Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 27 Feb, 2010
Print   |    |  Comment

Capitalisation on Capital Goods

 

Capitaliation on Capital Goods

 

Prepared By:

CA Pradeep Jain

Mayank Palgauta

 

The recent budget has made changes in respect of reversal of Cenvat credit on removal of capital goods. Through this piece, we are trying to analysis the same and seeing its impacts.

 

Amendment in the Budget:-

 

The second proviso to sub-rule 5 of Rule 3 has been substituted which reads as follows:-

 

 “Provided further that if the capital goods, on which CENVAT Credit has been taken, are removed after being used, the manufacturer or provider of output services shall pay an amount equal to the CENVAT Credit taken on the said capital goods reduced by the percentage points calculated by straight line method (SLM) as specified below for each quarter of a year or part thereof from the date of taking the CENVAT Credit, namely:-

 

1.      for computers and computer peripherals:

 

for each quarter in the first year @ 10%

for each quarter in the second year @ 8%

for each quarter in the third year @5%

for each quarter in the fourth and fifth year @1%

 

2.      for capital goods, other than computers and computer peripherals @ 2.5% for each quarter.”

 

Meaning:

 

From the above amendment in Rule 3 (5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 it is clarified that those Capital Goods on which credit is taken and are removed after being used by the Manufacturer or service provider then he will liable to pay the proportionate amount of Cenvat Credit which will be decreased by depreciation amount calculated on % basis on each quarter in each year or part thereof. Earlier the depreciation was provided @ 2.5% per quarter. But now the Capital goods have been classified in two categories for this purpose -

 

                               I.            computers and computer peripherals; and

                            II.            other capital goods

 

In first category of “computers and computer peripherals” the amount of depreciation will be determined as follows:

 

 

% apply in each quarter

Total historical cost of capital goods will reduced by

In first Year

10 %

10 * 4 =     40%

In second Year

8 %

 8 * 4 =       32%

In third Year

5 %

 5 * 4 =       20%

In fourth Year

1 %

 1 * 4 =         4%

In fifth Year

1 %

 1 * 4 =         4%

TOTAL % of depreciation

                  100%

 

Thus, the assessee will able to get the full amount of depreciation during the first five year due to affect of SLM approach.

 

For Capital Goods, other than computers and computer peripherals, the benefit of depreciation will be permitted during the period of ten years as rate of depreciation is given in this notification @ 2.5 % per quarter.

 

Whereas according to provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the amount of depreciation on "Computers and Office Equipments” will be calculated on the basis of Written down Value (WDV) method @ 60 % on carrying amount of such asset in each year and part thereof. This can be understood by the following table: -

 

 

PARTICULARS

CALCULATIONS OF DEPRECIATION AMOUNT

CARRYING AMOUNT

 

Assumed Cost of Asset

Rs. 100

First Year

100 * 60 % = Rs. 60

(100-60) = Rs. 40

Second Year

40 * 60% = Rs. 24

(40-24) = Rs. 16

Third Year

16 * 60% = Rs. 9.6

(16-9.6) = Rs. 6.4

Fourth Year

6.4 * 60% = Rs. 3.84

(6.4-3.84) = Rs. 2.56

Fifth Year

2.56 * 60% = Rs. 1.54

(2.56-1.54)= Rs. 1.02

 

Thus, according to Income Tax Act, 1961 the assessee will not be able to get full amount of depreciation on such asset due to affect of WDV approach during first five years.

 

But while going through per year benefit of depreciation in terms of % as a whole then it appears that benefit of depreciation amount in first year will be more under Income Tax Act whereas in subsequent years benefit will be more under Excise Law. This can be presented in tabular form as follows: -

 

 

Particulars

As per Excise Law

As per Income Tax Law

Excess Benefit under excise law

 

Benefit of depreciation in % on Original Cost

 

First Year

40 %

60 %

(-) 20 %

Second Year

32 %

24 %

8 %

Third Year

20 %

9.6 %

10.4 %

Fourth Year

4 %

3.84 %

0.16 %

Fifth Year

4 %

1.54 %

2.46 %

TOTAL

100 %

98.98 %

 

 

There should not be different tax rates under Income tax and Central Excise Rules.

 

The second impact of this amendment clarifies is that the depreciation will be allowed on straight line method. Earlier it was not clearly provided in the rule that the depreciation will be allowed on straight line or written down value method. The audit party has raised paras on the same. But this dispute is settled by this clear amendment. This is a welcome step.

 

Before parting……..

 

The cenvat credit on the capital goods falling under Chapter 82, 84, 85, 90 is allowed as per Rule 2(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The computer falls under the above definition. But the other condition is that the same should be used in the factory but does not include the things used in office premises. Most of the computers and peripherals are used in the office premises only. As such the credit will not be allowed on the same. However, the computers and computer peripherals are attached to machines comes along with machine and classified as a whole in that tariff heading. If this part is removed after use then the same will fall under tariff heading of machine. As such, whether the depreciation listed above will be allowed? The department will not agree to the same. But the service provider will definitely get the benefit of the same.

 

***********

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com