Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on whether partial completion certificate obtained for commercial shops applicable to residential flats also? 140/2020-21

GST Update on whether partial completion certificate obtained for commercial shops applicable to residential flats also? 140/2020-21
 GST Update on whether partial completion certificate obtained for commercial shops applicable to residential flats also? 
With the introduction of new taxation regime, the difficulties and compliances for the realty sectors have escalated to a higher level. Applicability of GST on sale of developed land, reversal in case of flats sold after completion certificate are few of the complexities faced by every builder in normal course of operations. Recently, The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling in case of V2 REALTY (ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/26/2020 dated 02.07.2020) ruled that selling of residential flats after the date of completion certificate of commercial shops is liable to GST under para 5(b) of Schedule II. This ruling has increased the tension amongst the builders of realty sector as the sale after first occupancy was also held to be liable to GST in absence of evidence regarding occupancy in commercial shop or residential flat. The outcome of this advance ruling is the subject matter of discussion of the present update.
The applicant is engaged in construction business. Their project V2 Signature is going on at Chala, Vapi and in the said project, Ground and First Floor in all wings of their projects are commercial shops. Remaining floors are residential flats. The applicant submitted that they have received BUP (Completion Certificate) for commercial shops i.e. Ground and First floors on 26.09.2017. There is also first occupancy in the building from 26.12.2017. Accordingly, the applicant sought the advance ruling on the following question:
  • Whether selling of residential flats after date of completion certificate of commercial shops or after first occupancy in building is exempt supply?
  • Manner of reversal of ITC on expenses incurred up to date of completion certificate shops.
  • Manner of claiming ITC on expenses incurred after date of completion certificate of commercial shops.
AAR has referred to Para 5(b) of Schedule II to the CGST Act, 2017 which reads as under-
Construction of a complex, building, civil structure or a part thereof, including a complex or building intended for sale to a buyer, wholly or partly, except where the entire consideration has been received after issuance of completion certificate, where required, by the competent authority or after its first occupation, whichever is earlier shall be treated as supply of services.
The AAR held that the applicant has received BUP (Completion Certificate) for commercial shops i.e. Ground and First floors on 26.09.2017 but not for residential units. The applicant has not submitted any evidence/document by which it can be seen that whether first occupancy is in commercial shop or Residential Flat. Therefore, AAR held that since no Building used permission has been issued by the competent authority in respect of residential flat and since no residential unit has been occupied by prospective buyer, supply of residential flats shall be treated as supply of service in terms Para 5(b) of Schedule-II of CGST Act, 2017.
With regard to second question, it is ruled that the manner of reversal of ITC on expenses incurred up to date of completion certificate shops is provided in Rule 42 and Rule 43 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Notification No. 16/2019-CT dated 29.03.2019.
The third question regarding the manner of claiming ITC on expenses incurred after date of completion certificate of commercial shops was answered by referring to provisions contained in section 16 and 17 of CGST Act, 2017.
The above ruling indicates that issuance of completion certificate is pre-requisite condition for not levying GST on flats sold after issuance of completion certificate. Upon completion of the building construction, the builder or the developer of the apartment needs to apply for the ‘building completion certificate’ with the local authorities. If the building construction is completed as per the building approval plan and if it also meets other building standards like distance from road, height of the building, proper rain water harvesting system etc., the civic authorities’ issues Completion Certificate. It is also important to obtain completion certificate for the entire project and not for portion of the project as in the present case, the completion certificate was obtained only for commercial shops. Hence, this ruling creates another challenge before the builders to obtain completion certificate for their entire project in order to ensure that their sale of flats sold after issuance of completion certificate are not liable to GST.  
This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com , at our facebook page on as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21 and u may also follow us on Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/ca-pradeep-jain-b6a31a16
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com