Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON TREATMENT OF SALES PROMOTION SCHEMES

GST UPDATE ON TREATMENT OF SALES PROMOTION SCHEMES

The GST implication on various sales promotion schemes have been clarified by the government vides Circular No. 92/11/2019-GST dated 07.03.2019. The present update seeks to discuss the clarifications issued by the circular in practical perspective.
 
Free samples and giftsIt is common practise in various industries that products are being distributed as free sample such as in case of pharmaceutical companies. However, since the product is being distributed as free sample, without involving any consideration, the transaction is not considered as ‘supply’ under section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017. It is clarified that goods distributed as free sample would constitute supply only if they are covered under Schedule I of the CGST Act, 2017. It is further clarified that the assessee would not be eligible to avail input tax credit with respect to inputs, input services and capital goods to the extent they are used in respect of goods distributed as free samples in view of provision contained in section 17(5)(h) of the CGST Act, 2017. However, assessees find the provision of reversing the input tax credit as tedious task practically. Consequently, many assessees are discharging GST on the products distributed as free samples in order to avoid the credit reversal. Although, the circular states the restriction of credit availment is not applicable for supplies covered under Schedule I of the CGST Act, 2017 but whether the practise of paying GST and availing input tax credit even when the transaction of distribution of free sample is not covered by Schedule I is proper or not is uncertain. However, assessees paying GST instead of reversing credit can contend that they have ultimately reversed the credit if they have paid GST on such supplies.
Buy one Get One offer:-It is clarified that in such offers it is not to be understood that one product is being supplied free of cost but rather it is to be understood that two products are being supplied at the price of one. In such cases, the concept of composite/mixed supply will come into picture and the rate of tax will be determined accordingly. Since it is being interpreted that there is no free supply in this case, the assessee will be eligible for availing full input tax credit of inputs, input services and capital goods used therein.
Discounts including ‘Buy more, save more’ offers:-It is very common that the supplier gives volume discounts on purchasing specified quantities of goods. Say for example-Additional discount of 5% if quantity purchased in a year exceeds 20,000 units. In such cases, the additional discount is deductible from the value of supply in terms of section 15(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 as the discount is known at the time of supplying goods provided that the recipeint of goods reverses the proportionate ITC. Furthermore, it is also clarified that the supplier of goods offering such volume discounts will be eligible for availing full input tax credit of inputs, input services and capital goods used therein. This is very common for automobile sector wherein there are different incentive schemes provided by the manufacturer to the automobile dealers for bulk purchase of vehicles. The said incentives are pre-determined and are in the nature of volume discounts. However, in the erstwhile service tax regime, the revenue authorities have disputed the said incentives to be liable to service tax under taxable service of business auxiliary service. In this regard, reference may be made to decision given in the following judicial pronouncements in Service Tax regime:-
  • COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-I VERSUS SAI SERVICE STATION LTD. [2014 (35) S.T.R. 625 (TRI. – MUMBAI)]
  • MY CAR PVT. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KANPUR [2015 (40) S.T.R. 1018 (TRI. - DEL.)]
  • COMMISSIONER OF S.T., MUMBAI VERSUS JAYBHARAT AUTOMOBILES LTD. [2016 (41) S.T.R. 311 (TRI. – MUMBAI)]
  • SHARYU MOTORS VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI [2016 (43) S.T.R. 158 (TRI. – MUMBAI)]
Similarly, the dispute as regards such incentives is prone to litigation in GST regime but this clarification seeks to provide basis for the assessees to contend that no GST is payable on such incentives.
 
Secondary Discounts:-It is clarified that if the terms of discount are altered after making supplies and the additional discount was not known at the time of making supply, then the deduction from the value of supply will not be allowed to the supplier of goods. Similarly, there will be no need to reverse any input tax credit on part of recipeint. Likewise, it is also clarified that the supplier of goods offering such volume discounts will be eligible for availing full input tax credit of inputs, input services and capital goods used therein. Such additional discounts which are not known at the time of making supply can be adjusted only by way of issuance of financial credit notes.
 
 
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
           
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com