Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 15 Mar, 2016
Print   |    |  Comment

Hopes of Auto Industry Shattered!

Hopes of Auto Industry Shattered! 

 

An article by:-
CA Pradeep Jain
CA Neetu Sukhwani &
Somya Jain

 
Introduction:- With the forthcoming budget 2016-17 there were lot of hopes and expectations of the automobile industry that they will be encouraged by way of various tax incentives but the budget came as a curse to them. All the hopes went in vain as soon as the Finance minister announced levy of Infrastructure cess on the vehicles. The levy of infrastructure cess came as a big blow to the car manufacturers.
 
Levy of Infrastructure Cess:-Vide Budget 2016-17, the government has announced to levy infrastructure Cess at the rate of 1 to 4 per cent on manufacturing of cars.
Infrastructure Cess is being levied on motor vehicles, of heading 8703, as per details mentioned hereunder:

Rate of Infrastructure Cess – Eleventh Schedule of Finance Bill 2016 read with Notification No. 01/2016-Infrastructure Cess dated 01.03.2016
The government has provided full exemption from the levy of Infrastructure Cess without any conditions on the following motor vehicles:-

SERIAL NO. CHAPTER HEADING DESCRIPTION OF EXCISABLE GOODS
1. 8703 Motor vehicles cleared as ambulances duly fitted with all the fitments, furniture and accessories necessary for an ambulance from the factory manufacturing such motor vehicles
4. 8703 Electrically operated vehicles, including three wheeled electric motor vehicles
5. 8703 Hybrid Motor Vehicles
6. 8703 Three wheeled vehicles
8. 8703 Hydrogen vehicles based on fuel cell technology

 
Furthermore, the government has provided exemption to the following motor vehicles subject to satisfaction of conditions prescribed therein:-

SERIAL NO. CHAPTER HEADING DESCRIPTION OF EXCISABLE GOODS CONDITION NO.
2. 8703 Motor vehicles (other than three wheeled motor vehicles for transport of upto seven persons), which after clearance has been registered for use solely as ambulance 1
3. 8703 Motor vehicles (other than three wheeled motor vehicles), which after clearance has been registered for use solely as taxi 1
7. 8703 Cars for physically handicapped persons 2

 
It is also worth noting that the condition no. 1 provides the exemption by way of refund mechanism as motor vehicles after clearance has been registered as ambulance or taxi.  A certificate issued by concerned State Transport Authority that the motor vehicle has been registered for use as ambulance/taxi is also required to be submitted to Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise within 3 months or extended period of 3 months from the date of clearance of motor vehicle.
 
Furthermore, condition no. 2 requires certification from Deputy Secretary of Department of Heavy Industries that goods are capable of being used by physically handicapped persons and affidavit by buyer of car that the car will not be sold for five years after its purchase.
Moreover, the rate of infrastructure cess for following motor vehicles has been prescribed as follows:-

SERIAL NO. HEADING DESCRIPTION OF EXCISABLE GOODS RATE
9. 8703 Motor vehicles of length not exceeding 4000 mm, namely petrol, liquefied petroleum gases (LPG) or compressed natural gas (CNG) driven vehicles of engine capacity not exceeding 1200 cc 1%
10. 8703 Motor vehicles of length not exceeding 4000 mm, namely diesel driven vehicles of engine capacity not 2.5% - exceeding 1500 cc 2.5%

 
It is worth noting that the effective rates of the Infrastructure Cess have been made applicable with effect from 1st March, 2016.
 
Amendment in Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 renders Infrastructure Cess as ‘Non-Cenvatable’

No Cenvat credit of this Infrastructure Cess will be available under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Notification No. 13/2016-CE (N.T.) dated 01.03.2016, has amended Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 made applicable from 01.04.2016 wherein proviso has been inserted in Rule 3 (4) thereby stating that the cenvat credit shall not be utilised for payment of Infrastructure Cess leviable under sub-clause (1) of clause 159 of the Finance Bill, 2016. Hence, when the payment of Infrastructure Cess is to be made in cash only and no cenvat credit can be utilised for its payment, it is implied that the Infrastructure Cess is non-cenvatable. This is for the reason that restricting utilisation tantamounts to restricting availment of credit as there is no point in taking credit when the same cannot be utilised at all.
 
Good bye words:-The intention of levying Infrastructure Cess is clear from the Budget speech wherein it was clarified that the pollution and traffic situation in Indian Cities is a matter of concern and so this new levy is being introduced on motor vehicles.  However, this infrastructure cess will definitely result in hike in the prices of cars. Moreover, even the Supreme Court has already imposed a ban on registration of diesel vehicles with engine capacity of over 2000 cc in Delhi, observing the alarming rise in pollution levels. Now the government has decided to impose infrastructure cess upto 4 per cent.  
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com