Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON WAIVER OF INTEREST IN CASE OF NON PAYMENT WITHIN 180 DAYS AND REVERSAL OF CREDIT THEREOF ??

GST UPDATE ON WAIVER OF INTEREST IN CASE OF NON PAYMENT WITHIN 180 DAYS AND REVERSAL OF CREDIT THEREOF ??
We have prepared a series of amendment proposed in recent GST council meeting. This update is also in continuation of the same. One more amendment proposed by GST council is waiver of interest on reversal of credit on non-payment within 180 days to supplier of goods.
The present relevant provision of Section 16(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 reads as follows -­
 
Where a recipient fails to pay to the supplier of goods or services or both, other than the supplies on which tax is payable on reverse charge basis, the amount towards the value of supply along with tax payable thereon within a period of one hundred and eighty days from the date of issue of invoice by the supplier, an amount equal to the input tax credit availed by the recipient shall be added to his output tax liability, along with interest thereon, in such manner as may be prescribed.
Therefore, if a person has availed input tax credit on inward supplies of goods or services or both and has not paid the amount due to the supplier within the time span of 180 days from the date of availing the credit, then such person shall have to reverse the amount of credit already availed in respect of that transaction. Such credit earlier availed will be added back to the output tax liability of the registered person. Apart from this aspect of reversal of credit on non-payment of the invoice value, there was also a clause of payment of interest on such procrastination.
This matter can be conveniently explained with the help of an example given below :
For example: Mr X, of Jodhpur has purchased goods from Mr.Z, of Delhi worth Rs 100,000/- on 1.08.2017. Such purchases are taxable with the rate 12% under GST. Therefore amount of IGST involved here is Rs 12000/-. Mr. X has received the goods on 15.08.2017. Mr X has taken input tax credit of such amount of IGST on 15.08.2017. Later on Mr X failed to pay the invoice value of 1,12,000/- to Mr Z even after 180 days from the date of taking credit i.e. upto 11.2.2018. This delay of payment will now require Mr X to reverse the credit of IGST, which shall be added back to output tax liability ledger. Mr. X reverses the credit on exact date of 11.2.2018. Also, he has to pay interest, calculated @ 18% on the amount IGST 12000/-. Time period involved for such calculation of interest will be commencing immediately from the date of availing credit and continuing till the date of reversal.  Suppose, Mr. X has made payment on 18.3.2018 then he can take credit back on such date.
But normally, the person taking the credit is not aware of the fact that 180 days has elapsed and he has not made the payment to supplier. He forgot to reverse the credit. The departmental audit comes and point out the same. Meanwhile the payment has been made and he is eligible to take the credit back also. Like in present example, the payment is made on 18.03.2018 by Mr. X. Hence, the interest will be charged from the date of taking credit on 15.08.2017 to date of re-eligible to take credit i.e.15.03.2018. There is no need of reversal as he is now eligible to take the credit once again.
But, there were certain recommendations made during the 28th meeting of the GST council held by the Ministry of Finance. One of such recommendations involved an amendment made to the above explained concept of delayed payment which states that ifthe recipient fails to pay the due amount to the supplier within 180 days from the date of availing credit, the input tax credit availed by the recipient will be reversed, but liability to pay interest is being done away with.
This can be interpreted in two ways. To start with, according to the first view it can be held that now there will no payment of interest and only consequence of such non-payment will be reversal of ITC already availed, thereby leading to NIL cost.
Now come again to example in hand. In first situation, Mr. X has reversed the credit on 11.02.2018. No need to pay the interest. He can again take the credit on 18.03.2018 when payment is made by Mr. X. There is no problem.
Situation 2 in above referred example wherein Mr. X forgets to reverse the credit. The audit points out the same. Meanwhile he has already made the payment to Mr. Z. Now he is re-eligible to take the credit. No need of reversal now. But the point is that he needs to pay the interest also. No interest is payable for both the periods i.e from 15.08.2017 to 11.02.2018 and also for the period from 11.02.2018 to 18.03.2018. The view taken above suggests the same. This seems to be absurd result. No reversal as well as no interest payment. Then nobody will do reversal under this provision.
Yet another view to this recommendation can be taken that there will be no complete waiver of interest. The waiver is only for the period when the assessee ought to have reversed the credit. The period after that date is his output liability and he has to pay the interest for remaining period. Hence, the interest is to be paid after 180 days if he has not reversed the credit. This concept can be more clearly explained via continuing to previous example:
Mr. X has not reversed the credit in situation 2. The audit has pointed out the same. He need not to reverse the credit as he has become re-eligible by making payment to Mr. Z. He needs not to pay the interest for the period from 15.08.2017 to 11.02.2018. But interest will be recovered for the period from 11.02.2018 to 18.03.2018 as it was his output liability. This seems to be more logical and legal interpretation.

Thus, there is ambiguity with respect to treatment of interest on the payment made to the supplier by the recipient.The notification has not been received so far. We shall wait till the notification is issued by the Government officials to clear the ambiguities arose by the press release released by the officials.

 
    
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com