Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update 09.01.2016

LONG DRIVEN PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF GST LAW

GST DAILY DOSE OF UPDATION:-

 
LONG DRIVEN PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF GST LAW:-
 
The Hon’ble Finance Minister is making its constant efforts to bring in force the revolutionary taxation reform, GST by the Mid of this year but it appears a far possibility that the GST would be implemented this year. The determination of BJP Government to implement GST can be seen from the recent meeting of Mr. Venkaiah Naidu, Parliamentary affair minister  with Congress president Mrs. Sonia Gandhi for early session of budget session of Rajya Sabha for passing of GST bill. Even if the bill is passed by Rajya Sabha in early budget session, which seems to be remote possibility, then also it will be very difficult to implement the same in this financial year.

This is for the reason that till now, even the Constitutional Amendment is pending and it is expected that the Constitution (One Hundred And Twenty Second Amendment) Bill, 2014 will be passed in the Rajya Sabha in the Budget Session of the Parliament as some of the Congress Members would be retiring and there would be comparatively better strength of members supporting the Constitutional Amendment for GST. However, even if the constitutional amendment is got through in the upcoming Budget Session, then too, it appears a remote possibility that the GST law would be implemented by the government this year itself. Although, the simultaneous initiatives taken by the government for preparation of Drafts for proposed GST Laws and creating necessary IT infrastructure for smooth implementation of GST are appreciable but there is still long driven path to be followed for introducing the GST law in India. Not only this, it is being reported in news that probably the Finance Minister will declare the deadline of GST to be April, 2017 in the upcoming budget. Furthermore, this year budget would foresee hike in excise duty and service tax so as to prepare the taxpayers for the higher rate of unified tax to be implemented in near future.
 
The new Constitution (One Hundred And Twenty Second Amendment) Bill, 2014 was introduced in the lower house of the Parliament, i.e., Lok Sabha on 19.12.2014 and the bill was taken for discussion and was finally passed on 06.05.2015 as the NDA had majority. However, in the upper house of the Parliament, i.e., in Rajya Sabha, the government does not have majority and so the Constitutional Amendment Bill is stuck there for passage. It is hoped that the bill is passed in the upcoming budget session of the Parliament. For announcing GST Bill, it is pre-requisite that the bill is passed by both the houses of the Parliament and thereafter, GST Council will be constituted. Furthermore, any Constitutional Bill is also required to be ratified by at least 50% of the State Assemblies. This means that the Constitutional bill after its passage by the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha is to be approved by more than the State Assemblies. At least 50% of the States have to pass the GST Constitutional Amendment Bill. This is not the end and rather beginning of the procedure for introduction of GST Law. Once the constitutional amendment bill is passed by the Parliament, the Central Government is to provide the draft bill of the proposed GST. Not only this, the draft bill is required to be placed in public domain before presenting it for passage in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha so that the suggestions from trade, industry and tax experts are gathered. After amending the draft bill keeping in mind the suggestions of the tax experts and industry, the bill will be required to be passed by both the houses of Parliament and thereafter, to be passed by  the State Assemblies.
 
It is submitted that the above procedure of passage of constitutional bill by both houses of Parliament and thereafter approval by 50% of the State Assemblies is only part of procedure for implementation of GST Law. Thereafter, the draft GST Bill is again to be passed by both the houses of Parliament and again approved by the State Assemblies. Hence, it can be concluded that the deadline of April, 2017 for the effective implementation of GST is also difficult to be met by the government. 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com