Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

INPUT TAX CREDIT AVAILMENT ON SUBSIDIARY SERVICES PROVIDED IN RESPECT TO MOTOR VEHICLES

INPUT TAX CREDIT AVAILMENT ON SUBSIDIARY SERVICES PROVIDED IN RESPECT TO MOTOR VEHICLES
INPUT TAX CREDIT AVAILMENT ON SUBSIDIARY SERVICES PROVIDED IN RESPECT TO MOTOR VEHICLES
This update seeks to discuss the admissibility of input tax credit pertaining to the purchase and other services in respect of motor vehicles and other conveyances.
Section 17(5) of CGST Act 2017 outlines the list of blocked credits and this lists allows the availability of input tax credit on motor vehicles on conditional basis. The relevant part of Section 17(5) reads as has been enumerated below-
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:—
(a) Motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used––
(i) For making the following taxable supplies, namely:—
(A) Further supply of such vehicles or conveyances; or
(B) Transportation of passengers; or
(C) Imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) For transportation of goods;
The analysis of above portion of section 17(5) makes it clear that the ITC on motor vehicles and other conveyances is allowed on conditional basis. It has been interpreted that the phrase "in respect of" is very restrictive in nature and it covers only the ITC involved in purchase of motor vehicle. All the other expenses like repairs-maintenance and insurance will be eligible for credit availment. This interpretation is based upon the fact that repairs and maintenance of motor vehicles is nowhere denied in section 17(5) or any other provision of CGST Act, 2017. When the ITC is not specifically denied, it is deemed to be allowed.
It is worthwhile to note that even the twitter handle provided by the government confirmed that ITC pertaining to the repair and maintenance of motor vehicles and conveyances used for business purpose shall be allowed.
In the recent proposed amendments in CGST Act wherein the bill is passed by the Lok Sabha i.e. CGST (Amendment) Bill, 2018, Section 17(5)(a) has been substituted as follows-
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:—
“(a) motor vehicles for transportation of persons having approved seating capacity of not more than thirteen persons (including the driver), except when they are used for making the following taxable supplies, namely:—
(A) Further supply of such motor vehicles; or
(B) Transportation of passengers; or
(C) Imparting training on driving such motor vehicles;
(aa) vessels and aircraft except when they are used––
(i) For making the following taxable supplies, namely:—
(A) Further supply of such vessels or aircraft; or
(B) Transportation of passengers; or
(C) Imparting training on navigating such vessels; or
(D) Imparting training on flying such aircraft;
(ii) For transportation of goods;
(ab) services of general insurance, servicing, repair and maintenance in so far as they relate to motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa).
Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such services shall be available—
(i) Where the motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) are used for the purposes specified therein;
(ii) Where received by a taxable person engaged—
(I) in the manufacture of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft; or
(II) in the supply of general insurance services in respect of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft insured by him;
On the basis of the analysis of the aforesaid newly proposed amendment, clause (ab) allows the credit on motor vehicle mentioned in clause (a) and (aa). The clause (a) mentions vehicle having approved seating capacity not more than 13 passengers. Hence, the buses and vans will be covered and it can be inferred that credit pertaining to repair, maintenance and other services explicitly provided in case of motor vehicles used in business purpose and having seating capacity of more than 13 persons (including the driver)like buses, Omnis, vans etc. will be allowed without any restrictions.
However, no ITC shall be allowed in case of repairs, maintenance and insurance of motor vehicles having seating capacity less than thirteen persons. But proviso to this clause (ab) allows the credit on repair, maintenance of such motor vehicle which are used for the purpose.
specified in clause (a) and (aa). The credit on vehicles of seating capacity less than 13 persons is allowed to traders of such vehicle, rent-a-cab operators and training and driving institutes. Hence, the credit of repair, servicing, insurance etc. will be allowed to them. But it will create unnecessary dispute that authorized car dealers having service centre will get the credit on outsourced repairing work but small workshops will not get the same.
Moreover, the credit of repair and maintenance of cars will be allowed to manufacturers of cars and credit of insurance will be allowed to insurance company.
Further, it is indispensible to note that this amendment bill is subject to changes as it has not been notified yet. The money bill is to be tabled in Rajya Sabha. Also, amended SGST bill is to be passed by all state assemblies before it become a statue applicable all over India.
This is solely for educational purposes. You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21. We hope the above is useful to you.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com