Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 27 Feb, 2010
Print   |    |  Comment

Large Benefits to Small Scale Units

 

Large benefits to Small Scale Units

 

Prepared By:

CA Pradeep Jain

Sukhvinder Kaur

 

This year budget has brought many good things for the small scale manufacturers. The small scale exemption is contained in notification 8/2003-C.E. dated 01.03.2003. The units opting for such exemption were treated as small scale units. But in this year Budget 2010 has brought amendment to this also. We are discussing the amendments and benefits given to small scale manufacturers in this article and the possible outcome of the same.

 

1.                 Credit of Capital Goods: Prior to this budget, sub rule 2(a) of rule 4 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provided that 50% of the Cenvat Credit can be taken in the financial year of purchase of the capital goods and 50% of the balance credit was to be taken in the next financial year.

 

Now in the Budget it has been provided that the eligible small scale manufacturers can take 100% credit of these capital goods in the year they have been purchased. As per Notification no 8/2003, the small scale exemption is available to the units whose aggregate value of clearances in the preceding financial year is less than Rs. 4 crores. The unit has to opt for the same. But this new definition of eligible SSI units is introduced. The explanation clarifies that the eligible units are those who are eligible to take the benefit of exemption and whose turnover is less than Rs. 400 Lakhs in preceding financial year. This is to be computed as per clause 3A of notification no. 8/2003 which reads as follows:-

 

3A.  For the purposes of determining the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods for home consumption, mentioned in clause (vii) of paragraph 2 of this notification, the following clearances shall not be taken into account, namely:-

 

 (a)    clearances of excisable goods without payment of duty-

 

(i)    to a unit in a free trade zone; or

 

(ii)   to a unit in a special economic zone; or

 

(iii)  to a hundred percent. export-oriented undertaking; or

 

(iv) to a unit in an Electronic Hardware Technology Park or Software Technology Park; or

 

(v)  supplied to the United Nations or an international organization for their official use or supplied to projects funded by them, on which exemption of duty is available under notification of the Government of India in the erstwhile Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.108/95- Central Excise, dated the 28th August, 1995, vide number GSR. 602 (E), dated the 28th August, 1995.

 

(b)     clearances bearing the brand name or trade name of another person, which are ineligible for the grant of this exemption in terms of paragraph 4.

 

(c)      clearances of the specified goods which are used as inputs for further manufacture of any specified goods within the factory of production of the specified goods;

 

(e)      clearances, which are exempt from the whole of the excise duty leviable thereon under notifications No. 214/86-Central Excise, dated the 25th March, 1986 (G.S.R.547(E), dated the 25th March, 1986), or No. 83/94-Central Excise, dated the 11th April, 1994 (G.S.R. 375(E), dated the 11th April, 1994), or No. 84/94-Central Excise, dated the 11th April, 1994 (G.S.R. 376 (E), dated the 11th April, 1994).]

 

This clause says that the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods is to be taken. This does not say whether the goods should be covered under this notification. Thus, it implies that it is available to units who are producing the goods which are ineligible to take SSI exemption. This also applicable to the units who are eligible to avail the SSI exemption but has forgone the same. This is normally done by the units who have industrial customers. Thus such units will also be eligible to take the credit. This is a welcome step.

 

2.       Payment of Excise Duty: In the Budget 2010, it has been provided that the small scale manufacturers (i.e. the units having the annual turnover of less than Rs. 4 crore in the preceding financial year) will have to pay excise duty on a quarterly basis. They are not required to pay duty monthly as was prescribed earlier. The payment of duty at quarterly basis is to be made from 1.04.2010 onwards.

 

3.       Filing of Returns: It had been prescribed in Budget 2010 that the small scale manufacturers are required to file returns at quarterly basis. This facility was already available to SSI units availing exemption under Notification No. 8/2003 cited supra. But now all the eligible small scale manufacturers, whether availing SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE or not, are to file quarterly returns. Earlier they have to file within 20 days of close of quarter. But he has to file return within 10 days of close of quarter.

 

4.       SSI exemption on Brand Name: In the Notification No. 8/2003-CE it has been provided that the exemption under this notification will not be available to those units which are affixing the brand name or trade name of another person on their finished goods. However, the dispute arose after judgement of Apex Court in case of Kohinoor Elastic [2005 (188) ELT 3 (SC)]. It was said by the board that the duty will be payable on printed packing materials if the brand name of buyer is printed. Many associations have represented the matter and suitable amendment was done in notification 8/2003 by notification no. 8/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006. This was further amended from time to time to add more products. Thereafter field formations pursued for the earlier period demand and matter was taken up with the Board and retrospective amendment was also issued under Section 11C of Central Excise Act. In the above list of packing materials, two more packing material namely packing bottles and plastic containers are added. Thus, if the units manufacturing plastic containers and plastic bottles who are affixing the brand name or trade name of another person on the same, are eligible to avail exemption under Notification 8/03-CE. But the exemption is available from Feb 27. The department will again gear up to issue demand for the past period. Again representations will be sent and 11C notification will be issued by the Board for these commodities also. History repeats itself.

 

**********

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com