Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Publish Date: 17 Oct, 2008
Print   |    |  Comment

Article on Recent Amendments in Excise Return (ER-4, ER-5, ER-6)

                                                                                                                          

                                                                  - Sukhvinder Kaur, LLB(FYIC)

 
Excise Returns: Recent Amendments
 
 
Every manufacturer has to file certain prescribed returns regarding his production, financial position, information on principal inputs etc. The filing of returns has been prescribed in the Central Excise Rules, 2002.
 
The Central Board of Excise and Customs has brought certain changes in the Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding filing of returns by a manufacturer. These changes have been brought due to falling revenue collections. These changes have been made to check the evasion of duty in the industry and increase the revenue collections.
 
These changes have been explained in the following paras:
 
1.) Annual Financial Information Statement (ER-4):-
 
Rule 12 (2) (a) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 provides that every assessee has to submit an Annual Financial Information Statement for which the statement relates by 30th day of November of the succeeding year. This Statement is to be filed in ER-4 to the Superintendent of Central Excise. However, the assessees paying excise duty less than One Crore from account current during the financial year, to which the Annual Financial Information Statement relates, were granted exemption from filing the said Statement vide Notification No. 17/2006-CE (NT), dated 1.08.06.
 
Now, Notification No. 17/2006-CE has been amended by Notification No. 42/2008-CE (NT) dated 29.09.08. The words “from account current” have been omitted from the Notification No.17/2006-CE. The effect of this amendment is that the assessee, who is paying excise duty of One Crore and more in total, i.e. from PLA as well as from Cenvat Credit Account, is now required to submit the Annual Financial Information Statement in ER-4. This statement is to be submitted by 30th November. Earlier, only the assessee paying excise duty of more than 1 Crore from account current (PLA) were required to file the Annual Financial Information Statement in ER-4 format.
 
2.)  Information relating to principle inputs (ER-5):-          
 
Rule 9A (1) provides that a manufacturer of final products has to furnish a declaration in respect of each of the excisable goods manufactured or to be manufactured by him, the principal inputs and the quantity of such inputs required for use in the manufacture of unit quantity of such final products. The said declaration is required to be filed in Form ER-5 annually before 30th April of each financial year. Notification No. 39/2004-CE(NT) dated 25.11.04 exempted the manufacturers of the following categories of goods from filing ER-5 who had paid excise duty less than One Crores from Current Account during the preceding financial year.
 
Now, vide Notification No. 41/2008-CE(NT) dated 29.09.08 the words “through account current” have been omitted. The effect of this amendment is that the assessee who is paying excise duty of One Crore and more in total i.e from PLA as well as from Cenvat Credit Account is required to file the Information relating to principal inputs in ER-5. This return is to be filed by 30th April of each financial year. Earlier, only the assessee paying excise duty of more than 1 Crore from account current (PLA) were required to file the Information relating to principle inputs in ER-5 format.
 
3.) Declaration by SSI units availing exemption from Registration:-
 
Notification No. 36/2001-CE(NT), dated 26.06.01 provides exemption from Registration to units manufacturing goods subject to ‘nil’ rate of duty or are fully exempt from excise duty by virtue of a Notification. Units availing SSI exemption are covered under this Notification. However, such units are required to file declaration that they fall under the exemption fixed, by submitting the details of goods manufactured by the factory during the preceding Financial Year.
 
Notification No. 36/2001-CE (NT) has been amended vide Notification No. 40/2008-CE(NT) dated 29.09.08. Now, the Units availing small scale excise exemption are required to file revised declaration for the year 2007-08 in new form for Declarant Units.
This revised declaration is to be filed by 31st October, 2008 in new form.
 
4.) Annual Installed Capacity Statement in ER-7:-
 
Returns to be filed by an assessee have been prescribed under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. CBEC has amended Rule 12 (2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 by the Central Excise (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2008 which have been introduced vide Notification No. 38/2008-CE (NT), dated 29.09.08. A new sub-rule (a) has been added which provides that every manufacturer has to submit an Annual Installed Capacity Statement.  
 
In this statement the assessee has to declare the annual production capacity of his factory for the Financial Year to which the statement relates. This means the assessee has to gives its annual production capacity of products manufactured, the details of main plant and machinery installed in the factory as well as the details of electricity consumed in his factory.
 
These details are to be submitted to the Superintendent of Central Excise in Form ER-7. This return is to be filed by 30th day of April of the succeeding financial year. But for the year 2007-08, the said statement is to be filed by 30th October, 2008. Form ER-7 has been prescribed vide Notification No. 39/2008-CE (NT), dated 29.09.08.
   
This return aim at curbing the evasion in the industry and increase in revenue. But the installed capacity will not bring revenue for the government. But the utilization of the same will bring the revenue. In Era of global recession, these steps will prove fatal for the industry. It will increase the corruption only.
 

 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com