Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON WAIVER OF INTEREST IN CASE OF NON PAYMENT WITHIN 180 DAYS AND REVERSAL OF CREDIT THEREOF ??

GST UPDATE ON WAIVER OF INTEREST IN CASE OF NON PAYMENT WITHIN 180 DAYS AND REVERSAL OF CREDIT THEREOF ??
We have prepared a series of amendment proposed in recent GST council meeting. This update is also in continuation of the same. One more amendment proposed by GST council is waiver of interest on reversal of credit on non-payment within 180 days to supplier of goods.
The present relevant provision of Section 16(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 reads as follows -­
 
Where a recipient fails to pay to the supplier of goods or services or both, other than the supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis, the amount towards the value of supply along with tax payable thereon within a period of one hundred and eighty days from the date of issue of invoice by the supplier, an amount equal to the input tax credit availed by the recipient shall be added to his output tax liability, along with interest thereon, in such manner as may be prescribed.
Therefore, if a person has availed input tax credit on inward supplies of goods or services or both and has not paid the amount due to the supplier within the time span of 180 days from the date of availing the credit, then such person shall have to reverse the amount of credit already availed in respect of that transaction. Such credit earlier availed will be added back to the output tax liability of the registered person. Apart from this aspect of reversal of credit on non-payment of the invoice value, there was also a clause of payment of interest on such procrastination.
This matter can be conveniently explained with the help of an example given below :
For example: Mr X, of Jodhpur has purchased goods from Mr.Z, of Delhi worth Rs 100,000/- on 1.08.2017. Such purchases are taxable with the rate 12% under GST. Therefore amount of IGST involved here is Rs 12000/-. Mr. X has received the goods on 15.08.2017. Mr X has taken input tax credit of such amount of IGST on 15.08.2017. Later on Mr X failed to pay the invoice value of 1,12,000/- to Mr Z even after 180 days from the date of taking credit i.e. upto 11.2.2018. This delay of payment will now require Mr X to reverse the credit of IGST, which shall be added back to output tax liability ledger. Mr. X reverses the credit on exact date of 11.2.2018. Also, he has to pay interest, calculated @ 18% on the amount IGST 12000/-. Time period involved for such calculation of interest will be commencing immediately from the date of availing credit and continuing till the date of reversal.  Suppose, Mr. X has made payment on 18.3.2018 then he can take credit back on such date.
But normally, the person taking the credit is not aware of the fact that 180 days has elapsed and he has not made the payment to supplier. He forgot to reverse the credit. The departmental audit comes and point out the same. Meanwhile the payment has been made and he is eligible to take the credit back also. Like in present example, the payment is made on 18.03.2018 by Mr. X. Hence, the interest will be charged from the date of taking credit on 15.08.2017 to date of re-eligible to take credit i.e.15.03.2018. There is no need of reversal as he is now eligible to take the credit once again.
But, there were certain recommendations made during the 28th meeting of the GST council held by the Ministry of Finance. One of such recommendations involved an amendment made to the above explained concept of delayed payment which states that ifthe recipient fails to pay the due amount to the supplier within 180 days from the date of availing credit, the input tax credit availed by the recipient will be reversed, but liability to pay interest is being done away with.
This can be interpreted in two ways. To start with, according to the first view it can be held that now there will no payment of interest and only consequence of such non-payment will be reversal of ITC already availed, thereby leading to NIL cost.
Now come again to example in hand. In first situation, Mr. X has reversed the credit on 11.02.2018. No need to pay the interest. He can again take the credit on 18.03.2018 when payment is made by Mr. X. There is no problem.
Situation 2 in above referred example wherein Mr. X forgets to reverse the credit. The audit points out the same. Meanwhile he has already made the payment to Mr. Z. Now he is re-eligible to take the credit. No need of reversal now. But the point is that he needs to pay the interest also. No interest is payable for both the periods i.e from 15.08.2017 to 11.02.2018 and also for the period from 11.02.2018 to 18.03.2018. The view taken above suggests the same. This seems to be absurd result. No reversal as well as no interest payment. Then nobody will do reversal under this provision.
Yet another view to this recommendation can be taken that there will be no complete waiver of interest. The waiver is only for the period when the assessee ought to have reversed the credit. The period after that date is his output liability and he has to pay the interest for remaining period. Hence, the interest is to be paid after 180 days if he has not reversed the credit. This concept can be more clearly explained via continuing to previous example:
Mr. X has not reversed the credit in situation 2. The audit has pointed out the same. He need not to reverse the credit as he has become re-eligible by making payment to Mr. Z. He needs not to pay the interest for the period from 15.08.2017 to 11.02.2018. But interest will be recovered for the period from 11.02.2018 to 18.03.2018 as it was his output liability. This seems to be more logical and legal interpretation.

Thus, there is ambiguity with respect to treatment of interest on the payment made to the supplier by the recipient.The notification has not been received so far. We shall wait till the notification is issued by the Government officials to clear the ambiguities arose by the press release released by the officials.

 
    
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com