Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on whether threshold exemption is really an exemption?

GST Update on whether threshold exemption is really an exemption?

WHETHER THRESHOLD EXEMPTION IS REALLY AN EXEMPTION?
 
If we look at the present Central Excise Laws and Service Tax Laws, we find that there is small scale exemption wherein certain assessees are being exempted from payment of tax if their turnover in the preceding financial year is less than the threshold limit. In case of Central Excise Laws, the levy of central excise duty is exempted upto Rs. 1.5 Crores if the turnover of the preceding financial year is less than Rs. 4 Crores. Similarly, there is no levy of service tax if the taxable value of services in the preceding financial year does not exceed Rs. 10 Lakhs. However, the government had announced that the exemptions presently available will be minimised so that a reasonable revenue neutral tax rate is achieved. But, the provisions of the final GST Law indicate that there will be no threshold exemption in the GST regime.
 
 
We submit that section 2(107) of the CGST Act defines “taxable person” as a person who is registered or liable to be registered under section 22 or section 24 thereby meaning that payment of tax is dependent on the fact who is the taxable person. Furthermore, the provisions of section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 states that every supplier shall be liable to be registered under this Act in the State or Union territory, other than special category States, from where he makes a taxable supply of goods or services or both, if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees. The above provision clearly states that a supplier is liable to be registered only if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees.
 
 
However, section 24 also states the categories of persons that are mandatorily required to get registered. The categories include persons making any inter-State taxable supply; casual taxable persons making taxable supply; persons who are required to pay tax under reverse charge etc. thereby meaning that the specified categories of persons will be required to get registration irrespective of the aggregate turnover. Say for example, a person making single supply of inter state will be liable to get registered as he will be considered as taxable person. Now, the question arises is that what is the benefit of relaxing requirement to get registered if the aggregate turnover is below twenty lakh rupees.
 
 
It is pertinent to mention here that a new provision has been introduced in the Final CGST Act, 2017 wherein as per section 9(4) if goods are supplied by unregistered person to registered person, the tax will be payable by the registered person under reverse charge mechanism. It is also worth noting that there is no monetary limit for invocation of this provision leading to conclusion that practically there is no threshold exemption in the GST regime. This is for the reason that even if the goods are procured from unregistered person, the tax will be payable by the registered person under reverse charge mechanism indicating that there is no threshold limit as such. Under the GST regime, tax will be payable by the registered person on purchase of goods from unregistered person thereby implying that the government does not intend to provide any kind of small scale exemption. However, no tax will be payable by unregistered person on supply of goods to another unregistered person if the aggregate turnover does not exceed Rs. 20 Lakhs but this will be a very rare phenomenon. It is most likely that the transportation of goods service by road will be under reverse charge mechanism which is commonly availed by every assessee and even if tax is paid under reverse charge mechanism, the assessee will be required to get registered and will be considered as taxable person. Hence, it appears that the threshold limit of Rs. 20 Lakhs provided in section 22 (1) is illusionary and rather GST will significantly enlarge the tax base of the government.  
 
Now the next question is whether an assessee who is required to register himself due to above reason, can continue to avail the exemption upto Rs. 20 Lakh? Say for example, if he has made an inter-state supply of Rs. 100/- and now he has to pay IGST. For this reason, he will register himself with the department. But his total intra state supply is Rs. 5 Lakh only. Can he avail the exemption on next intra state supply of Rs. 15 Lakh or he has to pay tax on next intra state supply since he is registered with the department. The provisions of CGST Act underlines that since he is registered with the department then he has to pay the tax on next supply. This means that as soon as he gets register for any reason then he has to forgoe his threshold exemption and start paying the tax.
 
 
Visit us at www.capradeepjain.comand also at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com