Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE-REAL ESTATE-PART-12 ADJUSTMENT OF GST PAID ON ADVANCES PRIOR TO 1.4.2019.

GST UPDATE-REAL ESTATE-PART-12 ADJUSTMENT OF GST PAID ON ADVANCES PRIOR TO 1.4.2019.

CA. Pradeep Jain

Your Need Our Concern

GST UPDATE-REAL ESTATE-PART-12 ADJUSTMENT OF GST PAID ON ADVANCES PRIOR TO 1.4.2019.

 

The new tax system introduced in real estate sector has been a pandora box which will remain unsolved till many coming years.In this series of updates regarding clarifications for complexities in new system, this update seeks to highlight the question- Whether GST paid on advances which remain unadjusted as on 1st April 2019 can be adjusted against the output tax liability supposedly to be paid in cash in new tax system?

Before proceeding further, we are discussing the treatment of the advances paid, advances adjusted, credit notes issued in a particular month in GSTR 3B and GSTR 1 returns.

 Although it is being clearly instructed while filing of GSTR 3B return that the advances against which tax has been paid shall be adjusted as and when the invoice has been raised against the same.Details of advances as well as adjustment of advances against invoices are required to be shown as a part of 3.1(a) in GSTR 3B. In addition to this, Details of the amount received as the advance are required to be mentioned in sr. no. 11A of the GSTR – 1 return. As it shows the figure of the advance money received in the tax period for which invoice has not been issued, details of all the invoices raised in the month for which return is being filed but advance was received and tax was already paid in the previous months has to be entered in sr. no. 11B of GSTR 1.

 

One of the practical issues among while filing GSTR 3B is how to fill GSTR 3B Form if the Sales return (Credit Notes issued) for any month is more than the actual Outward Supply for that month?While the GST Department and CBEC has not yet come out with clarification to these problems since the GSTR 3-B Form does not accept figures in the negative. But the experts have advised that in case of excess credit notes, the unadjusted minus figures should be adjusted against the sale of subsequent months of 3B. For example,Mr. A developer has issued credit notes worth Rs. 20,00,000/-(CGST 1,80,000  and SGST 1,80,000  each ) in March 2019 whereas the sale figure was Rs. 1,00,000/- (CGST 9000  and SGST 9000 each ) in the month of March 2019. Therefore, tax amounting to 1,71,000 each in CGST and SGST remain unadjusted in the same month. Since from 1st April onwards, taxpayers shifting to new tax regime has to dispose of the tax liability fully in cash, but the unadjusted advance would tantamount to payment of tax liability using input tax credit. The advances and credit notes unadjusted at the end of March 2019 were paid off using Input tax credit lying in the electronic credit ledger of the taxpayers. The department may raise contention that it is a tax evasion activity and therefore the whole amount would be required to be paid off in cash.

The point to be kept in mind that there is no utility of refunding the tax amount pertaining to the said unadjusted advance and credit notes in cash on the online portal. 
Therefore, the only option left with the assessee is to adjust such amounts in subsequent months against the 1% and 5% sales figure. 
Moreover, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has recently issued clarification in the form of FAQs on GST changes for real estate sector said that builders will have to refund GST paid by homebuyers if he/she cancels the flat booked in the last fiscal and will be allowed to avail credit adjustment for such refunds.
Developer will be able to issue a ‘Credit Note’ to buyer as per provisions of Section 34 in case of change in price.

 

Also, builders, not buyers, will have the power to choose between the optional GST rates decided for the real estate sector by May 10.
If a real estate developer has collected 12 per cent GST from homebuyers beginning April 1, 2019, but later opted for 5 per cent rate, the builder will have to refund the extra tax (7 per cent) collected to the buyer. The FAQs, however, did not clearly spell out whether 7 per cent tax refunded by the builder will be adjusted against his GST liability. The FAQs said developer will be able to issue a ‘Credit Note’ to the buyer as per provisions of Section 34 in case of change in price or cancellation of booking. “Developer shall be able to take adjustment of tax paid in respect of the amount of such Credit Note,” the FAQ said. If the developer is allowed to adjust the excess tax paid by way of utilisation of input tax credit prior to 01.04.2019 for discharging GST liability of 1%/5% after 01.04.2019, it will lead to utilisation of input tax credit indirectly even after 01.04.2019 which is technically not permissible. This can definitely be a measure of tax planning by builders and the quantum of litigation on this subject will be revealed in the days to come.

This is solely for the educational purpose.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21

           

 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com