Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

ISSUES ARISING WHILE SANCTIONING OF REFUND OF EXPORTS WITH PAYMENT OF DUTY

ISSUES ARISING WHILE SANCTIONING OF REFUND OF EXPORTS WITH PAYMENT OF DUTY
Almost more than 9 months have been passed since the GST has been implemented. But still the registered exporters are facing lot of issues every other day due to lack of proper co-ordination between GST portal and Customs EDI system in getting refunds. In this update, we will be listing out the common problems faced by the exporters due to wrong filing of returns resulting into non-sanctioning of refunds under exports with payment of duty.
 
For refund of exports with payment of duty, there are some conditions laid down for successful claiming of such refund which are:
 
1.     GSTR-3B for the month is filed;
2.     Table 6A of GSTR-1 has been filed;
3.     Details of Shipping Bill and Invoice provided in Table 6A of GSTR-1 should match; and
4.     The IGST amount mentioned in GSTR-3B under zero rated supply should tally to the IGST mentioned in Table 6A of GSTR-1.
 
However, certain mistakes or mismatch in the amount leads to non-sanctioning of such refunds thereby laying further hardships on exporters. Although exporters have been given an option to rectify any error committed while filing in GSTR 1 through Table 9A of GSTR 1 same facility is not been provided for return GSTR-3B. Moreover, there are large number of cases wherein data has still not been transmitted by GSTN to Customs EDI system due to failure on account of other validations at their end.
 
There has been a circulation of circular no. 450/36/2018-Cus IV dated 28.03.2018 on TAXGURU site which states that one of the validation check done by GSTN is to ensure that the refund claimed is not more than the IGST paid by the exporter. However, such validation error is due to the following reasons:
 
I.                   Issues pertaining to declaration of Cess amount –
 
Validation Error:Table 6A of GSTR 1 requires feeding of export details with regard to IGST mainly the rate, taxable value and amount on account of exports. However, for earlier periods of GST regime, there was no column for declaration of cess amount due to which the exporters filed the accumulated (IGST + cess) amount in the tax head. This resulted in mismatch of amount with GSTR-3B ensuing non transfer of such export details by GSTN to Customs EDI system leading to delay in refunds.
 
Solution:For non transmission of data validation error GSTN and Principal CCA are resorting to system based solution.
 
II.                 Export Supplies has been declared as domestic supplies in GSTR 3B-
 
Validation error: The most common mistake done by exporters is declaration of export supplies in domestic supplies, which means, in GSTR-3B export details are declared in outward supplies (i.e. in Table 3.1 (a)) instead of zero-rated supply instead of (Table 3.1 (b)).
 
Solution:In cases where it can be established that the mistake is only on account of feeding details as above which cannot be resolved by computing using system/logic, the GST field officers will scrutinize the returns as following and seek necessary clarification from the exporters wherever necessary:
 
1.     The officers would compare the aggregate data of inter- state supplies as declared in Table 4, 5, 6A and 7B along with amendments, if any declared in Table 9, 10 and 11 of FORM GSTR-1, with the aggregate data of inter-state supplies declared in Table 3.1(a), 3.1(b) and 3.1(d) of FORM GSTR-3B. Thereafter, if the aggregate values get matched, then the officer would calculate the notional value of Table 3.1(b) on the basis of reconciliation which should be greater than IGST amount declared in Table 6A of GSTR-1.
 
2.     While reconciling the data, the officer shall also take into account the amount of IGST paid as shown under Table 6.1 of GSTR 3B.
 
3.     In no case, the notional values of IGST in Table 3.1 shall exceed the value of IGST paid in Table 6.1 of GSTR 3B with the purpose to ascertain whether details pertaining to export supplies are actually filed under domestic supplies or not.
 
4.     The department may ask from the exporters about the errors made while filing Table 3.1(b) of GSTR 3B in written to ensure that revised values submitted by exporters in Table 6A of GSTR 1 shall be less than or equal to that in 3.1(b) of GSTR 3B.
 
III.              Any issue other than above
 
In all other cases, where the errors are committed by exporter a letter from exporter explaining the error and the correction to be made in GST return shall be taken wherein exporter may also provide a certificate from CA that the IGST has been paid on export or goods for which IGST refund is being claimed.
 
Although this solution seems to be feasible to get refund of exports with payment of duty with the help of manual intervention wherein all the aggregate amounts are to be verified by the officer of Customs, it is yet to be issued officially on website of CBIC i.e. www.cbec.gov.in.
 
The content of this GST update is for educational purpose only and not intended for solicitation.
 
 
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com