Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments
Print   |    |  Comment

GST UPDATE ON TAXABILITY OF TDR/FSI PART-7

GST UPDATE ON TAXABILITY OF TDR/FSI PART-7
GST UPDATE ON TAXABILITY OF TDR/FSI PART-7:-
 
In earlier update, we have discussed about the GST rates and various issues pertaining to affordable housing schemes post implementation of new scheme for real estate sector w.e.f. 01.04.2019. In the present update, we seek to discuss the taxability of Transfer Development Rights (TDR)/ Floor Space Index (FSI).
 
There has been a lot of debate over the taxability of TDR in a Joint Development Agreement. In this context, the provisions of Notification No. 04/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018issued in the context of payment of tax by registered person supplying service by way of construction against transfer of development right are worth noting. The above notification only says that GST is leviable on supply of development rights by land owner to builder/developer and by developer supplying construction service to the land owner and specifies the ‘time of supply’ for the said transactions. This notification does not speak about valuation but only states that liability to pay GST would arise on the date of issue of allotment letter. However, the provisions with respect to taxability of TDR have been substantially changed w.e.f. 01.04.2019 vide Notification No. 04/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019. The provisions of the notification are summarised as follows:-
  1. There shall be exemption from levy of GST on TDR in case of construction of residential apartments by a promoter in a project on or after 01.04.2019 except where the entire consideration has been received after issuance of completion certificate by the competent authority or after its first occupation, whichever is earlier.
  2. In nutshell, there will be exemption from levy of GST on TDR only on residential apartments sold before issuance of completion certificate or first occupancy whichever is earlier, on which the promoter has paid GST.
  3. With respect to TDR on residential apartments sold after issuance of completion certificate or first occupancy, whichever is earlier, the liability to pay tax on TDR will be on the promoter under reverse charge mechanism. The liability to pay tax will arise on the date of completion or first occupation of the project, whichever is earlier.
  4. The value of supply of service by way of transfer of development rights or FSI by a person to the promoter against consideration in the form of residential or commercial apartments shall be deemed to be equal to the value of similar apartments charged by the promoter from the independent buyers nearest to the date on which such development rights or FSI is transferred to the promoter.
  5. However, there is no such GST exemption on TDR with respect to commercial projects. The TDR on commercial projects will continue to be liable to GST at the rate of 18%.
  6. The exemption will be computed as follows:-
GST payable on TDR for construction of project* carpet area of residential apartments in the project/Total carpet area of residential and commercial apartments in the project.
  1. The amount of tax payable by the promoter under reverse charge mechanism will be computed as lowest of the following:-
  2. GST payable on TDR for construction of residential apartments in a project but for exemption contained herein* carpet area of residential apartments in a project which remain un-booked on the date of issuance of completion certificate or first occupation/Total carpet area of residential apartments in the project.
  3. GST at the rate of 1% of the value in case of affordable residential apartments and 5% of the value in case of residential apartments other than affordable residential apartments remaining un-booked on the date of issuance of completion certificate or first occupation.  
  4. The liability to pay tax on TDR for projects commenced prior to 01.04.2019 would continue to be governed by the provisions of notification no. 04/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018 and tax on the same will be payable by the landowner under forward charge.
The computation of GST exemption on TDR and GST payable by the promoter under reverse charge mechanism may be explained with the help of an example as follows:-
ABC Ltd, land-owner and XYZ Ltd, developer have entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) on 05.04.2019 for construction of 100 apartments wherein 50 apartments are allocated to Landowner and 50 apartments are allocated to Developer. The other information is as follows:-
 
  • The carpet area of each apartment would be 1000 sq ft.
 
  • Out of the 50 apartments allocated to the developer, developer sells 30 apartments prior to the completion certificate to independent buyers.
 
  • The remaining 50 apartments are allocated to the landowner before issuance of completion certificate.
 
  • The value of apartments sold to independent buyers nearest to the date of JDA is Rs. 75 Lakhs.
 
  • The value of apartments sold to independent buyers nearest to the completion certificate date is Rs. 85 Lakhs .
Solution:- The developer XYZ Ltd. is liable to pay GST under reverse charge mechanism on TDR with respect to 20 apartments sold after obtaining completion certificate. GST on TDR is exempt for 30 apartments sold before completion certificate. Furthermore, since all 50 apartments pertaining to ABC Ltd., Landowner have been sold by the developer prior to completion certificate, no GST is payable on TDR with respect to those 50 apartments by the developer under reverse charge mechanism. For the purpose of determining tax liability on TDR, only sale of apartments by the developer are to be considered and it is irrelevant whether the landowner further sells the apartments before completion certificate or not. The calculation of GST payable by the developer under reverse charge mechanism will be lowest of following:-
  1. (7500000*100*5%) * (1000 *20) /(1000*100) = Rs. 75,00,000/-
  2. (85,00,000*20*5%) = Rs. 85,00,000/-
The developer will be liable to pay GST amounting to Rs. 75,00,000/- under reverse charge mechanism.
 
This is solely for the educational purpose.
You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com, at our facebook page on
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ as well as follow us on Twitter at https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
           
 
   
    
 

Post a Comment
Department News


Query
 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com