Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Publish Date: 17 Mar, 2012
Print   |    |  Comment

Amendment in Refund scheme under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Amendment in Refund scheme under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Prepared By: -
Preeti parihar
Ankit Palgauta

Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, prior to Budget, 2012, allowed the refund of duty/service tax paid on any input or input service which is used –
 
-                     in the manufacture of final products which is exported; or
-                     in the intermediate product cleared for export; or
-                     in providing output service which is exported.
 
The refund of input duty and input service tax is allowed only if the manufacturer/exporter is unable to utilize that credit –
 
-                     in paying the central excise duty on goods cleared in home country; or
-                     in paying the Service tax on output service,
 
Also, the refund is not allowed if the exporter avails the drawback or claims the rebate of duty or service tax.
 
But there was condition that there should be correlation between the input and input services used for manufacture of final product. Thus, the exporter has to tell the inputs used in manufacture of final product and duty on the same. It is very cumbersome procedure.
 
Amended Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004-
 
Budget, 2012 has amended the said rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The amended rule 5 says that the refund of Cenvat Credit will be allowed to –
 
(i)                 A manufacturer who clears a final product or an intermediate product for export without payment of duty under bond or letter of undertaking, or
(ii)               A service provider who exports an output service without payment of service tax.

The new rule says that the refund shall be allowed on the basis of following formula:-
 
Refund amount = (Export turnover of goods+ Export turnover of services) x Net CENVAT credit
                                                                Total turnover
Where,-
 
(A)  Refund amount means the maximum refund that is admissible;
(B)   Net CENVAT credit = Total CENVAT credit availed on inputs and input services – Reversal under rule 3(5C);
(C)  Export turnover of goods = Total value of final products + intermediate products exported under bond or letter of undertaking;
(D)  Export turnover of services‖ means the value of the export service calculated as follows:-
Export turnover of services = payments received for export services + export services whose provision has been completed for which payment was received in previous period – advances received but service not provided.
(E)   Total turnover =  Value of all clearances including exempted goods, dutiable goods and excisable goods exported + value of export services + value of domestic services + As such removal of inputs.
 
Also, the refund may be claimed under this rule prior to commencement of the CENVAT Credit (Third Amendment) Rules, 2012 and within one year from such commencement.
 
Further, the condition of non availment of drawback or rebate has been kept intact.
 
Net Effect of amendment-
 
This amendment has simplified the procedure of claiming the refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Under old Rule, the refund was allowed only if the manufacturer-exporter/service-exporter was unable to utilize the credit. This condition is now removed. However, there would be negligible effect of the same as no prudent man will file the refund of the credit which he can utilize in paying the excise duty or service tax. Further, the Cenvat credit attributable to export goods/export services was to be calculated while filing the refund claim. This was bit cumbersome. We have come across the situations when the assessee has refused to file the refund due to such a cumbersome procedures. The exporter should know that particular batch of raw material is used in particular batch of finished goods. Further this particular batch of raw material was purchased from particular invoice of the supplier. This created many problems. Further, the co-relation of input service was impossible. But the department always insisted on the same.
 
Now a simple formula is prescribed and credit is allowed proportionately on the basis of quantum of goods/services exported. This amendment is going to receive a warm well come from the exporters.

 

Comments

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com