Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST update on whether composition rate of 1% on turnover of goods and 6% onservices applicable simultaneously? 65/2020-21

GST update on whether composition rate of 1% on turnover of goods and 6% onservices applicable simultaneously? 65/2020-21

The composition scheme prescribed under section 10 of CGST Act, 2017 was introduced with the objective of minimum compliance for assessees operating at small level. However, the conditions with which this benefit was granted made this scheme less attractive. One of the conditions for availing the composition benefit is that the assessee is not engaged in supply of services except to the extent of 10% of the turnover in State or Rs. 5 Lakhs, whichever is higher. It is worth noting that similar scheme is provided vide notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 for supplier of services with tax rate of 6% having annual turnover in preceding year upto Rs. 50 Lakhs. Now, the question arises is whether it is possible for an assessee to avail benefit of section 10 of CGST Act, 2017 for turnover of goods and benefit of notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 simultaneously? This question was raised before the Karnataka AAR in the case of M/s EMPATHIC TRADING CENTRE and the decision pronounced by the AAR is the subject matter of discussion of the present update.

 

The applicant is availing benefit of composition scheme and is engaged in supply of goods and supply of renting of immovable property service and his aggregate annual turnover is much less than Rs. 50 Lakhs. It was contended by the applicant that sincehe is engaged in supply of goods and supply of service which is totally unrelated and unconnected, whether the applicant is liable to pay 1% on turnover of goods and 6% on turnover of services OR 6% on total turnover of goods and services under composition scheme?

 

The AAR held that there is no dispute that both the activities of the applicant are taxable and also supplied by the same person. The provisions of section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 were analysed and it was concluded that it was possible to pay 1% on the total turnover only if the proportion of service element provided did not exceed 10% of the turnover in State or Rs. 5 Lakhs whichever is higher. Furthermore, the provisions contained in notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 were also examined and it was found that the notification is not a composition scheme but an optional scheme. Moreover, one of the conditions prescribed in the notification is that the supplies are made by a registered person who is not eligible to pay tax under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. It was held that since the applicant is availing benefit under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, he is not eligible for benefit of notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019.

 

However, it was ruled that if the applicant opts out of the composition scheme under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, and obtains separate registrations for supply of goods and supply of services, he shall be liable to pay 6% GST on each of the turnovers of the registrations. This is for the reason that all registrations under same PAN are to opt for the same benefit.

 

Therefore, it can be concluded that it is not possible for an assessee to opt for benefit of composition under section 10(1) of CGST Act, 2017 prescribing GST rate of 1% with respect to turnover of goods and opt for benefit under notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 prescribing GST rate of 6% for turnover of services simultaneously. The benefit under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 are mutually exclusive and cannot be opted for simultaneously. Hence, if the proportion of service is within the prescribed limit of 10% of turnover or Rs. 5 Lakhs whichever is higher, benefit of 1% under section 10(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 can be availed. However, if the condition of section 10(1) as regards proportion of service element is not satisfied, then benefit of notification no. 02/2019-Central Tax Rate dated 07.03.2019 can be availed by paying CGST @3% and SGST @ 3% but with the condition that the benefit of composition scheme under section 10(1) is opted out by the assessee.

This is solely for educational purpose.

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com , at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21 .

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com