Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 25 Nov, 2015
Print   |    |  Comment

Credit Balance of Ed Cess & SHE Cess-Never Ending Story!

Credit Balance of Ed Cess & SHE Cess-Never Ending Story

An Article By:-
CA PRADEEP JAIN
CA NEETU SUKHWANI

Introduction:-The announcement of the exemption to the levy of Education Cess and SHE Cess levied on Excise duty with effect from 01.03.2015 and that levied on service tax with effect from 01.06.2015 created new hopes in the minds of the assessees as regards ‘Ease of doing business’ with reduction in the compliance procedure for maintaining separate accounting records for Education Cess and SHE Cess. However, the assessees forgot that everything comes for a cost. The hapeless assessees did not realise that the exemption brought the inbuilt cost in the form of unutilised balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess for which there was no amendment or clarification. This article is an attempt to highlight the probable difficulties faced by the assessees on account of no clarification as regards utilisation of the balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess available as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015.  
 
Backdrop of recent amendments made by government:-Inspite of the much hype created as regards the fate of the balance of Education Cess & SHE Cess available with the assessees, the government has not responded in the correct perspective. The summarized version of the two notifications issued by the government is presented as follows:-
 
 

In-depth analysis of the scenario:-The assessees were waiting for the confirmation from the side of the government as regards utilisation of balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015 but on the contrary, the amendments were made for permitting utilisation of Education Cess & SHE cess on ‘Transit goods and services’. Anyways, following points are worth noting:-
ØThe government took around 5 months to amend Cenvat Credit Rules so as to enable service providers to utilise the education cess and SHE cess levied on transit goods and services whose invoices were issued after 01.06.2015. Furthermore, in author’s opinion, as exemption was granted to levy of education cess and SHE cess with effect from 01.03.2015, it is a very remote possibility that service provider would receive inputs/capital goods with education cess and SHE cess on or after 01.06.2015. But, as it is in favour of the assessee, we may appreciate the government’s action.
ØThe delay in making the amendment vide notification no. 22/2015-CE (NT) dated 29.10.2015 has also lead to inability to utilise the cenvat credit of education cess and SHE cess of inputs/capital goods/invoices of input services received on or after 01.06.2015 in the months of June, July, August and September, 2015 itself because the amendment is prospectively applicable with effect from 29.10.2015 whereas the last date of filing service tax return for the half year ending 30.09.2015 was 25.10.2015. Furthermore, even assessees revising returns are unable to utilise the said credit and reflect it in their service tax returns. The government should have released this amendment timely. Furthermore, there must have been certain assessees who have already availed and utilised cenvat credit of education cess and SHE cess on invoices received after 01.06.2015 on the presumption that similar amendment was made for manufacturers also and they might be probably receiving show cause notice for the same soon. 
ØThe government’s silence on utilisation of Education Cess and SHE Cess balance will also lead to complications in computing the quantum of cenvat credit wrongly availed under amended Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. This is for the reason that Rule 14 presupposes that the opening balance of the month has been utilised first, thereafter the credit taken during the month is utilised next. However, as per above amendments, the balance of education cess and SHE cess as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015 are intact while the education cess and SHE cess on inputs/capital goods/input services whose invoices are received after 01.06.2015 are in reality utilised first than the prevalent balance. If there is a case of wrong availment of cenvat credit after 01.03.2015, the calculations under Rule 14 will definitely be complicated.
ØApart from this, there is no restriction under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 that the balance 50% cenvat credit of capital goods is to be availed in the next year itself. However, express provisions as regards utilisation of balance cenvat credit of capital goods are being made for capital goods received in the financial year 2014-15 only.
ØIt may also be noted that while manufacturers were permitted to utilise the education cess and SHE cess on input services received by them on or after 01.03.2015 against payment of excise duty, the service providers were continued to follow the restriction of utilising cenvat credit of education cess and SHE cess towards payment of Education cess and SHE cess only. This definitely placed service providers under a disadvantageous position and they should also have been permitted to utilise the education cess and SHE cess against payment of service tax on or after 01.03.2015.

Winding up:-The government is not clarifying what the assessees want and rather is making situations more complicated. When the government can permit utilisation of Education Cess and SHE Cess on transit goods received on or after 01.03.2015 by manufacturer and transit goods received on or after 01.06.2015 by service providers and services for which invoices are received after 01.06.2015, that too towards payment of excise duty and service tax, then there is no loss in permitting utilisation of the balance of education cess and SHE cess available with assessees as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015. Well, all assessees are waiting a simple YES for utilising the balance of Education Cess and SHE Cess available with them as on 01.03.2015 and 01.06.2015.

 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com