Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Publish Date: 14 Sep, 2011
Print   |    |  Comment

Concept of Post Clearance Audit

CONCEPT OF POST CLEARANCE AUDIT

Prepared By: -
CA Pradeep Jain
CA Nishit Shah

Introduction
 

A common characteristics of customs is the high volume of the transactions and the impossibility of checking of all of them, therefore a system called ‘Self Assessment’ is in place in which responsibility of filing correct declaration lies with the importer or exporter, but there are chances that there might be revenue leakage and the risk management system in customs also has to be full proof to detect such leakage, however the same is not possible owing to the number of the transactions that are processed, so there has to be mechanism in which both “Self Assessment” is done and also to ensure that revenue leakage is minimum, the answer to the same is “Post Clearance Audit”  
 
CBEC also in its latest circular no. 39/2011-Cus dated 02.09.11 said about introducing Onsite – Post clearance Audit in the Customs.  

What is Post Clearance Audit?
 
According to the definition given in Technical note no.5 released by World Customs organization and UNCTAD
 
Post-clearance audit means audit-based Customs control performed subsequent to the release of the cargo from Customs' custody. The purpose of such audits is to verify the accuracy and authenticity of declarations and covers the control of traders' commercial data, business systems, records, books. Such an audit can take place at the premises of the trader, and may take into account individual transactions, so-called "transaction based" audit, or cover imports and/or exports undertaken over a certain period of time, so called "company based" audit.
 
In other words Post Clearance Audit is the audit after the release of the goods at the importers premises to verify the documents, valuation, compliances related with the Audit to ensure that there is no revenue leakage and the system in place is followed properly. It may be a Transaction based Audit or Company based Audit.
 
Objectives of Post Clearance Audit

The main objectives of PCA are:-
 
1. All importation & exportation are properly declared to the customs
 
2. To verify the accuracy & authenticity of customs declaration
 
3. The import & export and control of all goods under prohibitions and restrictions list are in compliance with the existing laws
 
4. All duties & taxes relating to the diversions or home consumption,  of those goods are properly paid and the conditions of this decision are made in accordance with the existing laws and regulations
 
5. Declarants are complying with their obligation to retain all supporting documents for the period as set by the existing laws and regulations
 
6. All goods under Customs temporary Storage procedure, customs bonded warehouse procedure, goods under suspended procedure have properly completed the customs declaration procedure and are properly receipted.
 
7. To ensure that the benefits of the schemes such as DEPB, Advance authorization, EPCG, duty drawback are taken in accordance with the law. 

Benefits of PCA
 
1. Post-clearance audit allows Customs to change the approach from a purely transaction based control to a more comprehensive, company-oriented control. Customs audit can benefit from a broader picture of the transactions over a longer period of time.

2. Details for comparison will come from local or national databases and include information from each Customs declaration registered. By comparing prices and tariff headings for identical or similar commodities related to different companies, inconsistencies may indicate fraud. Similarly, comparison between countries of origin or different suppliers or pattern of intra-company trading may reveal false declarations. If the audit detects an incorrect declaration, the audit officer will ask for the correction of the declaration. This may entail an additional payment of duties or taxes by the trader and even raise Customs revenues. 

3. The time taken while the goods are in custody will be reduced as compared to traditional customs control, it will also benefit to the industry as well since reduced storage time will lead to the faster deliveries.
 
4. Since the clearance process will be faster the cost such as storage and ware house fees together with the insurance cost for goods under storage will also be reduced.

Post clearance Audit in India

CBEC in August 2011 had published draft circular for “Onsite Post clearance Audit at the premises of Importer & Exporters regulations, 2011” the main features of the draft circular are 
 
- The definition of Audit given includes examination of bills of entry, shipping bills, invoices, packing lists, import licences, books of account, and other records of transaction relating to imported and export goods, so as to check the accuracy and correctness of assessment of duty thereof and may include inspection of goods at the premises, if available;
 
- The importer or exporter is required to maintain the transactions including electronic data for a period of five years from the date of import/export
 
Thus board will check the accuracy & correctness of assessment of duty and also inspect the goods at the premises, moreover the data is required to be maintained for the period of years. Also the audit is to be conducted at the place of premises of importer or exporter as the case may be.
 
This is not the first time that board has said of introducing On-Site Post clearance Audit, earlier board had also released draft scheme vide F.NO.450/1/2010-Dir(cus) dated 10.09.2010 for implementation of On-site Post clearance Audit, the major aspects of draft are as follows: -
 
Jurisdiction of Audit: The manufacturers and service providers registered under the Excise/Service Tax who are already subjected to audit by the Central Excise or service tax Department; the on-site audit will be merged with that audit. Thus, only the importers engaged in trading activity and those units which are exempt/not registered will be left. It is proposed that the address of IEC code would decide the jurisdiction of the concerned audit party. In case the importer-manufacturer/service provider is having more than one premise in different Commissionerates, it is proposed that on-site audit will be conducted both at the factory premises as well as the business premises.
 
- Procedure to be followed in on-site audit: It is proposed that the procedure for On-site Audit to be followed will be similar to the Central Excise Audit procedure which is done in line with EA-2000. Further, the full process to be followed by the importer and the audit party has been elucidated in the draft scheme. The procedure is more or less similar to a normal audit process. The guidelines have been given in the draft scheme regarding the selection of assessees, desk review, gathering information about the importer, internal control and revenue risk analysis, developing audit plan, site visit, verification, summarization of audit findings, reviewing the audit results, compliance of audit objections and future compliances.
 
Importers/Exporters Point of View
 
1. The post clearance audit is both a good and bad for the importer/exporter, good because it will largely help them in clearing their goods fast, procedures & compliances and all necessary documentation will be ensured, however it will be bad only for those notorious importer/exporter who change valuation of goods, claim undue benefit of export benefit schemes, tariff classification of goods is changed to go in to lower rate of duty etc. now they will have department officers checking each & every transaction and that at their place leading to many unwarranted disclosures.
 
2. Also since benefit of many export schemes such as DEPB, Advance license, duty drawback, EPCG are being claimed, the department in the Audit will scrutinize each & every document in details, also importer/exporter needs to be ready with detail explanatations of their valuations, country of export, applicability of notifications in order to avoid any problems during the audit.
 
3. It will give rise to another factum of corruption. The corruption is well known phenomenon in Central Excise and Custom department. The audit department normally harasses the assessee. The audit para are raised and demands are issued. These demands are normally settled in favour of assessee. This is due to the fact that there is no accountability on the part of officers conducting the audit. They normally raises the point on minor and technical issues. Such an approach lead to the fact that importers will be harassed and corruption will increase from such type of audits. The audit will have approach to their premises also and conduct the audit. Hence the importer community is afraid of such harassment.
 
Departments Point of View
 
1. Department will generally see the same as mechanism of increasing their revenue and targets after the scheme of EA-Audit which is highly successful, the selection of the Assessee for PCA will be done on the basis of  risk assessment done by the department.
 
2. Department needs to ensure the availability of qualified and train staff for the PCA, since the success of PCA lies in its implementation, department should ensure the proper training programmes are conducted at the zonal level to ensure the objectives of audit are met.
 
3. Department also needs to ensure that audit officers doesn’t unnecessarily harass the assessee, it should ensure PCA is not being used as weapon by them to fulfill the revenue targets
 
Conclusion
 
PCA is a welcome step, since India also wants to ensure that the benefits of globalization & liberalization are available, it needs to match with the foot – steps of the world and PCA being one of them, leading to easy compliance and faster clearance procedure. However, the essence and success of the scheme lies in its implementation, in which department as well as assessee needs to ensure they co-operate with each other leading to the mutual benefit as well as benefit to the country as a whole. 

**********

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com