Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Publish Date: 26 Aug, 2010
Print   |    |  Comment

Happy Intermission in 'SAD' Movie

 

HAPPY INTERMISSION IN ‘SAD’ MOVIE

 

Prepared By: -

CA. Pradeep Jain

CA. Preeti Parihar

Sukhvinder Kaur, LLB(FYIC)

Introduction: -

 

The importer-dealers are over the moon these days. Their SAD-ness is going to turn into happiness. Government granted exemption to the importers from Special Additional Duty which is levied @ 4% under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 by way of refund. But due to a no. of procedural formalities and slackness at the departmental end, 80% of the claims were reviewed as pending at the major custom houses as on 31.3.2010. This induced the Board to issue a Circular for fixing a time limit for granting the refund of SAD. This critique is about the happy intermission of the SAD refund movie.

 

History behind refund:-

 

The refund is available to dealers only who pay VAT on his sale. Actually, this levy was in lieu of sales tax. The local manufacturer pleaded that they have to pay sales tax on sale to Indian customer but on import, there is no such tax for importer. As such, it is cheaper to import. So, the Government introduced this special additional custom duty. The Cenvat credit of the same was allowed to manufacturers and it can be adjusted for payment of Excise duty. But the dealer importers have to bear it and it became part of their cost. But while trading the goods, they have to pay sales tax again. They pleaded for the waiver if they are paying sales tax on their sale. The Government agreed to it and said that they will get exemption by way of refund. If they have not passed on Cenvat of such duty on his sale then he can claim refund. As such, this scheme of refund was formulated.

 

Utility of such levy:-     

 

Further, in the opinion of the authors of this article, the goods are normally imported by manufacturers or dealers. A consumer rarely imports directly. The manufacturer gets the Cenvat credit of such duty and the dealer either pass on the credit to manufacturers or he gets this SAD refund. Then what is need of such levy? Everyone who is paying it, getting the benefit of the same.

 

Notification granting refund of Special Additional duty: -

 

Notification No. 102/2007-Cus, dated 14.09.2007 granted the exemption by way of refund of Special Additional duty (SAD) to the importer/ dealer of imported goods. The importer was to pay the duties at the time of import of goods and later claim the refund of 4% SAD from the Department.

 

The refund was subject to following conditions as prescribed in the said Notification:-

 

-      Declaration regarding non-passing of Cenvat of SAD: - The dealer, while issuing the sale invoice, shall indicate on the invoice that Cenvat credit in respect of SAD is not admissible.

                                              

-      No unjust enrichment: - The importer could not pass on the incidence of duty to the buyers.

 

-      Payment of VAT/CST: - The importer was required to pay the appropriate CST/VAT on the sale of imported goods on which he has paid SAD.

 

-      Time Limit for filing refund: - The refund claim is to be filed within one year from the date on which SAD has been paid by the importer.

 

-               Documents required to be filed with the refund claim: - In the Notification, it was provided that the claimant will have to attach the following documents: -

 

¨           Document evidencing payment of the said additional duty;

¨           Invoices of sale of the imported goods in respect of which refund of the said additional duty is claimed;

¨           Documents evidencing payment of appropriate sales tax or value added tax, as the case may be, by the importer, on sale of such imported goods.

 

 

Documents to be filed with the Refund: -

 

The board circular prescribed minimum documents for the refund but the field formalities are real players and they have asked a number of documents from the poor dealer. With the refund claim of 4% SAD, the importer was required to file a lot of documents to satisfy the Department that they have complied with the conditions prescribed in the Notifications.

 

Following documents were being insisted upon by the Department to be attached by the claimant: -

 

(i)       Original TR-6 Challan (Triplicate Copy)

 

(ii)      Duplicate Bill of Entry (Importer’s Original Copy).

 

(iii)     All Original Sales Invoices along with Summary of Sales Invoices of imported goods of all Bills of Entry sold from various location/branch of the importer containing Invoices No. & dated and amount of ST/VAT paid on the imported goods for which Refund is claimed (Annexure – B)

 

(iv)     Self Certified Copy of VAT Return

 

(v)      Self Certified Copy of VAT Challan Paid of the respective month.

 

(vi)     Sales Tax return and receipt along with 201A form

 

(vii)    Declaration appointing Chartered Accountant for preparation of Annual Financial Accounts for Year------

 

(viii)   Self Declaration regarding not passing the duty incidence of 4% (SAD) to the buyers of the imported goods (Annexure – C).

 

(ix)     Self certified copy of Sales Register

 

(x)      Self certified copy of Purchase and Sales

 

(xi)     Balance sheet containing details for the particular (SAD) shipping bills. (Note: the same has to be certified by C.A)

 

(xii)    Receivable Accounts for SAD (Note: the same has to be certified by C.A)

 

(xiii)   Refund Calculation Worksheet with Declaration (Annexure- A)

 

As such, there is a long list of documents to be annexed with the refund claim. Department was insisting on furnishing of all these documents/certificates alongwith the refund claim. This made the filing of refund claim of SAD a very cumbersome process. Even after filing of all these documents, the Department was not keenly sanctioning the refund claim.

 

Circular No. 6/2008-Cus, dated 28.04.2008: -

 

The trade and commerce associations represented against the same. The board has adhere to their demands and issued Circular No. 6/2008-Cus, dated 28.04.2008 providing the procedure to be adopted by the field formations to settle expeditiously refund claims of 4% SAD filed by importers under the Notification No. 102/2007-Cus.  In this circular, the Board had directed that the field formations will ensure the disposal of refund claims within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt.

 

The bulk of documents to be filed with the refund claim of SAD as mentioned above were also prescribed to be furnished in this Circular.

 

However, even with detailed instructions the refund claims were not being sanctioned speedily. Another aspect which was helping in the delay was that no interest was payable in case of delay in sanctioning of the refund claim. This was also prescribed in the Circular No. 6/2008-Cus.

 

Issuance of Circular for speedy sanctioning of refund of SAD: -

 

During the process of review at the major custom offices, it was noticed that around 80% of the claims were pending with the custom department. It was also noted that many refunds were being denied on one pretext or the other by the Department. On one hand they had paid the SAD at the time of import and had not passed on the incidence of this duty and on the other hand they had paid the VAT. Due to this, the delay and the denial of refund claims were causing a great hardship to the Trade and Industry. This induced the Board to issue a Circular clarifying certain issues to speed up the process of disbursing the refund claims. Circular No. 18/2010-Cus, dated 18/2010- Cus. has been issued for clearance of pending 4% SAD refund claims.

 

For the Accredited Clients in terms of Circular No.42/2005-Customs dated 24.11.2005 which were registered with the Customs, it was provided that refund claim should be sanctioned in full on preliminary scrutiny of following documents:

 

(a)   TR-6 Challans (in original) for CVD payment;

 

(b)   VAT/ST payment Challans (in original);

 

(c)   summary of sale invoices; and

 

(d) certificate of statutory Auditor / Chartered Accountant, for correlating the payment of ST/VAT on the imported goods with the invoices of sale and also to the effect that the burden of 4% CVD has not been passed on by the importer to the buyer.

 

Thus, now only a few documents are required for sanctioning of the refund claim of SAD.

 

Another step taken was to do away with the procedure for pre-audit for ACP clients. And it has also been provided that the detailed scrutiny should be done only at the post-audit stage.

 

Further, the Board has provided that the refund claims should be sanctioned within maximum time period of 30 days.

 

Another step taken was that the sales invoices were prescribed to be filed only in electronic form (CD or other media) and submission of paper documents was done away with.

 

An option was given to the claimant to accept the payment of refund of 4% SAD through RTGS (Real Time Gross Settlement) or NEFT (National Electronics Funds Transfer) System. This has been done to enable timely payment of refund amount. The Board has also prescribed the form in Annexure-I for necessary authorisation for payment of refund directly in the Bank Account of the claimant.

 

Further, it has been provided that for examining the unjust enrichment aspect, the audited Balance sheet and Profit and Loss Account (PLA) will not be insisted upon. Thus, the claimant is not required to submit the said documents. With regard to unjust enrichment aspect, the certificate from Chartered Accountant for the purpose of satisfying the condition that the burden of 4% CVD has not been passed on by the importer to any other person as well as the self-declaration to the effect that he has not passed on the incidence of 4% CVD to any other person, have been provided to be sufficient documents.

 

The Board has also provided that only the following documents will be required to be filed alongwith the refund claim by the importer: -

 

1.    Document evidencing payment of the Special Additional Duty (SAD).

 

2.    Invoices of sale of the imported goods in respect of which refund of the said SAD is claimed.

 

3.    Documents evidencing payment of appropriate sales tax or value added tax, as the case may be, by the importer, on sale of such imported goods.

 

4.    Certificate from a statutory auditor / CA who certifies the final accounts in respect of correlation of VAT payment, payment of 4% SAD amount and unjust enrichment as prescribed in Board’s circular No.6/2008-Customs dated 28.4.2008 and 16/2008-Customs dated 13.10.2008.

 

5.    Copy of the Consignment Sale Agreement. (in case of sale through consignment agents / stockists).

 

6.    Self-declaration / Affidavit (for e.g. in case of submission of invoice in soft form in lieu of paper documents, in case of fulfillment of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to the effect that the applicant has not passed on the incidence of 4% SAD to any other person).

 

7.    Any other document considered necessary in support of the claim.

 

Not only this, but the Board has also directed that Commissioner of Customs shall personally monitor all cases of 4% CVD refund claims pending for more than 30 days so as to ensure that these are disposed of within the overall time limit of three months. 

 

Before parting: -

 

The Board Circular No. 18/2010-Cus, is a welcome step. The Board has taken notice of the difficulties faced by the importers claiming refund of 4% SAD and have provided for steps that will ensure speedy disposal of refund claims. Also, Board has prescribed fewer documents to be filed alongwith the refund claim. This will reduce the burden of the importer and will help him in filing refund claim with lesser difficulty.

 

In the end, it is said that although the Board has issued Circular for speedy sanctioning of the refund claim but this goal can only be achieved if the provisions of the Circular are implemented in spirit by the Departmental officers. But expecting the full implementation of the Board Circular is wishful thinking as they are not going to do so and the only sufferer will be the importer. So, we can not say it is happy ending. Seeing the behavior of field formalities, we can say that it is intermission only, PICTURE TO ABHI BAKI HAI DOST.

 

********

Comments

  • pradeep jain on 28 August, 2010 wrote:

    Dear Mr. Aravind Kumar Chegu, This refund is given only to traders.The SAD is in lieu of sales tax. It was intoroduced on deamnd of trading community so that they have level playing field with imported goods.But when trader imports then he has to pay sales tax again. Hence, the refund for such trader has been introduced. but it is not meant for end user. CA. Pradeep Jain
  • Aravind Kumar Chegu on 27 August, 2010 wrote:

    Dear Sir, Thank you for your article. we have a doubt that is how to get refund of SAD on import of capital goods. because we do not trade any capital goods and that were only for usage of production. if there is any format to get that refund and there is any time limit? Regards, Aravind Kumar Ch.

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com