Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 02 Mar, 2016
Print   |    |  Comment

Import of goods by vessel – Budget, 2016 made it expensive!!!

Import of goods by vessel – Budget, 2016 made it expensive!!!

An article by:-
CA. Pradeep Jain
CA. Preeti Parihar
CA. Vaibhav Bothra

Introduction:-
Budget 2016 has been introduced and with it has come many amendments and changes in the law. One such change is with respect to the services by way of transportation of goods by an aircraft or a vessel. The amendments made in it are effective from 1.6.2016 andwill impose additional fiscal burden on the importers importing goods via sea. This article demonstrates the existing scenario, amendments made and the implications thereof.
 
Existing Situation:-
The services of transportation of goods by an aircraft or a vessel are exempted in negative list in section 66D as follows:-
(p) services by way of transportation of goods—
(i) by road except the services of—
(A) a goods transportation agency; or
(B) a courier agency;
(ii) by an aircraft or a vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India; or
(iii) by inland waterways;
Thus, there is exemption to the services of transportation of goods when carried by an aircraft or vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India. As a result the shipping lines particularly are exempt from service tax while importing goods on behalf of the importers.
 
Amendment effective from 1.6.2016:-
In the latest budget, it has been declared that this entry [sec. 66D (p)(ii)] shall be omitted w.e.f. 01/06/2016.The effect being that the above stated exemption to vessels and aircrafts under the above entry shall not be available. Amendment has also been made in notification no. 25/2012 dated 20/06/2012 vide notification no. 09/2016 dated 01/03/2016 by inserting a new entry no. 53 which states as follows:
“53. Services by way of transportation of goods by an aircraft from a place outside India upto the customs station of clearance in India.”
Thus, the new entry grants exemption only to the goods transported by an aircraft and not to vessels carrying goods. It is to be noted that this entry shall also be effective from 01/06/2016.
 
Effect of amendment:-
The new entry will exempt only the inward transportation of goods by an aircraft. The existing exemption to vessels is going to be withdrawn w.e.f. 1.6.2016. This directly impacts the shipping lines registered in India. The shipping lines are engaged in the transportation of goods from and to India. Now when the exemption from the shipping lines importing the goods from abroad to India is lifted, the Place of Provision of service rules, 2012 comes into direct play. Rule 10 of POPS states as follows:
“ The place of provision of services of transportation of goods, other than by way of mail or courier, shall be the place of destination of the goods:
 
 Provided that the place of provision of services of goods transportation agency shall be the location of the person liable to pay tax.”
 
In case of imports, the destination of goods is India which is a taxable territory. Thus, two situations will arise:-
1.     Where the shipping line is registered in India
2.     Where the shipping line is registered outside India
In the first case, as the shipping line is registered in India, and the service is taking place in a taxable territory, it will have to pay service tax as a service provider. On the other hand, in the second case, as the service provider is located outside India, and the service has taken place in India, rule 10 effects the place of provision in India and thus the service receiver becomes liable to pay service tax under reverse charge. The service tax so paid will be available as credit with the Indian manufacturer or service provider availing such services. The new notification also clarifies that service tax levied on such services shall not be part of value for custom duty purposes.
It is to be noted that this very entry only hits the imports and not the exports because as per the rule 10 of the POPS discussed above, the destination of goods will be outside taxable territory and thus no service tax shall be applicable.
 
While parting:-
Import of goods by vessels is now liable to service tax. Thus, the cost of imports will go high. The domestic shipping lines will be enjoying the threshold while the reverse charge cases will be taxable right from the beginning. In any case, the importers will have to suffer and the cost of imports will increase ultimately raising the cost of imported goods. Denial of this exemption further indicates the clear vision of government “Make in India”, do not import it dear!!
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com