Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

Note on GSTR 2A- 20% provision and accounting entries

Note on GSTR 2A- 20% provision and accounting entries

The present note seeks to discuss the provisions regarding restriction of credit availment to the extent of 20% which is to be implemented with effect from October, 2019. A new sub-rule (4) has been inserted in Rule 36 dealing with conditions for claiming input tax credit which reads as follows:

“(4) Input tax credit to be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes, the details of which have not been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37, shall not exceed 20 percent of the eligible credit available in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37.”

Hence the above inserted sub-rule provides that the availment of ITC with respect to the invoices or debit notes not uploaded by the supplier cannot exceed 20% of the eligible credit with respect to invoices or debit notes which have been uploaded.

Let us understand this with the help of an example. Suppose Mr. X is a registered person in GST era.

(a)  ITC reflected in GSTR 2A in October 2019 Rs. 1,00,000

(b) Ineligible Credit as per 2A out of (a) above Rs. 20,000

(c)  Therefore, Eligible Credit i.e (a)-(b) is Rs.80,000

(d) ITC as per books of accounts is Rs.1,50,000

(e)  Provisional ITC (20% of the limit) that can be claimed =20%*80000= Rs.16,000

(f)   Total ITC eligible for availment in 3B return =80,000+16,000
=Rs.96,000

(g)  Credit to be transferred in unclaimed account in books of accounts 1,50,000-96,000=Rs.54,000

ITC will be restricted for buyers if suppliers have not uploaded invoice and paid tax. Buyers will be able to claim only 20% provisional ITC. Provisional ITC will be a maximum of 20% of the ITC available as per GSTR-2A i.e. 20% of ITC for invoices that have been uploaded by suppliers.

The inserted rule does not elaborate the term eligible credit. However, in-depth analysis of the term depicts that eligible credit is the total credit reflected in the GSTR 2A for a particular period or month. However, this credit excludes ineligible credit as per Section 17(5), credit pertaining to exempt supplies, reverse charge supplies reflecting in 2A return etc.

However, the credit to be taken cannot be exactly 20%, it has to be based on the invoices only. We can maximize our credit availment by doing various permutation and combination of invoices but it will be nearest to 20%. Suppose in above example, 20% comes to Rs. 16,000/- but the combination of invoices not uploaded by the supplier is Rs. 15,272/- and rest all invoices involve credit greater than Rs. 10,000/- then we should avail Rs. 15,272/- and not Rs. 16,000/- in GSTR-3B. In nutshell, the credit availment to the extent of 20% should also be supported by invoices and should not be on ad-hoc basis.

Furthermore, credits which cannot be availed due to 20% restriction are supposedly to be debited in unclaimed ledgers in our books of accounts rather than directly posting in Input ledgers.

The entry would be as follows-


Purchases a/c Dr……
Unclaimed Input CGST a/c Dr….
Unclaimed Input SGST a/c Dr….
          To Sundry Creditors a/c………


Or else at the end of the month, you can pass the entry and transfer from Input SGST and Input CGST to unclaimed credit account. Now, it is not clear that 20 percent will be applicable for each account of CGST, SGST and IGST separately or overall restriction will be applicable. If overall restriction is applied then everyone will take 20 percent IGST credit which can be utilized in payment of any account.

Every month while reconciling GSTR 2A with the books of accounts, the excess credit remaining after availing 20% credit will be transferred to Unclaimed input ledgers.

The invoices which were transferred to unclaimed ledgers in the previous month and are duly reflecting in updated GSTR 2A of next months and previous months would be transferred to input credit ledgers.

Entries would be-

Input CGST a/c       Dr

Input SGST a/c       Dr

To Unclaimed Input CGST a/c ….
To Unclaimed Input SGST a/c ….

A taxpayer will have to reconcile ITC between books of accounts and Form GSTR-2A in 8 days, i.e. starting from 12th of the succeeding month and before 20th of such month before filing Form GSTR-3B. It is practically impossible to undertake such detailed exercise in such a limited time frame.

Another critical aspect which stands unaddressed relates to the cases wherein a taxpayer has significant procurements from vendors who file quarterly Form GSTR-1. The ITC owing to such vendors shall always be in the unmatched bucket, which will have to be reconciled on quarterly basis. Hence, in first two months of the quarter, the taxpayer will have to forego validly due ITC.

Goods-in-transit is a common practice in business, and it is only logical that some procurement at month-end will be received in next month. Under GST, ITC on such invoices can be availed in month of receipt. Hence, a monthly reconciliation will have mismatches related to goods in transit (both opening and closing), and opening goods-in-transit needs to be matched by the taxpayer by analysing Form GSTR-2A of the previous month.

 

This provision has increased the complications further for the taxpayer and instead of availing this benefit of availing credit pertaining to invoices not uploaded by the supplier to the extent of 20% of the eligible credit appearing in GSTR-2A, the taxpayer can simply follow the policy for availing eligible credit that is being reflected in GSTR-2A. This will save them from the reconciliations to be made every month with respect to 20% calculation.

 

The content of this GST update is for educational purpose only and not intended for solicitation.You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21

 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com