Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 17 Mar, 2012
Print   |    |  Comment

Change in Notification levying Duty on Ready-made Garments, Made-up Articles & Textiles

Change in Notification levying duty on ready-made garments, made-up articles, textiles

Prepared By:
CA Pradeep Jain,
CA Preeti Parihar

Previous Provision-
 
Notification No. 31/2011-CE dated 24.03.2011 was issued for the benefit of manufacturers of Branded Goods falling under Chapter no. 61, 62, or 63 of Central Excise Tariff i.e. Branded Apparels etc. This notification was issued to facilitate the return of duty paid goods to the same premises/factory. Duty free clearance of these returned goods was allowed after being re-made, re-conditioned, re-packed or subjected to any other process in the factory.
 
Following conditions have been stipulated to avail the said exemption notification:-
 
1.            Cenvat credit on the returned goods was not allowed.
2.            Intimation was required to be filed to jurisdictional Central Excise Authority     within 48 hrs. of the receipt of the returned goods alongwith the details.
3.            Proper accounts of receipt and disposal of such goods was required and these were to be mentioned in their monthly return as well.
4.            The exemption is available upto 10% of the aggregate value of clearance for home consumption from the same premises/factory in preceding financial year.
 
By virtue of Budget, 2012 certain procedural relaxations have been made in the operation of this exemption. These are as follows: -
 
- Exemption will now be available to goods returned or brought back to any registered premises of the same brand owner/ manufacturer.

- The goods are returned or brought back within a maximum period of one year from the date of their clearance.

- The threshold limit of 10% is to be computed for each factory/ registered premises separately. While computing this limit, the value of goods cleared under the provisions ofrule 16 of the Central Excise Rules are to be excluded.

- Finally, duty-free clearance under this notification will be allowed on the basis of a declaration from the manufacturer that the goods are duty-paid. This aspect should be verified on the basis of documents/ records maintained by the manufacturer at the time of audit of the unit.
 
Further, the effective excise duty rate applicable to the textile sector (other than readymade garments and made ups bearing a brand name or sold under a brand name) is currently covered by Notification No. 29/2004-CE dated 9.7.2004. This notification is being superseded by notification no. 7/2012 –CE dated 17th March, 2012. Under this notification, the rate of excise duty on ready-made garments and made-up articles of textiles bearing or sold under brand name and falling under Chapters 61, 62 and 63 (heading nos.63.01 to 63.08) has been increased from 10% to 12%. This notification is not applicable on tariff heading nos.63.09 and 63.10.
 
Further, the tariff value for these items has been revised. The abatement has been increased from 55% to 70%. In other words, duty would be payable on 30% of the Retail Sale Price.
 
Net Effect-
 

                Previous provision           Amended provision
1.      Only chapters 61, 62, 63 are covered. Chapters 61, 62 and 63 (heading no. 63.01and 63.08) are covered but heading no. 63.09 and 63.10 are not included.
2.      Rate of abatement was 55%. Now rate of abatement is 70%.
3.      Full exemption was available to duty paid branded ready-made garments and made-ups which were returned or brought back to the same premises/factory and cleared after being reconditioned, re-made or subjected to some process and conditions. Now, exemption will be available even if duty paid ready-made garments and made-ups are returned or brought-back to any registered premises of the same brand owner/ manufacturer.
4.      There is no time limit of returning goods to the factory. The exemption will be allowed only if goods are returned within a period of 1 year from the date of their clearance.
5.      The excise duty applicable to textile sector is currently covered by notification no. 29/2001-CE dated 9.7.2004. The notification no. 29/2001-CE dated 9.7.2004 is superseded by notification no. 7/2012 CE dated 17th march, 2012.
6.      In computing threshold limit, value of goods cleared under Rule 16 of central excise rules is included. In computing threshold limit, value of goods cleared under Rule 16 of central excise rules is excluded.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com