Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON TREATMENT OF STEEL DIE INVOICED TO FOREIGN BUYER BUT SCRAPPED IN INDIA 64/2020-21

GST UPDATE ON TREATMENT OF STEEL DIE INVOICED TO FOREIGN BUYER BUT SCRAPPED IN INDIA 64/2020-21
The Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling has recently pronounced an interesting decision in the case of M/s Dolphine Die Cast (P) Ltd  wherein it has discussed in detail the treatment to be done in case where the steel dies used in manufacture of aluminium and zinc die castings were invoiced to the foreign buyer which were subsequently either exported to the foreign buyer or scrapped at the applicant’s end as per the instructions of the foreign buyer.
The applicant is a manufacturer and exporter of Aluminium and Zinc die Castings to the overseas customer. The applicant first manufactures the die mould as per the requirements and specification given by the customer. This die is retained by the applicant and is used for the manufacture and supply of Aluminium and Zinc die Castings. The applicant raises the tax invoice for this steel die in the name of overseas customer in foreign currency for receipt of payment though the die is rarely exported as per instructions of the customer. After the completion of the export order or completion of the die life, applicant either exports the dies to the overseas customer or scraps the die at applicant’s end as per the instruction of the customer.
Similarly, the applicant is an importer of the Aluminium casting and pressure die casting component of Aluminium from Thailand. The Thailand supplier first manufactures die as per the requirement and specifications given by the applicant and uses the same for the manufacture of the Aluminium casting and pressure die casting component of Aluminium for the applicant. The Thailand supplier raises the tax invoice in the name of the applicant though the die is not physically imported. After completion of the order or completion of the die life, the applicant either imports the dies and returns to the domestic customer or as per the instruction of the domestic customer the applicant inform the Thailand supplier to scrap the die at their end.
The applicant seeks advance ruling on taxability of the above transactions and admissibility of input tax credit.
The AAR ruled that in the case of manufacture of die by the applicant and invoiced to the overseas recipient, without moving the goods, the applicant has to raise the tax invoice addressed to the foreign buyer. The place of supply of goods, other than supply of goods imported into, or exported from India, shall be the location of such goods at the time of the delivery to the recipient as per section 10(1)(c) of the IGST Act 2017. Therefore, the place of supply of die in this case is the location of the applicant.
In view of the above, the location of the supplier of die and place of supply of die are one and the same i.e., location of the applicant and such being the case said transaction shall be treated as intra-state transaction. Since it is an intra-state supply, applicant has to collect CGST and SGST and discharge the liability. The applicant is not eligible to claim said payment as input tax credit on the invoice raised by him as he is not the recipient. Further if the said steel die is scrapped at applicant’s end as per the instruction of the overseas customer, while supplying the die scrap to the third party, the applicant has to issue intra/interstate tax invoice depending upon the nature of the transaction and collect and pay the applicable tax as per the provisions of the GST Act.
In the case of manufacture of die by the Thailand supplier, if applicant physically imports the die to a place in India then applicant has to pay the IGST under reverse charge mechanism and claim the IGST tax paid as input tax credit, subject to conditions applicable. Further if the steel die belonging to the applicant is scrapped at the location of the overseas supplier without die coming to India, then such transaction is occurring outside the taxable territory, i.e. India and hence not under the purview of GST Act.
This advance ruling raises various questions in the minds of the assessee as regards the transaction of supplying aluminium castings to the overseas buyer is concerned. One such question is whether raising of invoice for die without physically sending die abroad attracts the provisions of section 10(1)(c) of IGST Act, 2017? The reasoning adopted by the AAR is that since export of goods means taking out of India to a place outside India, and as this criteria is not fulfilled for the steel dies, the place of supply will be determined by invoking provisions of section 10 of the IGST Act, 2017 which prescribes place of supply of goods other than supply of goods imported into or exported from India. By application of this provision, the applicant is required to consider the transaction of selling of steel die to the overseas customer without physical delivery of said settle die as intra-state transaction attracting CGST and SGST of Karnataka. We all have basic perception in our minds that sale involves movement of goods but the provisions contained in section 10(1)(c) of the IGST Act, 2017 seeks to levy GST even if there is sale of goods without movement of such goods. The common example framed in our minds for this section 10(1)(c) was that of showroom sales but this advance ruling has changed our perception as regards application of the provision of section 10(1)(c) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Now further another question arises is as to whether the title of goods is transferred to foreign buyer when the goods does not move from the premises and also the scrap is also to be sold by Indian supplier in India only. Hence, it is clear when the title of goods is transferred then only supply will take place. If it is not a supply of goods, can it be termed as export of service of “ manufacturing of die steel” and will qualify for export of service. There are number of questions are raised in this advance ruling and each one is to be decided on facts of each case.

This is solely for educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/as well as follow us on twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com