Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

INPUT TAX CREDIT AVAILMENT ON SUBSIDIARY SERVICES PROVIDED IN RESPECT TO MOTOR VEHICLES

INPUT TAX CREDIT AVAILMENT ON SUBSIDIARY SERVICES PROVIDED IN RESPECT TO MOTOR VEHICLES
INPUT TAX CREDIT AVAILMENT ON SUBSIDIARY SERVICES PROVIDED IN RESPECT TO MOTOR VEHICLES
This update seeks to discuss the admissibility of input tax credit pertaining to the purchase and other services in respect of motor vehicles and other conveyances.
Section 17(5) of CGST Act 2017 outlines the list of blocked credits and this lists allows the availability of input tax credit on motor vehicles on conditional basis. The relevant part of Section 17(5) reads as has been enumerated below-
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:—
(a) Motor vehicles and other conveyances except when they are used––
(i) For making the following taxable supplies, namely:—
(A) Further supply of such vehicles or conveyances; or
(B) Transportation of passengers; or
(C) Imparting training on driving, flying, navigating such vehicles or conveyances;
(ii) For transportation of goods;
The analysis of above portion of section 17(5) makes it clear that the ITC on motor vehicles and other conveyances is allowed on conditional basis. It has been interpreted that the phrase "in respect of" is very restrictive in nature and it covers only the ITC involved in purchase of motor vehicle. All the other expenses like repairs-maintenance and insurance will be eligible for credit availment. This interpretation is based upon the fact that repairs and maintenance of motor vehicles is nowhere denied in section 17(5) or any other provision of CGST Act, 2017. When the ITC is not specifically denied, it is deemed to be allowed.
It is worthwhile to note that even the twitter handle provided by the government confirmed that ITC pertaining to the repair and maintenance of motor vehicles and conveyances used for business purpose shall be allowed.
In the recent proposed amendments in CGST Act wherein the bill is passed by the Lok Sabha i.e. CGST (Amendment) Bill, 2018, Section 17(5)(a) has been substituted as follows-
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) of section 16 and subsection (1) of section 18, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the following, namely:—
“(a) motor vehicles for transportation of persons having approved seating capacity of not more than thirteen persons (including the driver), except when they are used for making the following taxable supplies, namely:—
(A) Further supply of such motor vehicles; or
(B) Transportation of passengers; or
(C) Imparting training on driving such motor vehicles;
(aa) vessels and aircraft except when they are used––
(i) For making the following taxable supplies, namely:—
(A) Further supply of such vessels or aircraft; or
(B) Transportation of passengers; or
(C) Imparting training on navigating such vessels; or
(D) Imparting training on flying such aircraft;
(ii) For transportation of goods;
(ab) services of general insurance, servicing, repair and maintenance in so far as they relate to motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa).
Provided that the input tax credit in respect of such services shall be available—
(i) Where the motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) are used for the purposes specified therein;
(ii) Where received by a taxable person engaged—
(I) in the manufacture of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft; or
(II) in the supply of general insurance services in respect of such motor vehicles, vessels or aircraft insured by him;
On the basis of the analysis of the aforesaid newly proposed amendment, clause (ab) allows the credit on motor vehicle mentioned in clause (a) and (aa). The clause (a) mentions vehicle having approved seating capacity not more than 13 passengers. Hence, the buses and vans will be covered and it can be inferred that credit pertaining to repair, maintenance and other services explicitly provided in case of motor vehicles used in business purpose and having seating capacity of more than 13 persons (including the driver)like buses, Omnis, vans etc. will be allowed without any restrictions.
However, no ITC shall be allowed in case of repairs, maintenance and insurance of motor vehicles having seating capacity less than thirteen persons. But proviso to this clause (ab) allows the credit on repair, maintenance of such motor vehicle which are used for the purpose.
specified in clause (a) and (aa). The credit on vehicles of seating capacity less than 13 persons is allowed to traders of such vehicle, rent-a-cab operators and training and driving institutes. Hence, the credit of repair, servicing, insurance etc. will be allowed to them. But it will create unnecessary dispute that authorized car dealers having service centre will get the credit on outsourced repairing work but small workshops will not get the same.
Moreover, the credit of repair and maintenance of cars will be allowed to manufacturers of cars and credit of insurance will be allowed to insurance company.
Further, it is indispensible to note that this amendment bill is subject to changes as it has not been notified yet. The money bill is to be tabled in Rajya Sabha. Also, amended SGST bill is to be passed by all state assemblies before it become a statue applicable all over India.
This is solely for educational purposes. You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21. We hope the above is useful to you.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com