Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 15 Mar, 2016
Print   |    |  Comment

Hopes of Auto Industry Shattered!

Hopes of Auto Industry Shattered! 

 

An article by:-
CA Pradeep Jain
CA Neetu Sukhwani &
Somya Jain

 
Introduction:- With the forthcoming budget 2016-17 there were lot of hopes and expectations of the automobile industry that they will be encouraged by way of various tax incentives but the budget came as a curse to them. All the hopes went in vain as soon as the Finance minister announced levy of Infrastructure cess on the vehicles. The levy of infrastructure cess came as a big blow to the car manufacturers.
 
Levy of Infrastructure Cess:-Vide Budget 2016-17, the government has announced to levy infrastructure Cess at the rate of 1 to 4 per cent on manufacturing of cars.
Infrastructure Cess is being levied on motor vehicles, of heading 8703, as per details mentioned hereunder:

Rate of Infrastructure Cess – Eleventh Schedule of Finance Bill 2016 read with Notification No. 01/2016-Infrastructure Cess dated 01.03.2016
The government has provided full exemption from the levy of Infrastructure Cess without any conditions on the following motor vehicles:-

SERIAL NO. CHAPTER HEADING DESCRIPTION OF EXCISABLE GOODS
1. 8703 Motor vehicles cleared as ambulances duly fitted with all the fitments, furniture and accessories necessary for an ambulance from the factory manufacturing such motor vehicles
4. 8703 Electrically operated vehicles, including three wheeled electric motor vehicles
5. 8703 Hybrid Motor Vehicles
6. 8703 Three wheeled vehicles
8. 8703 Hydrogen vehicles based on fuel cell technology

 
Furthermore, the government has provided exemption to the following motor vehicles subject to satisfaction of conditions prescribed therein:-

SERIAL NO. CHAPTER HEADING DESCRIPTION OF EXCISABLE GOODS CONDITION NO.
2. 8703 Motor vehicles (other than three wheeled motor vehicles for transport of upto seven persons), which after clearance has been registered for use solely as ambulance 1
3. 8703 Motor vehicles (other than three wheeled motor vehicles), which after clearance has been registered for use solely as taxi 1
7. 8703 Cars for physically handicapped persons 2

 
It is also worth noting that the condition no. 1 provides the exemption by way of refund mechanism as motor vehicles after clearance has been registered as ambulance or taxi.  A certificate issued by concerned State Transport Authority that the motor vehicle has been registered for use as ambulance/taxi is also required to be submitted to Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise within 3 months or extended period of 3 months from the date of clearance of motor vehicle.
 
Furthermore, condition no. 2 requires certification from Deputy Secretary of Department of Heavy Industries that goods are capable of being used by physically handicapped persons and affidavit by buyer of car that the car will not be sold for five years after its purchase.
Moreover, the rate of infrastructure cess for following motor vehicles has been prescribed as follows:-

SERIAL NO. HEADING DESCRIPTION OF EXCISABLE GOODS RATE
9. 8703 Motor vehicles of length not exceeding 4000 mm, namely petrol, liquefied petroleum gases (LPG) or compressed natural gas (CNG) driven vehicles of engine capacity not exceeding 1200 cc 1%
10. 8703 Motor vehicles of length not exceeding 4000 mm, namely diesel driven vehicles of engine capacity not 2.5% - exceeding 1500 cc 2.5%

 
It is worth noting that the effective rates of the Infrastructure Cess have been made applicable with effect from 1st March, 2016.
 
Amendment in Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 renders Infrastructure Cess as ‘Non-Cenvatable’

No Cenvat credit of this Infrastructure Cess will be available under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Notification No. 13/2016-CE (N.T.) dated 01.03.2016, has amended Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 made applicable from 01.04.2016 wherein proviso has been inserted in Rule 3 (4) thereby stating that the cenvat credit shall not be utilised for payment of Infrastructure Cess leviable under sub-clause (1) of clause 159 of the Finance Bill, 2016. Hence, when the payment of Infrastructure Cess is to be made in cash only and no cenvat credit can be utilised for its payment, it is implied that the Infrastructure Cess is non-cenvatable. This is for the reason that restricting utilisation tantamounts to restricting availment of credit as there is no point in taking credit when the same cannot be utilised at all.
 
Good bye words:-The intention of levying Infrastructure Cess is clear from the Budget speech wherein it was clarified that the pollution and traffic situation in Indian Cities is a matter of concern and so this new levy is being introduced on motor vehicles.  However, this infrastructure cess will definitely result in hike in the prices of cars. Moreover, even the Supreme Court has already imposed a ban on registration of diesel vehicles with engine capacity of over 2000 cc in Delhi, observing the alarming rise in pollution levels. Now the government has decided to impose infrastructure cess upto 4 per cent.  
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com