Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   RTI applicant in Madhya Pradesh asked to pay GST for information *   India’s GST collection drops to Rs93,960cr in August *   Karnataka Taxmen arrest two Bengaluru businessmen in GST related fraud *  Govt may soon impose IGST on ex-factory sales; decision in September. *  Niti Aayog Suggests Slashing Import Duty, GST On Gold *  Kerala Floods: Relief Goods Exempted From Customs Duty, IGST *  No GST On Petrol, Diesel In Near Future As Centre, States Not In Favour. *  Kerala plans to raise Rs 7.5 bn through hiked liquor duty & 10% cess on GST. *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST. *  Firms can't be selective in passing on rate cut benefits under GST regime *  Technical glitches continue to haunt the Goods and Services Tax Network *  GST Annual Return: Everything you need to know about the format, eligibility & rules around GSTR 9  *  Post GST, J&K’s own tax collection drops by Rs 1,300 crore since July 2017 *  GST Council may replace 12% and 18% slabs with 14-15% one: Sushil Modi *  Domino’s lands in trouble for not passing on GST cuts *   Higher oil prices, GST may boost states revenue by Rs 37,400 crore in FY19  *   These taxpayers no more at mercy of GST intermediaries *  Budget 2018: No fiscal derailment, but a lot rides on GST; expect caution from RBI *  GST: E-way bill implementation deferred due to glitches *  Homebuyers must avoid traps on the name of NO GST Impact *   Govt will formulate a comprehensive gold policy to develop gold as an asset class *   Government to evolve to asign a unique id to every individual enterprise. *   1.48 lakh crore for rail budget. *   7148 Crore to be sanctioned to textile sector. *   3700 corore for SME industry *  16000 crore for free electricity connection *   Government ignored warnings over GST rollout: sources *  GSTR 3B questionaire introduced- To be filled before filing return *  Advisory mail  to all the taxpayers received from GSTN *   Advisory group on GST submits report, suggests changes
Subject News *  Consumer durables firms, GST body continue to spar over profiteering *   225 million e-way bills generated across India since GST rollout *   September last month to fix GST filing errors *   Due date of TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 is extended *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-3B only for newly migrated taxpayers *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-1 *   Taxpayer with turnover over Rs 2 cr need GST audit certificate, will be arduous job for auditors *   Whether the appellants are eligible for refund of the duty claimed to have been paid in excess on the basis of DMT of the goods? Whether the said claim of refund is sustainable without challenging the assessment of the shipping bills. (Source:PJ/CASE LAW/2018-2019/3479) *   GST Flash Updates on various circulars and notifications dated 04/09/2018 *   GST Update on Circular No. 61/2018-GST dated 04.09.2018 *   GST Update on disharmony in CGST and SGST *    Update on restriction of refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules *   1,800 businesses migrate to GST regime *   ‘Missing’ service tax credit in GST update worries companies  *   Government notifies new annual return form for GST *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff. *  : Whether processing of secondary raw materials(steel scrap of different and variable composition) into blended steel scrap is liable for payment of central excise duty under the provision of the central excise Act,1944?Can  such “blended metal scrap” can be classified under tariff item 72044900 of the central excise tariff Act, 1985? *  Whether the transportation of goods by means of hired vehicles such that no consignment note is issued, would fall under the category of Goods Transport Agency Service? *  Whether the applicant is eligible to avail the benefit of exemption from payment of SAD provided under Notification No. 21/2012-Cus. *  Whether the polyester sewing thread manufactured by the appellant is excisable or not. *  INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIAMOND GRADING & RESEARCH INDIA P. LTD. *  Whether grading and inscription of diamonds by the appellant (IIDGR India Private Limited) would amount to manufacture under Central Excise legislation. *  What is the classification when frozen meat is sold in packaged form and rate of tax to be applicable? *  Is the unutilized cenvat credit available before surrender of registration transferable to the new unit? *  Whether Kindle device is covered under Tariff Item 8543 70 99 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or not? *  GST Council considering Kerala government's proposal of 'calamity tax' *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST *  Whether the assessee on filing of second appeal before Tribunal is required to make an additional pre-deposit of 10% of the duty and penalty in dispute? *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff? *  Niti Aayog Suggests Slashing Import Duty, GST On Gold  

Comments

Publish Date: 21 Sep, 2016
Print   |    |  Comment

Audit by department: Justified or not?

Audit by department: Justified or not?
 

An article by:-
CA. Pradeep Jain
CA. Preeti Parihar
CA. Vaibhav Bothra

 
Introduction

“Audit” – One of the most dreaded consequence of getting registered with the service tax department. Nobody wants to get strangled in the vicious circles of departmental audit and yet, sooner or later, you have to face the dungeon of audit. Times and now, questions have been raised on the qualifications and eligibility of the officers of the department to conduct audit, but the Government has proved to be adamant in continuing the ritual despite of the poor results of such audits. This piece of articulation is on the journey of provisions related to audit in the Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 governing the service tax law.
 
The mysterious provisions
 

Rule 5(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 It requires the Assessee to furnish to the Superintendent of Central Excise a list in duplicate of all the records prepared or maintained by him for accounting of transactions, in regard to providing any service, receipt or procurement of anybody’s service and payment of such service.
 
Types of documents that can be asked to be made available “on demand” The assessee is required to furnish following documents on demand:-
(i)    Records mentioned in terms of Rule 5(2);
(ii)   Cost Audit Reports, if any, under Section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013;
(iii)   Income Tax Audit Report, if any, under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
 
Section 72A of the Finance Act (Special Audit)
 
It is only where one of the three contingencies as mentioned in Section 72A of the Finance Act exists, that the Commissioner may direct the Assessee to “get his accounts audited either by a Chartered Accountant or a Cost Accountant nominated by such Commissioner”. The extent of the audit and the period for which it should be conducted is also to be specified by the Commissioner.
 
Section 82 of the Finance Act (Power to search premises)
 
This power can be exercised when the officer has a reason to believe that:-
(i)                there are documents or books that have been secreted in a place; and  
(ii)             such documents or books are useful or relevant for any proceedings.

 
The dispute
The service tax department undertakes audit at frequent intervals and all the records maintained by the service provider are scrutinized. The outcome is in form of audit paras, some genuine and some issued for procedural lapses, almost all result into issue of show cause notice. As the audit is an unwarranted situation, some of the assessees keep their fingers crossed and some opt for legal way to avoid the same. So, the issue of legality of audit by departmental officers has been commented by various Courts.
 
Judicial pronouncements
·        The very first stone was thrown by the Hon’ble  High Court of Delhi in the case of Travelite (India) Vs. Union of India & Ors. [W.P. (C) 3774/2013, C.M. No. 7065/2013]. It very specifically held that Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act. It quashed the rule stating that no Service Tax Audit can be conducted by the Department and only Special Audit within the Statute as mentioned under Section 72A of the Finance Act can be done either by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant only in specified certain circumstances”. It was further held that Service Tax Audit as envisaged in Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules does not have appropriate statutory backing of the Finance Act.
 
·        Following the same decision, the service tax audit by departmental officers was denied in the cases of ACL Education Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Union of India [2014-TIOL-120-HC-ALL-ST] and SKP Securities Ltd. Vs. DD (RA-IDT) & Ors. [2013-TIOL-38-HC-KOL-ST].
 
·        As on December 18, 2014, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted stay on the operation of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court judgment in the Travelite case. This decision has been cited at Union of India And Ors Vs. M/s Travelite (India) [2014 (12) TMI 1099 – SUPREME COURT]
 
Circulars & Notification issued to nullify the HC decisions
·        Circular No. 986/10/2014-CX dated October 9, 2014 was issued by the board which intended to clarify that judgment under the Travelite case does not deal with the issue of audit in the Central Excise. It was further clarified that there is adequate statutory backing for Audit by the Central Excise officers by virtue of Section 37(2)(x) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 22 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for conducting Central Excise Audit.
 
·        Notification No. 23/2014-ST dated December 5, 2014was issued to substitute rule 5A(2) to bring within its purview the officer authorised by the Commissioner or the Audit Party deputed by the Commissioner or CAG to conduct Service Tax Audit alongwith the Chartered Accountant or a Cost Accountant.  
 
·        Circular No. 181/7/2014-ST dated December 10, 2014 was issued to clarify that by virtue of amendment made in Section 94(2)(k) of the Finance Act by Section 114(J) of the Finance Act, 2014 w.e.f. August 6, 2014; now the Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules has legal backing. Therefore, it was clarified that the judgment of Travelite (India) is not applicable.
 
·        Circular No. 995/2/2015-CX dated February 27, 2015was issued by the CBEC on the subject – “Central Excise and Service Tax Audit norms to be followed by the Audit Commissionerates”. In this circular, directions were given to field formations regarding planning and conduct of audits and audit procedures to be followed.
Thus, after judicial pronouncements quashing the validity of audit by service tax authority, amendment was made in legal provisions to nullify the effect. Subsequent circulars issued in this respect also indicate that the Revenue is not in mood of giving up the audit powers.
 
Recently held:-
Recently, in the case of Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India And Ors [2016-TIOL-1061-HC-DEL-ST], the Hon’ble Delhi high Court has delivered a landmark judgment covering the following issues:-
1.     Whether Service Tax Department or CAG can conduct Service Tax Audit?
2.      Whether substituted Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 (“the Service Tax Rules”) is ultra vires the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 (“the Finance Act”)?
In this case, M/s Mega Cabs Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) received a letter in which it was intimated that the audit will be done of its service tax records by service tax officers in terms of rule 5(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. Being aggrieved, the Petitioner filed a petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, challenging the Impugned letter, along with Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules (as amended) on the grounds that it is beyond the rule making powers of the Central Government. The Petitioner also challenged the constitutional validity of Section 94(2)(k) of the Finance Act on the ground that it gives “plainly unguided and uncontrolled” delegated powers to the Central Government for framing rules and also the Circular No. 181 which clarifies that by virtue of amendments made by notification no. 23/2014-ST, now the audit by service tax department has legal backing.
The Delhi High Court analyzed the provisions of the Finance Act extensively and observed as under:-

  • Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, as amended, to the extent that it authorizes the officers of the Service Tax Department, the audit party deputed by a Commissioner or the CAG to seek production of the documents mentioned therein on demand, was held as ultra vires the Finance Act and, therefore, struck it down to that extent;
  • It was held that the expression ‘verify’ in Section 94(2)(k) of the Finance Act cannot be construed as audit of the accounts of an Assessee and, therefore, Rule 5A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, cannot be sustained with reference to Section 94(2)(k) of the Finance Act;
  • Circular No. 181 was declared as ultra vires the Finance Act and was struck down.
  • It quashed the Impugned Letter addressed to the Petitioner as being unsustainable in law.
  • It declared Circular No. 995 and the Central Excise and Service Tax Audit Manual 2015 issued by the Directorate General of Audit of the CBEC, as ultra vires the Finance Act, as they do not have any statutory backing and cannot be relied upon by the Department to legally justify the audit undertaken by officers of the Service Tax Department.

 
While winding
It is pretty much clear from the recent decision that the tussle between the courts and the government is a long running drama and the end to it is no way near. On one hand the courts have understood the pain of the assessees to be assessed by ineligible auditors and on the other hand the government does not want to let the assessees breath freely. As of now the situation seems to be in favour of assessees, only until the department does not issue any such letter for audit.
P.S. the situation in favour of assessees can be said only if they opt for suit in the court of law, otherwise no benefit of these decisions is ever available to them and litigation has its own costs.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com