Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 17 Oct, 2008
Print   |    |  Comment

Article on Recent Amendments in Excise Return (ER-4, ER-5, ER-6)

                                                                                                                          

                                                                  - Sukhvinder Kaur, LLB(FYIC)

 
Excise Returns: Recent Amendments
 
 
Every manufacturer has to file certain prescribed returns regarding his production, financial position, information on principal inputs etc. The filing of returns has been prescribed in the Central Excise Rules, 2002.
 
The Central Board of Excise and Customs has brought certain changes in the Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding filing of returns by a manufacturer. These changes have been brought due to falling revenue collections. These changes have been made to check the evasion of duty in the industry and increase the revenue collections.
 
These changes have been explained in the following paras:
 
1.) Annual Financial Information Statement (ER-4):-
 
Rule 12 (2) (a) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 provides that every assessee has to submit an Annual Financial Information Statement for which the statement relates by 30th day of November of the succeeding year. This Statement is to be filed in ER-4 to the Superintendent of Central Excise. However, the assessees paying excise duty less than One Crore from account current during the financial year, to which the Annual Financial Information Statement relates, were granted exemption from filing the said Statement vide Notification No. 17/2006-CE (NT), dated 1.08.06.
 
Now, Notification No. 17/2006-CE has been amended by Notification No. 42/2008-CE (NT) dated 29.09.08. The words “from account current” have been omitted from the Notification No.17/2006-CE. The effect of this amendment is that the assessee, who is paying excise duty of One Crore and more in total, i.e. from PLA as well as from Cenvat Credit Account, is now required to submit the Annual Financial Information Statement in ER-4. This statement is to be submitted by 30th November. Earlier, only the assessee paying excise duty of more than 1 Crore from account current (PLA) were required to file the Annual Financial Information Statement in ER-4 format.
 
2.)  Information relating to principle inputs (ER-5):-          
 
Rule 9A (1) provides that a manufacturer of final products has to furnish a declaration in respect of each of the excisable goods manufactured or to be manufactured by him, the principal inputs and the quantity of such inputs required for use in the manufacture of unit quantity of such final products. The said declaration is required to be filed in Form ER-5 annually before 30th April of each financial year. Notification No. 39/2004-CE(NT) dated 25.11.04 exempted the manufacturers of the following categories of goods from filing ER-5 who had paid excise duty less than One Crores from Current Account during the preceding financial year.
 
Now, vide Notification No. 41/2008-CE(NT) dated 29.09.08 the words “through account current” have been omitted. The effect of this amendment is that the assessee who is paying excise duty of One Crore and more in total i.e from PLA as well as from Cenvat Credit Account is required to file the Information relating to principal inputs in ER-5. This return is to be filed by 30th April of each financial year. Earlier, only the assessee paying excise duty of more than 1 Crore from account current (PLA) were required to file the Information relating to principle inputs in ER-5 format.
 
3.) Declaration by SSI units availing exemption from Registration:-
 
Notification No. 36/2001-CE(NT), dated 26.06.01 provides exemption from Registration to units manufacturing goods subject to ‘nil’ rate of duty or are fully exempt from excise duty by virtue of a Notification. Units availing SSI exemption are covered under this Notification. However, such units are required to file declaration that they fall under the exemption fixed, by submitting the details of goods manufactured by the factory during the preceding Financial Year.
 
Notification No. 36/2001-CE (NT) has been amended vide Notification No. 40/2008-CE(NT) dated 29.09.08. Now, the Units availing small scale excise exemption are required to file revised declaration for the year 2007-08 in new form for Declarant Units.
This revised declaration is to be filed by 31st October, 2008 in new form.
 
4.) Annual Installed Capacity Statement in ER-7:-
 
Returns to be filed by an assessee have been prescribed under Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. CBEC has amended Rule 12 (2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 by the Central Excise (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2008 which have been introduced vide Notification No. 38/2008-CE (NT), dated 29.09.08. A new sub-rule (a) has been added which provides that every manufacturer has to submit an Annual Installed Capacity Statement.  
 
In this statement the assessee has to declare the annual production capacity of his factory for the Financial Year to which the statement relates. This means the assessee has to gives its annual production capacity of products manufactured, the details of main plant and machinery installed in the factory as well as the details of electricity consumed in his factory.
 
These details are to be submitted to the Superintendent of Central Excise in Form ER-7. This return is to be filed by 30th day of April of the succeeding financial year. But for the year 2007-08, the said statement is to be filed by 30th October, 2008. Form ER-7 has been prescribed vide Notification No. 39/2008-CE (NT), dated 29.09.08.
   
This return aim at curbing the evasion in the industry and increase in revenue. But the installed capacity will not bring revenue for the government. But the utilization of the same will bring the revenue. In Era of global recession, these steps will prove fatal for the industry. It will increase the corruption only.
 

 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com