Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 27 Feb, 2010
Print   |    |  Comment

Capitalisation on Capital Goods

 

Capitaliation on Capital Goods

 

Prepared By:

CA Pradeep Jain

Mayank Palgauta

 

The recent budget has made changes in respect of reversal of Cenvat credit on removal of capital goods. Through this piece, we are trying to analysis the same and seeing its impacts.

 

Amendment in the Budget:-

 

The second proviso to sub-rule 5 of Rule 3 has been substituted which reads as follows:-

 

 “Provided further that if the capital goods, on which CENVAT Credit has been taken, are removed after being used, the manufacturer or provider of output services shall pay an amount equal to the CENVAT Credit taken on the said capital goods reduced by the percentage points calculated by straight line method (SLM) as specified below for each quarter of a year or part thereof from the date of taking the CENVAT Credit, namely:-

 

1.      for computers and computer peripherals:

 

for each quarter in the first year @ 10%

for each quarter in the second year @ 8%

for each quarter in the third year @5%

for each quarter in the fourth and fifth year @1%

 

2.      for capital goods, other than computers and computer peripherals @ 2.5% for each quarter.”

 

Meaning:

 

From the above amendment in Rule 3 (5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 it is clarified that those Capital Goods on which credit is taken and are removed after being used by the Manufacturer or service provider then he will liable to pay the proportionate amount of Cenvat Credit which will be decreased by depreciation amount calculated on % basis on each quarter in each year or part thereof. Earlier the depreciation was provided @ 2.5% per quarter. But now the Capital goods have been classified in two categories for this purpose -

 

                               I.            computers and computer peripherals; and

                            II.            other capital goods

 

In first category of “computers and computer peripherals” the amount of depreciation will be determined as follows:

 

 

% apply in each quarter

Total historical cost of capital goods will reduced by

In first Year

10 %

10 * 4 =     40%

In second Year

8 %

 8 * 4 =       32%

In third Year

5 %

 5 * 4 =       20%

In fourth Year

1 %

 1 * 4 =         4%

In fifth Year

1 %

 1 * 4 =         4%

TOTAL % of depreciation

                  100%

 

Thus, the assessee will able to get the full amount of depreciation during the first five year due to affect of SLM approach.

 

For Capital Goods, other than computers and computer peripherals, the benefit of depreciation will be permitted during the period of ten years as rate of depreciation is given in this notification @ 2.5 % per quarter.

 

Whereas according to provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the amount of depreciation on "Computers and Office Equipments” will be calculated on the basis of Written down Value (WDV) method @ 60 % on carrying amount of such asset in each year and part thereof. This can be understood by the following table: -

 

 

PARTICULARS

CALCULATIONS OF DEPRECIATION AMOUNT

CARRYING AMOUNT

 

Assumed Cost of Asset

Rs. 100

First Year

100 * 60 % = Rs. 60

(100-60) = Rs. 40

Second Year

40 * 60% = Rs. 24

(40-24) = Rs. 16

Third Year

16 * 60% = Rs. 9.6

(16-9.6) = Rs. 6.4

Fourth Year

6.4 * 60% = Rs. 3.84

(6.4-3.84) = Rs. 2.56

Fifth Year

2.56 * 60% = Rs. 1.54

(2.56-1.54)= Rs. 1.02

 

Thus, according to Income Tax Act, 1961 the assessee will not be able to get full amount of depreciation on such asset due to affect of WDV approach during first five years.

 

But while going through per year benefit of depreciation in terms of % as a whole then it appears that benefit of depreciation amount in first year will be more under Income Tax Act whereas in subsequent years benefit will be more under Excise Law. This can be presented in tabular form as follows: -

 

 

Particulars

As per Excise Law

As per Income Tax Law

Excess Benefit under excise law

 

Benefit of depreciation in % on Original Cost

 

First Year

40 %

60 %

(-) 20 %

Second Year

32 %

24 %

8 %

Third Year

20 %

9.6 %

10.4 %

Fourth Year

4 %

3.84 %

0.16 %

Fifth Year

4 %

1.54 %

2.46 %

TOTAL

100 %

98.98 %

 

 

There should not be different tax rates under Income tax and Central Excise Rules.

 

The second impact of this amendment clarifies is that the depreciation will be allowed on straight line method. Earlier it was not clearly provided in the rule that the depreciation will be allowed on straight line or written down value method. The audit party has raised paras on the same. But this dispute is settled by this clear amendment. This is a welcome step.

 

Before parting……..

 

The cenvat credit on the capital goods falling under Chapter 82, 84, 85, 90 is allowed as per Rule 2(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The computer falls under the above definition. But the other condition is that the same should be used in the factory but does not include the things used in office premises. Most of the computers and peripherals are used in the office premises only. As such the credit will not be allowed on the same. However, the computers and computer peripherals are attached to machines comes along with machine and classified as a whole in that tariff heading. If this part is removed after use then the same will fall under tariff heading of machine. As such, whether the depreciation listed above will be allowed? The department will not agree to the same. But the service provider will definitely get the benefit of the same.

 

***********

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com