Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

ISSUES ARISING WHILE SANCTIONING OF REFUND OF EXPORTS WITH PAYMENT OF DUTY

ISSUES ARISING WHILE SANCTIONING OF REFUND OF EXPORTS WITH PAYMENT OF DUTY
Almost more than 9 months have been passed since the GST has been implemented. But still the registered exporters are facing lot of issues every other day due to lack of proper co-ordination between GST portal and Customs EDI system in getting refunds. In this update, we will be listing out the common problems faced by the exporters due to wrong filing of returns resulting into non-sanctioning of refunds under exports with payment of duty.
 
For refund of exports with payment of duty, there are some conditions laid down for successful claiming of such refund which are:
 
1.     GSTR-3B for the month is filed;
2.     Table 6A of GSTR-1 has been filed;
3.     Details of Shipping Bill and Invoice provided in Table 6A of GSTR-1 should match; and
4.     The IGST amount mentioned in GSTR-3B under zero rated supply should tally to the IGST mentioned in Table 6A of GSTR-1.
 
However, certain mistakes or mismatch in the amount leads to non-sanctioning of such refunds thereby laying further hardships on exporters. Although exporters have been given an option to rectify any error committed while filing in GSTR 1 through Table 9A of GSTR 1 same facility is not been provided for return GSTR-3B. Moreover, there are large number of cases wherein data has still not been transmitted by GSTN to Customs EDI system due to failure on account of other validations at their end.
 
There has been a circulation of circular no. 450/36/2018-Cus IV dated 28.03.2018 on TAXGURU site which states that one of the validation check done by GSTN is to ensure that the refund claimed is not more than the IGST paid by the exporter. However, such validation error is due to the following reasons:
 
I.                   Issues pertaining to declaration of Cess amount
 
Validation Error:Table 6A of GSTR 1 requires feeding of export details with regard to IGST mainly the rate, taxable value and amount on account of exports. However, for earlier periods of GST regime, there was no column for declaration of cess amount due to which the exporters filed the accumulated (IGST + cess) amount in the tax head. This resulted in mismatch of amount with GSTR-3B ensuing non transfer of such export details by GSTN to Customs EDI system leading to delay in refunds.
 
Solution:For non transmission of data validation error GSTN and Principal CCA are resorting to system based solution.
 
II.                 Export Supplies has been declared as domestic supplies in GSTR 3B-
 
Validation error: The most common mistake done by exporters is declaration of export supplies in domestic supplies, which means, in GSTR-3B export details are declared in outward supplies (i.e. in Table 3.1 (a)) instead of zero-rated supply instead of (Table 3.1 (b)).
 
Solution:In cases where it can be established that the mistake is only on account of feeding details as above which cannot be resolved by computing using system/logic, the GST field officers will scrutinize the returns as following and seek necessary clarification from the exporters wherever necessary:
 
1.     The officers would compare the aggregate data of inter- state supplies as declared in Table 4, 5, 6A and 7B along with amendments, if any declared in Table 9, 10 and 11 of FORM GSTR-1, with the aggregate data of inter-state supplies declared in Table 3.1(a), 3.1(b) and 3.1(d) of FORM GSTR-3B. Thereafter, if the aggregate values get matched, then the officer would calculate the notional value of Table 3.1(b) on the basis of reconciliation which should be greater than IGST amount declared in Table 6A of GSTR-1.
 
2.     While reconciling the data, the officer shall also take into account the amount of IGST paid as shown under Table 6.1 of GSTR 3B.
 
3.     In no case, the notional values of IGST in Table 3.1 shall exceed the value of IGST paid in Table 6.1 of GSTR 3B with the purpose to ascertain whether details pertaining to export supplies are actually filed under domestic supplies or not.
 
4.     The department may ask from the exporters about the errors made while filing Table 3.1(b) of GSTR 3B in written to ensure that revised values submitted by exporters in Table 6A of GSTR 1 shall be less than or equal to that in 3.1(b) of GSTR 3B.
 
III.              Any issue other than above
 
In all other cases, where the errors are committed by exporter a letter from exporter explaining the error and the correction to be made in GST return shall be taken wherein exporter may also provide a certificate from CA that the IGST has been paid on export or goods for which IGST refund is being claimed.
 
Although this solution seems to be feasible to get refund of exports with payment of duty with the help of manual intervention wherein all the aggregate amounts are to be verified by the officer of Customs, it is yet to be issued officially on website of CBIC i.e. www.cbec.gov.in.
 
The content of this GST update is for educational purpose only and not intended for solicitation.
 
 
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com