Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 27 Feb, 2009
Print   |    |  Comment

Implications of Third Stimulus Package.

Implications of Third Stimulus Package

The third stimulus package was announced by the Government on 24.02.09. Following are the implications of the same:

 1.)       Reduction in general rate of excise duty and service tax:- 

 

The Government has reduced the rate of Excise Duty and Service Tax. The rate of basic excise duty is reduced from 10% to 8% on all articles except petroleum products, specified rated items and tobacco products. The change has been made vide notification no. 4/2009-CE dated 24.2.2009.

The rate of Service Tax has also been reduced from 12% to 10% vide notification no. 8/2009-ST dated 24.2.2009. The new rates are effective from 24.2.2009. Now the following will be the rates of Excise duty and service tax:-

 

 

 

Excise Duty (%)

Service Tax (%)

Basic Rate

8

10

Education Cess

0.16

0.20

SHE Cess

0.08

0.10

Total effective rate

8.24

10.30

 

General reduction in Excise Duty rates by 4 per cent, which was brought into effect from December 7, 2008, has now been extended beyond March 31, 2009

 

2.)        Retention of the rate of central excise duty on goods currently attracting ad valorem rates of 8 per cent and 4 per cent, respectively

 

 There has been no change in the rate of excise duty which is levied at the concessional rates of 4% and 8%. Prior to this change, the effective rates of duty on these goods were 4% & 8% by virtue of Exemption Notifications. Now the rate of basic excise duty is reduced to 8% but no change has been made in the goods (like disposable needles and syringes) already attracting duty @ 8% by virtue of exemption notification. The effect is as if the notification has been withdrawn from these goods as now the basic excise duty itself is levied @ 8%.  

 

 3.)        No change in rate of service tax levied under the Composition Scheme of Works Contract Service:

 

Under the Works Contract Service, the service provider has an option either to pay service tax at full rate and utilise Cenvat credit or he can opt for payment of service tax @ 4% under the Composition Scheme. At the time, this scheme was implemented the rate of service tax was 12% and the scheme was implemented at a very attractive rate of 2%. Only after one year, the rate under composition scheme was increased to 4%. There is no option to opt out of the composition scheme once it is opted in respect of a particular contract. This increase in rate under composition scheme made the construction companies re-think about their decision of opting under composition scheme but there is no option left with them. Now the situation has become still worse as the basic rate of service tax has been reduced to 10%. Now the service tax under composition scheme which was looking favourable has become bitter as the other options like Construction of Commercial complex or Installation and commissioning services are now more favourable to the construction companies. The effective rate of service tax on these options after abatement comes 3.3% which is lower than service tax under composition scheme which is 4%. Hence, it is a true case of promissory estoppel.      

 

4.)       No change in rate of excise duty prescribed for compound levy scheme:

 

Under the compound levy scheme, the duty is not levied on the clearances of the goods but is levied on the production capacity of the factory. Fixed duty is payable on the number of machines installed. The Patta/Patti units as well as pan masala manufacturing units fall under the purview of this scheme. The rate of excise duty has come down from 16% to 8% in the last 12 months, but there is no change in the rates prescribed under Compounded Levy Scheme.

 

5.)        No change in rate of 10% reversal for excise duty and rate of 8% reversal for service tax under Rule 6 (3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004:

 

Rule 6 (3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provides for reversal of 10% of the value of exempted goods in case common inputs are used for manufacturing dutiable as well as exempted goods and separate records are not maintained by the manufacturer. Similarly, a service provider has to reverse 8% of the value of exempted services if he is providing both taxable service and exempted service and opts not to maintain separate records. When this rate of reversing 10% on the value of exempted goods was prescribed, the rate of basic excise duty was 16%. Now the rate of basic excise duty has come down to 8%, but there is no change in the rate of reversal. As such, if the manufacturer pays excise duty on the exempted goods – it will be favourable rather than claiming exemption and reversing the amount under rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Similarly, in case of service provider also, the rate of reversal is 8% which is kept intact but the basic rate of service tax has been reduced from 12% to 10%.

 

6.)         Duty on bulk cement reduced:

 

The duty on bulk cement was 10% or Rs.290 per tonne, whichever is higher. The duty on bulk cement has been reduced to 8% or Rs. 230 per tonne, which ever is higher. This will definitely give a boost to the real estate sector.

 

7.)       Exemption from Customs duty:

 

Exemption from basic customs duty on Naptha imported for generation of electric energy is now being extended beyond March 31, 2009.

 

8.)       Key sectors with 2% excise duty cut

 

Following are the key sectors in which reduction in prices is expected due to duty cuts:

 

Sector

Expected price reduction

Steel

Rs 500 -600 per tonne

Aluminum

Rs 1,500 -1600 per tonne

Commercial Vehicles

Rs 10,000 - 30,000 per vehicle

Tyres

Rs 200 - Truck tyre; Rs 25 - Car tyre

Cement (only on bulk cement)

Rs 60 - 100 per tonne

Household appliances

21" Flat CTV price to be lower by Rs 150

Organic Chemicals

Caustic soda - Rs 500/tonne; soda ash - Rs 290-320 per tonne

Petrochemicals

Rs 700 - 1,000 per tonne

 

9.)       Key sectors with 2% service tax cut

 

Following are the key sectors in which reduction in prices is expected due to Service tax cuts:

 

1.      Construction

2.      Media & entertainment

3.      Telecom Services

4.      Hotels

5.      Airline Services

6.      Healthcare Providers

 

 

10.)     Key sectors where duties remain unchanged

 

Following are the key sectors in which the duties remain unchanged:

 

1.      Textiles

2.      Paper

3.      Petroleum products

4.      Cars & two-wheelers

 

Impact:

 

The benefits of the above-mentioned measures will be passed on to the consumers resulting in a marginal reduction in cost of services and reduced prices of commercial vehicles, household appliances and commodities such as steel, aluminum and cement.

While the housing segment is expected to marginally benefit due to lower cost of inputs (steel, cement), the end consumer will benefit from lower prices of products and services (including lease rentals).

However, these measures are unlikely to spur demand/consumption, given weak consumer sentiments. Player profitability is expected to remain unaffected in most sectors leading to an overall neutral impact across key sectors.

 

Comments

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com