Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 01 Mar, 2011
Print   |    |  Comment

Change in definition of "Input Service" under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Change in definition of “Input Services” under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Prepared By: -
CA. Pradeep Jain
 Sukhvinder KaurLLB[FYIC]

 

Introduction: - This year budget has seen a major change in definition of inputs and input services. Through this piece of articulation we intend to study the impact of change in definition of input services.
 
Old definition:-The earlier definition of ‘input services’ is given in Rule 2 (l) which reads as under:
 
(l) "input service" means any service,-
 
(i) used by a provider of taxable service for providing an output service; or

(ii) used by the manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products, upto the place of removal,

and includes services used in relation to setting up, modernization, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises, advertisement or sales promotion, market research, storage upto the place of removal, procurement of inputs, activities relating to business, such as accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, and security, inward transportation of inputs or capital goods and outward transportation upto the place of removal;
 
New definition: - Now, vide Budget 2011-12, the definition of input services is amended and will read as under:
 
(l) “input service” means any service, -
 
(i) used by a provider of taxable service for providing an output service; or
 
(ii) used by a manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products upto the place of removal,
 
and includes services used in relation to modernisation, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises, advertisement or sales promotion, market research, storage upto the place of removal, procurement of inputs, accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, security, business exhibition, legal services, inward transportation of inputs or capital goods and outward transportation upto the place of removal; but excludes services,-
 
(A) specified in sub-clauses (p), (zn), (zzl), (zzm), (zzq), (zzzh) and (zzzza) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Finance Act (hereinafter referred as specified services), in so far as they are used for-
 
(a) construction of a building or a civil structure or a part thereof; or
 
(b) laying of foundation or making of structures for support of capital goods, except for the provision of one or more of the specified services; or
 
(B) specified in sub-clauses (d), (o), (zo) and (zzzzj) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Finance Act, in so far as they relate to a motor vehicle except when used for the provision of taxable services for which the credit on motor vehicle is available as capital goods; or
 
(C) such as those provided in relation to outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, membership of a club, health and fitness centre, life insurance, health insurance and travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as Leave or Home Travel Concession, when such services are used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee;”
 
Changes in definition:-
 
Hence, there is lot of change in definition of “inputs services”. We are discussing the changes in the same and their impact in following paras:-
 
Business Expenditure:- First visible change is deletion of words “relating to business”. There was a lot of litigation on the point whether a particular service was an input service for the assessee or not. In the case of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur v/s Ultra Tech Cement Ltd [2010-TIOL-745-HC-MUM-ST] it was held that
 
Cenvat Credit – Service Tax – input service – extends to all services used in relation to the business of manufacturing the final product – the definition of “input service” is very wide and covers not only services, which are directly or indirectly used in or in relation to the business of manufacture of final products, be it prior to the manufacture of final products after the manufacture of final products. To put it differently, the definition of input service is not restricted to services used in or in relation to manufacture of final products, but extends to all services used in relation to the business of manufacturing the final product.
 
It was further held that:
 
In Relation to Business: The expression “activities in relation to business” in the definition of “input service” postulates activities which are integrally connected with the business of the assessee. If the activity is not integrally connected with the business of the manufacture of final product, the service would not qualify to be a input service under Rule 2 (1) of the 2004 Rules.
 
Thus, the outdoor catering service was held by the Hon’ble High Court to be an input service for the assessee therein as being integrally connected with the business of manufacturing cement and therefore, credit of service paid on outdoor catering services would be allowable.
 
Similarly in the case of Coca Cola India (P) Ltd v/s CCE, Pune-III {[2009] 22 STT 130 (BOM.)} it was held as under:
 
Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Cenvat credit -Input service - Whether services of advertising and marketing procured by an assessee-manufacturer in respect of advertisements for aerated waters are covered by definition of term ‘input services’ as defined in rule 2(l) when admittedly assessee manufactures concentrates which are exclusively used for manufacture of respective aerated waters which are advertised by assessee - Held, yes -Whether, therefore, service tax paid on expenditure incurred by assessee on advertisement, sales promotion, market research, etc., will have to be allowed as input stage credit more particularly if same forms a part of price of final product of assessee on which excise duty is paid - Held, yes [Paras 38 and 44]
 
Thus, all the services which were utilised in or in relation to business expenditure of the assessee were treated as input services and cenvat credit was held to be admissible in the said cases.
 
Now, in the amended definition the words “activities relating to business, such as” have been deleted. Now the credit of services utilised in the business activities if not mentioned in the definition would not be eligible input services for availing cenvat credit facility. The definition of input service has been narrowed down. The effect of the judgment in the cases of Coca Cola India (P) Ltd and Ultra Tech Cement has been nullified. But will it has the same effect. It is due to the fact that all the services are still listed in the definition of “input services”. Further, the definition still uses the words “includes”. Thus, it is inclusive definition and is not complete list of services to be covered in input services.
 
Construction services: - Another change in the definition is that an exclusion clause has been added excluding certain services used for specified construction activities. By the addition of the exclusion clause more conflict has been created.
 
In the main part of the definition it has been provided that input services will include services used in relation to modernisation, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises. And cenvat credit has been allowed not only on the renovation, repairing etc. of factory or premises of output service provider but it went further to allow the same for office also.
 
But the exclusion clause excludes the commercial construction services, architect service, residential construction service and works contract services from the purview of input services. Thus, the litigation will arise as to the main part of the definition will prevail or the exclusion clause.
 
Port services: - Further, there was dispute on admissibility of service tax paid on port services and other port services used after clearance of goods from the factory but the department has never objected on service tax paid on port services used for clearance of inputs. But the cenvat is being denied on all port service, other port services and services provided at the airport. Further, it says that it will be denied to the extent it is used for construction of building or civil structure or for laying foundation or making of structure for support services. We are not able to understand as to how port services are used in construction of laying foundation.
 
Addition of legal services and business exhibition:- This is welcome step and these are included in definition of inputs. The credit will be available on the same.
 
Specific exclusions: - the definition has clearly excluded the services of outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, membership of club, health and fitness, life insurance, health insurance, travel benefits. This is clearly stated that these are used for employees for personal use then the same will not be allowed. Out of above, there is lot of litigation on outdoor catering. The larger bench has allowed the cenvat credit on outdoor catering services in GTC industries. Further, the same was travelled to High Court and decision in case Ultratech Cement cited supra has come and credit was allowed. But now the department has changed the definition. The Board should have done at earlier stage only so that litigation has not taken place.  
 
Conclusion: - The board has amended the definition to reduce the litigation but exact outcome will be known in times to come. But this is true that amendment has unsettled the things once again which were already settled. 

*************

 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com