Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  No Service Tax On Reimbursed Salary of Seconded Employee: CESTAT *  Customs Dept. Can’t Deny Exemption Benefits Based On Laboratory Test Reports Not Drawn As Per ISI: CESTAT *  Service Tax Not Payable on Hostel Buildings Rented to Educational Institutions: CESTAT *  GST Penalty on Partners Valid Even for Pre-2021 Transactions U/s 122(1A): Gauhati High Court  *  KYC Verification Of Importer By Customs Broker Through Govt. Portals Enough, No Physical Verification Required: CESTAT  *  GSTN Extends Timeline for implementation of mandatory “Ship To GSTIN” and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities.  *  Customs Dept. Can’t Indefinitely Suspend Cargo License Without Inquiry: CESTAT  *  No Evidence of Customs Broker’s Knowledge of Mis declared Sugar Export: CESTAT Quashes Penalty Under CBLR.  *  Transportation Charges Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT  *  No Gold Seizure Without Proof of Smuggling or Foreign Origin: CESTAT *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines
Subject News *  Personal Hearing Before Reply Deadline: Uttarakhand HC Quashes GST Assessment Order. *  GST Assessment Order Invalid Where Notice, Reply, Hearing Dates Were Fixed on Same Day: Allahabad High Court *  GST Assessment Order Quashed for Denial of Personal Hearing Despite Taxpayer Opting ‘No’ in DRC-06: Gujarat High Court *  Reversal of CENVAT Credit Equals Non-Availment: CESTAT *  Rule 9(1)(bb) Can’t Be Invoked to Deny CENVAT Credit When Penalty Proceedings Fail: CESTAT *  • Customs Duty Exemption on Edible-Grade Oils Used in Cosmetics: CESTAT  *  Bona Fide Purchaser Can’t Be Denied ITC Merely For Seller’s Deposit Tax Failure: Gauhati High Court  *  Reversal of CENVAT Credit Equals Non-Availment: CESTAT  *  Sec. 73 & 74 Permit Consolidated Proceedings Across FY: Gauhati High Court Upholds Multi-Year GST SCN  *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case   

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

IGST ON ADVANCE RECIEVED FOR EXPORTS

IGST ON ADVANCE RECIEVED FOR EXPORTS

GST DAILY DOSE OF UPDATION
 
IGST ON ADVANCE RECIEVED FOR EXPORTS:-
 
The government has released the revised CGST Act, IGST Act and Formats for various returns to be filed in GST regime. However, harmonious study of the material released by the government is leading to confusions for which there are no solutions. What can one really do is to wait for a suitable clarification from the government. This update seeks to analyse the applicability of IGST on advances received for export of goods/services.
 
Before proceeding to discuss the ambiguity, it is pertinent to refer to section 17 of the Revised IGST Act, 2016 which states that various provisions of CGST Act relating to registration, valuation, time of supply of goods, time of supply of services, input tax credit and utilization thereof, distribution of input tax credit by an Input Service Distributor, job work, accounts and records, payment, tax deduction at source, return, tax collection at source, audit, assessment, adjudication, demands, refunds, interest, recovery of tax, offences and penalties, inspection, search and seizure, prosecution andpower to arrest, appeals, review, advance ruling and compounding shall be applicable for levy of IGST as well. Consequently, we can say that the provisions pertaining to time of supply of goods contained in section 12 shall also be applicable for levy of IGST. Similarly, the provisions pertaining to time of supply of services contained in section 13 shall also be applicable for levy of IGST.
 
The section 12 pertaining to time of supply of goods states that the time of supply of goods shall be earliest of date of issue of invoice by the supplier or the last date of issuing invoice or the date of receipt of payment. Furthermore, the residuary sub-section (5) states that in cases where it is not possible to determine the time of supply under earlier provisions, the time of supply shall be due date of filing return where periodical return is to be filed or date of payment of CGST/SGST in any other case. Similar provisions are contained in section 13 pertaining to time of supply of services. Thus, one may conclude, that in case of export of goods or services, if any advance is received, the date of receipt of advance shall be treated as time of supply.
 
At the same time, it is pertinent to refer the meaning of export of goods given in section 2(5) means taking goods out of India to a place outside India. However, meaning of supply is stated as that defined in section 3 of CGST Act, 2016. Now, in case of exports, for the purpose of levy of IGST, when will the supply be said to have been made will be a matter of dispute. Although, export means taking out of India but there is no clear cut provision for export in the definition of supply. Therefore, in case of advance received for exports, whether IGST will be payable at the time of receipt of advance or not will be a question that is difficult to answer.
 
Simultaneously, if one pursues thedraft return formats, the GSTR-1 serial no. 10 pertains to details of supplies exported including deemed exports but only when invoices have been issued and export has been concluded as the details of shipping bill is to be given. Furthermore, serial no. 10A pertains to amendment to supplies exported including deemed exports in cases of revision of invoice. However, serial no. 11 of the GSTR-1 speaks of tax liability arising on account of time of supply without issuance of invoice in the same period. On perusal of the entries made in serial no. 11, it is found that there is no clarification as regards liability of tax in cases of advances received for exports. Since there is no specific mention of tax liability for advances received against domestic supplies only, it is presumed that even the advances received for exports will have to be captured in GSTR-1. However, this raises doubts as regards liability of payment of IGST in cases where the exports are being done on payment of IGST. Not only this, one may also ponder whether debit is required in the bond if the exports are being made without payment of duty in such cases.
 
Well, if the exporters are made liable to pay IGST even on advances received in lieu of probable exports, they will definitely be at disadvantageous position and it will lead to more compliance.
 
 
Visit us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com