Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Publish Date: 17 Mar, 2012
Print   |    |  Comment

Amendment in Refund scheme under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Amendment in Refund scheme under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004

Prepared By: -
Preeti parihar
Ankit Palgauta

Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, prior to Budget, 2012, allowed the refund of duty/service tax paid on any input or input service which is used –
 
-                     in the manufacture of final products which is exported; or
-                     in the intermediate product cleared for export; or
-                     in providing output service which is exported.
 
The refund of input duty and input service tax is allowed only if the manufacturer/exporter is unable to utilize that credit –
 
-                     in paying the central excise duty on goods cleared in home country; or
-                     in paying the Service tax on output service,
 
Also, the refund is not allowed if the exporter avails the drawback or claims the rebate of duty or service tax.
 
But there was condition that there should be correlation between the input and input services used for manufacture of final product. Thus, the exporter has to tell the inputs used in manufacture of final product and duty on the same. It is very cumbersome procedure.
 
Amended Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004-
 
Budget, 2012 has amended the said rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The amended rule 5 says that the refund of Cenvat Credit will be allowed to –
 
(i)                 A manufacturer who clears a final product or an intermediate product for export without payment of duty under bond or letter of undertaking, or
(ii)               A service provider who exports an output service without payment of service tax.

The new rule says that the refund shall be allowed on the basis of following formula:-
 
Refund amount = (Export turnover of goods+ Export turnover of services) x Net CENVAT credit
                                                                Total turnover
Where,-
 
(A)  Refund amount means the maximum refund that is admissible;
(B)   Net CENVAT credit = Total CENVAT credit availed on inputs and input services – Reversal under rule 3(5C);
(C)  Export turnover of goods = Total value of final products + intermediate products exported under bond or letter of undertaking;
(D)  Export turnover of services‖ means the value of the export service calculated as follows:-
Export turnover of services = payments received for export services + export services whose provision has been completed for which payment was received in previous period – advances received but service not provided.
(E)   Total turnover =  Value of all clearances including exempted goods, dutiable goods and excisable goods exported + value of export services + value of domestic services + As such removal of inputs.
 
Also, the refund may be claimed under this rule prior to commencement of the CENVAT Credit (Third Amendment) Rules, 2012 and within one year from such commencement.
 
Further, the condition of non availment of drawback or rebate has been kept intact.
 
Net Effect of amendment-
 
This amendment has simplified the procedure of claiming the refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Under old Rule, the refund was allowed only if the manufacturer-exporter/service-exporter was unable to utilize the credit. This condition is now removed. However, there would be negligible effect of the same as no prudent man will file the refund of the credit which he can utilize in paying the excise duty or service tax. Further, the Cenvat credit attributable to export goods/export services was to be calculated while filing the refund claim. This was bit cumbersome. We have come across the situations when the assessee has refused to file the refund due to such a cumbersome procedures. The exporter should know that particular batch of raw material is used in particular batch of finished goods. Further this particular batch of raw material was purchased from particular invoice of the supplier. This created many problems. Further, the co-relation of input service was impossible. But the department always insisted on the same.
 
Now a simple formula is prescribed and credit is allowed proportionately on the basis of quantum of goods/services exported. This amendment is going to receive a warm well come from the exporters.

 

Comments

Post a Comment



Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com