by road in a goods carriage;”

 

But this is most ideal situation and everyone knows it. The issue of outward freight arises only when the supplier of goods makes the payment to transport agency and also the service tax on the same.

 

(B) When the Outward Freight is charged, in the Excise Invoice, from the Buyer: -

 

In this circumstance the supplier manufacturer shall pay the outward freight and service tax on the outward freight. He should charge the same in the Excise Invoice from his buyer along with the service tax. In this option the tax burden on the manufacturer shall reduce as he will be charging the same from the buyer and there will simultaneously be no cost effect to the buyer also, as he would avail the CENVAT of such service tax on the basis of said Excise Invoice. The Excise invoice under Rule 11 of Central Excise Rules is a valid duty paying document as per Rule 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules.

 

However, the caution to be taken in this case is that the manufacturer should mention the Freight and Service tax thereon separately, in such a way that this is shown separately. For example the face of the invoice should contain as follows: -

 

 

 

Assessable value of Goods                                                     XX

 

Excise duty @ __ %                                       X

Education Cess @ 2%                                                X

Sec. & Higher Education Cess @ 1%                        X                                 XX

                                                                                                ___   

                                    Sub Total                                            XX

 

Freight Charges                                                                       XX

Service tax @ __%                                                     X

Education Cess @ 2%                                                X

Sec. & Higher Education Cess @ 1%                        X                                 XX

 

                                    Grand Total                                                     XX

 

 

(C) When the Outward Freight is paid by the Manufacturer as an agent of Buyer: -

 

This is one more option where the service tax liability shifts to buyer of goods. In this circumstance the manufacturer shall pay the Freight amount of the outward freight as an agent of Buyer. For this purpose, he should have an agreement with the buyer that he is paying the freight to the transporter as an agent of buyer. The goods transport agency should write clearly in his consignment note that the liability to pay service tax is on consignee of the goods. Following this situation, although the freight shall be paid by the Supplier Manufacturer but the liability to pay service tax thereon shall be conferred upon the Buyer as per Rule 2(1) (d) (v) of Service Tax Rules, 1944. This is because Rule 2(1) (d) (v) provides that the liability to pay service tax is on “any person who pays or is liable to pay freight either himself or through his agent for the transportation”.

 

This is also one of the best methods wherein the liability to pay service tax is conferred on the buyer but the transportation charges are paid by the manufacturer himself. Now, as the buyer is operating under Cenvat Credit, he will get the credit of service tax paid on the basis of GAR-7 challan which is a specified document for taking credit.

 

II.)      When CENVAT Credit is not availed by the buyer of the Goods: -

 

In this situation we have categorized those buyers who after purchasing the goods from the supplier manufacturer are not availing the CENVAT Credit because of varied reasons, including either the buyer is a SSI unit, or is covered under any area based exemption, or manufactures such goods which are totally exempt etc. The various possible circumstances and possibilities of tax planning under this category are as under: -

 

(A) When Outward Freight is charged in the Invoice and Excise duty is collected on it: -

 

As we know that the buyer of the goods is not availing CENVAT credit then we have an option wherein we can charge the freight in the Invoice and collect the duty of excise on the aggregate value including such freight. However, following this option the manufacturer shall have to concurrently fulfil three conditions in terms of the sale contract /agreement as per Circular no. 97/08/2007- ST, dt. 23/08/2007, which has also been upheld in the case of Ambuja Cement Ltd. by Punjab and Haryana High Court [2009 (14) S.T.R. 3 (P & H)], as under: -

 

(i)           the ownership of goods and the property in the goods remained with the seller of the goods till the delivery of the goods in acceptable condition to the purchaser at his door step;

 

(ii)         the seller bore the risk of loss of or damage to the goods during transit to the destination; and

 

(iii)       the freight charges were an integral part of the price of the goods.

 

Under this situation the cost to the buyer will increase by the Excise duty amount paid on the Freight amount but consecutively the cost of service tax paid on the Freight will be avoided as it will be availed as CENVAT Credit by the manufacturer. But it is prone to litigation. We have come across a situation where the department has taken the help of general terms and conditions printed on invoice to disallow the credit. The condition written was “the liability of supplier of goods ceases when the goods are delivered to transporter”. In actual, all the damages and shortfall in goods were borne by the buyer only. But the department said that the general terms and conditions printed on invoice are clear and going against the board circular. Thus, this situation is prone to litigation and department can find ways to disallow the credit.

 

(B) When Service tax on Outward Freight is paid and borne by Manufacturer himself: -

 

Under this category the Outward Freight will be paid by the manufacturer and hence the service tax thereon shall also be paid by the manufacturer himself. This will lead to an overall cost burden of service tax paid on such freight as the manufacturer will not be able to avail the CENVAT Credit.

 

The excise duty is payable on transaction value defined under Section 4 of Central Excise Act. If the delivery of goods is at a place other than depot then the actual or average cost of transportation is not includible in transaction value. Now, to get the benefit, the outward transport charges should not be included in the transaction value of excisable goods. Thus, this is suggested that duty should be paid on sale value of goods excluding the transportation charges. These charges are shown in the invoice after charging Cenvat duty. As such, the excise duty will not be paid on the freight component.

 

Thus under this second situation where the buyer is not availing the CENVAT Credit the best option is the one wherein the Service tax on Outward Freight is paid and borne by Manufacturer himself as the tax burden on Freight is only 2.5% of Freight amount and in general the excise duty liability is around 8 %. Henceforth going for option B in this category the manufacturer will save around 5.5% of tax amount, which will reduce the cost to the buyer as well.

 

We have applied our mind and tried to do the tax planning on service tax liability on outward freight. We have tried to analysis the issue of cenvat credit on outward freight from different angle. We hope that this will be definitely help the manufacturers to take the benefit without going into litigation. But we are sure that the other options will also be available. Hence, we seek the comments from other authors also.

 

***********

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com