Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on whether threshold exemption is really an exemption?

GST Update on whether threshold exemption is really an exemption?

WHETHER THRESHOLD EXEMPTION IS REALLY AN EXEMPTION?
 
If we look at the present Central Excise Laws and Service Tax Laws, we find that there is small scale exemption wherein certain assessees are being exempted from payment of tax if their turnover in the preceding financial year is less than the threshold limit. In case of Central Excise Laws, the levy of central excise duty is exempted upto Rs. 1.5 Crores if the turnover of the preceding financial year is less than Rs. 4 Crores. Similarly, there is no levy of service tax if the taxable value of services in the preceding financial year does not exceed Rs. 10 Lakhs. However, the government had announced that the exemptions presently available will be minimised so that a reasonable revenue neutral tax rate is achieved. But, the provisions of the final GST Law indicate that there will be no threshold exemption in the GST regime.
 
 
We submit that section 2(107) of the CGST Act defines “taxable person” as a person who is registered or liable to be registered under section 22 or section 24 thereby meaning that payment of tax is dependent on the fact who is the taxable person. Furthermore, the provisions of section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 states that every supplier shall be liable to be registered under this Act in the State or Union territory, other than special category States, from where he makes a taxable supply of goods or services or both, if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees. The above provision clearly states that a supplier is liable to be registered only if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees.
 
 
However, section 24 also states the categories of persons that are mandatorily required to get registered. The categories include persons making any inter-State taxable supply; casual taxable persons making taxable supply; persons who are required to pay tax under reverse charge etc. thereby meaning that the specified categories of persons will be required to get registration irrespective of the aggregate turnover. Say for example, a person making single supply of inter state will be liable to get registered as he will be considered as taxable person. Now, the question arises is that what is the benefit of relaxing requirement to get registered if the aggregate turnover is below twenty lakh rupees.
 
 
It is pertinent to mention here that a new provision has been introduced in the Final CGST Act, 2017 wherein as per section 9(4) if goods are supplied by unregistered person to registered person, the tax will be payable by the registered person under reverse charge mechanism. It is also worth noting that there is no monetary limit for invocation of this provision leading to conclusion that practically there is no threshold exemption in the GST regime. This is for the reason that even if the goods are procured from unregistered person, the tax will be payable by the registered person under reverse charge mechanism indicating that there is no threshold limit as such. Under the GST regime, tax will be payable by the registered person on purchase of goods from unregistered person thereby implying that the government does not intend to provide any kind of small scale exemption. However, no tax will be payable by unregistered person on supply of goods to another unregistered person if the aggregate turnover does not exceed Rs. 20 Lakhs but this will be a very rare phenomenon. It is most likely that the transportation of goods service by road will be under reverse charge mechanism which is commonly availed by every assessee and even if tax is paid under reverse charge mechanism, the assessee will be required to get registered and will be considered as taxable person. Hence, it appears that the threshold limit of Rs. 20 Lakhs provided in section 22 (1) is illusionary and rather GST will significantly enlarge the tax base of the government.  
 
Now the next question is whether an assessee who is required to register himself due to above reason, can continue to avail the exemption upto Rs. 20 Lakh? Say for example, if he has made an inter-state supply of Rs. 100/- and now he has to pay IGST. For this reason, he will register himself with the department. But his total intra state supply is Rs. 5 Lakh only. Can he avail the exemption on next intra state supply of Rs. 15 Lakh or he has to pay tax on next intra state supply since he is registered with the department. The provisions of CGST Act underlines that since he is registered with the department then he has to pay the tax on next supply. This means that as soon as he gets register for any reason then he has to forgoe his threshold exemption and start paying the tax.
 
 
Visit us at www.capradeepjain.comand also at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com