Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update on whether composition rate of 1% on turnover of goods and 6% onservices applicable simultaneously? 65/2020-21

GST update on whether composition rate of 1% on turnover of goods and 6% onservices applicable simultaneously? 65/2020-21

The composition scheme prescribed under section 10 of CGST Act, 2017 was introduced with the objective of minimum compliance for assessees operating at small level. However, the conditions with which this benefit was granted made this scheme less attractive. One of the conditions for availing the composition benefit is that the assessee is not engaged in supply of services except to the extent of 10% of the turnover in State or Rs. 5 Lakhs, whichever is higher. It is worth noting that similar scheme is provided vide notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 for supplier of services with tax rate of 6% having annual turnover in preceding year upto Rs. 50 Lakhs. Now, the question arises is whether it is possible for an assessee to avail benefit of section 10 of CGST Act, 2017 for turnover of goods and benefit of notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 simultaneously? This question was raised before the Karnataka AAR in the case of M/s EMPATHIC TRADING CENTRE and the decision pronounced by the AAR is the subject matter of discussion of the present update.

 

The applicant is availing benefit of composition scheme and is engaged in supply of goods and supply of renting of immovable property service and his aggregate annual turnover is much less than Rs. 50 Lakhs. It was contended by the applicant that sincehe is engaged in supply of goods and supply of service which is totally unrelated and unconnected, whether the applicant is liable to pay 1% on turnover of goods and 6% on turnover of services OR 6% on total turnover of goods and services under composition scheme?

 

The AAR held that there is no dispute that both the activities of the applicant are taxable and also supplied by the same person. The provisions of section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 were analysed and it was concluded that it was possible to pay 1% on the total turnover only if the proportion of service element provided did not exceed 10% of the turnover in State or Rs. 5 Lakhs whichever is higher. Furthermore, the provisions contained in notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 were also examined and it was found that the notification is not a composition scheme but an optional scheme. Moreover, one of the conditions prescribed in the notification is that the supplies are made by a registered person who is not eligible to pay tax under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. It was held that since the applicant is availing benefit under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, he is not eligible for benefit of notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019.

 

However, it was ruled that if the applicant opts out of the composition scheme under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, and obtains separate registrations for supply of goods and supply of services, he shall be liable to pay 6% GST on each of the turnovers of the registrations. This is for the reason that all registrations under same PAN are to opt for the same benefit.

 

Therefore, it can be concluded that it is not possible for an assessee to opt for benefit of composition under section 10(1) of CGST Act, 2017 prescribing GST rate of 1% with respect to turnover of goods and opt for benefit under notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 prescribing GST rate of 6% for turnover of services simultaneously. The benefit under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 are mutually exclusive and cannot be opted for simultaneously. Hence, if the proportion of service is within the prescribed limit of 10% of turnover or Rs. 5 Lakhs whichever is higher, benefit of 1% under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 can be availed. However, if the condition of section 10(1) as regards proportion of service element is not satisfied, then benefit of notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 can be availed by paying CGST @3% and SGST @ 3% but with the condition that the benefit of composition scheme under section 10(1) is opted out by the assessee.

This is solely for educational purpose.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com , at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21 .

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com