Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 17 Oct, 2008
Print   |    |  Comment

Article on Recent Amendments in Excise Return (ER-4, ER-5, ER-6)

                                                                                                                          

                                                                  - Sukhvinder Kaur, LLB(FYIC)

 
Excise Returns: Recent Amendments
 
 
Every manufacturer has to file certain prescribed returns regarding his production, financial position, information on principal inputs etc. The filing of returns has been prescribed in the Central Excise Rules, 2002.
 
The Central Board of Excise and Customs has brought certain changes in the Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding filing of returns by a manufacturer. These changes have been brought due to falling revenue collections. These changes have been made to check the evasion of duty in the industry and increase the revenue collections.
 
These changes have been explained in the following paras:
 
1.) Annual Financial Information Statement (ER-4):-
 
Rule 12 (2) (a) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 provides that every assessee has to submit an Annual Financial Information Statement for which the statement relates by 30th day of November of the succeeding year. This Statement is to be filed in ER-4 to the Superintendent of Central Excise. However, the assessees paying excise duty less than One Crore from account current during the financial year, to which the Annual Financial Information Statement relates, were granted exemption from filing the said Statement vide Notification No. 17/2006-CE (NT), dated 1.08.06.
 
Now, Notification No. 17/2006-CE has been amended by Notification No. 42/2008-CE (NT) dated 29.09.08. The words “from account current” have been omitted from the Notification No.17/2006-CE. The effect of this amendment is that the assessee, who is paying excise duty of One Crore and more in total, i.e. from PLA as well as from Cenvat Credit Account, is now required to submit the Annual Financial Information Statement in ER-4. This statement is to be submitted by 30th November. Earlier, only the assessee paying excise duty of more than 1 Crore from account current (PLA) were required to file the Annual Financial Information Statement in ER-4 format.
 
2.)  Information relating to principle inputs (ER-5):-          
 
Rule 9A (1) provides that a manufacturer of final products has to furnish a declaration in respect of each of the excisable goods manufactured or to be manufactured by him, the principal inputs and the quantity of such inputs required for use in the manufacture of unit quantity of such final products. The said declaration is required to be filed in Form ER-5 annually before 30th April of each financial year. Notification No. 39/2004-CE(NT) dated 25.11.04 exempted the manufacturers of the following categories of goods from filing ER-5 who had paid excise duty less than One Crores from Current Account during the preceding financial year.
 
Now, vide Notification No. 41/2008-CE(NT) dated 29.09.08 the words “through account current” have been omitted. The effect of this amendment is that the assessee who is paying excise duty of One Crore and more in total i.e from PLA as well as from Cenvat Credit Account is required to file the Information relating to principal inputs in ER-5. This return is to be filed by 30th April of each financial year. Earlier, only the assessee paying excise duty of more than 1 Crore from account current (PLA) were required to file the Information relating to principle inputs in ER-5 format.
 
3.) Declaration by SSI units availing exemption from Registration:-
 
Notification No. 36/2001-CE(NT), dated 26.06.01 provides exemption from Registration to units manufacturing goods subject to ‘nil’ rate of duty or are fully exempt from excise duty by virtue of a Notification. Units availing SSI exemption are covered under this Notification. However, such units are required to file declaration that they fall under the exemption fixed, by submitting the details of goods manufactured by the factory during the preceding Financial Year.
 
Notification No. 36/2001-CE (NT) has been amended vide Notification No. 40/2008-CE(NT) dated 29.09.08. Now, the Units availing small scale excise exemption are required to file revised declaration for the year 2007-08 in new form for Declarant Units.
This revised declaration is to be filed by 31st October, 2008 in new form.
 
4.) Annual Installed Capacity Statement in ER-7:-
 
Returns to be filed by an assessee have been prescribed under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. CBEC has amended Rule 12 (2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 by the Central Excise (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2008 which have been introduced vide Notification No. 38/2008-CE (NT), dated 29.09.08. A new sub-rule (a) has been added which provides that every manufacturer has to submit an Annual Installed Capacity Statement.  
 
In this statement the assessee has to declare the annual production capacity of his factory for the Financial Year to which the statement relates. This means the assessee has to gives its annual production capacity of products manufactured, the details of main plant and machinery installed in the factory as well as the details of electricity consumed in his factory.
 
These details are to be submitted to the Superintendent of Central Excise in Form ER-7. This return is to be filed by 30th day of April of the succeeding financial year. But for the year 2007-08, the said statement is to be filed by 30th October, 2008. Form ER-7 has been prescribed vide Notification No. 39/2008-CE (NT), dated 29.09.08.
   
This return aim at curbing the evasion in the industry and increase in revenue. But the installed capacity will not bring revenue for the government. But the utilization of the same will bring the revenue. In Era of global recession, these steps will prove fatal for the industry. It will increase the corruption only.
 

 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com