Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON TREATMENT OF VARIOUS AFFORDABLE HOUSING SCHEMES POST 01.04.2019 PART-6:-

GST UPDATE ON TREATMENT OF VARIOUS AFFORDABLE HOUSING SCHEMES POST 01.04.2019 PART-6:-

GST UPDATE ON TREATMENT OF VARIOUS AFFORDABLE HOUSING SCHEMES POST 01.04.2019 PART-6:-
 
In earlier update, we have discussed about the GST rates on various affordable housing schemes post implementation of new scheme for real estate sector w.e.f. 01.04.2019. It was concluded that only the ongoing projects covered under various schemes of affordable housing such as credit linked subsidy scheme for EWS/LIG, Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission of Rajiv Awas Yojana etc. will be considered as ‘affordable residential apartment’ liable to GST rate of 1%. The new projects will be eligible to concessional GST rate of 1% only if the criteria of 60/90 sq meters + Rs. 45 Lakhs is satisfied. If the criteria is not satisfied, the projects commenced on or after 01.04.2019, even if covered under various affordable schemes would be liable to GST rate of 5% applicable for “construction of apartments other than affordable residential apartments”. In the present update, we will discuss certain other issues such as what will be the GST rate applicable for contractors providing construction services to the promoter in above cases and the amended entries at serial no. 3(iv), 3(v) and 3(vi) of the notification no. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
 
The answer to the question regarding the rate of GST applicable to the contractor providing services to the developer with respect to affordable residential apartments lies in entry 3 (va) inserted vide Notification No. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. The said entry states that composite supply of works contract by way of construction/renovation/alteration of affordable residential apartments for which promoter has not opted to pay GST at old rates will be liable to GST at the rate of 12%. However, the condition required to be satisfied for availing concessional rate of 12% is that the carpet area of affordable residential apartments should not be less than 50% of the total carpet area of all the apartments in the project. Moreover, if it is found that the condition of carpet area of 50% affordable residential apartments is not satisfied, the promoter will be liable to pay the differential GST under reverse charge mechanism as if the applicable GST rate was 18%. This will again be hardship for the promoters as the sub-contractor with respect to affordable residential apartments would charge GST at the rate of 12% whereas the GST payable by the promoter on such affordable residential apartments is 1% to be paid in cash. Furthermore, on violation of the condition as regards 50% carpet area for affordable residential apartments, the differential GST would be payable by the builder under reverse charge mechanism in cash thereby ensuring that the concessional GST rate of 12% is applicable only if the contractor provides services with respect to affordable residential apartments constituting at least 50% of the total carpet area of the project.
 
Now, coming to the another aspect regarding amendment made in the entries 3(iv), 3(v) and 3(vi) of the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. We submit that the opening paragraph of the above entries has been amended to read as follows:-
Serial No. Description of services CGST
Rate
3(iv) Composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 other than that covered by items (i), (ia), (ib), (ic), (id), (ie) and (if) above, supplied by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of,-
(a) .......................
(b) a civil structure or any other original works pertaining to a scheme under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission of Rajiv Awas Yojana;
(c) ....................
6
3(v) Composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 other than that covered by items (i), (ia), (ib), (ic), (id), (ie) and (if) above,, supplied by way of construction, erection, commissioning, or installation of original works pertaining to,-
(a)................
(b) a single residential unit otherwise than as a part of a residential complex;
(c)................
6
3(vi) Composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 other than that covered by items (i), (ia), (ib), (ic), (id), (ie) and (if) above,, provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union Territory, a local authority, a Governmental Authority or a Government Entity by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of –
  1. ...................
  2. .........................
(c) a residential complex predominantly meant for self-use or the use of their employees or other persons specified in paragraph 3 of the Schedule III of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
6
   
If we analyse the simultaneous impact of all amended entries of notification no. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019, it is found that entries 3(i), (ia), (ib), (ic), (id), (ie) and (if) all pertain to construction of complex, building, civil structure or part thereof, including complex or building intended for sale to a buyer, wholly or partly, except where the entire consideration has been received after issuance of completion certificate, where required by the competent authority or after its first occupation, whichever is earlier. However, the entries 3(iv), 3(v), 3(va) and 3(vi) pertain to composite supply of works contract for construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation or alteration. Therefore, there is difference in the said entries. Consequently, the entries 3(iv), 3(v), 3(va) and 3(vi) contain phrase “other than that covered by items (i), (ia), (ib), (ic), (id), (ie) and (if) above”. However, in our opinion, the entries 3(iv), 3(v) and 3(va) have been kept intact as these prescribe GST rate for the contractors supplying works contract services in relation to construction/renovation of residential apartments. It is found that the government has provided same GST rates for contractor providing works contract services pertaining to various schemes and the affordable residential apartments as 12%. However, the concessional GST rate of 12% is subject to condition that 50% of the carpet area pertains to affordable residential apartments whereas there is no such condition with respect to projects covered under other schemes. This surely creates discrimination as regards works contract services provided by the contractor with respect to various other housing schemes because concessional GST rate of 12% applies without any condition. It is also worth observing that the new projects started on or after 01.04.2019 under the aforesaid housing schemes are not considered as ‘affordable residential apartments’ but still the contractors would enjoy unconditional concessional GST rate of 12% on such projects.   
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
           
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com