Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

Hindi update on refund of input service under inverted duty structure-102H/2020-21

Hindi update on refund of input service under inverted duty structure-102H/2020-21
Hindi update on refund of input service under inverted duty structure-102H/2020-21
अभीहालहीमें  गुजरातहाईकोर्टनेVKC Footwear and others  के  केस  मेंएकlandmark judgement  दियाहै  जिसमेंयहकहागयाहैकिinverted duty structure  केरिफंडमें  इनपुटकाहीनहींअपितुइनपुटसर्विसकाभीरिफंडमिलेगा।
यदिटैक्सपेयर  केप्रोडक्टकाoutput tax rate उसकेinput पर  लगेटैक्सरेटसेकमहै  तोउसस्थितिमें  टैक्सपेयरको  inverted duty structure मेंसरकारद्वारारिफंडकामैकेनिज्मदियागयाहै|  इनवर्टेडड्यूटीस्ट्रक्चरमें  जीएसटीडिपार्मेंट  केवलजोइनपुटउसकेबनाएगएourput goods में  प्रयोगमेंआरहेहैंतथाउसकीइनपुटकी  जीएसटीरेटउसकेआउटपुटसेज्यादाहैतोउसीस्थितिमेंजीएसटीका  रिफंडप्रदानकरतीहै|  यदिसेक्शन54(3) of CGST Act  काअध्ययनकरतेहैतोउसमेंयहस्पष्टलिखागयाहैकिरजिस्टर्डटैक्सपेयर  Refund of any unutilized input tax credit  जोकी    रिफंड  अवधिसमाप्तहोनेकेपश्चात  फाइलकरसकताहै| यानीNet input tax credit में    इनपुटसर्विसभीसम्मिलितहोगी|  उपरोक्तसेक्शन  इनपुट  एवंइनपुटसर्विस  दोनोंका  रिफंड  टैक्सपेयर  कोदेनेकेलिए  कहताहै|  जबकिरूल89(5)  इसको  नहींदेनेकेलिएबाध्यकर  करताहै|  यदिप्रोविजनकाअध्ययनकियाजाए  तोनिष्कर्षयहीनिकलता  कीसेक्शन  रूलकेऊपरPrevail  करताहै  तथा  उपरोक्त  स्थितिमें  टैक्सपेयररिफंडकेलिएएलिजिबलहोगा|   
उपरोक्त  प्रोविजनकोध्यानमेंरखतेहुए  गुजरातहाईकोर्टने  डिसीजन  टैक्सपेयर  केपक्षमेंदियाहैयानीटैक्सपेयर  कोइनपुटसर्विसकाभी  रिफंडमिलेगा|  
उपरोक्त  विषय  परराजस्थानहाईकोर्टमेंभी  अपीलफाइलहोचुकीहैजिसकानिर्णयअभीआनाबाकीहै|  क्यागुजरातहाईकोर्टका  उपरोक्तनिर्णयसभी  states में  लागूहोगा? यदि  judicial discipline काअध्ययनकियाजाएतोनिष्कर्षयहीनिकलताहैकियदिउपरोक्तविषयपर  किसीभीहाईकोर्ट  द्वारानिर्णय  नहींदियागयाहै  तोउसस्थितिमेंगुजरातहाईकोर्टकानिर्णयसभीकेऊपरलागूहोगा| परंतुविभागहमेशा  अपनेजूरिडिक्शनमेंदिएगएहाईकोर्टकेनिर्णयकोही  मानताहै|  इस  स्थितिमें  डिपार्टमेंटराजस्थानमेंइनपुटसर्विसकेऊपररिफंडनहींदेगापरंतुगुजरातमें  यहरिफंडमिलनाशुरूहोजाएगा।  इसअपडेटकेलेखककेअनुसार  टैक्सपेयरकोइनपुटवइनपुटसर्विसकारिफंडलगानाचाहिएतथाडिपार्टमेंट  द्वाराइनपुटसर्विसकारिफंडरिजेक्टहोनेकीस्थितिमेंअपीलदायरकरनीचाहिए।  कमिश्नरअपील  उनकीबातजरूरसुनेगातथाइनपुटसर्विसपररिफंडदेदेगा।अगरअपीलमेंभी  रिफंडनहींमिलताहैतोटैक्सपेयरकेपासकोर्टमेंजानेकारास्ताखुलारहेगा।  एकबाततोसाफहैकिलड़ेबिना  इसकारिफंडनहींमिलेगा।
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com