Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update-19.12.2016

SECTION 15 VALUE OF TAXABLE SUPPLY UNDER REVISED GST LAW:-

GST DAILY DOSE OF UPDATION
 
SECTION 15 VALUE OF TAXABLE SUPPLY UNDER REVISED GST LAW:-
 
There is material departure in the valuation provisions of a taxable supply in the revised GST Law. A comparative analysis of the changes made with respect to present laws is made as follows:-
 
The valuation of taxable supply has been specified to be transaction value provided that supplier and recipient are not related and price is the sole consideration for supply. Apart from this, certain inclusions and exclusions have also been provided in the transaction value which is discussed in the succeeding paragraphs.
 
Firstly, we discuss the deletions made in the inclusive list of transaction value. The amortised value of goods/services supplied free of cost or at reduced price for use in connection with supply of goods/services so valued to the extent not included has been deleted thereby meaning that free supplies are no longer added in the transaction value. At present, under excise laws, amortised value of free supplies is added while under Service Tax Laws, larger bench of Tribunal in case of Bhayana Builders Case has ruled that free supplies are not to be added in the taxable value of service. Therefore, presently the issue as regards inclusion of free supplies in the taxable value of services is under dispute. However, under GST regime, it appears that the free supplies are not includible in the transaction value. However, at the same time, clause (b) of the section states that any amount incurred by recipeint of the supply that was supposed to be paid by supplier and which is not included in the price is to be added in the transaction value. This somehow indicates that free supplies should also be included in the transaction value but specific deletion of the clause leads to interpretation that free supplies are not to be included in transaction value.
Second deletion is regarding royalties and licence fees related to the supply of goods and/or services beingvalued that the recipient of supply must pay, either directly or indirectly, as a conditionof the said supply, to the extent that such royalties and fees are not included in the priceactually paid or payable.
 
Apart from above deletions, a new clause (d) has been inserted in the inclusion list regarding interest or late fee or penalty for delayed payment of any consideration for any supply. This has the effect that interest charged from the receiver which is in the nature of penalty for delayed payment will also be leviable to GST. As per present Excise/Service Tax Laws, there are number of judicial pronouncements holding that interest for delayed payment is not includible in the transaction value. This will definitely lead to enhancement in the transaction value.
 
Thirdly, Old GST Law provided that any reimbursable expenditure or cost incurred by or on behalf of the supplier and charged in relation to the supply of goods and/or services was also to be included in the transaction value. But, this clause has been deleted in the Revised GST Law which is highly appreciated. Presently, as per Service Tax Laws, there is Delhi High Court decision in the case of Inter Continental Techno Crafts quashing the Rule 5 specifying that reimbursable expenditure is includible in the taxable value of service.
 
 
There are also amendments in certain clauses, prominent being that as per old GST Law, value of supply included any taxes, duties, fees and charges levied under any statute other than the SGSTAct or the CGST Act or the IGST Act. However, as per revised GST Law, value of supply will include any taxes, duties, cesses, fees and charges levied under any statute, other than the {SGST Act/the CGST Act} and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to the States for Loss of Revenue) Act, 2016, if charged separately by the supplier to the recipient. Here, mention of IGST is missing which means that even IGST will be included in transaction value.
 
Furthermore, as per old GST Law, subsidies provided in any form or manner, linked to the supply were included in transaction value but as per revised GST law, subsidies provided by the Central and State Government are not to be included. This is a very appreciable step because presently, under Central Excise Laws, even subsidies provided by Central and State Governments are included in the transaction value in light of Apex Court decision in the case of Maruti Suzuki and Super Synotex.
 
Lastly, in the earlier Draft GST Law, situations were specified wherein transaction value was not applicable but not the said sub-section has been deleted.
 
 
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com