Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 03 Mar, 2015
Print   |    |  Comment

Exemption to E Cess & SHE Cess- Really Lucrative?

Exemption to E Cess & SHE Cess- Really Lucrative?

An article by:
CA Pradeep Jain,
CA Neetu Sukhwani &
Somya Jain

Right from the common man to the corporates and foreign investors, where everyone was expecting the government to deliver a reform-oriented Budget, but the changes proposed in the Budget announced by the Hon’ble Finance Minister took all the hopes in vain. Even before the cheer over the raising of tax exemption limit could have died down, Budget 2015 delivered a staggering blow by hiking the rate of service tax from 12.36% (including Education Cess and SHE Cess) to 14%. Likewise, the rate of excise duty was increased from 12.36% (including Education Cess and SHE Cess) to a consolidated rate of 12.5%. Not only this, Swatch Bharat Cess of 2% on the value of taxable services has been proposed thereby leading to service tax rate to be 16%. In order to calm down the temper of the declared hike in the excise and service tax rates, the government gave “so called relief” by exempting the levy of Education Cess and SHE cess. The Education Cesslevied under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance Act, 2004 on excise duty is being fully exempted vide notification no. 14/2015-CE dated 01.03.2015. Similarly, SHE Cess leviable under section 136 read with section 138 of the Finance Act, 2007 on excise duty is also being fully exempted vide notification no. 15/2015-CE dated 01.03.2015. However, with respect to Education Cess and SHE Cess levied on service tax under section 95 of the Finance Act, 2004 and section 140 of the Finance Act, 2007, the same will cease to have effect from a date to be notified by the Government. Not only this, the TRU Letter dated 28.02.2015 also clarifies that till the time the revised rates comes into effect, the ‘Education Cess’ and ‘SHE Cess’ will continue to be levied in service tax. It is worth noting that the Education Cess and SHE Cess in Customs is not being exempted. Consequently, there is no final “Bye Bye” to Education Cess and SHE Cess. It is submitted that providing exemption to levy of Education Cess and SHE Cess all of a sudden, that too, with respect to Excise and Service Tax only leaves many questions that remain unanswered and will only lead to litigation in days to come.
Whether credit balance available as on 01.03.2015 to lapse?First and foremost question that arises in the minds of the assessees is that what will be the fate of the credit balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess pertaining to excise duty lying with them as on 01.03.2015 because the exemption to Education Cess and SHE Cess of excise duty is applicable w.e.f. 01.03.2015. There is no express provision as regards the lapse of balance of credit available with the manufacturers or the provision of its utilisation in future or its refund in the Budget provisions. Moreover, the credit of Education Cess can be utilised only for payment of Education Cess and likewise, the credit of SHE Cess can be utilised only for payment of SHE Cess. Consequently, the balance of cenvat credit of Education Cess and SHE cess available with the manufacturers will become a “sheer cost” unless and until a clarification as regards disposal of the available cenvat credit balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess is issued by the government. One view that may be taken is that the balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess may be retained by the manufacturers and may be used if any demand is fastened against them for the prior period in future. Alternatively, one may also view that the intention of the government is to grant temporary exemption to the levy of Education Cess and SHE Cess because there is no such exemption with respect to Customs duty and also, the government could have abolished it altogether instead of granting exemption from its levy.
Credit eligibility on transit goods as well as on input services:-  Supposing the goods are dispatched on February 27 and received in the factory of manufacturer in the month of March. The Education cess and SHE cess will be charged on the same. But the credit will not be available as there is no Education cess and SHE cess leviable on the final product. Similarly the education cess and SHE cess is payable on service tax. It will be discontinued on the date notified after the enactment of budget. But the credit of the same will not be available to manufacturers. This will add to cost of their goods.  
Whether discrimination between excise and service tax assessees proper?It is further submit that with the gap created in the grant of exemption of Education Cess and SHE Cess on excise duty and that on service tax to be applicable on a date to be notified later, the government has put the service providers at a relatively advantageous position than the manufacturer assessees. This is for the reason that the Education Cess and SHE Cess will be continued to be levied until the new service tax rates are effective and so the service providers will continue to utilise their credit balance till notified date. However, if we talk of manufacturer assessees that avail input services, they will have to bear additional cost of Education Cess and SHE Cess levied on input services availed by them because they would be unable to utilise the same. But, the manufacturer who is service provider also will be saved from the absurd situation. This will be termed as step towards GST or step away from GST where the rates of service tax and excise are different and credit provisions will also apply differently for both of them.
Whether reversal under Rule 6(3)(i) of 6% still proper in light of hike in duties?It is submitted that when the issue of availment of credit of inputs/input services commonly used by assessee is considered, it is found that the government seeks to deny the cenvat credit attributable to inputs/input services that are used in the manufacture of exempted goods or provision of exempted services. Moreover, if the present provisions of credit reversal as contained in Rule 6(3)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 are pursued, they warranted approximately 50% of the credit reversal because the rate of duty of excise and service tax was 12%. Consequently, the credit reversal under Rule 6(3)(i) was 6%. However, when the government has hiked the service tax rate to 14% (effectively 16% as there is 2% Swatch Bharat Cess) and has also hiked excise duty to 12.5%, then whether the rate of credit reversal of 6% will be proper or not is also another question that the government appears to have skipped.
How to apportion duties under Pan Masala Rules for the purpose of claiming abatement?Another question that has arisen in the minds of the assessees working under compound levy scheme is that how the abatement amount will be apportioned under various heads of duties. As it is known that in compound levy scheme, a fixed amount of duty is paid which is apportioned in the specified ratio under different categories of duties. With this budget, the apportionment under Education Cess and SHE Cess has been specified as “0”. However, for claiming the amount of abatement for the prior period, the manner of computation will be highly debatable and will be prone to litigation. In abatement, no cash refund is allowed but the manufacturer is allowed to adjust the duty in ensuing months. If so, the department will allow the abatement of education cess and SHE cess but it cannot be adjusted as there is Education cess and SHE cess on final product now. So, refund of the same in cash should be allowed.
Whether assessees claiming benefit of Notification no. 01/2011 and 2/2011 benefitted?It is also worth observing that although the rate of excise duty has been hiked from 12.36% (Including Cesses) to 12.5% (without cess) but the assessees availing the benefit of concessional rate of duties as contained in Notification no. 1/2011 and 2/2011 will pay 2% and 6% duty instead of 2.06% and 6.18%. Hence, it can be said that they have been benefitted by the exemption from Education Cess and SHE Cess granted by the government.
Manufacturers of stainless steel patta patti :- The manufacturers of Stainless steel patta patti are working under special procedure under notification 17/2007 and paying duty in advance. They have already paid duty, education cess and SHE cess for the month of March 2015. But there is no education cess and SHE cess for the month of March 2015. The only remedy for them is to claim refund of the same. But claiming refund of small amount of Rs. 1200/- per month and to clear the doctrine of unjust enrichment is a big hurdle.
Before parting:-Before concluding, we wish to submit that one of our suggestions in our Article titled:- “BUDGET 2015: STEPPING STONE TO SIMPLIFIATION?” was that there should be a single rate of tax so that the requirement of maintaining separate cenvat credit balances of Education Cess, SHE Cess is dispensed with which appears to have been considered by the government. However, the back door route of providing exemption has made the amendment prone to litigation. Moreover, It is submitted that on one hand, the new government is making earnest efforts to introduce and implement GST, which is a unified tax measure that is aimed at streamlining the different rates of service tax and excise duties to one consolidated rate of tax and has made promises to implement GST by April, 2016. However, on the other hand, the amendments proposed in the Budget seeks to create greater disparity between the rates of excise duties and the service tax. The effective rate of excise duty has been declared as 12.5% while the effective rate of service tax has been made 16%. The assessees expected a budget with changes that facilitate in introducing the unified tax reform GST but on the contrary, it seems that the implementation of GST is a remote possibility in the coming years. 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com