Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 15 Jul, 2014
Print   |    |  Comment

GOVERNMENT HEADING TOWARDS E-COLLECTION OF TAXES

GOVERNMENT HEADING TOWARDS E-COLLECTION OF TAXES

An article by:
CA Pradeep Jain,
CA Neetu Sukhwani &
Kushal Shah
 

Introduction:- The Hon’ble Finance Minister, Mr. Arun Jaitley in his budget speech delivered on 10th July, 2014 had expressed his desire to create an e-biz platform that is aimed to create a business and investor friendly ecosystem in India by making all business and investment related clearances and compliances available on a 24X7 single portal, with an integrated payment gateway. It was stated by him that all Central Government Departments and Ministries will integrate their services with e-biz platform on priority basis by 31st December, 2014. With a view to implement and effect the said technological change, amendments have been made in the recent budget 2014-15 by making payment of excise duties and service taxes mandatory through internet banking. However, discretion has also been given to the Assistant/Deputy Commissioners to allow payment of taxes via any other mode in exceptional circumstances on reasons to be recorded in writing. This article is an attempt to analyse the above change introduced by the government.

History:-
The government followed the practice of collecting the taxes manually through challans. However, with the technological advancement, the method of collection of taxes also changed and gradually, the government resorted to facilitate tax collections electronically. This may be better observed if we look at the series of amendments being made from time to time as follows:-
The proviso to Rule 6(2) as regards electronic payment of service tax was first introduced by the Service Tax (Fourth Amendment ) Rules, 2006 with effect from 01.10.2006 which read as follows:-

The assessees shall  deposit the service  tax liable to be paid by him with the bank designed by the Central Board of Excise and Customs for this purpose in Form TR-6 or in any other manner prescribed by the Central Board of Excise and Customs:

“Provided that the assessee, who has paid service tax of rupees fifty lakhs or above in the preceding financial year or has already paid service tax of rupees fifty lakhs in the current financial year, shall deposit the service tax liable to be paid by him electronically through internet banking.”

Thereafter, this limit was reduced by the Service Tax (Amendment Rules), 2010, w.e.f. 01.04.2010 vide Notification no. 01/2010-ST dated 19.02.2010 wherein the proviso was substituted as follows:-

 “Provided that where an assessee has paid a total service tax of rupees ten lakh or more including the amount paid by utilisation of CENVAT credit, in the preceding financial year, he shall deposit the service tax liable to be paid by him electronically, through internet banking.”

Subsequently, this limit was further reduced w.e.f. 01.01.2014 vide Notification no. 16/2013-ST dated 22.11.2013 to Rs. One Lakhs.  

Similarly, amendments have been also effected in the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and the same are summarized as follows:-
 
The third proviso to Rule 8 regarding manner of payment of excise duty was inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2007 by Notification no. 08/2007-CE (N.T.) dated 01.03.2007 which provided that an assessee who has paid total duty of Rs. Ten lakhs or more including the amount of duty paid by utilisation of cenvat credit in the preceding financial year, shall thereafter, deposit the duty electronically through internet banking.
 
The limit specified in the proviso was substituted from Rs. 10 Lakhs to Rs. 1 Lakhs w.e.f. 01.01.2014 vide Notification no. 15/2013-C.E. (N.T.) dated 22.11.2013.
 
Amendment vide Notification no. 09/2014-ST w.e.f  1st October,2014 :-

In rule 6 of the said rules, for sub-rule (2), the following sub-rule shall be substituted with effect from the 1st  October, 2014, namely:-

“ (2) Every assessee shall electronically pay the service tax payable by him, through internet banking:
Provided that the Assistant Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction, may for reasons to be recorded in writing, allow the assessee to deposit the service tax by any mode other than internet banking.”
 
Simultaneously, similar amendments have been made in the Central Excise Rules, 2002 vide Notification no. 19/2014-C.E. (N.T.) dated 11.07.2014 wherein it has been stated as follows:-
 
After sub rule (1A) of Rule 8, the following sub-rule shall be inserted w.e.f. 01.10.2014, namely:-
 
(1B) Every assessee shall electronically pay duty through internet banking:
 
Provided that the Assistant Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, for reasons to be recorded in writing, allow the assessee payment of duty by any mode other than internet banking.”
 
Implication of Amendment:-
 
With effect from 01.10.2014, every assessee will be required to pay excise duty and service tax payable by him electronically through internet banking and there is no other option available except in certain peculiar circumstances. Therefore, with the technological advancement, the government has also adopted advanced means of revenue collection. However, realising the fact that still there are villages in the country that are not equipped with sufficient internet facilities, a proviso has also been added wherein the powers have been given to the Assistant Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner to allow the assessees for reasons recorded in writing to deposit excise duty or service tax by any mode other than internet banking. But, the facility of making payment of excise duty or service tax by any other mode is not available to every assessee and it is dependent on the desire and discretion of the revenue officers. Moreover, the reasons for allowing payment to be made by other mode are also not mentioned which may lead to controversies and unnecessary litigation. All that we can hope is that in the desire to collect taxes electronically, the government does not harass the small assessees who are unable or incapable to pay taxes electronically due to lack of adequate facilities because even in the present times there are certain remote areas in the country that are not even connected with uninterrupted electricity.  
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com