Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 14 Jul, 2014
Print   |    |  Comment

Colors of ambiguity still on Heena

Colors of ambiguity still on Heena

An article by:-

CA. Pradeep Jain
Prayushi Jain
 

There was dispute was going on between the trade and the Central excise department on the exemption on Heena Paste. This exemption was given in last year budget but there was ambiguity in drafting on such notification. We have written an article on the this issue  just after the presentation of the budget. Now the Government has come with the clarification in the next budget. This article tries to analysis this issue.
The history:-
The notification no. 12/2012-CE dated 1.3.2012 exempted the Henna powder not mixed with any other ingredient” by its entry number 134. In next year budget, this entry was amended by notification 12/2013 and heena paste was also exempted. But the entry read as follow:-
 
S. No. Chapter or
heading or
sub-heading or
tariff item of
the First
Schedule
Description
of excisable goods
Rate Condition
No.
66. 33 Henna powder or  paste, not mixed with any other ingredient 8% -
 
Thus the aforesaid entry exempted the Heena paste but the word "not mixed with any other ingredient" also travelled with the Heena paste. It was pointed out by us at that time also that heena paste cannot be made without adding the liquid into the powder. But the department will view it as mixing other ingredient into it. But no clarification was issued by the CBEC at that time.
Later on, the audit wing raised the audit objection on the same lines. The demand of lakhs of Rupees was issued to the manufacturers. Pleading was made that if such interpretation was taken then the benefit of this notification will not extended to any manufacturer. Following the Rule of homogenous construction, the benefit of this notification should be allowed.  However, the department was of stringent in view that there should be no ingredient in the henna paste which at no stretch of imagination was possible.
The post budget era:-
In this budget 2014, a clarification was issued by the department which read as follows:-
 
The clarification given by the budget, 2014 would have given relief to the poor manufacturers of heena paste which finally were exempted of tax if the powder is mixed with any liquid.  But the exclusion of powder mixed with heena dye and any other cosmetics again gave the birth to new dispute era. Revenue shall again allege the assessee those who mix heena dye in the powder or any other cosmetic will not be entitled to claim the exemption. For this purpose, the samples will be taken and will be given to CRCL. Unless and until  the report of the same is received, the manufacturer will not be allowed to clear the goods without payment of duty.
This Henna paste is very cheap selling marketable goods are of strong social values too:-
  • No social function is completed without the application of henna on the hands and feet – whether the function is of engagement, marriage, baby shower, etc.
 
  • When there is birth of any child at home, there is tradition of distributing the henna to all the neighborhood and relatives. This tradition is still alive in many parts of Rajasthan including Jodhpur. 
  • It is considered as a symbol of “akhand saubhagya” in Hindu culture and it is to be essentially applied hands and feet on various fasts like “karva chauth”, “gangaur”, “teej”, etc. It is even required during the pooja in these fasts.
  • It is an essentially to be there in the items of “pooja” of goddesses like laxmi, parvati, etc. In all the temples of these goddesses, henna is an important item which is applied on the hands and legs of statues of these deities, particularly on the festivals. 
  • No hawan/yagya is complete without applying henna.
  • It is applied by Indian girls and ladies on all the occasions and festivals. On the diwali pooja, it is considered customary to sit there with henna on the hands.
The application of henna is not merely limited to hindu culture, rather it is an essential part of muslim festivals like Eid-ul-Fitr and Eid-ul-Azha.
Nobody can afford to add any other dye or any other cosmetic value in such cheaper product.
However, again new round of litigations will start wherein revenue who has always taken up the legal language in the raw form and as it is. Now the department will allege every mixture as made of heena dye or of any of the cosmetic product. Further the cosmetic definition holds its own ambiguity in itself. Every mixture would be sent for testing in laboratories, paras would be raised and representations shall be made. It is the same battle but with dissimilar fuel. Not the least, even the Henna grown in different locations contain certain ingredients from the land itself but the same cannot separated. the department will term it as "other ingredient than liquid. But the manufacturer will say that these are not dye or an ingredient having cosmetic nature.
Winding up:-
Yes the government gave the clarification to the relief of heena manufacturer but with a half hearted approach. Heena is a cheap selling commodity carrying huge social implications as seen above which at no incidence should be brought in the ambit of service tax. The exemptions with if’s & but’s is not justifiable and should be completely be exempted from the tax.
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com