Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON WHETHER BEST JUDGMENT ASSESSMENT CAN BE MADE FOR DEFAULT IN FILING GSTR-3B? 155/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON WHETHER BEST JUDGMENT ASSESSMENT CAN BE MADE FOR DEFAULT IN FILING GSTR-3B? 155/2020-21
The concept of best judgment assessment is new to indirect taxation and appears to have been borrowed from direct taxes. Section 62(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that where a registered person fails to furnish return under section 39 or section 45 even after service of a notice under section 46, the proper officer may proceed to assess the tax liability of the said person to the best of his judgment taking into account all the relevant material which is available. Recently, an interesting decision was passed by the Appellate authority in the case of M/s OMSAI PROFESSIONAL DETECTIVE & SECURITY SERVICES (P.) LTD. [2020 (121) TAXMANN.COM 192 (AA-GST-AP)] wherein it was held that best judgment assessment cannot be done in respect of non-filers of GSTR-3B. The reasoning adopted and the implications of this decision are the subject matter of consideration of the present update.
                            
The appellant has been filing GSTR-1 returns by declaring outward taxable supplies under GST but have not filed GSTR-3B returns and has not paid the applicable taxes on its outward supplies as declared in the returns in GSTR-1. The assessing authority issued notices to the appellant for filing GSTR-3B but the appellant failed to file the same. Consequently, the assessing authority passed best judgment orders under section 62 of CGST Act, 2017 by enhancing the value of supplies declared in GSTR-1 by 50%. The appellant submitted that the reason for not filing GSTR-3B was the cash crunch faced by them. It was also submitted by the appellant that the conditions for invocation of provisions of section 62(1) were not satisfied as one of the conditions is the failure to furnish returns under section 39 of the CGST Act, 2017. It was submitted that as per section 39, returns specified are GSTR-1, GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 and GSTR-3B is not a return prescribed under section 39. Reliance was also placed on the decision rendered by Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of M/S AAP & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA [2019-TIOL-1422-HC-AHM-GST] wherein it was held that GSTR-3B is not a return under section 39.
 
The appellate authority held that enhancing the value by 50% on ad-hoc basis reflects the arbitrariness of the assessing authority in passing best judgment assessment. The appellate authority placed reliance on various decisions of Income Tax/Sales Tax wherein it was held that best judgment assessment is not a wild assessment. Best judgment order must be founded upon some rational basis, relevant material and logic and should not be based on presumptions and guess work. Any best judgment assessment must be supplemented by reason, because reason is the heart beat of any conclusion and fetches clarity in conclusion of any order, as such, without the reason best judgment orders becomes lifeless and amounts to denial of fundamental justice. The Hon’ble High Court also conceded that the GSTR-3B cannot be considered as a return under section 39 of CGST Act, 2017 by placing reliance on the decision rendered by Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of M/S AAP & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA [2019-TIOL-1422-HC-AHM-GST] . Therefore, the appeal was allowed by setting aside the best judgment order.
 
 It is pertinent to mention here that although the government has amended Rule 61(5) with retrospective effect by way of insertion of Proviso clearly stating that where return in Form GSTR-3B is required to be furnished by a person, then such person shall not be required to furnish return in Form GSTR-3 vide Notification No. 49/2019-CT dated 09.10.2019 nullifying the effect of decision rendered by Hon’ble Gujarat High Court and this fact was discussed also. However, still the Hon’ble High Court granted relief to the assessee by declaring the best judgment assessment to be arbitrary. This decision is of immense importance to the assessees for restricting invocation of best judgment assessment for non-filing of GSTR-3B return. 

This is solely for educational purpose. 
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21and u may also follow us on Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/ca-pradeep-jain-b6a31a16
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com