Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 27 Feb, 2010
Print   |    |  Comment

Capitalisation on Capital Goods

 

Capitaliation on Capital Goods

 

Prepared By:

CA Pradeep Jain

Mayank Palgauta

 

The recent budget has made changes in respect of reversal of Cenvat credit on removal of capital goods. Through this piece, we are trying to analysis the same and seeing its impacts.

 

Amendment in the Budget:-

 

The second proviso to sub-rule 5 of Rule 3 has been substituted which reads as follows:-

 

 “Provided further that if the capital goods, on which CENVAT Credit has been taken, are removed after being used, the manufacturer or provider of output services shall pay an amount equal to the CENVAT Credit taken on the said capital goods reduced by the percentage points calculated by straight line method (SLM) as specified below for each quarter of a year or part thereof from the date of taking the CENVAT Credit, namely:-

 

1.      for computers and computer peripherals:

 

for each quarter in the first year @ 10%

for each quarter in the second year @ 8%

for each quarter in the third year @5%

for each quarter in the fourth and fifth year @1%

 

2.      for capital goods, other than computers and computer peripherals @ 2.5% for each quarter.”

 

Meaning:

 

From the above amendment in Rule 3 (5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 it is clarified that those Capital Goods on which credit is taken and are removed after being used by the Manufacturer or service provider then he will liable to pay the proportionate amount of Cenvat Credit which will be decreased by depreciation amount calculated on % basis on each quarter in each year or part thereof. Earlier the depreciation was provided @ 2.5% per quarter. But now the Capital goods have been classified in two categories for this purpose -

 

                               I.            computers and computer peripherals; and

                            II.            other capital goods

 

In first category of “computers and computer peripherals” the amount of depreciation will be determined as follows:

 

 

% apply in each quarter

Total historical cost of capital goods will reduced by

In first Year

10 %

10 * 4 =     40%

In second Year

8 %

 8 * 4 =       32%

In third Year

5 %

 5 * 4 =       20%

In fourth Year

1 %

 1 * 4 =         4%

In fifth Year

1 %

 1 * 4 =         4%

TOTAL % of depreciation

                  100%

 

Thus, the assessee will able to get the full amount of depreciation during the first five year due to affect of SLM approach.

 

For Capital Goods, other than computers and computer peripherals, the benefit of depreciation will be permitted during the period of ten years as rate of depreciation is given in this notification @ 2.5 % per quarter.

 

Whereas according to provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the amount of depreciation on "Computers and Office Equipments” will be calculated on the basis of Written down Value (WDV) method @ 60 % on carrying amount of such asset in each year and part thereof. This can be understood by the following table: -

 

 

PARTICULARS

CALCULATIONS OF DEPRECIATION AMOUNT

CARRYING AMOUNT

 

Assumed Cost of Asset

Rs. 100

First Year

100 * 60 % = Rs. 60

(100-60) = Rs. 40

Second Year

40 * 60% = Rs. 24

(40-24) = Rs. 16

Third Year

16 * 60% = Rs. 9.6

(16-9.6) = Rs. 6.4

Fourth Year

6.4 * 60% = Rs. 3.84

(6.4-3.84) = Rs. 2.56

Fifth Year

2.56 * 60% = Rs. 1.54

(2.56-1.54)= Rs. 1.02

 

Thus, according to Income Tax Act, 1961 the assessee will not be able to get full amount of depreciation on such asset due to affect of WDV approach during first five years.

 

But while going through per year benefit of depreciation in terms of % as a whole then it appears that benefit of depreciation amount in first year will be more under Income Tax Act whereas in subsequent years benefit will be more under Excise Law. This can be presented in tabular form as follows: -

 

 

Particulars

As per Excise Law

As per Income Tax Law

Excess Benefit under excise law

 

Benefit of depreciation in % on Original Cost

 

First Year

40 %

60 %

(-) 20 %

Second Year

32 %

24 %

8 %

Third Year

20 %

9.6 %

10.4 %

Fourth Year

4 %

3.84 %

0.16 %

Fifth Year

4 %

1.54 %

2.46 %

TOTAL

100 %

98.98 %

 

 

There should not be different tax rates under Income tax and Central Excise Rules.

 

The second impact of this amendment clarifies is that the depreciation will be allowed on straight line method. Earlier it was not clearly provided in the rule that the depreciation will be allowed on straight line or written down value method. The audit party has raised paras on the same. But this dispute is settled by this clear amendment. This is a welcome step.

 

Before parting……..

 

The cenvat credit on the capital goods falling under Chapter 82, 84, 85, 90 is allowed as per Rule 2(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The computer falls under the above definition. But the other condition is that the same should be used in the factory but does not include the things used in office premises. Most of the computers and peripherals are used in the office premises only. As such the credit will not be allowed on the same. However, the computers and computer peripherals are attached to machines comes along with machine and classified as a whole in that tariff heading. If this part is removed after use then the same will fall under tariff heading of machine. As such, whether the depreciation listed above will be allowed? The department will not agree to the same. But the service provider will definitely get the benefit of the same.

 

***********

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com