Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 25 Nov, 2015
Print   |    |  Comment

Credit Balance of Ed Cess & SHE Cess-Never Ending Story!

Credit Balance of Ed Cess & SHE Cess-Never Ending Story

An Article By:-
CA PRADEEP JAIN
CA NEETU SUKHWANI

Introduction:-The announcement of the exemption to the levy of Education Cess and SHE Cess levied on Excise duty with effect from 01.03.2015 and that levied on service tax with effect from 01.06.2015 created new hopes in the minds of the assessees as regards ‘Ease of doing business’ with reduction in the compliance procedure for maintaining separate accounting records for Education Cess and SHE Cess. However, the assessees forgot that everything comes for a cost. The hapeless assessees did not realise that the exemption brought the inbuilt cost in the form of unutilised balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess for which there was no amendment or clarification. This article is an attempt to highlight the probable difficulties faced by the assessees on account of no clarification as regards utilisation of the balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess available as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015.  
 
Backdrop of recent amendments made by government:-Inspite of the much hype created as regards the fate of the balance of Education Cess & SHE Cess available with the assessees, the government has not responded in the correct perspective. The summarized version of the two notifications issued by the government is presented as follows:-
 
 

In-depth analysis of the scenario:-The assessees were waiting for the confirmation from the side of the government as regards utilisation of balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015 but on the contrary, the amendments were made for permitting utilisation of Education Cess & SHE cess on ‘Transit goods and services’. Anyways, following points are worth noting:-
ØThe government took around 5 months to amend Cenvat Credit Rules so as to enable service providers to utilise the education cess and SHE cess levied on transit goods and services whose invoices were issued after 01.06.2015. Furthermore, in author’s opinion, as exemption was granted to levy of education cess and SHE cess with effect from 01.03.2015, it is a very remote possibility that service provider would receive inputs/capital goods with education cess and SHE cess on or after 01.06.2015. But, as it is in favour of the assessee, we may appreciate the government’s action.
ØThe delay in making the amendment vide notification no. 22/2015-CE (NT) dated 29.10.2015 has also lead to inability to utilise the cenvat credit of education cess and SHE cess of inputs/capital goods/invoices of input services received on or after 01.06.2015 in the months of June, July, August and September, 2015 itself because the amendment is prospectively applicable with effect from 29.10.2015 whereas the last date of filing service tax return for the half year ending 30.09.2015 was 25.10.2015. Furthermore, even assessees revising returns are unable to utilise the said credit and reflect it in their service tax returns. The government should have released this amendment timely. Furthermore, there must have been certain assessees who have already availed and utilised cenvat credit of education cess and SHE cess on invoices received after 01.06.2015 on the presumption that similar amendment was made for manufacturers also and they might be probably receiving show cause notice for the same soon. 
ØThe government’s silence on utilisation of Education Cess and SHE Cess balance will also lead to complications in computing the quantum of cenvat credit wrongly availed under amended Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. This is for the reason that Rule 14 presupposes that the opening balance of the month has been utilised first, thereafter the credit taken during the month is utilised next. However, as per above amendments, the balance of education cess and SHE cess as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015 are intact while the education cess and SHE cess on inputs/capital goods/input services whose invoices are received after 01.06.2015 are in reality utilised first than the prevalent balance. If there is a case of wrong availment of cenvat credit after 01.03.2015, the calculations under Rule 14 will definitely be complicated.
ØApart from this, there is no restriction under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 that the balance 50% cenvat credit of capital goods is to be availed in the next year itself. However, express provisions as regards utilisation of balance cenvat credit of capital goods are being made for capital goods received in the financial year 2014-15 only.
ØIt may also be noted that while manufacturers were permitted to utilise the education cess and SHE cess on input services received by them on or after 01.03.2015 against payment of excise duty, the service providers were continued to follow the restriction of utilising cenvat credit of education cess and SHE cess towards payment of Education cess and SHE cess only. This definitely placed service providers under a disadvantageous position and they should also have been permitted to utilise the education cess and SHE cess against payment of service tax on or after 01.03.2015.

Winding up:-The government is not clarifying what the assessees want and rather is making situations more complicated. When the government can permit utilisation of Education Cess and SHE Cess on transit goods received on or after 01.03.2015 by manufacturer and transit goods received on or after 01.06.2015 by service providers and services for which invoices are received after 01.06.2015, that too towards payment of excise duty and service tax, then there is no loss in permitting utilisation of the balance of education cess and SHE cess available with assessees as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015. Well, all assessees are waiting a simple YES for utilising the balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess available with them as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015.

 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com