Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 14 Jul, 2014
Print   |    |  Comment

Colors of ambiguity still on Heena

Colors of ambiguity still on Heena

An article by:-

CA. Pradeep Jain
Prayushi Jain
 

There was dispute was going on between the trade and the Central excise department on the exemption on Heena Paste. This exemption was given in last year budget but there was ambiguity in drafting on such notification. We have written an article on the this issue  just after the presentation of the budget. Now the Government has come with the clarification in the next budget. This article tries to analysis this issue.
The history:-
The notification no. 12/2012-CE dated 1.3.2012 exempted the Henna powder not mixed with any other ingredient” by its entry number 134. In next year budget, this entry was amended by notification 12/2013 and heena paste was also exempted. But the entry read as follow:-
 
S. No. Chapter or
heading or
sub-heading or
tariff item of
the First
Schedule
Description
of excisable goods
Rate Condition
No.
66. 33 Henna powder or  paste, not mixed with any other ingredient 8% -
 
Thus the aforesaid entry exempted the Heena paste but the word "not mixed with any other ingredient" also travelled with the Heena paste. It was pointed out by us at that time also that heena paste cannot be made without adding the liquid into the powder. But the department will view it as mixing other ingredient into it. But no clarification was issued by the CBEC at that time.
Later on, the audit wing raised the audit objection on the same lines. The demand of lakhs of Rupees was issued to the manufacturers. Pleading was made that if such interpretation was taken then the benefit of this notification will not extended to any manufacturer. Following the Rule of homogenous construction, the benefit of this notification should be allowed.  However, the department was of stringent in view that there should be no ingredient in the henna paste which at no stretch of imagination was possible.
The post budget era:-
In this budget 2014, a clarification was issued by the department which read as follows:-
 
The clarification given by the budget, 2014 would have given relief to the poor manufacturers of heena paste which finally were exempted of tax if the powder is mixed with any liquid.  But the exclusion of powder mixed with heena dye and any other cosmetics again gave the birth to new dispute era. Revenue shall again allege the assessee those who mix heena dye in the powder or any other cosmetic will not be entitled to claim the exemption. For this purpose, the samples will be taken and will be given to CRCL. Unless and until  the report of the same is received, the manufacturer will not be allowed to clear the goods without payment of duty.
This Henna paste is very cheap selling marketable goods are of strong social values too:-
  • No social function is completed without the application of henna on the hands and feet – whether the function is of engagement, marriage, baby shower, etc.
 
  • When there is birth of any child at home, there is tradition of distributing the henna to all the neighborhood and relatives. This tradition is still alive in many parts of Rajasthan including Jodhpur. 
  • It is considered as a symbol of “akhand saubhagya” in Hindu culture and it is to be essentially applied hands and feet on various fasts like “karva chauth”, “gangaur”, “teej”, etc. It is even required during the pooja in these fasts.
  • It is an essentially to be there in the items of “pooja” of goddesses like laxmi, parvati, etc. In all the temples of these goddesses, henna is an important item which is applied on the hands and legs of statues of these deities, particularly on the festivals. 
  • No hawan/yagya is complete without applying henna.
  • It is applied by Indian girls and ladies on all the occasions and festivals. On the diwali pooja, it is considered customary to sit there with henna on the hands.
The application of henna is not merely limited to hindu culture, rather it is an essential part of muslim festivals like Eid-ul-Fitr and Eid-ul-Azha.
Nobody can afford to add any other dye or any other cosmetic value in such cheaper product.
However, again new round of litigations will start wherein revenue who has always taken up the legal language in the raw form and as it is. Now the department will allege every mixture as made of heena dye or of any of the cosmetic product. Further the cosmetic definition holds its own ambiguity in itself. Every mixture would be sent for testing in laboratories, paras would be raised and representations shall be made. It is the same battle but with dissimilar fuel. Not the least, even the Henna grown in different locations contain certain ingredients from the land itself but the same cannot separated. the department will term it as "other ingredient than liquid. But the manufacturer will say that these are not dye or an ingredient having cosmetic nature.
Winding up:-
Yes the government gave the clarification to the relief of heena manufacturer but with a half hearted approach. Heena is a cheap selling commodity carrying huge social implications as seen above which at no incidence should be brought in the ambit of service tax. The exemptions with if’s & but’s is not justifiable and should be completely be exempted from the tax.
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com