Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update-20.12.2016

SECTION 16 ZERO RATED SUPPLY (IGST ACT):-

GST DAILY DOSE OF UPDATION
 
SECTION 16 ZERO RATED SUPPLY (IGST ACT):-
 
A new Chapter VIII has been introduced in the IGST Act wherein the concept of zero rated supply has been framed. The provisions contained in the section 16 are discussed as follows:-
Zero rated supply means any of the following taxable supply of goods and/or services, namely-

(a)  Export of goods and/or services; or

(b)Supply of goods and/or services to a SEZ developer or an SEZ unit.
 
It is also provided that the credit of input tax may be availed for making zero rated supplies notwithstanding that such supply may be an exempt supply.
 
It is further provided that a registered taxable person exporting goods or services shall be eligible to claim refund under one of the following two options:-

(a)  A registered taxable person may export goods or services under bond, subject to such conditions, safeguards and procedure as may be prescribed without payment of IGST and claim refund of unutilised input tax credit in accordance with provisions of section 48 of the CGST Act.

(b)A registered taxable person may export goods or services subject to such conditions, safeguards and procedure as may be prescribed with payment of IGST and claim refund of IGST paid on goods and services exported in accordance with provisions of section 48 of the CGST Act.

Lastly, it is provided that the SEZ developer or SEZ unit receiving zero rated supply shall be entitled to claim refund of IGST paid by registered taxable person on such supply.
 
On studying the above provisions, following implications may be drawn:-

·        The meaning of zero rated supply is very restricted and limited to normal exports and supply to SEZ or SEZ developer. The supplies made to EOUs, EHTP, STP etc are not covered under the concept of zero rated supply.

·        The input tax credit is available for zero rated supplies. This means that export without payment of duty and supply to SEZ will be considered as zero rated supply and credit will be available. Consequently, there will not be requirement to reverse credit even when the supplies are made without payment of duty in cases of exports and supply made to SEZ.

·        As EOU are not covered under zero rated supplies, the refund of unutilised cenvat credit will not be admissible to the supplies made to EOU. It was concluded by various judicial pronouncements like NBM Industries Case wherein supply to EOU was treated at par with physical export and benefit of refund of accumulated credit was extended. However, there amendment was made vide Budget, 2015 wherein definition of export was given for the purpose of refund of accumulated cenvat credit which stated that export means taking out of India to a place outside India. Consequently, refund of accumulated credit is not admissible to EOU but is available for clearances made to SEZ because the provisions of SEZ Act have overriding effect and supplies to SEZ are to be considered as export. It appears that the present policy is carried forward in the GST regime too.

·        It appears that the concept of ‘deemed exports’ will also be introduced in GST laws. This is evident from the definition of ‘deemed exports’ given under section 2(37) of the GST Act, 2016. It states that deemed exports as notified by the Central/State Government on the recommendation of the Council, refer to those transactions in which the goods supplied do not leave India and payment for such supplies is received either in Indian rupees or in convertible foreign exchange. At present, as per DGFT Laws, supplies to EOU is considered as deemed export and it may be possible that it is specified as deemed exports in GST Law also if the same is recommended by the Council. It is also pertinent to mention that refund under section 48 of the GST Act, 2016 includes refund of tax on supply of goods regarded as deemed exports. Consequently, it may be possible that supplies to EOU are made on payment of tax but refund of the said tax is admissible to the supplier. This is departure from the present provision under Central Excise Laws wherein clearances to EOU are made without payment of excise duty. We can say that exemption for supplies to EOU will be through refund mechanism. Similarly, for SEZ, exemption by way of refund mechanism has been prescribed in GST regime.
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com