Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on taxability of sub-contracting of GTA services 91/2020-21

GST Update on taxability of sub-contracting of GTA services 91/2020-21
The GTA service providers have the option to pay GST under forward charge at the rate of 12% and avail input tax credit. It is also clear that if the GTA opts for paying GST under forward charge at the rate of 12% with availing the facility of input tax credit, the said option is to be exercised for all the transactions. It is not possible for GTA to declare certain supplies under reverse charge mechanism and certain supplies under forward charge. The issue regarding the GST implication on the transaction of sub-contracting the services of GTA was recently considered by the Maharashtra AAR in the case of M/s Liberty Translines and the outcome of this advance ruling is the subject matter of discussion of our present update.
 
The applicant is engaged in providing services as GTA and has been appointed by M/s POSCO to provide service of transportation of goods by road for its clients. In simple words, the applicant is sub-contractor for providing GTA services to the clients of M/s POSCO.  Hence, the applicant seeks advance ruling on the following questions:-
  1. Whether the services rendered by the applicant to M/s POSCO as sub contractor will be classified as GTA Service?
  2.  Whether assesses can charge GST @12% under Forward Charge mechanism in terms of Notification No 20/2017-Central Tax (Rate) 2017 dated 22 August, 2017 as M/s POSCO is also charging GST @ 12% from its clients?
  3. Whether recipient of service, M/s POSCO would be eligible to claim Input Tax Credit of the invoices issued by the applicant under forward charge mechanism?
  4. Whether is it correct to have two GTA Service Providers and two consignment notes for the same movement of goods?
Goods Transport Agency is not defined in CGST Act, 2017 but the meaning of GTA is given by way of an explanation to Entry 9(iii) of Notification No 20/2017-Central Tax (Rate) 2017 dated 22 August, 2017 which reads as follows:-
 
Explanation to Entry 9(iii):- “goods transport agency” means any person who provides service in relation to transport of goods by road and issues consignment note, by whatever name called.
 
It was concluded that main contractor, M/s POSCO is providing road transport service to the ultimate customer and is issuing consignment notes and so falls under the definition of GTA.  Main Contractor is not the owner of the vehicle but he has appointed a sub-contractor to provide services of transportation of goods by road. However, the applicant cannot be treated as GTA as the applicant is truck owner and has providing services of hiring of trucks to M/s POSCO which is exempt from levy of GST.
 
There is a difference between a GTA and a person who owns truck commonly known as transporter who may give transportation service either by himself or through a transport agent i.e. GTA. It was held that a consignment note is a necessary qualification to be considered as a GTA as per the explanation in Notification 11/2017 (CT) Rate dated 28thJune 2017 . In the transportation industry, where one transporter has takes the help of another transporter by way of sub-contracting the work and the sub contractor bills to main contractor for sub contracting service. It is very clear in the GST Law that who issues consignment note will be treated as goods transport agency. Main Contactor issues consignment note and therefore only main contractor is a GTA for this transaction. Any services by way of transportation of goods by road other than through GTA would be exempt supply as per the notification no. 20/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated. 22.08.2017.
 
In the present case, assessee is providing the transportation service but not as GTA but only as a truck owner to Main Contractor. Therefore, it was held that the services of applicant are exempt and there is no need to charge GST @12% under forward charge mechanism. 
As regards the regarding admissibility to input tax credit to the recipient, it was held that the question pertains to M/s POSCO and so the AAR refrained from answering the same. Similarly, as regards the question whether there can be two consignment notes for the same transaction, the AAR denied from commenting as the said question is outside the ambit of scope of advance ruling as prescribed in section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017.
 
It is pertinent to mention here that in frequently asked question (FAQ) related to registration, it has been clarified that registration is not required in case where services of GTA are being provided to another GTA as services by way of giving on hire, a means of transportation of goods to a GTA are exempt from tax vide entry no. 22 of Notification number 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017.
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com