Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 27 Feb, 2010
Print   |    |  Comment

Large Benefits to Small Scale Units

 

Large benefits to Small Scale Units

 

Prepared By:

CA Pradeep Jain

Sukhvinder Kaur

 

This year budget has brought many good things for the small scale manufacturers. The small scale exemption is contained in notification 8/2003-C.E. dated 01.03.2003. The units opting for such exemption were treated as small scale units. But in this year Budget 2010 has brought amendment to this also. We are discussing the amendments and benefits given to small scale manufacturers in this article and the possible outcome of the same.

 

1.                 Credit of Capital Goods: Prior to this budget, sub rule 2(a) of rule 4 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provided that 50% of the Cenvat Credit can be taken in the financial year of purchase of the capital goods and 50% of the balance credit was to be taken in the next financial year.

 

Now in the Budget it has been provided that the eligible small scale manufacturers can take 100% credit of these capital goods in the year they have been purchased. As per Notification no 8/2003, the small scale exemption is available to the units whose aggregate value of clearances in the preceding financial year is less than Rs. 4 crores. The unit has to opt for the same. But this new definition of eligible SSI units is introduced. The explanation clarifies that the eligible units are those who are eligible to take the benefit of exemption and whose turnover is less than Rs. 400 Lakhs in preceding financial year. This is to be computed as per clause 3A of notification no. 8/2003 which reads as follows:-

 

3A.  For the purposes of determining the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods for home consumption, mentioned in clause (vii) of paragraph 2 of this notification, the following clearances shall not be taken into account, namely:-

 

 (a)    clearances of excisable goods without payment of duty-

 

(i)    to a unit in a free trade zone; or

 

(ii)   to a unit in a special economic zone; or

 

(iii)  to a hundred percent. export-oriented undertaking; or

 

(iv) to a unit in an Electronic Hardware Technology Park or Software Technology Park; or

 

(v)  supplied to the United Nations or an international organization for their official use or supplied to projects funded by them, on which exemption of duty is available under notification of the Government of India in the erstwhile Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.108/95- Central Excise, dated the 28th August, 1995, vide number GSR. 602 (E), dated the 28th August, 1995.

 

(b)     clearances bearing the brand name or trade name of another person, which are ineligible for the grant of this exemption in terms of paragraph 4.

 

(c)      clearances of the specified goods which are used as inputs for further manufacture of any specified goods within the factory of production of the specified goods;

 

(e)      clearances, which are exempt from the whole of the excise duty leviable thereon under notifications No. 214/86-Central Excise, dated the 25th March, 1986 (G.S.R.547(E), dated the 25th March, 1986), or No. 83/94-Central Excise, dated the 11th April, 1994 (G.S.R. 375(E), dated the 11th April, 1994), or No. 84/94-Central Excise, dated the 11th April, 1994 (G.S.R. 376 (E), dated the 11th April, 1994).]

 

This clause says that the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods is to be taken. This does not say whether the goods should be covered under this notification. Thus, it implies that it is available to units who are producing the goods which are ineligible to take SSI exemption. This also applicable to the units who are eligible to avail the SSI exemption but has forgone the same. This is normally done by the units who have industrial customers. Thus such units will also be eligible to take the credit. This is a welcome step.

 

2.       Payment of Excise Duty: In the Budget 2010, it has been provided that the small scale manufacturers (i.e. the units having the annual turnover of less than Rs. 4 crore in the preceding financial year) will have to pay excise duty on a quarterly basis. They are not required to pay duty monthly as was prescribed earlier. The payment of duty at quarterly basis is to be made from 1.04.2010 onwards.

 

3.       Filing of Returns: It had been prescribed in Budget 2010 that the small scale manufacturers are required to file returns at quarterly basis. This facility was already available to SSI units availing exemption under Notification No. 8/2003 cited supra. But now all the eligible small scale manufacturers, whether availing SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE or not, are to file quarterly returns. Earlier they have to file within 20 days of close of quarter. But he has to file return within 10 days of close of quarter.

 

4.       SSI exemption on Brand Name: In the Notification No. 8/2003-CE it has been provided that the exemption under this notification will not be available to those units which are affixing the brand name or trade name of another person on their finished goods. However, the dispute arose after judgement of Apex Court in case of Kohinoor Elastic [2005 (188) ELT 3 (SC)]. It was said by the board that the duty will be payable on printed packing materials if the brand name of buyer is printed. Many associations have represented the matter and suitable amendment was done in notification 8/2003 by notification no. 8/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006. This was further amended from time to time to add more products. Thereafter field formations pursued for the earlier period demand and matter was taken up with the Board and retrospective amendment was also issued under Section 11C of Central Excise Act. In the above list of packing materials, two more packing material namely packing bottles and plastic containers are added. Thus, if the units manufacturing plastic containers and plastic bottles who are affixing the brand name or trade name of another person on the same, are eligible to avail exemption under Notification 8/03-CE. But the exemption is available from Feb 27. The department will again gear up to issue demand for the past period. Again representations will be sent and 11C notification will be issued by the Board for these commodities also. History repeats itself.

 

**********

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com