Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 01 Mar, 2011
Print   |    |  Comment

Change in definition of "Input Service" under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Change in definition of “Input Services” under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Prepared By: -
CA. Pradeep Jain
 Sukhvinder KaurLLB[FYIC]

 

Introduction: - This year budget has seen a major change in definition of inputs and input services. Through this piece of articulation we intend to study the impact of change in definition of input services.
 
Old definition:-The earlier definition of ‘input services’ is given in Rule 2 (l) which reads as under:
 
(l) "input service" means any service,-
 
(i) used by a provider of taxable service for providing an output service; or

(ii) used by the manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products, upto the place of removal,

and includes services used in relation to setting up, modernization, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises, advertisement or sales promotion, market research, storage upto the place of removal, procurement of inputs, activities relating to business, such as accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, and security, inward transportation of inputs or capital goods and outward transportation upto the place of removal;
 
New definition: - Now, vide Budget 2011-12, the definition of input services is amended and will read as under:
 
(l) “input service” means any service, -
 
(i) used by a provider of taxable service for providing an output service; or
 
(ii) used by a manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products upto the place of removal,
 
and includes services used in relation to modernisation, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises, advertisement or sales promotion, market research, storage upto the place of removal, procurement of inputs, accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, security, business exhibition, legal services, inward transportation of inputs or capital goods and outward transportation upto the place of removal; but excludes services,-
 
(A) specified in sub-clauses (p), (zn), (zzl), (zzm), (zzq), (zzzh) and (zzzza) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Finance Act (hereinafter referred as specified services), in so far as they are used for-
 
(a) construction of a building or a civil structure or a part thereof; or
 
(b) laying of foundation or making of structures for support of capital goods, except for the provision of one or more of the specified services; or
 
(B) specified in sub-clauses (d), (o), (zo) and (zzzzj) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Finance Act, in so far as they relate to a motor vehicle except when used for the provision of taxable services for which the credit on motor vehicle is available as capital goods; or
 
(C) such as those provided in relation to outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, membership of a club, health and fitness centre, life insurance, health insurance and travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as Leave or Home Travel Concession, when such services are used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee;”
 
Changes in definition:-
 
Hence, there is lot of change in definition of “inputs services”. We are discussing the changes in the same and their impact in following paras:-
 
Business Expenditure:- First visible change is deletion of words “relating to business”. There was a lot of litigation on the point whether a particular service was an input service for the assessee or not. In the case of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur v/s Ultra Tech Cement Ltd [2010-TIOL-745-HC-MUM-ST] it was held that
 
Cenvat Credit – Service Tax – input service – extends to all services used in relation to the business of manufacturing the final product – the definition of “input service” is very wide and covers not only services, which are directly or indirectly used in or in relation to the business of manufacture of final products, be it prior to the manufacture of final products after the manufacture of final products. To put it differently, the definition of input service is not restricted to services used in or in relation to manufacture of final products, but extends to all services used in relation to the business of manufacturing the final product.
 
It was further held that:
 
In Relation to Business: The expression “activities in relation to business” in the definition of “input service” postulates activities which are integrally connected with the business of the assessee. If the activity is not integrally connected with the business of the manufacture of final product, the service would not qualify to be a input service under Rule 2 (1) of the 2004 Rules.
 
Thus, the outdoor catering service was held by the Hon’ble High Court to be an input service for the assessee therein as being integrally connected with the business of manufacturing cement and therefore, credit of service paid on outdoor catering services would be allowable.
 
Similarly in the case of Coca Cola India (P) Ltd v/s CCE, Pune-III {[2009] 22 STT 130 (BOM.)} it was held as under:
 
Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Cenvat credit -Input service - Whether services of advertising and marketing procured by an assessee-manufacturer in respect of advertisements for aerated waters are covered by definition of term ‘input services’ as defined in rule 2(l) when admittedly assessee manufactures concentrates which are exclusively used for manufacture of respective aerated waters which are advertised by assessee - Held, yes -Whether, therefore, service tax paid on expenditure incurred by assessee on advertisement, sales promotion, market research, etc., will have to be allowed as input stage credit more particularly if same forms a part of price of final product of assessee on which excise duty is paid - Held, yes [Paras 38 and 44]
 
Thus, all the services which were utilised in or in relation to business expenditure of the assessee were treated as input services and cenvat credit was held to be admissible in the said cases.
 
Now, in the amended definition the words “activities relating to business, such as” have been deleted. Now the credit of services utilised in the business activities if not mentioned in the definition would not be eligible input services for availing cenvat credit facility. The definition of input service has been narrowed down. The effect of the judgment in the cases of Coca Cola India (P) Ltd and Ultra Tech Cement has been nullified. But will it has the same effect. It is due to the fact that all the services are still listed in the definition of “input services”. Further, the definition still uses the words “includes”. Thus, it is inclusive definition and is not complete list of services to be covered in input services.
 
Construction services: - Another change in the definition is that an exclusion clause has been added excluding certain services used for specified construction activities. By the addition of the exclusion clause more conflict has been created.
 
In the main part of the definition it has been provided that input services will include services used in relation to modernisation, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises. And cenvat credit has been allowed not only on the renovation, repairing etc. of factory or premises of output service provider but it went further to allow the same for office also.
 
But the exclusion clause excludes the commercial construction services, architect service, residential construction service and works contract services from the purview of input services. Thus, the litigation will arise as to the main part of the definition will prevail or the exclusion clause.
 
Port services: - Further, there was dispute on admissibility of service tax paid on port services and other port services used after clearance of goods from the factory but the department has never objected on service tax paid on port services used for clearance of inputs. But the cenvat is being denied on all port service, other port services and services provided at the airport. Further, it says that it will be denied to the extent it is used for construction of building or civil structure or for laying foundation or making of structure for support services. We are not able to understand as to how port services are used in construction of laying foundation.
 
Addition of legal services and business exhibition:- This is welcome step and these are included in definition of inputs. The credit will be available on the same.
 
Specific exclusions: - the definition has clearly excluded the services of outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, membership of club, health and fitness, life insurance, health insurance, travel benefits. This is clearly stated that these are used for employees for personal use then the same will not be allowed. Out of above, there is lot of litigation on outdoor catering. The larger bench has allowed the cenvat credit on outdoor catering services in GTC industries. Further, the same was travelled to High Court and decision in case Ultratech Cement cited supra has come and credit was allowed. But now the department has changed the definition. The Board should have done at earlier stage only so that litigation has not taken place.  
 
Conclusion: - The board has amended the definition to reduce the litigation but exact outcome will be known in times to come. But this is true that amendment has unsettled the things once again which were already settled. 

*************

 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com