Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Publish Date: 02 Mar, 2011
Print   |    |  Comment

Determination of Time & Rate in Service Tax (Point of Taxation Rules, 2011)

Determination of Time & Rate in Service Tax
(Point of Taxation Rules, 2011)

Prepared By:
CA Pradeep Jain,
CA Preeti Parihar And
Mayank Palgauta

INTRODUCTION:-
 
In respect to the service tax Law, the Central Government of India, as always, has come with lots of amendments and clarifications in the Budget, 2011. When a particular service will be taxed is the major aspect in the service tax law. As on date the service tax is payable on the receipt of payment towards the service provided, but now government has notified the "Point of Taxation Rules, 2011" which prescribe the procedure for determination of point of taxation, i.e. when the service tax will be payable. For prescribing these rules, Notification No. 18/2011-Service Tax dated 1st March, 2011 has been issued which will be effective as from 1.4.2011.
 
WHAT IS POINT OF TAXATION:-
 
Rule 2(e) of these rules says that the point of taxation is the point at which the service will be deemed to be provided. In brief, this notification says that the point of taxation will be the earliest of the following dates:-
 
i. Date on which service is provided or to be provided
ii. Date of invoice
iii. Date of receipt of payment
 
The detailed analysis of the above general rule is as under-
 
THE TIME WHEN A TAXABLE SERVICE IS TAXED-
 
As per Point of Taxation Rules, 2011, "Point of Taxation" shall be determined in the following sequence as under: - 

(a) a service is said to be taken place at the time when service is provided or to be provided; and

(b) if the person issues an invoice or receives a payment (including any Advances whatever name called from such customers) before the time as specified in (a), the service shall be deemed to have been provided at the time the invoice was issued or the payment was received, as the case may be, whichever is earlier. 

Analysis:-

  • In the above clause (a), the point of taxation will be the time when the service is actually provided. But if the service is not actually provided and the date of providing such service is fixed, then the point of taxation will be that date. This is clear by the use of words “provided or to be provided”
  • If before actual providing the service / fixing the date of providing such service; the service provider receives the payment for the same or if he raises the invoice for it; the point of taxation will the date of payment or invoice whichever is earlier. In case of reverse charge method where the recipient is made liable to pay the service tax under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994; the date of receipt of invoice or date of making the payment will be the point of taxation.
  • Where any advance is received for service, the point of taxation will be date of receipt of such advance. 

HOW TO DETERMINE THE "POINT OF TAXATION" WHEN CHANGE IN RATE OF TAX HAS TAKEN PLACE-
 
Levy and collection of service tax revolves around three aspects – providing of service, raising invoice and payment of consideration. If all the three arise at the same time, there is absolutely no problem. But practically all the three transpire at the different points of time. In such case, the litigation arises if the service tax rate changes in between the chain of these three. These rules have dealt with such situation in rule 4 which is analyzed as follows:-
 
(a)  in case a taxable service has been provided before the change of rate,‑

  1. where the invoice for the same has been issued and the payment received after the change of rate, the point of taxation shall be date of payment or issuing of invoice, whichever is earlier; or
  2. where the invoice has also been issued prior to change in tax rate but the payment is received after the change of rate, the point of taxation shall be the date of issuing of invoice; or
  3. where the payment is also received before the change of rate, but the invoice for the same has been issued after the change of rate, the point of taxation shall be the date of payment; 

Analysis:-
 
If the taxable service is provided before the change in rate of service tax, the point of taxation will be determined as follows:-
 

Events occurring before ST rate change Events occurring after ST rate change Point of taxation
Service provided Invoice is issued and payment is received Date of receiving payment or date of issue of invoice whichever is earlier
Service provided & invoice issued Payment is received Date of issue of invoice
Service provided & payment received Invoice is issued Date of receipt of payment

 
(b)  in case a taxable service has been provided after the change of rate,‑

  1. where the payment for the invoice is also made after the change in tax rate but the invoice has been issued prior to the change of tax rate, the point of taxation shall be the date of payment; or
  2. where the invoice has been issued and the payment for the invoice received before the change of tax rate, the point of taxation shall be the date of receipt of payment or date of issuance of invoice, whichever is earlier; or
  3. where the invoice has also been raised after the change of rate but the payment has been received before the change of rate, the point of taxation shall be date of issuing of invoice. 

Analysis:-
 
If the taxable service is provided after the change in rate of service tax, the point of taxation will be determined as follows:-
 

Events occurring before ST rate change Events occurring after ST rate change Point of taxation
Invoice is issued Service provided and payment is received Date of payment
Invoice is issued and payment is made  
Service provided
Date of receipt of payment or date of issue of invoice whichever is earlier
Payment is received Service provided and invoice is issued Date of issue of invoice

 
This rule seems to be in contradiction to the basic rule 3 determining the point of taxation. Rule 3 says the point of taxation will be earlier of three – providing of service, issue of invoice or receipt of payment. As such, according to this rule 3, even if any of the three events has occurred the service tax deemed to have been paid. But in case of change in rate, it prescribes entirely different thing. For eg. in the above table, the last provision says that the payment is received before change in rate; so the point of taxation as per rule 3 should be date of payment. But this rule says in case of rate change, it will be date of issue of invoice. It is not clarified when the basic rule says the point of taxation has already occurred whether as per this rule, the assessee will be required to pay the differential tax.
 
HOW TO PAY THE SERVICE TAX IN CASES OF NEW SERVICES-
 
In case of new service, no service tax shall be payable to the extent the invoice has been issued and the payment of the same has been received before it became taxable. Service tax will also not be payable if the payment is already been received before the service becomes taxable and the invoice is raised within a period of 14 days as prescribed in rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. These provisions are not applicable in case of continuous supply of service. Continuous supply of service means service that is provided for more than three months.
 
DETERMINATION OF POINT OF TAXATION IN CASE OF CONTINUOUS SUPPLY OF SERVICE-
 
The following steps have to be taken for determining the point of taxation in case of continuous supply of service-
 
(1) Where there is a continuous supply of service, the whole or part of which is determined periodically, shall be treated as separately provided at the date on which the payment is liable to be made by the service receiver, if such date is specified in the contract.
 
(2) If, before the time specified in sub-rule (1), the person providing the service issues an invoice or receives a payment (including any advance payment), the service shall, to the extent covered by the invoice or the payment made thereof, be deemed to have been provided at the time the invoice was issued or the payment was received, as the case may be, whichever is earlier.
 
Analysis: -

  • The contract between service provider and receiver will play important role as the point of taxation is majorly depended on such agreement.
  • In case of continuous supply of service and periodically billing (like weekly, monthly, half yearly etc) by service provider, each period will be treated as separately provided on the date the liability of payment arise.
  • If contract provides different dates of payments on which service receiver is liable to pay, then such different-different dates shall constitute point of taxation.
  • If before providing the service of fixing date of service, payment is received or invoice is issued, point of taxation will be the date of payment or date of invoice whichever is earlier. In case of reverse charge method where the recipient is made liable to pay the service tax under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994; the date of receipt of invoice or date of making the payment will be the point of taxation.
  • Where any advance is received for the continuous supply of service, the point of taxation will be date of receipt of such advance. 

DETERMINATION OF POINT OF TAXATION IN CASE OF ASSOCIATED ENTERPRISES-
 
The point of taxation in respect of associated enterprises shall be the date on which the payment has been made, or invoice under rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 has been issued, or the date of debit or credit in books of accounts of the person liable to pay service tax, whichever is earlier.
 
Analysis:-
 
The determination of point of taxation in case of "association" will be earlier of following three things- 

  • the date of issuing of invoice
  • the date of receipt of payment
  • debit or credit entry made in the books of accounts 

DETERMINATION OF POINT OF TAXATION IN CASE OF COPYRIGHTS, ETC.-
 
In respect of royalties and payments pertaining to copyrights, trademarks, designs or patents, where the whole amount of the consideration for the provision of service is not ascertainable at the time when service was performed, and subsequently the use or the benefit of these services by a person other than the provider gives rise to any payment of consideration, the service shall be treated as having been provided each time when a payment in respect of such use or the benefit is received by the provider in respect thereof, or an invoice is issued by the provider, whichever is earlier.
 
Analysis:-
 
In case of royalty, copyrights, patents etc. the whole amount is not ascertainable at the time of providing service. In such cases, the service will be deemed to have performed each and every time the payment is received or the invoice is issued. In such cases, the point of taxation will be the date of receipt of payment /the date of receipt of such benefit for such use or date of issue of invoice whichever is earlier.
 
SAVINGS-
 
Nothing contained in these rules shall be applicable in case of invoices issued prior to the date from which these rules become effective.
 
Analysis:-
 
No provision of the point of taxation rules, 2011 shall be applicable to those invoices which have been issued before these rules come into force i.e. 1st day of April, 2011.
 
CONSOLIDATED ANALYSIS OF THESE RULES AND THEIR EFFECTS:-

  • As these rules contain that the point of taxation will be determined even when the service is deemed to have been provided by service provider which itself is not exact determinable that when a service is called as "deemed to be provided". 
  • These rules provide that service tax rate of such time will be applicable when either service is deemed to be provided or date of receipt of payment, whichever is earlier. The effect of this rule will be that the service provider is liable to pay service tax even before the receipt of payment from service receiver. 
  • These rules say that where the person issues an invoice or receives a payment, before providing the service; the point of taxation will be the date of invoice or the date of payment whichever is earlier. But this point of taxation will be applicable only to the extent of the invoice raised or payment received. Thus, if there is a case where the invoice is issued for some value (say Rs. 1 lacs) before providing the service, then the service is provided and then the invoice is issued for remaining value (say Rs. 5 lacs) and finally the payment is received in lumpsum (Rs. 6 lacs); the point of taxation will be determined at two levels. Firstly, at the time when the invoice is raised for Rs. 1 lacs and secondly; at the time of providing the service. 
  • As these rules shall be come into force from 1/4/2011 will not be applicable on the invoices issued prior to this date, what will be the point of taxation for those receipts which are received after 1/4/2011 but provided before 1/4/2011. It is also not clarified in these rules. 
  • In case of continuous of supply of service, in what manner the point of taxation will be determined if there is no specific contract regarding payments and issuance of invoices. It is also not clarified. 
  • The accounting aspect of the service tax will be difficult and would not commensurate with the normal accounting practices. It will be difficult to trace out the defaults as there is not set practice system for this type of accounting. Further, it will be almost impossible to tally the figures of service tax records and Balance sheet. Over and above all, the chances of errors – both intentional and unintentional will increase. 
  • There is recent trend in the departmental audit teams to make out paras by comparing the figures of Service tax return & records, with the Balance sheet. If these rules are implemented, Balance sheet will not tally with the return in any way. So, what will be the basis of finding the authenticity of the figures shown in the service tax return? 

In the nutshell, these rules are taking the providing of service as basis of determining the point of taxation. But it is practically not possible to verify whether the service has been provided or not. Thus, when the basis itself is uncertain, what will be the fate of these rules, no one knows… 

**************

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com