Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 27 Feb, 2009
Print   |    |  Comment

Implications of Third Stimulus Package.

Implications of Third Stimulus Package

The third stimulus package was announced by the Government on 24.02.09. Following are the implications of the same:

 1.)       Reduction in general rate of excise duty and service tax:- 

 

The Government has reduced the rate of Excise Duty and Service Tax. The rate of basic excise duty is reduced from 10% to 8% on all articles except petroleum products, specified rated items and tobacco products. The change has been made vide notification no. 4/2009-CE dated 24.2.2009.

The rate of Service Tax has also been reduced from 12% to 10% vide notification no. 8/2009-ST dated 24.2.2009. The new rates are effective from 24.2.2009. Now the following will be the rates of Excise duty and service tax:-

 

 

 

Excise Duty (%)

Service Tax (%)

Basic Rate

8

10

Education Cess

0.16

0.20

SHE Cess

0.08

0.10

Total effective rate

8.24

10.30

 

General reduction in Excise Duty rates by 4 per cent, which was brought into effect from December 7, 2008, has now been extended beyond March 31, 2009

 

2.)        Retention of the rate of central excise duty on goods currently attracting ad valorem rates of 8 per cent and 4 per cent, respectively

 

 There has been no change in the rate of excise duty which is levied at the concessional rates of 4% and 8%. Prior to this change, the effective rates of duty on these goods were 4% & 8% by virtue of Exemption Notifications. Now the rate of basic excise duty is reduced to 8% but no change has been made in the goods (like disposable needles and syringes) already attracting duty @ 8% by virtue of exemption notification. The effect is as if the notification has been withdrawn from these goods as now the basic excise duty itself is levied @ 8%.  

 

 3.)        No change in rate of service tax levied under the Composition Scheme of Works Contract Service:

 

Under the Works Contract Service, the service provider has an option either to pay service tax at full rate and utilise Cenvat credit or he can opt for payment of service tax @ 4% under the Composition Scheme. At the time, this scheme was implemented the rate of service tax was 12% and the scheme was implemented at a very attractive rate of 2%. Only after one year, the rate under composition scheme was increased to 4%. There is no option to opt out of the composition scheme once it is opted in respect of a particular contract. This increase in rate under composition scheme made the construction companies re-think about their decision of opting under composition scheme but there is no option left with them. Now the situation has become still worse as the basic rate of service tax has been reduced to 10%. Now the service tax under composition scheme which was looking favourable has become bitter as the other options like Construction of Commercial complex or Installation and commissioning services are now more favourable to the construction companies. The effective rate of service tax on these options after abatement comes 3.3% which is lower than service tax under composition scheme which is 4%. Hence, it is a true case of promissory estoppel.      

 

4.)       No change in rate of excise duty prescribed for compound levy scheme:

 

Under the compound levy scheme, the duty is not levied on the clearances of the goods but is levied on the production capacity of the factory. Fixed duty is payable on the number of machines installed. The Patta/Patti units as well as pan masala manufacturing units fall under the purview of this scheme. The rate of excise duty has come down from 16% to 8% in the last 12 months, but there is no change in the rates prescribed under Compounded Levy Scheme.

 

5.)        No change in rate of 10% reversal for excise duty and rate of 8% reversal for service tax under Rule 6 (3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004:

 

Rule 6 (3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provides for reversal of 10% of the value of exempted goods in case common inputs are used for manufacturing dutiable as well as exempted goods and separate records are not maintained by the manufacturer. Similarly, a service provider has to reverse 8% of the value of exempted services if he is providing both taxable service and exempted service and opts not to maintain separate records. When this rate of reversing 10% on the value of exempted goods was prescribed, the rate of basic excise duty was 16%. Now the rate of basic excise duty has come down to 8%, but there is no change in the rate of reversal. As such, if the manufacturer pays excise duty on the exempted goods – it will be favourable rather than claiming exemption and reversing the amount under rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Similarly, in case of service provider also, the rate of reversal is 8% which is kept intact but the basic rate of service tax has been reduced from 12% to 10%.

 

6.)         Duty on bulk cement reduced:

 

The duty on bulk cement was 10% or Rs.290 per tonne, whichever is higher. The duty on bulk cement has been reduced to 8% or Rs. 230 per tonne, which ever is higher. This will definitely give a boost to the real estate sector.

 

7.)       Exemption from Customs duty:

 

Exemption from basic customs duty on Naptha imported for generation of electric energy is now being extended beyond March 31, 2009.

 

8.)       Key sectors with 2% excise duty cut

 

Following are the key sectors in which reduction in prices is expected due to duty cuts:

 

Sector

Expected price reduction

Steel

Rs 500 -600 per tonne

Aluminum

Rs 1,500 -1600 per tonne

Commercial Vehicles

Rs 10,000 - 30,000 per vehicle

Tyres

Rs 200 - Truck tyre; Rs 25 - Car tyre

Cement (only on bulk cement)

Rs 60 - 100 per tonne

Household appliances

21" Flat CTV price to be lower by Rs 150

Organic Chemicals

Caustic soda - Rs 500/tonne; soda ash - Rs 290-320 per tonne

Petrochemicals

Rs 700 - 1,000 per tonne

 

9.)       Key sectors with 2% service tax cut

 

Following are the key sectors in which reduction in prices is expected due to Service tax cuts:

 

1.      Construction

2.      Media & entertainment

3.      Telecom Services

4.      Hotels

5.      Airline Services

6.      Healthcare Providers

 

 

10.)     Key sectors where duties remain unchanged

 

Following are the key sectors in which the duties remain unchanged:

 

1.      Textiles

2.      Paper

3.      Petroleum products

4.      Cars & two-wheelers

 

Impact:

 

The benefits of the above-mentioned measures will be passed on to the consumers resulting in a marginal reduction in cost of services and reduced prices of commercial vehicles, household appliances and commodities such as steel, aluminum and cement.

While the housing segment is expected to marginally benefit due to lower cost of inputs (steel, cement), the end consumer will benefit from lower prices of products and services (including lease rentals).

However, these measures are unlikely to spur demand/consumption, given weak consumer sentiments. Player profitability is expected to remain unaffected in most sectors leading to an overall neutral impact across key sectors.

 

Comments

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com