Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Publish Date: 17 Mar, 2012
Print   |    |  Comment

Amendment in Refund scheme under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Amendment in Refund scheme under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Prepared By: -
Preeti parihar
Ankit Palgauta

Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, prior to Budget, 2012, allowed the refund of duty/service tax paid on any input or input service which is used –
 
-                     in the manufacture of final products which is exported; or
-                     in the intermediate product cleared for export; or
-                     in providing output service which is exported.
 
The refund of input duty and input service tax is allowed only if the manufacturer/exporter is unable to utilize that credit –
 
-                     in paying the central excise duty on goods cleared in home country; or
-                     in paying the Service tax on output service,
 
Also, the refund is not allowed if the exporter avails the drawback or claims the rebate of duty or service tax.
 
But there was condition that there should be correlation between the input and input services used for manufacture of final product. Thus, the exporter has to tell the inputs used in manufacture of final product and duty on the same. It is very cumbersome procedure.
 
Amended Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004-
 
Budget, 2012 has amended the said rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The amended rule 5 says that the refund of Cenvat Credit will be allowed to –
 
(i)                 A manufacturer who clears a final product or an intermediate product for export without payment of duty under bond or letter of undertaking, or
(ii)               A service provider who exports an output service without payment of service tax.

The new rule says that the refund shall be allowed on the basis of following formula:-
 
Refund amount = (Export turnover of goods+ Export turnover of services) x Net CENVAT credit
                                                                Total turnover
Where,-
 
(A)  Refund amount means the maximum refund that is admissible;
(B)   Net CENVAT credit = Total CENVAT credit availed on inputs and input services – Reversal under rule 3(5C);
(C)  Export turnover of goods = Total value of final products + intermediate products exported under bond or letter of undertaking;
(D)  Export turnover of services‖ means the value of the export service calculated as follows:-
Export turnover of services = payments received for export services + export services whose provision has been completed for which payment was received in previous period – advances received but service not provided.
(E)   Total turnover =  Value of all clearances including exempted goods, dutiable goods and excisable goods exported + value of export services + value of domestic services + As such removal of inputs.
 
Also, the refund may be claimed under this rule prior to commencement of the CENVAT Credit (Third Amendment) Rules, 2012 and within one year from such commencement.
 
Further, the condition of non availment of drawback or rebate has been kept intact.
 
Net Effect of amendment-
 
This amendment has simplified the procedure of claiming the refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Under old Rule, the refund was allowed only if the manufacturer-exporter/service-exporter was unable to utilize the credit. This condition is now removed. However, there would be negligible effect of the same as no prudent man will file the refund of the credit which he can utilize in paying the excise duty or service tax. Further, the Cenvat credit attributable to export goods/export services was to be calculated while filing the refund claim. This was bit cumbersome. We have come across the situations when the assessee has refused to file the refund due to such a cumbersome procedures. The exporter should know that particular batch of raw material is used in particular batch of finished goods. Further this particular batch of raw material was purchased from particular invoice of the supplier. This created many problems. Further, the co-relation of input service was impossible. But the department always insisted on the same.
 
Now a simple formula is prescribed and credit is allowed proportionately on the basis of quantum of goods/services exported. This amendment is going to receive a warm well come from the exporters.

 

Comments

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com