Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update 09.01.2016

LONG DRIVEN PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF GST LAW

GST DAILY DOSE OF UPDATION:-

 
LONG DRIVEN PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF GST LAW:-
 
The Hon’ble Finance Minister is making its constant efforts to bring in force the revolutionary taxation reform, GST by the Mid of this year but it appears a far possibility that the GST would be implemented this year. The determination of BJP Government to implement GST can be seen from the recent meeting of Mr. Venkaiah Naidu, Parliamentary affair minister  with Congress president Mrs. Sonia Gandhi for early session of budget session of Rajya Sabha for passing of GST bill. Even if the bill is passed by Rajya Sabha in early budget session, which seems to be remote possibility, then also it will be very difficult to implement the same in this financial year.

This is for the reason that till now, even the Constitutional Amendment is pending and it is expected that the Constitution (One Hundred And Twenty Second Amendment) Bill, 2014 will be passed in the Rajya Sabha in the Budget Session of the Parliament as some of the Congress Members would be retiring and there would be comparatively better strength of members supporting the Constitutional Amendment for GST. However, even if the constitutional amendment is got through in the upcoming Budget Session, then too, it appears a remote possibility that the GST law would be implemented by the government this year itself. Although, the simultaneous initiatives taken by the government for preparation of Drafts for proposed GST Laws and creating necessary IT infrastructure for smooth implementation of GST are appreciable but there is still long driven path to be followed for introducing the GST law in India. Not only this, it is being reported in news that probably the Finance Minister will declare the deadline of GST to be April, 2017 in the upcoming budget. Furthermore, this year budget would foresee hike in excise duty and service tax so as to prepare the taxpayers for the higher rate of unified tax to be implemented in near future.
 
The new Constitution (One Hundred And Twenty Second Amendment) Bill, 2014 was introduced in the lower house of the Parliament, i.e., Lok Sabha on 19.12.2014 and the bill was taken for discussion and was finally passed on 06.05.2015 as the NDA had majority. However, in the upper house of the Parliament, i.e., in Rajya Sabha, the government does not have majority and so the Constitutional Amendment Bill is stuck there for passage. It is hoped that the bill is passed in the upcoming budget session of the Parliament. For announcing GST Bill, it is pre-requisite that the bill is passed by both the houses of the Parliament and thereafter, GST Council will be constituted. Furthermore, any Constitutional Bill is also required to be ratified by at least 50% of the State Assemblies. This means that the Constitutional bill after its passage by the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha is to be approved by more than the State Assemblies. At least 50% of the States have to pass the GST Constitutional Amendment Bill. This is not the end and rather beginning of the procedure for introduction of GST Law. Once the constitutional amendment bill is passed by the Parliament, the Central Government is to provide the draft bill of the proposed GST. Not only this, the draft bill is required to be placed in public domain before presenting it for passage in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha so that the suggestions from trade, industry and tax experts are gathered. After amending the draft bill keeping in mind the suggestions of the tax experts and industry, the bill will be required to be passed by both the houses of Parliament and thereafter, to be passed by  the State Assemblies.
 
It is submitted that the above procedure of passage of constitutional bill by both houses of Parliament and thereafter approval by 50% of the State Assemblies is only part of procedure for implementation of GST Law. Thereafter, the draft GST Bill is again to be passed by both the houses of Parliament and again approved by the State Assemblies. Hence, it can be concluded that the deadline of April, 2017 for the effective implementation of GST is also difficult to be met by the government. 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com